Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 28 references

A pre-equilibrium plasma scatters jets more often by small momentum kicks than a thermal plasma would, especially along the beam axis.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

The full elastic collision kernel for jet broadening in the pre-equilibrium gluon plasma is enhanced at small momentum transfer compared to thermal equilibrium, particularly along the beam axis.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A competent proceedings summary; the new C(q_perp) plot is borrowed from [16], so the real scientific claim lives there. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05904 v1 pith:FOM6RGAF submitted 2025-09-07 hep-ph nucl-th

Jet momentum broadening beyond the jet quenching parameter from QCD kinetic theory

Alois Altenburger , Kirill Boguslavski , Florian Lindenbauer This is my paper
classification hep-ph nucl-th
keywords QCD kinetic theoryjet quenchingmomentum broadeningcollision kernelpre-equilibrium plasmaheavy-ion collisionshard-thermal-loop screeningjet quenching parameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies how a fast jet parton is deflected while passing through the quark-gluon plasma before it reaches equilibrium, using weakly-coupled QCD kinetic theory. Rather than compressing the response into a single number, the jet quenching parameter qhat, it extracts the full elastic collision kernel C(q_perp), which gives the probability per time for the parton to receive a transverse momentum transfer q_perp. The central result is that in this pre-equilibrium stage, small momentum transfers are more probable than in a thermal plasma with the same energy density, especially when the transferred momentum lies along the beam axis, while large transfers are suppressed. If this is right, jet-quenching models that treat the early medium as a thermal bath will misjudge the shape of jet broadening and the resulting energy loss; using the full kernel removes the need for the harmonic approximation and its cutoff.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a change in the shape of the elastic scattering probability during the earliest kinetic-theory stage of a heavy-ion collision. The authors compute C(q_perp) from the evolving gluon distribution, with soft-gluon exchange regulated by an isotropic hard-thermal-loop self-energy, and compare it with a thermal kernel at the same energy density. At early times the nonequilibrium kernel is enhanced at small q_perp and suppressed at large q_perp relative to equilibrium, and the enhancement is strongest for momentum transfer parallel to the beam axis (phi_pq=0). The kernel's peak sits below the Debye mass at early times and only later shifts to the Debye sca

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the full elastic collision kernel C(q_perp), the differential broadening probability defined in Eq. (3): an integral of the squared screened matrix element weighted by the gluon distribution and a Bose-enhancement factor. It is extracted from QCD kinetic theory, in which the gluon distribution evolves under the Boltzmann equation with elastic and inelastic collision terms; the jet quenching parameter qhat is just the second moment of the kernel, so the kernel is a strictly finer quantity. The extraction regulates soft-gluon exchange with an isotropic hard-thermal-loop self-energy, and the comparison baseline is the analytic thermal kernel for large q_perp. Time evo

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that an isotropic hard-thermal-loop self-energy, designed for an equilibrium plasma, correctly regulates soft-gluon exchange in the highly anisotropic, overoccupied early-time plasma; if this screening is inaccurate, the claimed small-momentum enhancement and its beam-axis directionality would be distorted.

What would settle it

Recompute C(q_perp) at the same early times using an anisotropic hard-thermal-loop self-energy that accounts for the plasma's momentum-space anisotropy, or use a real-time lattice simulation of the pre-equilibrium fields. If the small-q_perp enhancement along the beam axis disappears or reverses, the central claim is an artifact of the isotropic regulator; if it survives, the claim is robust.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Medium-induced radiation codes that use the full collision kernel can now use a nonequilibrium C(q_perp) instead of the harmonic approximation, removing the UV-cutoff dependence that qhat carries.
  • Early-time broadening is direction-dependent: the kernel is largest for kicks along the beam axis, so the angular distribution of jet broadening in the first fractions of a fm/c is more anisotropic than the qhat ratio alone indicates.
  • Because the nonequilibrium kernel is enhanced at small q_perp and suppressed at large q_perp, low-momentum-transfer scatterings contribute relatively more to early-time energy loss than a thermal calculation would predict.
  • The extraction gives a cutoff-independent transport input that can be matched to Glasma-stage results at early times and to hydrodynamic-stage results at late times.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to repeat the extraction with an anisotropic hard-thermal-loop self-energy that respects the plasma's momentum-space anisotropy; if the beam-axis small-kick enhancement survives, it is a genuine medium effect, and if it does not, the isotropic regulator is the source.
  • The same extraction applied to heavy-quark diffusion would predict whether the small-kick enhancement alters heavy-flavour momentum broadening and flow at moderate pT, since the same collision kernel controls both.
  • The shifted peak below the Debye mass suggests that effective models imposing a Debye-mass floor on momentum transfers will systematically bias early-time energy loss; switching to the full kernel should remove that bias.
  • Comparing C(q_perp) with a Glasma-stage computation near the interface time would show whether the small-q enhancement is continuous across the two descriptions or an artifact of switching between classical fields and kinetic theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports on the extraction of the full elastic collision kernel C(q_perp) for jet momentum broadening in the pre-equilibrium, nonequilibrium stage of heavy-ion collisions, using QCD kinetic theory. The authors numerically solve the Boltzmann equation for an overoccupied, anisotropic gluonic plasma, compute the collision kernel from the simulated distribution, and compare it with a Landau-matched thermal kernel at the same energy density. Their central finding is that at early times the nonequilibrium kernel is enhanced for small momentum transfer, especially when the momentum transfer is along the beam axis, and suppressed for large momentum transfer. The paper also summarizes earlier results for the jet quenching parameter qhat, including its time evolution, directional anisotropy, and the apparent collapse of the anisotropy ratio when time is rescaled by tau_BMSS.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides a step beyond the harmonic approximation by giving the full momentum-transfer dependence of the collision kernel in an out-of-equilibrium plasma. The extraction is not directly tied to the UV cutoff that complicates qhat, and the angular resolution could give jet-quenching models access to anisotropic pre-equilibrium physics. The authors are transparent that the details are developed in companion papers, and they make a concrete, falsifiable prediction about the shape and angular dependence of C(q_perp). The main caveats are the use of isotropic hard-thermal-loop screening in an anisotropic medium and the choice of Landau matching as the baseline; both can affect the claimed enhancement and its angular pattern. The paper does not provide error bars or convergence studies, and the central figure is taken from a companion paper. Overall, the claim is plausible and of interest to the heavy-ion community, but it needs clearer assessment of systematic uncertainties.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3 and Sec. 5 (Eq. (2), Fig. 4)] The central claim about enhancement at small q_perp and its angular dependence is obtained with the isotropic HTL self-energy [15] to regulate soft gluon exchange. The early-time plasma is strongly anisotropic, and soft screening is generally direction-dependent. Without comparing to an anisotropic screening prescription or justifying the isotropic HTL in this regime, the small-q and angular structure of C(q_perp) could be an artifact of the regulator. Please add a sensitivity test or explicitly quantify the systematic uncertainty from this modeling choice.
  2. [Sec. 5, Fig. 4 (right)] The statement that the nonequilibrium kernel is enhanced for small q_perp and suppressed for large q_perp is defined relative to a Landau-matched thermal kernel at the same energy density. This is a reasonable reference, but the ratio C/C_eq and the qualitative conclusion can depend on the matching scheme (energy density versus temperature versus number density, for example). The manuscript does not test this sensitivity. Please show how robust the ratio is under different thermal-matching conventions.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4), Fig. 3] The qhat results rely on cutoff models whose proportionality constants are fixed to the JETSCAPE Bayesian extraction [21]. The paper states this, but it should be emphasized that the qhat values are not ab initio predictions; the agreement in Fig. 3 is a consistency check with a phenomenological reference point, not an independent first-principles result. Since qhat is used as a comparison anchor, the text should clearly label this calibration for the reader.
  4. [Sec. 5, Fig. 4] The central new figure is taken verbatim from the companion paper [16], and the present manuscript does not provide error bars, numerical convergence checks, or the precise definition of the time markers used in the right panel (e.g., what 'earliest time' and 'latest time' correspond to quantitatively). Given that the factor-level enhancement is the main claim, the reader should be told the uncertainties or pointed to explicit sections of Ref. [16] where the numerical/systematic errors are established. As written, the robustness of the claimed factor ~5-6 enhancement cannot be assessed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (2)] The initial condition is written with p_xi and an exponential factor exp(-2 p^2/xi/(3 <p_T>^2)). The notation should be cleaned up: define p_xi, p_T, and p_z explicitly in the equation or immediately below, and make sure the argument has consistent dimensions.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption mentions time markers (star, circle, triangle) that do not appear in the displayed figure. If they are introduced for later figures, state that explicitly in the caption or add them to the figure.
  3. [Sec. 4, Fig. 3] The quantity T_epsilon appears in the figure caption and text but is defined later in the paragraph. Define the Landau-matched temperature at first occurrence, before using it in the plots.
  4. [Fig. 4 (left)] The label 'Integrand for the jet quenching parameter' could be misread. The plotted quantity is essentially q^2 C(q_perp) (with normalization factors), which is the integrand for the second moment, not for qhat itself. Clarify the normalization in the caption.
  5. [Abstract and Sec. 6] The phrase 'significant step' is used twice. Consider a more quantitative summary of what the extraction enables, e.g., direct use in full broadening probability calculations.
  6. [Ref. [21]] For the JETSCAPE calibration, specify the jet energy and reference temperature at which the proportionality constants are fixed, or give the equation/parametrization from [21] used in Eq. (4).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central C(q_perp) result is a direct simulation observable, not fitted to the reported enhancement.

full rationale

The paper's main claim is the extraction of the elastic collision kernel C(q_perp) from QCD kinetic theory simulations (Section 5, Eq. (3)). That quantity is computed as a phase-space integral over the distribution function f(k) and the squared matrix element |M|^2, with soft-gluon exchange regulated by an isotropic HTL self-energy. No parameter is fitted to the reported enhancement at small momentum transfer or suppression at large momentum transfer; the claim is a direct output of the simulation. The qhat results in Section 4 do involve a cutoff model (Eq. (4)) whose proportionality constant is calibrated to a JETSCAPE reference value [21], but this is explicitly disclosed and applies only to the absolute normalization of qhat, not to the shape of C(q_perp) nor to the central beyond-qhat claim. The paper relies substantially on the authors' own companion works ([5], [15], [16], [20]) for figures and methods, which is a reproducibility/independence concern rather than circularity: the cited screening calculation [15] is a physical input with stated assumptions, and the central result is not defined in terms of itself. There is no self-definitional equation, no fitted quantity renamed as a prediction in the central claim, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz smuggled in via self-citation. Therefore no circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central C(q_perp) claim rests on the kinetic theory simulation (with chosen coupling, initial conditions, and HTL screening) and on the Landau-matched thermal kernel as the comparison baseline. The qhat results additionally depend on cutoff models calibrated to a phenomenological extraction.

free parameters (3)
  • Lambda_perp cutoff proportionality constants = not stated (fixed to JETSCAPE reference qhat)
    In Eq. (4), the Lambda_LPM and Lambda_kin proportionality constants are 'fixed to obtain a reference value of qhat at a given jet energy and temperature [21]', making absolute qhat predictions dependent on a phenomenological fit.
  • Coupling lambda = lambda = 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20
    Chosen simulation parameters; not fitted to the target result but the results depend on them.
  • Initial condition parameters <p_T>, xi, A(xi) = <p_T> = 1.8 Q_s, xi = 4 or 10, A(xi=10) = 5.24171
    Kurkela-Zhu glasma-inspired initial conditions; chosen inputs.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Weakly-coupled QCD kinetic theory with elastic and inelastic collision terms describes the pre-equilibrium stage.
    Assumed throughout; Ref [10] provides the effective kinetic theory.
  • domain assumption The system is pure gluonic and gluons dominate at early times.
    Section 3 states 'we consider a system of pure gluons, which are the dominant degree of freedom at early times'.
  • domain assumption Isotropic hard-thermal-loop self-energy regulates soft gluon exchange in the anisotropic plasma.
    Section 3: for C(q_perp) results, regulation is by 'the isotropic hard-thermal loop self-energy [15]'.
  • ad hoc to paper Landau matching: the thermal equilibrium kernel at the same energy density is the right baseline for comparison.
    Used for the comparison in Fig. 4 (right); this choice drives the claim of small-q enhancement.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Jet momentum broadening beyond the jet quenching parameter from QCD kinetic theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FOM6RGAF

@misc{pith2026250905904,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Jet momentum broadening beyond the jet quenching parameter from QCD kinetic theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FOM6RGAF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05904}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Using QCD kinetic theory, we study momentum broadening of jets using the full broadening probability (elastic collision kernel) $C(\mathbf{q_\perp})$ extracted during simulations of the nonequilibrium initial stages in heavy-ion collisions. We find that small momentum transfer is more likely than in thermal equilibrium, particularly along the beam axis. Our extraction represents a significant step towards a more realistic modeling of jet quenching during the initial stages.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05904 by Alois Altenburger, Florian Lindenbauer, Kirill Boguslavski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Left): Schematic evolution of the jet quenching parameter ˆq during the initial stages in heavy-ion collisions. (Right): Jet quenching parameter obtained from a kinetic theory simulation. Ad￾ditionally shown is the Glasma result of Ref. [2]. Figures taken from Ref. [5]. Within the harmonic approximation (1), the gluon emission rate can be obtained ana￾lytically [8, 9], and these results can be used in a p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Left): Time evolution of an initially overoccupied gluonic plasma undergoing longitudinal expansion. The three stages of bottom-up thermalization [18] are visible and denoted by arrows in the figure. Adapted from [5], based on a plot in [17]. (Right): Sketch of a jet moving in the x− direction through the quark-gluon plasma generated in heavy-ion collisions. The jet accumulates a transverse momentum ∆pz a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Left): Time evolution of the jet quenching parameter in a Bjorken expanding plasma for two different couplings (color-coded) and different broadening directions. Comparison of the two cutoff models (4). Taken from [5]. (Center and right): The ratio of jet quenching parameters in different di￾rections for different couplings (color-coded). Time is rescaled with τBMSS and τR, respectively. Shown are also ex… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Collision kernel C(q⊥) for different times for λ = 2. (Left): Integrand for the jet quenching parameter ˆq for different angles of q⊥ and the angular average. Squares represent the Debye mass. (Right): Normalized to the Landau-matched thermal equilibrium kernel. Figures taken from [16]. the energy density of the nonequilibrium system). We observe that (apart from very early times) momentum broadening is en… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Andres, N

    C. Andres, N. Armesto, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, C.A. Salgado, Jet quenching as a probe of the initial stages in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B803, 135318 (2020), 1902.03231. 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135318

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Ipp, D.I

    A. Ipp, D.I. Müller, D. Schuh, Jet momentum broadening in the pre- equilibrium Glasma, Phys. Lett. B810, 135810 (2020),2009.14206. 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135810

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Carrington, A

    M.E. Carrington, A. Czajka, S. Mrowczynski, Transport of hard probes through glasma, Phys. Rev. C105, 064910 (2022),2202.00357. 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064910

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Avramescu, V

    D. Avramescu, V . B˘aran, V . Greco, A. Ipp, D.I. Müller, M. Ruggieri, Simulating jets and heavy quarks in the glasma using the colored particle-in-cell method, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114021 (2023),2303.05599. 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.114021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, J. Peuron, Jet momentum broad- ening during initial stages in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B850, 138525 (2024), 2303.12595. 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138525

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Barata, S

    J.a. Barata, S. Hauksson, X. Mayo López, A.V . Sadofyev, Jet quenching in the glasma phase: Medium-induced radiation, Phys. Rev. D110, 094055 (2024),2406.07615. 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Berges, M.P

    J. Berges, M.P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, R. Venugopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab ini- tio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021), 2005.12299. 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Zakharov, Fully quantum treatment of the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect in QED and QCD, JETP Lett.63, 952 (1996),hep-ph/9607440

    B.G. Zakharov, Fully quantum treatment of the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect in QED and QCD, JETP Lett.63, 952 (1996),hep-ph/9607440. 10.1134/1.567126

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  9. [9]

    Radiative Energy Loss of High Energy Partons Traversing an Expanding QCD Plasma

    R. Baier, Y .L. Dokshitzer, A.H. Mueller, D. Schiff, Radiative energy loss of high- energy partons traversing an expanding QCD plasma, Phys. Rev. C58, 1706 (1998), hep-ph/9803473. 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1706

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Arnold, G.D

    P.B. Arnold, G.D. Moore, L.G. Yaffe, Effective kinetic theory for high tem- perature gauge theories, JHEP01, 030 (2003),hep-ph/0209353. 10.1088/1126- 6708/2003/01/030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Kurkela, A

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical Equilibration in Hadronic Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 142301 (2019),1811.03040. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.142301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Arnold, G.D

    P.B. Arnold, G.D. Moore, L.G. Yaffe, Photon and gluon emission in relativistic plasmas, JHEP06, 030 (2002),hep-ph/0204343. 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    Kurkela, F

    A. Kurkela, F. Lindenbauer, Ektqhat - effective kinetic theory solver with jet quenching parameter (2023),https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10409474

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10409474 2023

  14. [14]

    Abraao York, A

    M.C. Abraao York, A. Kurkela, E. Lu, G.D. Moore, UV cascade in classical Yang-Mills theory via kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D89, 074036 (2014),1401.3751. 10.1103/Phys- RevD.89.074036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    Boguslavski, F

    K. Boguslavski, F. Lindenbauer, Soft-gluon exchange matters: Isotropic screening in QCD kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D110, 074017 (2024),2407.09605. 10.1103/Phys- RevD.110.074017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Altenburger, K

    A. Altenburger, K. Boguslavski, F. Lindenbauer, Jet broadening and radiation in the early anisotropic plasma in heavy-ion collisions (2025),2509.03868

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Kurkela, Y

    A. Kurkela, Y . Zhu, Isotropization and hydrodynamization in weakly coupled heavy- ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 182301 (2015),1506.06647. 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.115.182301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Baier, A.H

    R. Baier, A.H. Mueller, D. Schiff, D.T. Son, ’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B502, 51 (2001),hep-ph/0009237. 10.1016/S0370- 2693(01)00191-5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  19. [19]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, J. Peuron, Jet quenching pa- rameter in QCD kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D110, 034019 (2024),2312.00447. 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, J. Peuron, Limiting at- tractors in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B852, 138623 (2024),2312.11252. 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138623

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Cao et al

    S. Cao et al. (JETSCAPE), Determining the jet transport coefficient ˆqfrom inclusive hadron suppression measurements using Bayesian parameter estimation, Phys. Rev. C 104, 024905 (2021),2102.11337. 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024905

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Momentum Broadening in an Anisotropic Plasma

    P. Romatschke, Momentum broadening in an anisotropic plasma, Phys. Rev. C75, 014901 (2007),hep-ph/0607327. 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.014901

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  23. [23]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, J. Peuron, Heavy quark diffusion coefficient in heavy-ion collisions via kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D109, 014025 (2024), 2303.12520. 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Keegan, A

    L. Keegan, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, D. Teaney, Initial conditions for hydrodynam- ics from weakly coupled pre-equilibrium evolution, JHEP08, 171 (2016),1605.04287. 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Caron-Huot, C

    S. Caron-Huot, C. Gale, Finite-size effects on the radiative energy loss of a fast parton in hot and dense strongly interacting matter, Phys. Rev. C82, 064902 (2010),1006.2379. 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.064902

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    Andres, L

    C. Andres, L. Apolinário, F. Dominguez, Medium-induced gluon radiation with full resummation of multiple scatterings for realistic parton-medium interactions, JHEP07, 114 (2020),2002.01517. 10.1007/JHEP07(2020)114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Moore, S

    G.D. Moore, S. Schlichting, N. Schlusser, I. Soudi, Non-perturbative determination of collisional broadening and medium induced radiation in QCD plasmas, JHEP10, 059 (2021),2105.01679. 10.1007/JHEP10(2021)059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Arnold, W

    P.B. Arnold, W. Xiao, High-energy jet quenching in weakly-coupled quark-gluon plas- mas, Phys. Rev. D78, 125008 (2008),0810.1026. 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.125008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.