The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2209.15259 · v2 · pith:FQSZTPOQ · submitted 2022-09-30 · cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CR

On the Impossible Safety of Large AI Models

Reviewed by Pithpith:FQSZTPOQopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR
keywords largemodelslaimslearningmachinesecurityaccuracyaccurate
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large AI Models (LAIMs), of which large language models are the most prominent recent example, showcase some impressive performance. However they have been empirically found to pose serious security issues. This paper systematizes our knowledge about the fundamental impossibility of building arbitrarily accurate and secure machine learning models. More precisely, we identify key challenging features of many of today's machine learning settings. Namely, high accuracy seems to require memorizing large training datasets, which are often user-generated and highly heterogeneous, with both sensitive information and fake users. We then survey statistical lower bounds that, we argue, constitute a compelling case against the possibility of designing high-accuracy LAIMs with strong security guarantees.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. High-probability zeroth-order online convex optimisation beyond Euclidean geometry

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Unified high-probability regret bounds for online convex optimisation with ℓq-Lipschitz losses via ℓp-regularised FTRL and cone-measure sampling from ℓr-spheres, for all p,q,r in [1,∞].

  2. Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?

    cs.LG 2023-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM safety training fails due to competing objectives and mismatched generalization, enabling new jailbreaks that succeed on all unsafe prompts from red-teaming sets in GPT-4 and Claude.