Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Explanation for Unsupervised Graph-Level Representation Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.09934 v2 pith:FROGKIBA submitted 2022-05-20 cs.LG cs.AI

Towards Explanation for Unsupervised Graph-Level Representation Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords graphexplanationrepresentationsunsupervisedbottleneckclassificationexplanatorygraph-level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to the superior performance of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in various domains, there is an increasing interest in the GNN explanation problem "\emph{which fraction of the input graph is the most crucial to decide the model's decision?}" Existing explanation methods focus on the supervised settings, \eg, node classification and graph classification, while the explanation for unsupervised graph-level representation learning is still unexplored. The opaqueness of the graph representations may lead to unexpected risks when deployed for high-stake decision-making scenarios. In this paper, we advance the Information Bottleneck principle (IB) to tackle the proposed explanation problem for unsupervised graph representations, which leads to a novel principle, \textit{Unsupervised Subgraph Information Bottleneck} (USIB). We also theoretically analyze the connection between graph representations and explanatory subgraphs on the label space, which reveals that the expressiveness and robustness of representations benefit the fidelity of explanatory subgraphs. Experimental results on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our developed explainer and the validity of our theoretical analysis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.