Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Supervised fine-tuning on trajectories with intermediate visual dependencies turns open multimodal agents into long-horizon vision-in-the-loop searchers, without any reinforcement learning.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A multimodal search agent fine-tuned on event-graph-synthesized trajectories with intermediate visual dependencies improves long-horizon visual search across ten benchmarks.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection Genuinely new data-synthesis pipeline and strong same-backbone ablations, but the vision-in-the-loop mechanism is inferred from accuracy gains, not directly measured on the trained policy. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2608.01827 v1 pith:FODNJXWK submitted 2026-08-03 cs.CV cs.AI

DeepVoyager-VL: Incentivizing Vision-in-the-Loop Search for Long-Horizon Multimodal Agents

Huanyao Zhang , Jiepeng Zhou , Runhao Zhao , Yanzhe Shan , Jiaoyang Chen , Bowen Zhou , Bo Li , Fang Wang
show 7 more authors
Jialong Wu Zhengwei Tao Lang Mei Xiaohan Yu Liyan Liu Chong Chen Wentao Zhang
This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords vision-in-the-loop searchmultimodal deep searchlong-horizon agentssupervised fine-tuningmultimodal event graphactive visual acquisitiontrajectory distillationvisual tool use
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes DeepVoyager-VL, a framework for multimodal deep search in which newly discovered images actively drive later retrieval steps. It claims that the right training data is enough: supervised fine-tuning on about 7K synthesized vision-in-the-loop trajectories adds 5.4 and 6.5 points over a strong 20K multi-source baseline for 8B and 30B models, and lifts the 30B model's ten-benchmark average from 40.7 to 58.6. The method constructs questions from a multimodal event graph so that intermediate visual evidence is necessary by construction, then trains an agent that discovers, selectively fetches, crops, and reuses images over up to 50 turns. If correct, the result means long-horizon multimodal search skill can be distilled from structure-before-language synthetic data without RL, and that open models can approach proprietary agentic baselines.

Core claim

The central claim is that vision-in-the-loop search—where an image found mid-search resolves an intermediate variable and determines the next retrieval action—can be reliably induced by trajectory supervision rather than reinforcement learning. DeepVoyager-VL synthesizes problems with this property by composing inference programs over a visually enriched multimodal event graph, enforcing that at least one internal interface is resolved by visual evidence and that every principal constraint is necessary. The agent separates image discoverability from observability: search returns lightweight references; FETCHIMAGE and CROPIMAGE materialize only selected visual evidence. On ten multimodal sear

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the structure-before-language synthesis pipeline, EventVoyage-VL: a multimodal event graph with entities, atomic events, macro-events, and images; subgraph extraction composes deterministic inference programs with visual interfaces, and only then are they verbalized into questions. Vision-in-the-loop is defined by two conditions: a visual observation resolves a variable needed by a later action (Eq. 2), and the same answer is not determined without retrieved images (Eq. 3). The agent side uses active visual acquisition—discovery tools returning URL–caption references, FETCHIMAGE/CROPIMAGE as the only paths for visual tokens into policy context, and goal-conditio

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that tasks whose intermediate visual dependencies are guaranteed by construction transfer to naturally occurring multimodal search problems, so the agent learns a general vision-in-the-loop skill rather than matching the distribution of the synthesized programs.

What would settle it

Measure the same SFT recipe on a benchmark where a counterfactual check shows each question's answer is still determinable without the image discovered mid-search; if performance stays at baseline levels, the claimed skill is not vision-in-the-loop. Simpler: replace the 7K VIL trajectories with 7K similarly long trajectories from public multimodal search data matched for tool-call composition; if the +5.4/+6.5 gains vanish, the result is data-distributional rather than structural.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • SFT alone on synthetic vision-in-the-loop trajectories is a viable substitute for RL when training multimodal deep-search agents.
  • Gains concentrate on long-horizon, visually demanding benchmarks, indicating the data teaches the intended loop rather than generic tool use.
  • The framework's benefit transfers across three base models, so the recipe may generalize beyond the specific backbones tested.
  • Open 30B-scale models can come within 6–9 points of proprietary agentic systems on the same benchmark suite.
  • The ablations imply that context management, image search, and on-demand loading and cropping are complementary rather than redundant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's strongest untested assumption is transfer: visual necessity is guaranteed in synthesized data by construction but never verified on evaluation benchmarks; a natural test would compare models trained on VIL trajectories against matched-length text-only or random-image trajectories on benchmarks filtered by Eq. 3.
  • If the transfer claim holds, the same structure-before-language pipeline could be repurposed for other modalities—audio, video, structured data—where an intermediate evidence type must trigger continued search.
  • The reported concentration of gains on BrowseComp-V3 is suggestive but confounded by possible source overlap between the Wikipedia/news event graph and self-authored benchmarks; an external, independently authored benchmark would sharpen the conclusion.
  • A complementary RL stage could push performance further; the paper frames SFT-only as sufficient, but nothing rules out RL as an add-on for even longer horizons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes DeepVoyager-VL, a long-horizon multimodal deep-search agent trained by supervised fine-tuning on synthetic 'vision-in-the-loop' trajectories. The authors construct EventVoyage-VL, a structure-before-language pipeline built on a multimodal event graph, in which intermediate visual evidence is made necessary for later retrieval actions (Eqs. 2–3, 7–8). They then define an agent framework that separates image discovery from active visual acquisition and report large same-backbone gains on ten multimodal search benchmarks, with ablations isolating the contribution of the 7K VIL trajectories and of four framework components. The central claim is that SFT alone on synthetic trajectories with intermediate visual dependencies can induce long-horizon, vision-in-the-loop search behavior, without reinforcement learning.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper makes a substantial contribution: it would show that supervised trajectory fine-tuning on structure-before-language synthetic data is a viable alternative to RL for training multimodal deep-search agents. The same-backbone cumulative data ablation (Table 3) is a genuine strength, as is the explicit synthesis-time enforcement of counterfactual visual necessity (Eq. 3). The framework ablation (Table 4) and the careful separation of difficulty estimation from teacher-trajectory generation are also well designed. The main weakness is that the paper never demonstrates the claimed vision-in-the-loop behavior for the trained policy; the trajectory analysis uses rollouts of a different model, and the counterfactual property is never verified on evaluation benchmarks. The self-authored BrowseComp-V3 benchmark and the absence of released artifacts further limit the strength of the quantitative claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3, Figure 3] The trajectory analysis that allegedly evidences vision-in-the-loop behavior is conducted on rollouts of Doubao-2.0-Pro over EventVoyage-VL and three public datasets, not on trajectories of the fine-tuned DeepVoyager-VL policy on evaluation benchmarks. Table 1 reports accuracy only; a policy that simply imitates longer, image-tool-heavy trajectories after generic SFT could produce these gains without any intermediate visual dependency satisfying Eq. (2) or counterfactual necessity Eq. (3). Please report and annotate trajectories of the trained 8B/30B policies on held-out benchmarks, including at least one case where a visual observation at turn t resolves a variable required by a later retrieval action at t'.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (3), (7), (8)] Counterfactual visual necessity is enforced during synthetic program construction, but it is never verified on any evaluation benchmark. Eq. (3) is a property of the task/program, not of the trained policy; without checking it on evaluation queries, the central transfer claim—that the agent learned a general vision-in-the-loop skill rather than matching the synthesized distribution—remains an assumption. Provide a counterfactual analysis on evaluation benchmarks (e.g., remove intermediate image evidence and show that answers become underdetermined or incorrect) or otherwise demonstrate that evaluation trajectories contain intermediate visual dependencies under Eqs. (2)–(3).
  3. [Section 4.1, Table 1] BrowseComp-V3 is a benchmark authored by the same group (Zhang et al., 2026a), and the paper reports the largest gain there (+23.7 for the 30B-A3B model). No overlap analysis is given between the Wikipedia/news event-graph training source (Sec. 3.2) and BrowseComp-V3's queries and images. This gain could partly reflect distributional similarity to the training distribution rather than a transferred vision-in-the-loop skill. Please quantify query/image/topic overlap between EventVoyage-VL training data and all evaluation benchmarks, and report results separately with and without the self-authored benchmark.
  4. [Section 4.1, Appendix C.2] All results are single runs judged by Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, with no error bars, no multiple seeds, and no released code, data, or checkpoints. The same-backbone ablations in Tables 3–4 are load-bearing for the paper's quantitative claims, but single numbers for one run cannot establish the size of the +5.4/+6.5-point VIL-data effects or the component ablations. Please provide multiple seeds or per-item scores for bootstrap confidence intervals, and release the synthetic trajectories and trained checkpoints, or clearly label the results as preliminary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] The Avg. column appears to average over different benchmark subsets for different baselines. Please state the subset over which each average is computed, or remove the column to avoid incomparable aggregates.
  2. [Table 4 / Section 4.1] Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is used both as the ablated base model and as the LLM judge. Potential judge-family bias should be discussed or controlled, especially for the framework ablation.
  3. [Eq. (8)] Define U_{L\setminus{\ell}} explicitly. The set-minus notation can be misread as removing an element from the universe rather than dropping a constraint from the constraint set L.
  4. [Conclusion] The relative improvements '+55.2% and +44.0%' are hard to interpret; report absolute point gains alongside, as is done earlier in the paper.
  5. [Appendix D] The limitations section is candid about scope, latency, and memory, but it does not mention the unverified transfer of the counterfactual property to evaluation benchmarks. This should be added as a limitation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No definitional circularity: the VIL property is enforced in synthetic data but validated on external benchmarks; score reflects a minor self-authored benchmark without overlap analysis.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 4.1 (Benchmarks), Table 1, References (Zhang et al., 2026a)]
    "We evaluate on ten multimodal information-seeking benchmarks: MMSearch, SimpleVQA, LiveVQA, FVQA, BrowseComp-VL, MM-BrowseComp, MMSearch-Plus, VDR-Bench, BrowseComp-V3, and VisBrowse-Bench (Jiang et al., 2025; Cheng et al., 2025b; Fu et al., 2025; Wu et al., 2025; Geng et al., 2025; Li et al., 2025b; Tao et al., 2026; Zeng et al., 2026; Zhang et al., 2026a;c)."

    BrowseComp-V3 is presented as an external benchmark, but the cited reference shows it is authored by the same group (Huanyao Zhang, Jiepeng Zhou, Bo Li, Bowen Zhou, Yanzhe Shan, Jiaoyang Chen, Zhengwei Tao, Jialong Wu, Runhao Zhao, Xiaohan Yu, Lang Mei, Chong Chen, Wentao Zhang). Table 1 reports a +23.7 point gain on this benchmark, and the paper provides no overlap analysis between the Wikipedia/news event-graph training source and BrowseComp-V3 content. This makes part of the benchmark validation self-referential. However, the central claim is also supported by external benchmarks and by the +20K multi-source trajectory ablation, so this is a minor self-citation/contamination risk rather than a definitional identity between training input and reported output.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular: it constructs synthetic trajectories that satisfy vision-in-the-loop by construction (Eqs. 2, 3, 7, 8), trains via SFT, and then measures transfer on ten benchmarks. Because the headline gains come from external evaluation distributions, success is not logically entailed by the synthesis equations. The cumulative ablation in Table 3 provides a non-circular control: adding 7K VIL trajectories over a 20K open-source trajectory baseline yields further gains, isolating the contribution of the synthesized data. The trajectory analysis in Section 4.3 characterizes the synthetic data itself via Doubao-2.0-Pro rollouts, not the trained policy; this is an evidence gap for the claim that the trained model exhibits vision-in-the-loop, but it is not a self-referential derivation. The only circularity-adjacent issue is the self-authored BrowseComp-V3 benchmark and the absence of an overlap analysis between the training event graph and that benchmark. This lowers confidence in the magnitude of the reported gains, but the core claim does not reduce to its own inputs. Score 2 reflects one minor, non-load-bearing self-citation/contamination risk.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical or ontological entities are posited. The visual register, event graph, and goal-conditioned summaries are software artifacts internal to the system, not independent entities requiring external evidence. The load-bearing assumptions are about data sufficiency, judge reliability, and transfer from synthetic programs to natural benchmarks.

free parameters (3)
  • difficulty stratification thresholds = Pass@8: easy 7-8, medium 4-6, hard 0-3 correct answers
    Hand-chosen cutoffs determine which synthesized questions are kept for teacher trajectory generation (Appendix B.3); changing them changes the training mixture and could affect the reported gains.
  • training corpus scale = ~20K multi-source + ~7K VIL trajectories
    Data volume was chosen by availability and engineering, not by an optimization criterion; the 7K number is central to the ablation claim in Table 3.
  • evaluation turn budget = 50
    A fixed maximum of 50 interaction turns is used for all framework-based evaluations (Section 4.1); some baseline results were reported under smaller budgets, which may favor DeepVoyager-VL on long-horizon benchmarks.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Wikipedia and multi-domain news event records, aggregated by spatio-temporal co-occurrence, are a sufficient source for constructing tasks with genuine intermediate visual dependencies.
    The entire synthesis pipeline in Section 3.2 depends on event graph G0 being rich enough to compose the programs of Eq. 6-8; if the source graph is too sparse or unrepresentative, the synthetic VIL tasks do not teach a general skill.
  • domain assumption LLM judges and helper-VLM summaries are reliable enough that filtering, difficulty labels, and final answer correctness are not systematically biased toward the proposed method.
    The pipeline uses Qwen-3.6-Flash for filtering (Appendix B.3), Qwen3-VL-Plus for goal-conditioned summarization (Appendix B.2), and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B as the benchmark judge (Section 4.1); no human agreement or bias analysis is reported.
  • ad hoc to paper Synthetic programs that satisfy counterfactual visual necessity (Eq. 3, enforced via Eq. 7-8) transfer to naturally occurring multimodal search queries.
    The paper's main contribution is training on such programs, so the claim that this teaches vision-in-the-loop behavior on unseen benchmarks is assumed rather than proven; see Section 3.2 and Appendix B.3.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DeepVoyager-VL: Incentivizing Vision-in-the-Loop Search for Long-Horizon Multimodal Agents." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FODNJXWK

@misc{pith2026260801827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DeepVoyager-VL: Incentivizing Vision-in-the-Loop Search for Long-Horizon Multimodal Agents},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FODNJXWK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01827}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced visual understanding and reasoning, yet their static parametric knowledge limits their ability to address knowledge-intensive and dynamically evolving open-world problems. To move beyond this limitation, multimodal deep search has emerged as a key direction for open-world information access, evolving from single-turn factual retrieval toward long-horizon, multi-turn search guided by visual evidence. However, existing methods typically confine vision to the input or answer stage, overlooking its role in intermediate reasoning, and lack designs tailored to long-horizon interaction. Consequently, visual evidence rarely drives continued retrieval, constraining both interaction depth and reasoning span. To address these limitations, we propose DeepVoyager-VL, a long-horizon multimodal deep-search framework for vision-in-the-loop search. Specifically, we construct a multimodal event graph to drive data synthesis, yielding problems with intermediate visual dependencies and long reasoning chains. We then design an agent framework for active visual acquisition and on-demand image loading. Finally, we fine-tune models on the synthesized data without reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments across ten multimodal search benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01827 by Bo Li, Bowen Zhou, Chong Chen, Fang Wang, Huanyao Zhang, Jialong Wu, Jiaoyang Chen, Jiepeng Zhou, Lang Mei, Liyan Liu, Runhao Zhao, Wentao Zhang, Xiaohan Yu, Yanzhe Shan, Zhengwei Tao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of multimodal search data synthesis paradigms. Prior methods place vision [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of DeepVoyager-VL, encompassing vision-in-the-loop data synthesis, difficulty [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Trajectory statistics from unified Doubao-2.0-Pro rollouts on 1,000 examples per dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 20 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025a

    Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025a. Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, et al. Qwen2.5-vl technical report.arXiv pr...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [4]

    Zheng Chu, Xiao Wang, Jack Hong, Huiming Fan, Yuqi Huang, Yue Yang, Guohai Xu, Chenxiao Zhao, Cheng Xiang, Shengchao Hu, Dongdong Kuang, Ming Liu, Bing Qin, and Xing Yu

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24330. Zheng Chu, Xiao Wang, Jack Hong, Huiming Fan, Yuqi Huang, Yue Yang, Guohai Xu, Chenxiao Zhao, Cheng Xiang, Shengchao Hu, Dongdong Kuang, Ming Liu, Bing Qin, and Xing Yu. Red- searcher: A scalable and cost-efficient framework for long-horizon search agents,

    arXiv

  3. [5]

    Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, Ice Pasupat, Noveen Sachdeva, Inderjit Dhillon, Marcel Blistein, Ori Ram, Dan Zhang, Evan Rosen, et al

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14234. Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, Ice Pasupat, Noveen Sachdeva, Inderjit Dhillon, Marcel Blistein, Ori Ram, Dan Zhang, Evan Rosen, et al. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capa- bilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261,

    arXiv

  4. [6]

    Yifan Du, Zikang Liu, Jinbiao Peng, Jie Wu, Junyi Li, Jinyang Li, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31504. Yifan Du, Zikang Liu, Jinbiao Peng, Jie Wu, Junyi Li, Jinyang Li, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. Towards long-horizon agentic multimodal search,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [7]

    Mingyang Fu, Yuyang Peng, Dongping Chen, Zetong Zhou, Benlin Liu, Yao Wan, Zhou Zhao, Philip S

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2604.12890. Mingyang Fu, Yuyang Peng, Dongping Chen, Zetong Zhou, Benlin Liu, Yao Wan, Zhou Zhao, Philip S. Yu, and Ranjay Krishna. Seeking and updating with live visual knowledge,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [9]

    10 Preprint Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al

    URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.05748. 10 Preprint Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [10]

    Bohan Hou, Jiuning Gu, Jiayan Guo, Ronghao Dang, Sicong Leng, Xin Li, Xuemeng Song, and Jianfei Yang

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05271. Bohan Hou, Jiuning Gu, Jiayan Guo, Ronghao Dang, Sicong Leng, Xin Li, Xuemeng Song, and Jianfei Yang. InterLV-Search: Benchmarking interleaved multimodal agentic search.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07510,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [11]

    Aaron Hurst, Adam Lerer, Adam P Goucher, Adam Perelman, Aditya Ramesh, Aidan Clark, AJ Os- trow, Akila Welihinda, Alan Hayes, Alec Radford, et al

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22060. Aaron Hurst, Adam Lerer, Adam P Goucher, Adam Perelman, Aditya Ramesh, Aidan Clark, AJ Os- trow, Akila Welihinda, Alan Hayes, Alec Radford, et al. Gpt-4o system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276,

    arXiv

  9. [12]

    Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516,

    Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan Arik, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, and Jiawei Han. Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [13]

    Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering

    Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih. Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. InPro- ceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing,

    2020

  11. [15]

    Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326,

    Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Dong Guo, Renrui Zhang, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Kaichen Zhang, Peiyuan Zhang, Yanwei Li, Ziwei Liu, et al. Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [17]

    11 Preprint Kartik Narayan, Yang Xu, Tian Cao, Kavya Nerella, Vishal M Patel, Navid Shiee, Peter Grasch, Chao Jia, Yinfei Yang, and Zhe Gan

    URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2604.14029. 11 Preprint Kartik Narayan, Yang Xu, Tian Cao, Kavya Nerella, Vishal M Patel, Navid Shiee, Peter Grasch, Chao Jia, Yinfei Yang, and Zhe Gan. Deepmmsearch-r1: Empowering multimodal llms in multi- modal web search.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12801,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [18]

    Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathemati- cal reasoning in open language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300,

    Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Yang Wu, et al. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathemati- cal reasoning in open language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [19]

    Pixel reasoner: In- centivizing pixel-space reasoning with curiosity-driven reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15966, 2025a

    Alex Su, Haozhe Wang, Weiming Ren, Fangzhen Lin, and Wenhu Chen. Pixel reasoner: In- centivizing pixel-space reasoning with curiosity-driven reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15966, 2025a. Zhaochen Su, Peng Xia, Hangyu Guo, Zhenhua Liu, Yan Ma, Xiaoye Qu, Jiaqi Liu, Yanshu Li, Kaide Zeng, Zhengyuan Yang, et al. Thinking with images for mult...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [20]

    Tongyi DeepResearch Team, Baixuan Li, Bo Zhang, Dingchu Zhang, Fei Huang, Guangyu Li, Guoxin Chen, Huifeng Yin, Jialong Wu, Jingren Zhou, et al

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21475. Tongyi DeepResearch Team, Baixuan Li, Bo Zhang, Dingchu Zhang, Fei Huang, Guangyu Li, Guoxin Chen, Huifeng Yin, Jialong Wu, Jingren Zhou, et al. Tongyi deepresearch technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24701,

    arXiv

  16. [21]

    Jialong Wu, Baixuan Li, Runnan Fang, Wenbiao Yin, Liwen Zhang, Zhenglin Wang, Zhengwei Tao, Ding-Chu Zhang, Zekun Xi, Robert Tang, et al

    URLhttps:// arxiv.org/abs/2507.01006. Jialong Wu, Baixuan Li, Runnan Fang, Wenbiao Yin, Liwen Zhang, Zhenglin Wang, Zhengwei Tao, Ding-Chu Zhang, Zekun Xi, Robert Tang, et al. Webdancer: Towards autonomous information seeking agency.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38:120957–120985,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [22]

    Huanjin Yao, Qixiang Yin, Min Yang, Ziwang Zhao, Yibo Wang, Haotian Luo, Jingyi Zhang, and Jiaxing Huang

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20670. Huanjin Yao, Qixiang Yin, Min Yang, Ziwang Zhao, Yibo Wang, Haotian Luo, Jingyi Zhang, and Jiaxing Huang. Mm-deepresearch: A simple and effective multimodal agentic search baseline,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [23]

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01050. Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03629,

    arXiv

  19. [25]

    Memagent: Reshaping long-context llm with multi-conv rl-based memory agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02259,

    Hongli Yu, Tinghong Chen, Jiangtao Feng, Jiangjie Chen, Weinan Dai, Qiying Yu, Ya-Qin Zhang, Wei-Ying Ma, Jingjing Liu, Mingxuan Wang, et al. Memagent: Reshaping long-context llm with multi-conv rl-based memory agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02259,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [26]

    Visrag: Vision-based retrieval-augmented generation on multi- modality documents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10594,

    Shi Yu, Chaoyue Tang, Bokai Xu, Junbo Cui, Junhao Ran, Yukun Yan, Zhenghao Liu, Shuo Wang, Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, et al. Visrag: Vision-based retrieval-augmented generation on multi- modality documents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10594,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [27]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2602.02185. Huanyao Zhang, Jiepeng Zhou, Bo Li, Bowen Zhou, Yanzhe Shan, Haishan Lu, Zhiyong Cao, Jiaoyang Chen, Yuqian Han, Zinan Sheng, Zhengwei Tao, Hao Liang, Jialong Wu, Yang Shi, Yuanpeng He, Jiaye Lin, Qintong Zhang, Guochen Yan, Runhao Zhao, Zhengpin Li, Xiaohan Yu, Lang Mei, Chong Chen, Wentao Zhang, and Bin Cui. Browsec...

    arXiv

  22. [28]

    thinking with images

    Ziwei Zheng, Michael Yang, Jack Hong, Chenxiao Zhao, Guohai Xu, Le Yang, Chao Shen, and Xing Yu. Deepeyes: Incentivizing “thinking with images” via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14362,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [29]

    Internvl3: Exploring advanced training and test-time recipes for open-source multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479,

    Jinguo Zhu, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen, Zhaoyang Liu, Shenglong Ye, Lixin Gu, Hao Tian, Yuchen Duan, Weijie Su, Jie Shao, et al. Internvl3: Exploring advanced training and test-time recipes for open-source multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [30]

    13 Preprint A RELATEDWORK A.1 MULTIMODALLARGELANGUAGEMODELS Early MLLMs connect pretrained vision encoders to language models through lightweight projec- tion modules, establishing general visual instruction-following capabilities (Liu et al., 2023). Subse- quent systems scale both model architectures and vision–language corpora to improve cross-modal und...

    2023

  25. [31]

    In parallel, the available operations have expanded from fixed crops to code-synthesized image trans- formations (Zhao et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025a)

    observes that pure reinforce- ment learning struggles to produce the deep visual trajectories required by difficult searches. In parallel, the available operations have expanded from fixed crops to code-synthesized image trans- formations (Zhao et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025a). These advances substantially improve how a model examines visual evidence, b...

    2025

  26. [32]

    op- timizes the policy end-to-end with an outcome-based reward and a search penalty, encouraging tool calls to be made on demand. A widely adopted alternative performs supervised cold-start training on synthesized multi-turn trajectories before reinforcement-learning refinement (Geng et al., 2025; Huang et al., 2026; Chen et al., 2026; Yao et al., 2026; C...

    2025

  27. [33]

    similarly shows that reinforcement learning alone does not reliably induce tool use. A third line argues that a modest collection of high-quality, planning-consistent tra- jectories can be sufficient, avoiding the cost and instability of an additional reinforcement-learning stage (Zhang et al., 2025b; 2026b). DeepV oyager-VL follows this supervised-only r...

    2025

  28. [34]

    or folding stale context into visual space (Liu et al., 2026). Related text-only approaches learn memory updates (Yu et al., 2025), proactively fold context (Ye et al., 2025), or compress long histories into visual representations (Cheng et al., 2025a). These mechanisms primarily manage evidence after it has entered the interaction history. DeepV oyager-V...

    2026

  29. [35]

    This improves the placement of input-side visual grounding, but the image still substitutes for a node in a reasoning chain that was constructed in text

    assigns functional roles to nodes along a sampled Wikipedia path and anchors the image at the source, arguing that grounding near the answer can create single-hop shortcuts. This improves the placement of input-side visual grounding, but the image still substitutes for a node in a reasoning chain that was constructed in text. A second paradigm performsfro...

    2026

  30. [36]

    evaluates the complementary roles of visual and textual search within a unified protocol. Visual-native and verifiable browsing benchmarks.BrowseComp-V 3 (Zhang et al., 2026a) tar- gets visual, vertical, and verifiable browsing problems, with performance reported as Success Rate. VisBrowse-Bench (Zhang et al., 2026c) contains visual-native queries for whi...

    2025

  31. [2020]

    Mini-o3: Scaling up reasoning patterns and interaction turns for visual search.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07969,

    Xin Lai, Junyi Li, Wei Li, Tao Liu, Tianjian Li, and Hengshuang Zhao. Mini-o3: Scaling up reasoning patterns and interaction turns for visual search.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07969,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [2022]

    Glyph: Scaling context windows via visual-text compression

    Jiale Cheng, Yusen Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Yulin Fei, Wenyi Hong, Ruiliang Lyu, Weihan Wang, Zhe Su, Xiaotao Gu, Xiao Liu, et al. Glyph: Scaling context windows via visual-text compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.17800, 2025a. Xianfu Cheng, Wei Zhang, Shiwei Zhang, Jian Yang, Xiangyuan Guan, Xianjie Wu, Xiang Li, Ge Zhang, Jiaheng Liu, Yuying Mai, Yutao Zeng...

    arXiv

  33. [2023]

    Agentfold: Long-horizon web agents with proactive context management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24699,

    Rui Ye, Zhongwang Zhang, Kuan Li, Huifeng Yin, Zhengwei Tao, Yida Zhao, Liangcai Su, Liwen Zhang, Zile Qiao, Xinyu Wang, et al. Agentfold: Long-horizon web agents with proactive context management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24699,

    arXiv

  34. [2024]

    Websailor: Navigating super-human reasoning for web agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02592, 2025a

    Kuan Li, Zhongwang Zhang, Huifeng Yin, Liwen Zhang, Litu Ou, Jialong Wu, Wenbiao Yin, Baix- uan Li, Zhengwei Tao, Xinyu Wang, et al. Websailor: Navigating super-human reasoning for web agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02592, 2025a. Shilong Li, Xingyuan Bu, Wenjie Wang, Jiaheng Liu, Jun Dong, Haoyang He, Hao Lu, Haozhe Zhang, Chenchen Jing, Zhen Li, Chuanha...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [2025]

    Xinyu Geng, Peng Xia, Zhen Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Qiuchen Wang, Ruixue Ding, Chenxi Wang, Jialong Wu, Yida Zhao, Kuan Li, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, and Jingren Zhou

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05288. Xinyu Geng, Peng Xia, Zhen Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Qiuchen Wang, Ruixue Ding, Chenxi Wang, Jialong Wu, Yida Zhao, Kuan Li, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, and Jingren Zhou. Web- watcher: Breaking new frontier of vision-language deep research agent,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [2026]

    Wenhu Chen, Hexiang Hu, Xi Chen, Pat Verga, and William W Cohen

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05185. Wenhu Chen, Hexiang Hu, Xi Chen, Pat Verga, and William W Cohen. Murag: Multimodal retrieval-augmented generator for open question answering over images and text.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02928,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.