Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 8 cited by

Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Neutrinos carry 99 percent of a supernova's binding energy, heat the stalled shock that makes it explode, and set the heavy-element yields of neutron-star mergers; upcoming detectors will test this picture.

desk verdict A solid, honest review that maps the field well; no new science, but it deserves a careful referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09699 v2 pith:FT6T2OO6 submitted 2024-12-12 astro-ph.HE hep-exhep-ph

Irene Tamborra This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEhep-exhep-ph
keywords neutrinoastrophysicsmulti-messengerastronomycore-collapsesupernovaeneutron-starmergersflavorconversiondiffusesupernovabackgroundhigh-energyneutrinosr-processnucleosynthesis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that neutrinos are not just messengers from explosive transients; they are dynamic agents inside the source. In core-collapse supernovae they carry 99 percent of the gravitational binding energy and are the leading candidate for reviving the stalled shock, while in neutron-star mergers they set the electron fraction of the outflows and therefore which heavy elements are synthesized. The paper surveys the thermal (MeV) and non-thermal (TeV to PeV) neutrino signals expected from supernovae, neutron-star mergers, gamma-ray bursts, and newly discovered fast blue optical transients, and makes the case that the coming generation of neutrino telescopes, gravitational-wave detectors, and wide-field surveys is poised to test this picture. Its central caution is that neutrino flavor conversion—fast, collisional, and matter-driven resonance—is expected to occur in the source core but is not yet included in hydrodynamic simulations, leaving the largest uncertainty in predictions of the explosion mechanism, the diffuse supernova neutrino background, and kilonova nucleosynthesis. A sympathetic reader will come away with the paper's thesis: the next Galactic supernova and the detection of the diffuse supernova neutrino background are near-term events that can turn neutrinos into precision probes, provided theory catches up with the data.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is neutrino flavor conversion governed by the neutrino quantum kinetic equations: a density matrix $\rho(t,x,p)$ evolves with vacuum mixing, matter, and a neutrino self-interaction term $H_{\nu\nu} \propto \sqrt{2}G_F \int dp'\,(1-v\cdot v')(\rho_p - \bar{\rho}_p)$. The review highlights fast flavor conversion, an instability that can grow from crossings in the angular distribution of the electron-neutrino lepton number even for vanishing neutrino mass, and matter-neutrino resonance in merger remnants where antineutrino abundance flips the sign of the self-interaction potential. These flavor instabilities are what make neutrinos dynamical agents: by changing the electron (anti)neutrino spectra before decoupling, they alter the shock-heating rate, the electron fraction in the outflows, and the yields of r-process nuclei, thereby connecting microphysics in the source core to the kilonova light curve, the supernova explosion energy, and the diffuse neutrino background observed at Earth.

What would settle it

Compare the neutrino light curve and energy spectrum of the next Galactic supernova, as measured by Hyper-Kamiokande and IceCube, against the same three-dimensional explosion models run with and without flavor conversion: a match to the no-conversion model within statistical errors would show that pre-decoupling flavor conversion is not a controlling ingredient, while a mismatch, especially in the accretion-phase electron neutrino to antineutrino ratio, would confirm its role.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is the synthesis that neutrinos are central actors in the physics of explosive transients, not merely diagnostic particles. Neutrino-driven convection and the standing accretion shock instability set the explosion geometry; the lepton-number emission self-sustained asymmetry can kick the neutron star; and in merger remnants, electron antineutrino-dominated fluxes drive the r-process and shape the kilonova. Flavor conversion triggered by neutrino self-interactions, including fast conversion which operates even in the limit of vanishing neutrino mass, can occur before decoupling, altering the heating behind the shock, and is therefore a candidate ingredient that could help or hinder the explosion and change the yield of heavy elements. The paper argues that the multi-messenger signal, combining tens-of-MeV thermal neutrinos, TeV to PeV non-thermal neutrinos, gravitational waves, and photons across wavebands, can break the degeneracies that currently plague source modeling, and that the imminent instruments make a Galactic supernova neutrino detection and a diffuse supernova neutrino background detection realistic targets of the next decade.

Load-bearing premise

The hopeful outlook depends on theorists being able to fold neutrino flavor conversion into full source simulations; if that never becomes tractable, the predicted explosion energies, heavy-element yields, and neutrino backgrounds all carry uncontrolled uncertainties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Galactic core-collapse supernova detected in neutrinos would deliver a day-early alert, trigger electromagnetic and gravitational-wave follow-up, and map the pre-explosion accretion phase, rotating SASI, and the black-hole-forming or neutron-star cooling phase.
  • The detection of the diffuse supernova neutrino background by Super-Kamiokande-Gd or Hyper-Kamiokande would measure the cosmic core-collapse rate in neutrinos, revealing electromagnetically dark collapses and black-hole-forming transients missed by photon surveys.
  • If flavor conversion operates before decoupling, the explosion energy and morphology become dependent on neutrino flavor physics, meaning three-dimensional explosion simulations that omit it may be missing a controlling ingredient.
  • High-energy neutrinos from choked jets and magnetar winds would confirm particle acceleration sites that are invisible in electromagnetic radiation, linking compact-object engines to the cosmic neutrino flux.
  • Coordinated radio and X-ray observations with neutrino alerts will separate which waveband tracks the same emission region, replacing coincident-by-chance associations with physically matched multi-messenger signals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the next Galactic supernova's neutrino light curve matches simulations without flavor conversion, the case for pre-decoupling flavor conversion as an explosion lever is weakened; if it differs, flavor conversion moves from a theoretical feature to an observational input for nucleosynthesis models.
  • A detection of the diffuse supernova neutrino background at the high end of the predicted band would support a large population of black-hole-forming or otherwise dim collapses, coupling neutrino astrophysics to stellar initial mass function and binary evolution studies.
  • The author's emphasis on flavor conversion feedback implies that kilonova light curves and r-process yields could eventually serve as neutrino flavor detectors, so quantities computed today without flavor conversion may need revision once self-consistent simulations become available.
  • The same techniques that use neutrino timing to define gravitational-wave search windows could be extended to pre-supernova neutrino alerts, building a multi-day early-warning system that coordinates optical, X-ray, radio, and gravitational-wave facilities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review article surveys the role of neutrinos in explosive transients, focusing on core-collapse supernovae and neutron-star mergers and their associated multi-messenger emission. It covers the physics of thermal (MeV) neutrino production and detection, the status of neutrino flavor conversion in dense astrophysical environments, the diffuse supernova neutrino background, and the non-thermal (TeV-PeV) neutrino emission from jets, magnetar winds, and circumstellar shocks. The paper also discusses current and upcoming observational facilities, multi-messenger detection strategies, and the main open theoretical challenges, particularly the absence of self-consistent flavor conversion in (magneto)hydrodynamic simulations, which the author explicitly acknowledges in Sec. 4.

Significance. The review provides a timely and balanced synthesis of a fast-moving field, and its main value lies in its clear organization of known results and its concrete guidance for multi-messenger follow-up observations. The manuscript is careful in its hedging: it repeatedly flags uncertainties in supernova rates, neutrino transport, and flavor conversion, and it reports null detections (e.g., neutrinos from GW170817, IceCube GRB limits) accurately. Its central message, that neutrinos are both probes and active agents in explosive transients, is supported by the cited literature and is not internally inconsistent. The paper also gives a useful set of falsifiable expectations, such as the detectability of the DSNB with Super-Kamiokande with gadolinium and the representative neutrino fluences shown in Fig. 4. As a review, it makes no new derivational claim, so its soundness rests on the quality and completeness of the references, which are extensive and generally appropriate.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2.2.2, key-points bullet] The bullet stating that "electron neutrinos having a larger local number density than electron neutrinos in merger remnants" is self-contradictory; based on the surrounding text (Sec. 2.2.2), it should presumably read "electron antineutrinos" rather than "electron neutrinos" in the second occurrence.
  2. [Sec. 2.1.5] The abbreviation "DNSB" appears in the sentence "but such collapses would contribute to the DNSB"; this should be "DSNB" (diffuse supernova neutrino background).
  3. [Sec. 2.1.4] In the bullet on physics beyond the Standard Model, "before to draw any conclusions" should be "before drawing any conclusions."
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains the typo "uncertanties" for "uncertainties" in the phrase "allowing for uncertanties on the supernova rate."
  5. [Sec. 3.1.1] There is a missing space before the parenthesis in "circumstellar medium(gamma-ray emission should be expected as well)"; it should read "circumstellar medium (gamma-ray emission should be expected as well)."
  6. [Acknowledgements] The apology for incomplete coverage is understandable for a fast-moving field, but the review would benefit from stating an explicit literature cutoff date so readers know how current the synthesis is.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a review with no derivational claim; its self-citations are contextual and its central open issue is explicitly hedged, not hidden.

full rationale

This is a review article rather than a paper making a new testable prediction, so most circularity patterns do not apply. The few places where the author's own work is cited are contextual: the claim that neutrinos affect neutron-star merger remnants cites Ref. [10] (Foucart), the possibility that flavor conversion alters the explosion cites Refs. [11,12] (one of which is an independent paper by Nagakura), and the nucleosynthesis impact cites Refs. [13-15] with independent co-authors. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction; Fig. 4's fluence curves are explicitly described as 'for orientation since uncertainties ... can lead to changes by a few orders of magnitude.' The weakest point identified by the reader is exactly acknowledged in Sec. 4: 'neutrino flavor conversion is not taken into account in (magneto)hydrodynamic simulations of the source. Hence, the impact of the feedback of flavor conversion physics on the source and the nucleosynthesis is yet to be understood.' Similarly Sec. 2.1.2 states that the coupled quantum kinetic equations are 'not yet available.' Stating a field-level limitation is not circular reasoning. The review's central content is independently grounded in the broader literature (e.g., SN 1987A observations, IceCube and Super-Kamiokande results, GW170817), so any self-citation burden is minor and non-load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters and no new entities. It rests on standard supernova and merger physics from the cited literature. The axioms listed are the background assumptions whose failure would change the review's synthesis. The most consequential is the expectation that fast flavor conversion occurs in dense sources and can alter observables, since the paper repeatedly admits this is not yet implemented in hydrodynamic simulations.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The delayed neutrino-driven mechanism drives the majority of core-collapse supernova explosions.
    Adopted in Sec. 2.1.1 as the baseline for interpreting neutrino signals. The mechanism is widely supported but still incomplete, and the paper itself notes that magneto-rotational and other mechanisms exist.
  • domain assumption Fast pairwise neutrino flavor conversion can operate in dense neutrino sources when electron lepton number crossings exist.
    Underlies Sec. 2.1.2 and Sec. 2.2.2 arguments that flavor conversion affects explosion dynamics and nucleosynthesis. The paper states that the numerical solution coupled to hydrodynamics is not yet available.
  • standard math The diffuse supernova neutrino background is described by the redshift integral in Eq. (3) using a supernova rate R(z) and spectral emission F_nu(E).
    This is a standard cosmological integration formula. The review uses it to organize DSNB uncertainties rather than to derive a new result.
  • domain assumption Electron antineutrinos dominate over electron neutrinos in neutron-star merger remnants, enabling a matter-neutrino resonance.
    Used in Sec. 2.2.2 to argue for unique flavor conversion in merger remnants. The paper notes that recent work questions the reliability of this resonance once angular distributions are modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FT6T2OO6

@misc{pith2026241209699,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FT6T2OO6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09699}
}
read the original abstract

With the advent of time-domain astronomy and the game-changing next generation of telescopes, we have unprecedented opportunities to explore the most energetic events in our Universe through electromagnetic radiation, gravitational waves, and neutrinos. These are elementary particles, which exist in three different flavors and change the latter as they propagate in the dense core of astrophysical sources as well as en route to Earth. To capitalize on existing and upcoming multi-messenger opportunities, it is crucial to understand: 1. the role of neutrinos in explosive transient sources as well as in the synthesis of the elements heavier than iron; 2. the impact of neutrino physics on the multi-messenger observables; 3. the information on the source physics carried by the detectable neutrino signal. In this review, the status of this exciting and fast-moving field is outlined, focusing on astrophysical sources linked to collapsing massive stars and neutron-star mergers. In light of the upcoming plethora of multi-messenger data, outstanding open issues concerning the optimization of multi-messenger detection strategies are discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09699 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Antineutrino fluence from a supernova and a neutron-star merger (left panel) and cumulative flux of neutrinos from all supernovae in our Universe (right panel) . Left: Fluences of ν¯e (solid lines) and ν¯x (= ν¯µ or ν¯τ , dashed lines) from a core-collapse supernova (in blue) and a neutron-star merger remnant (in orange, multiplied by 4 for visual purposes), both located at 10 kpc from Earth. All curves have been ob… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Regions of flavor conversion of neutrinos in a core-collapse supernova (left panel) and a neutron-star merger remnant with outflows powering a kilonova and a gamma-ray burst (right panel). Left: Flavor conversion enhanced by the matter background (MSW resonances) and slow neutrino-neutrino conversion is expected to be relevant beyond the shock (cyan solid line). Flavor conversion mainly due to fast instabilities and… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sketch of the sites of non-thermal neutrino production in a collapsing massive star (left panel) and a neutron-star merger remnant (right panel). Left: Outflows launched during the core collapse and powered by a central source of heating, such as a magnetar (emerald green region). A jet can be harbored and eventually break out (aqua region), being observable as a gamma-ray burst. The supernova ejecta (light blue reg… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Muon neutrino and antineutrino fluences as functions of the neutrino energy expected for representative transients stemming from collapsing massive stars and neutron-star mergers (located ad different distances from Earth). The following curves are plotted: prompt emis…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Local-equilibrium theory of neutrino oscillations

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors generalize neutrino flavor-wave linear analysis to arbitrary mixing-equilibrium backgrounds and propose a kinetic-theory closure for turbulent flavor-wave viscosity.

  2. Interacting Supernovae: a Radio and X-ray Strategy to Constrain the Structure of the Circumstellar Medium

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The rise and decay shape of a supernova's radio light curve can diagnose the three-dimensional geometry of the surrounding circumstellar medium, and hourglass-shaped winds fit SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf.

  3. Quasi-steady flavor configuration of multi-energy neutrino ensembles

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Semi-analytic formulas for the quasi-steady flavor state of multi-energy neutrinos reproduce numerical kinetic-equation solutions to about 10-15% accuracy in homogeneous periodic boxes.

  4. Electron-neutrino lepton number crossings: Variations with the supernova core physics

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a suite of 12 supernova models, electron-neutrino lepton number crossings appear at larger radii when proto-neutron star convection is included and at smaller radii when muon production is included.

  5. Identifying Thorne-\.Zytkow Objects through Neutrinos

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neutrinos from hyperaccreting Thorne-Zytkow objects should be detectable by Super-Kamiokande, IceCube, JUNO, and Hyper-Kamiokande out to the Small Magellanic Cloud.

  6. Pauli blocking: probing beyond-mean-field effects in neutrino flavor evolution

    astro-ph.HE 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding heuristic Pauli-blocking factors to neutrino self-interactions shifts fast flavor stability regions: two instabilities weaken, and one stable case becomes unstable.

  7. Strong field gravitational lensing of particles by a black-bounce-Schwarzschild black hole

    gr-qc 2026-02 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    For a black-bounce-Schwarzschild black hole, the paper derives the strong-deflection lensing observables for massive particles and quantifies how they differ from photon lensing.

  8. Exploring the properties of newborn pulsars with high-energy neutrinos

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Neutrinos from newborn pulsar winds hitting supernova ejecta could be detected from a galactic source by IceCube if B/P^2 exceeds ~0.003, with parameter constraints and a detectable diffuse flux for next-generation te...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

203 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    & Raffelt, G

    Vitagliano, E., Tamborra, I. & Raffelt, G. G. Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 45006, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.045006 (2020). 1910.11878

    arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Aartsen, M. G. et al. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory: Instrumentation and Online Systems. JINST 12, P03012, DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/P03012 (2017). [Erratum: JINST 19, E05001 (2024)], 1612.05093

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Aartsen, M. G. et al. Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube- 170922A. Science 361, eaat1378, DOI: 10.1126/science.aat1378 (2018). 1807.08816

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Abbasi, R. et al. Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068. Science 378, 538–543, DOI: 10.1126/science.abg3395 (2022). 2211.09972

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Abbasi, R. et al. Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane. Science 380, adc9818, DOI: 10.1126/ science.adc9818 (2023). 2307.04427

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    & Chornock, R

    Margutti, R. & Chornock, R. First Multimessenger Observations of a Neutron Star Merger. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 155–202, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-030742 (2021). 2012.04810

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    & Andreoni, I

    Nicholl, M. & Andreoni, I. Electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational waves: review and lessons learned. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 383, 20240126, DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0126 (2025). 2410.18274

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Albert, A. et al. Search for High-energy Neutrinos from Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 with ANTARES, IceCube, and the Pierre Auger Observatory. Astrophys. J. Lett. 850, L35, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9aed (2017). 1710.05839

    arXiv 2017

Show all 203 references
  1. [9]

    Search for Neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande Associated with the GW170817 Neutron-star Merger

    Hayato, Y .et al. Search for Neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande Associated with the GW170817 Neutron-star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 857, L4, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aabaca (2018). 1802.04379

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Neutrinos in colliding neutron stars and black holes

    Foucart, F. Neutrinos in colliding neutron stars and black holes. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2410.03646, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv. 2410.03646 (2024). 2410.03646

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Ehring, J., Abbar, S., Janka, H.-T., Raffelt, G. G. & Tamborra, I. Fast Neutrino Flavor Conversions Can Help and Hinder Neutrino-Driven Explosions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 061401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.061401 (2023). 2305.11207

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Roles of Fast Neutrino-Flavor Conversion on the Neutrino-Heating Mechanism of Core-Collapse Supernova

    Nagakura, H. Roles of Fast Neutrino-Flavor Conversion on the Neutrino-Heating Mechanism of Core-Collapse Supernova. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 211401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.211401 (2023). 2301.10785

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    & Janka, H.-T

    Wu, M.-R., Tamborra, I., Just, O. & Janka, H.-T. Imprints of neutrino-pair flavor conversions on nucleosynthesis in ejecta from neutron-star merger remnants. Phys. Rev. D 96, 123015, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123015 (2017). 1711.00477

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Just, O. et al. Fast neutrino conversion in hydrodynamic simulations of neutrino-cooled accretion disks. Phys. Rev. D 105, 083024, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083024 (2022). 2203.16559

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    & Siegel, D

    Li, X. & Siegel, D. M. Neutrino Fast Flavor Conversions in Neutron-Star Postmerger Accretion Disks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 251101, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.251101 (2021). 2103.02616. 13/23

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A lanthanide-rich kilonova in the aftermath of a long gamma-ray burst

    Yang, Y .-H.et al. A lanthanide-rich kilonova in the aftermath of a long gamma-ray burst. Nature 626, 742–745, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06979-5 (2024). 2308.00638

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Sneppen, A. et al. Spherical symmetry in the kilonova AT2017gfo/GW170817. Nature 614, 436–439, DOI: 10.1038/ s41586-022-05616-x (2023). 2302.06621

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    High-energy neutrinos from the vicinity of the supermassive black hole in NGC 1068

    Padovani, P.et al. High-energy neutrinos from the vicinity of the supermassive black hole in NGC 1068. Nat. Astron. 8, 1077–1087, DOI: 10.1038/s41550-024-02339-z (2024). 2405.20146

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Drout, M. R. et al. Rapidly-Evolving and Luminous Transients from Pan-STARRS1. Astrophys. J. 794, 23, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/23 (2014). 1405.3668

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ho, A. Y . Q.et al. A Search for Extragalactic Fast Blue Optical Transients in ZTF and the Rate of AT2018cow-like Transients. Astrophys. J. 949, 120, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc533 (2023). 2105.08811

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    AT2018cow: IceCube neutrino search

    Blaufuss, E. AT2018cow: IceCube neutrino search. The Astron. Telegr. 11785, 1 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Fryer, C. L. & Woosley, S. E. Helium Star/Black Hole Mergers: A New Gamma-Ray Burst Model. Astrophys. J. Lett. 502, L9–L12, DOI: 10.1086/311493 (1998). astro-ph/9804167

    1998 arXiv

  15. [23]

    & Vigna-Gómez, A

    Martínez-Miravé, P., Tamborra, I. & Vigna-Gómez, A. Identifying Thorne– ˙Zytkow Objects through Neutrinos. Astrophys. J. Lett. 984, L2, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc8ab (2025). 2501.03330

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    DeMarchi, L., Sanders, J. R. & Levesque, E. M. Prospects for Multimessenger Observations of Thorne- ˙Zytkow Objects. Astrophys. J. 911, 101, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abebe1 (2021). 2103.03887

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Metzger, B. D. Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients and Type Ibn/Icn SNe from Wolf-Rayet/Black Hole Mergers. Astrophys. J. 932, 84, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6d59 (2022). 2203.04331

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    A Common Envelope Jets Supernova (CEJSN) Impostor Scenario for Fast Blue Optical Transients

    Soker, N. A Common Envelope Jets Supernova (CEJSN) Impostor Scenario for Fast Blue Optical Transients. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 22, 055010, DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac5b40 (2022). 2201.07728

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    & Mueller, B

    Janka, H.-T., Langanke, K., Marek, A., Martinez-Pinedo, G. & Mueller, B. Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae. Phys. Rept. 442, 38–74, DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.002 (2007). astro-ph/0612072

    2007 arXiv

  20. [28]

    & Vartanyan, D

    Burrows, A. & Vartanyan, D. Core-Collapse Supernova Explosion Theory. Nature 589, 29–39, DOI: 10.1038/ s41586-020-03059-w (2021). 2009.14157

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bethe, H. A. Supernova mechanisms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 801–866, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.801 (1990)

    1990 doi

  22. [30]

    M., Mezzacappa, A

    Blondin, J. M., Mezzacappa, A. & DeMarino, C. Stability of standing accretion shocks, with an eye toward core collapse supernovae. Astrophys. J. 584, 971–980, DOI: 10.1086/345812 (2003). astro-ph/0210634

    2003 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Tamborra, I. et al. Self-sustained asymmetry of lepton-number emission: A new phenomenon during the supernova shock-accretion phase in three dimensions. Astrophys. J. 792, 96, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/96 (2014). 1402.5418

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    R., Lyne, A

    Hobbs, G., Lorimer, D. R., Lyne, A. G. & Kramer, M. A Statistical study of 233 pulsar proper motions. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 360, 974–992, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09087.x (2005). astro-ph/0504584

    2005

  25. [33]

    & Kresse, D

    Janka, H.-T. & Kresse, D. Interplay between neutrino kicks and hydrodynamic kicks of neutron stars and black holes. Astrophys. Space Sci. 369, 80, DOI: 10.1007/s10509-024-04343-1 (2024). 2401.13817

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    & Coleman, M

    Burrows, A., Wang, T., Vartanyan, D. & Coleman, M. S. B. A Theory for Neutron Star and Black Hole Kicks and Induced Spins. Astrophys. J. 963, 63, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2353 (2024). 2311.12109

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Vigna-Gómez, A. et al. Constraints on Neutrino Natal Kicks from Black-Hole Binary VFTS 243. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 191403, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.191403 (2024). 2310.01509

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Supernova Simulations

    Müller, B. Supernova Simulations. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2403.18952, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.18952 (2024). 2403. 18952

    2024 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Mösta, P. et al. A large scale dynamo and magnetoturbulence in rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae. Nature 528, 376, DOI: 10.1038/nature15755 (2015). 1512.00838. 14/23

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    & Aloy, M.-A

    Obergaulinger, M. & Aloy, M.-A. Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progenitors. III. Three-dimensional models. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503, 4942–4963, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab295 (2021). 2008.07205

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Mirizzi, A. et al. Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39, 1–112, DOI: 10.1393/ncr/i2016-10120-8 (2016). 1508.00785

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    & Thompson, T

    Burrows, A., Reddy, S. & Thompson, T. A. Neutrino opacities in nuclear matter. Nucl. Phys. A 777, 356–394, DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.06.012 (2006). astro-ph/0404432

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Neutrino Reactions in Hot and Dense Matter

    Lohs, A. Neutrino Reactions in Hot and Dense Matter. Ph.D. thesis, Darmstadt, Tech. Hochsch. (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Smith, N., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V . & Chornock, R. Observed Fractions of Core-Collapse Supernova Types and Initial Masses of their Single and Binary Progenitor Stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 412, 1522, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2011.17229.x (2011). 1006.3899

    2011

  35. [43]

    & Heger, A

    Zha, S., Müller, B., Weir, A. & Heger, A. Light Curves of Type IIP Supernovae from Neutrino-driven Explosions of Red Supergiants Obtained by a Semianalytic Approach. Astrophys. J. 952, 155, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd845 (2023). 2301.00359

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    & Auchettl, K

    Sarmah, P., Chakraborty, S., Tamborra, I. & Auchettl, K. High energy particles from young supernovae: gamma-ray and neutrino connections. JCAP 08, 011, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/011 (2022). 2204.03663

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Szczepanczyk, M. et al. Detecting and reconstructing gravitational waves from the next galactic core-collapse supernova in the advanced detector era. Phys. Rev. D 104, 102002, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.102002 (2021). 2104.06462

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Salmaso, I. et al. The diversity of strongly interacting Type IIn supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 695, A29, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451764 (2025). 2410.06111

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Li, W. et al. Nearby Supernova Rates from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search. II. The Observed Luminosity Functions and Fractions of Supernovae in a Complete Sample. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 412, 1441, DOI: 10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2011.18160.x (2011). 1006.4612

    2011

  40. [48]

    Sollerman, J. et al. Maximum luminosities of normal stripped-envelope supernovae are brighter than explosion models allow. Astron. Astrophys. 657, A64, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142049 (2022). 2109.14339

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Prajs, S. et al. The volumetric rate of superluminous supernovae at z ∼ 1. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 464, 3568–3579, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1942 (2017). 1605.05250

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    The Most Luminous Supernovae

    Gal-Yam, A. The Most Luminous Supernovae. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57, 305–333, DOI: 10.1146/ annurev-astro-081817-051819 (2019). 1812.01428

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    & Franckowiak, A

    Pitik, T., Tamborra, I., Lincetto, M. & Franckowiak, A. Optically informed searches of high-energy neutrinos from interaction-powered supernovae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 524, 3366–3384, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2025 (2023). 2306.01833

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Abbott, R. et al. Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3. Phys. Rev. X 13, 011048, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 (2023). 2111.03634

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Drout, M. R. et al. Light Curves of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817/SSS17a: Implications for R-Process Nucleosyn- thesis. Science 358, 1570–1574, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaq0049 (2017). 1710.05443

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kimura, S. S. et al. Transejecta high-energy neutrino emission from binary neutron star mergers. Phys. Rev. D 98, 043020, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043020 (2018). 1805.11613

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    & Dietrich, T

    Zappa, F., Bernuzzi, S., Radice, D., Perego, A. & Dietrich, T. Gravitational-wave luminosity of binary neutron stars mergers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 111101, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.111101 (2018). 1712.04267

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Andreoni, I. et al. Fast-transient Searches in Real Time with ZTFReST: Identification of Three Optically Discovered Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and New Constraints on the Kilonova Rate. Astrophys. J. 918, 63, DOI: 10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac0bc7 (2021). 2104.06352

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Abbott, B. P. et al. Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c (2017). 1710.05834. 15/23

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    & Wu, X.-F

    Lan, G.-X., Zeng, H.-D., Wei, J.-J. & Wu, X.-F. The Luminosity Function and Formation Rate of A Complete Sample of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 488, 4607–4613, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2011 (2019). 1907.08342

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Pescalli, A. et al. The rate and luminosity function of long Gamma Ray Bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 587, A40, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526760 (2016). 1506.05463

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Kimura, S. S. Chapter 9: Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts. The Encycl. Cosmol. Chapter 9 433–482, DOI: 10.1142/ 9789811282645_0009 (2023). 2202.06480

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Gottlieb, O. et al. Jetted and Turbulent Stellar Deaths: New LVK-detectable Gravitational-wave Sources. Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L30, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace03a (2023). 2209.09256

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Zevin, M. et al. Observational Inference on the Delay Time Distribution of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 940, L18, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac91cd (2022). 2206.02814

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Ghirlanda, G. et al. Short gamma-ray bursts at the dawn of the gravitational wave era. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A84, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628993 (2016). 1607.07875

    2016 arXiv

  56. [64]

    & Winter, W

    Biehl, D., Heinze, J. & Winter, W. Expected neutrino fluence from short Gamma-Ray Burst 170817A and off-axis angle constraints. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476, 1191–1197, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty285 (2018). 1712.00449

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Coppejans, D. L. et al. A mildly relativistic outflow from the energetic, fast-rising blue optical transient CSS161010 in a dwarf galaxy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 895, L23, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8cc7 (2020). 2003.10503

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Search for Neutrinos from Populations of Optical Transients

    Stein, R. Search for Neutrinos from Populations of Optical Transients. PoS ICRC2019, 1016, DOI: 10.22323/1.358.1016 (2020). 1908.08547

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Garching core-collapse supernova archive, https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/ccsnarchive/

  60. [68]

    W., Hempel, M

    Steiner, A. W., Hempel, M. & Fischer, T. Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations. Astrophys. J. 774, 17, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/17 (2013). 1207.2184

    2013 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Kiuchi, K. et al. Self-Consistent Picture of the Mass Ejection from a One Second Long Binary Neutron Star Merger Leaving a Short-Lived Remnant in a General-Relativistic Neutrino-Radiation Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 011401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13...

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    M., Tamborra, I

    Møller, K., Suliga, A. M., Tamborra, I. & Denton, P. B. Measuring the supernova unknowns at the next-generation neutrino telescopes through the diffuse neutrino background. JCAP 05, 066, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/066 (2018). 1804.03157

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Review of Diffuse supernova Neutrino Background

    Harada, M. Talk “Review of Diffuse supernova Neutrino Background” at the XXXI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2024), Milano (Italy), June 16-22, 2024

    2024

  64. [72]

    Observational neutrino astrophysics

    Koshiba, M. Observational neutrino astrophysics. Phys. Rept. 220, 229–381, DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(92)90083-C (1992)

    1992 doi

  65. [73]

    Hirata, K. et al. Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1490–1493, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1490 (1987)

    1987 doi

  66. [74]

    Bionta, R. M. et al. Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1494, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1494 (1987)

    1987 doi

  67. [75]

    Fiorillo, D. F. G. et al. Supernova simulations confront SN 1987A neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D 108, 083040, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.083040 (2023). 2308.01403

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    & Raffelt, G

    Sigl, G. & Raffelt, G. G. General kinetic description of relativistic mixed neutrinos. Nucl. Phys. B 406, 423–451, DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90175-O (1993)

    1993 doi

  69. [77]

    M., Carlson, J

    Duan, H., Fuller, G. M., Carlson, J. & Qian, Y .-Z. Simulation of Coherent Non-Linear Neutrino Flavor Transformation in the Supernova Environment. 1. Correlated Neutrino Trajectories. Phys. Rev. D 74, 105014, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74. 105014 (2006). astro-ph/0606616. 16/23

    2006 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Izaguirre, I., Raffelt, G. G. & Tamborra, I. Fast Pairwise Conversion of Supernova Neutrinos: A Dispersion-Relation Approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021101, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.021101 (2017). 1610.01612

    2017 arXiv

  71. [79]

    & Raffelt, G

    Chakraborty, S., Hansen, R., Izaguirre, I. & Raffelt, G. G. Collective neutrino flavor conversion: Recent developments. Nucl. Phys. B 908, 366–381, DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.02.012 (2016). 1602.02766

    2016 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Glas, R. et al. Fast Neutrino Flavor Instability in the Neutron-star Convection Layer of Three-dimensional Supernova Models. Phys. Rev. D 101, 063001, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063001 (2020). 1912.00274

    2020

  73. [81]

    & Fuller, G

    Nagakura, H., Johns, L., Burrows, A. & Fuller, G. M. Where, when, and why: Occurrence of fast-pairwise collective neutrino oscillation in three-dimensional core-collapse supernova models. Phys. Rev. D 104, 083025, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.083025 (2021). 2108.07281

    2021 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Collisional Flavor Instabilities of Supernova Neutrinos

    Johns, L. Collisional Flavor Instabilities of Supernova Neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 191001, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.191001 (2023). 2104.11369

    2023 arXiv

  75. [83]

    & Tamborra, I

    Shalgar, S. & Tamborra, I. Do neutrinos become flavor unstable due to collisions with matter in the supernova decoupling region? Phys. Rev. D 109, 103011, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103011 (2024). 2307.10366

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    & Zaizen, M

    Nagakura, H. & Zaizen, M. Basic characteristics of neutrino flavor conversions in the postshock regions of core-collapse supernova. Phys. Rev. D 108, 123003, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123003 (2023). 2308.14800

    2023 arXiv

  77. [85]

    & Tamborra, I

    Shalgar, S. & Tamborra, I. A change of direction in pairwise neutrino conversion physics: The effect of collisions. Phys. Rev. D 103, 063002, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063002 (2021). 2011.00004

    2021 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Xiong, Z. et al. Fast neutrino flavor conversions in a supernova: Emergence, evolution, and effects. Phys. Rev. D 109, 123008, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123008 (2024). 2402.19252

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    & Kneller, J

    Horiuchi, S. & Kneller, J. P. What can be learned from a future supernova neutrino detection? J. Phys. G 45, 043002, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/aaa90a (2018). 1709.01515

    2018 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Fischer, T. et al. Neutrinos and nucleosynthesis of elements. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 137, 104107, DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp. 2024.104107 (2024). 2308.03962

    2024

  81. [89]

    & Shalgar, S

    Tamborra, I. & Shalgar, S. New Developments in Flavor Evolution of a Dense Neutrino Gas. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 165–188, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102920-050505 (2021). 2011.01948

    2021 arXiv

  82. [90]

    T., Melson, T

    Janka, H. T., Melson, T. & Summa, A. Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae in Three Dimensions: a Sneak Preview. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66, 341–375, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044747 (2016). 1602.05576

    2016 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Mezzacappa, A., Endeve, E., Bronson Messer, O. E. & Bruenn, S. W. Physical, numerical, and computational challenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae. Liv. Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 6, 4, DOI: 10.1007/s41115-020-00010-8 (2020). 2010.09013

    2020 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Dasgupta, B., O’Connor, E. P. & Ott, C. D. The Role of Collective Neutrino Flavor Oscillations in Core-Collapse Supernova Shock Revival. Phys. Rev. D 85, 065008, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.065008 (2012). 1106.1167

    2012 arXiv

  85. [93]

    & Tamborra, I

    Shalgar, S. & Tamborra, I. Neutrino decoupling is altered by flavor conversion. Phys. Rev. D 108, 043006, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043006 (2023). 2206.00676

    2023 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Performance of SK-Gd’s Upgraded Real-time Supernova Monitoring System

    Kashiwagi, Y .et al. Performance of SK-Gd’s Upgraded Real-time Supernova Monitoring System. Astrophys. J. 970, 93, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d8e (2024). 2403.06760

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Abbasi, R. et al. IceCube Sensitivity for Low-Energy Neutrinos from Nearby Supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 535, A109, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117810e (2011). [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 563, C1 (2014)], 1108.0171

    2011 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Supernova Signatures of Neutrino Mass Ordering

    Scholberg, K. Supernova Signatures of Neutrino Mass Ordering. J. Phys. G 45, 014002, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa97be (2018). 1707.06384

    2018 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Al Kharusi, S. et al. SNEWS 2.0: a next-generation supernova early warning system for multi-messenger astronomy. New J. Phys. 23, 031201, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/abde33 (2021). 2011.00035. 17/23

    2021 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Abe, S. et al. Combined Pre-supernova Alert System with KamLAND and Super-Kamiokande. Astrophys. J. 973, 140, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5fee (2024). 2404.09920

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Realtime Follow-up of External Alerts with the IceCube Supernova Data Acquisition System

    Valtonen-Mattila, N. Realtime Follow-up of External Alerts with the IceCube Supernova Data Acquisition System. PoS TAUP2023, 236, DOI: 10.22323/1.441.0236 (2024). 2311.10398

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report

    Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-Collaboration et al. Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1805.04163, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1805.04163 (2018). 1805.04163

    2018 doi arXiv

  93. [101]

    Abusleme, A. et al. Real-time monitoring for the next core-collapse supernova in JUNO. JCAP 01, 057, DOI: 10.1088/ 1475-7516/2024/01/057 (2024). 2309.07109

    2024

  94. [102]

    Abi, B. et al. Supernova neutrino burst detection with the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 423, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09166-w (2021). 2008.06647

    2021

  95. [103]

    F., McCabe, C., Reichard, S., Selvi, M

    Lang, R. F., McCabe, C., Reichard, S., Selvi, M. & Tamborra, I. Supernova neutrino physics with xenon dark matter detectors: A timely perspective. Phys. Rev. D 94, 103009, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.103009 (2016). 1606.09243

    2016 arXiv

  96. [104]

    & Tamborra, I

    Pattavina, L., Ferreiro Iachellini, N. & Tamborra, I. Neutrino observatory based on archaeological lead. Phys. Rev. D 102, 063001, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063001 (2020). 2004.06936

    2020 arXiv

  97. [105]

    & Katz, B

    Waxman, E. & Katz, B. Shock Breakout Theory. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.)Handbook of Supernovae, 967, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_33 (2017)

    2017 doi

  98. [106]

    Nakamura, K. et al. Multimessenger signals of long-term core-collapse supernova simulations: synergetic observation strategies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 461, 3296–3313, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1453 (2016). 1602.03028

    2016 arXiv

  99. [107]

    & Torres-Forné, A

    Drago, M., Andresen, H., Di Palma, I., Tamborra, I. & Torres-Forné, A. Multimessenger observations of core-collapse supernovae: Exploiting the standing accretion shock instability. Phys. Rev. D 108, 103036, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108. 103036 (2023). 2305.07688

    2023 arXiv

  100. [108]

    M., Lunardini, C., Farmer, R

    Patton, K. M., Lunardini, C., Farmer, R. J. & Timmes, F. X. Neutrinos from beta processes in a presupernova: probing the isotopic evolution of a massive star. Astrophys. J. 851, 6, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa95c4 (2017). 1709.01877

    2017 arXiv

  101. [109]

    X., Taylor, M., Patton, K

    Farag, E., Timmes, F. X., Taylor, M., Patton, K. M. & Farmer, R. On Stellar Evolution In A Neutrino Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. Astrophys. J. 893, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7f2c (2020). [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 965, (2024)], 2003.05844

    2020 arXiv

  102. [110]

    & Ott, C

    O’Connor, E. & Ott, C. D. Black Hole Formation in Failing Core-Collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 730, 70, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/70 (2011). 1010.5550

    2011 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Neustadt, J. M. M. et al. The search for failed supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: a new candidate and the failed SN fraction with 11 yr of data. Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 508, 516–528, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2605 (2021). 2104.03318

    2021 arXiv

  104. [112]

    & Raffelt, G

    Tamborra, I., Hanke, F., Müller, B., Janka, H.-T. & Raffelt, G. G. Neutrino signature of supernova hydrodynamical instabilities in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 121104, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.121104 (2013). 1307. 7936

    2013 doi

  105. [113]

    & Summa, A

    Walk, L., Tamborra, I., Janka, H.-T. & Summa, A. Identifying rotation in SASI-dominated core-collapse supernovae with a neutrino gyroscope. Phys. Rev. D 98, 123001, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123001 (2018). 1807.02366

    2018 arXiv

  106. [114]

    & Kotake, K

    Takiwaki, T. & Kotake, K. Anisotropic emission of neutrino and gravitational-wave signals from rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 475, L91–L95, DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly008 (2018). 1711.01905

    2018 arXiv

  107. [115]

    & V olpe, M

    Gallo Rosso, A., Abbar, S., Vissani, F. & V olpe, M. C. Late time supernova neutrino signal and proto-neutron star radius. JCAP 12, 006, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/006 (2018). 1809.09074

    2018 arXiv

  108. [116]

    W., Roberts, L

    Li, S. W., Roberts, L. F. & Beacom, J. F. Exciting Prospects for Detecting Late-Time Neutrinos from Core-Collapse Supernovae. Phys. Rev. D 103, 023016, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.023016 (2021). 2008.04340

    2021 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Snowmass Neutrino Frontier Report

    Huber, P.et al. Snowmass Neutrino Frontier Report. In Snowmass 2021 (2022). 2211.08641. 18/23

    2022 arXiv

  110. [118]

    & Tamborra, I

    MacDonald, M., Martínez-Miravé, P. & Tamborra, I. The Unknowns of the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background Hinder New Physics Searches. JCAP 2025, 062, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/062 (2025). 2409.16367

    2025 arXiv

  111. [119]

    & Koshio, Y

    Ando, S., Ekanger, N., Horiuchi, S. & Koshio, Y . Diffuse neutrino background from past core collapse supernovae. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 99, 460–479, DOI: 10.2183/pjab.99.026 (2023). 2306.16076

    2023

  112. [120]

    & Reitz, S

    Ekanger, N., Horiuchi, S., Nagakura, H. & Reitz, S. Diffuse supernova neutrino background with up-to-date star formation rate measurements and long-term multidimensional supernova simulations. Phys. Rev. D 109, 023024, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023024 (2024). 2310.15254

    2024 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Ziegler, J. J. et al. Non-universal stellar initial mass functions: large uncertainties in star formation rates at z ≈ 2–4 and other astrophysical probes. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517, 2471–2484, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2748 (2022). 2205.07845

    2022 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Diffuse neutrino flux from failed supernovae

    Lunardini, C. Diffuse neutrino flux from failed supernovae. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 231101, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 102.231101 (2009). 0901.0568

    2009 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Martínez-Miravé, P., Tamborra, I., Aloy, M. A. & Obergaulinger, M. Diffuse neutrino background from magnetorotational stellar core collapses. Phys. Rev. D 110, 103029, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103029 (2024). 2409.09126

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    & Tsujimoto, T

    Ashida, Y ., Nakazato, K. & Tsujimoto, T. Diffuse Neutrino Flux Based on the Rates of Core-collapse Supernovae and Black Hole Formation Deduced from a Novel Galactic Chemical Evolution Model. Astrophys. J. 953, 151, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace3ba (2023). 2305.13543

    2023 arXiv

  117. [125]

    & Kotake, K

    Horiuchi, S., Kinugawa, T., Takiwaki, T., Takahashi, K. & Kotake, K. Impact of binary interactions on the diffuse supernova neutrino background. Phys. Rev. D 103, 043003, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043003 (2021). 2012.08524

    2021 arXiv

  118. [126]

    & Janka, H.-T

    Kresse, D., Ertl, T. & Janka, H.-T. Stellar Collapse Diversity and the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background. Astrophys. J. 909, 169, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd54e (2021). 2010.04728

    2021 arXiv

  119. [127]

    & Tamborra, I

    Lunardini, C. & Tamborra, I. Diffuse supernova neutrinos: oscillation effects, stellar cooling and progenitor mass dependence. JCAP 07, 012, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/012 (2012). 1205.6292

    2012 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Lien, A., Fields, B. D. & Beacom, J. F. Synoptic Sky Surveys and the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background: Removing Astrophysical Uncertainties and Revealing Invisible Supernovae. Phys. Rev. D 81, 083001, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81. 083001 (2010). 1001.3678

    2010 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Harada, M. et al. Search for Astrophysical Electron Antineutrinos in Super-Kamiokande with 0.01% Gadolinium-loaded Water. Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L27, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdc9e (2023). 2305.05135

    2023 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Abusleme, A. et al. Prospects for detecting the diffuse supernova neutrino background with JUNO. JCAP 10, 033, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/033 (2022). 2205.08830

    2022

  123. [131]

    M., Beacom, J

    Suliga, A. M., Beacom, J. F. & Tamborra, I. Towards probing the diffuse supernova neutrino background in all flavors. Phys. Rev. D 105, 043008, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043008 (2022). 2112.09168

    2022 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Metzger, B. D. Kilonovae. Living Rev. Rel. 23, 1, DOI: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0 (2020). 1910.01617

    2020 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Foucart, F. et al. Robustness of neutron star merger simulations to changes in neutrino transport and neutrino-matter interactions. Phys. Rev. D 110, 083028, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083028 (2024). 2407.15989

    2024 arXiv

  126. [134]

    & Sekiguchi, Y

    Kiuchi, K., Reboul-Salze, A., Shibata, M. & Sekiguchi, Y . A large-scale magnetic field produced by a solar-like dynamo in binary neutron star mergers. Nat. Astron. 8, 298–307, DOI: 10.1038/s41550-024-02194-y (2024). 2306.15721

    2024 arXiv

  127. [135]

    & Bauswein, A

    Janka, H.-T. & Bauswein, A. Dynamics and Equation of State Dependencies of Relevance for Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae and Neutron Star Mergers. Handbook of Nuclear Physics 1–98, DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_93-1 (2023). 2212.07498

    2023 arXiv

  128. [136]

    W., Shapiro, S

    Baumgarte, T. W., Shapiro, S. L. & Shibata, M. On the maximum mass of differentially rotating neutron stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 528, L29, DOI: 10.1086/312425 (2000). astro-ph/9910565

    2000 arXiv

  129. [137]

    B., Shapiro, S

    Cook, G. B., Shapiro, S. L. & Teukolsky, S. A. Spin-up of a Rapidly Rotating Star by Angular Momentum Loss: Effects of General Relativity. Astrophys. J. 398, 203, DOI: 10.1086/171849 (1992). 19/23

    1992 doi

  130. [138]

    & Hotokezaka, K

    Shibata, M. & Hotokezaka, K. Merger and Mass Ejection of Neutron-Star Binaries. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 41–64, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023625 (2019). 1908.02350

    2019 arXiv

  131. [139]

    & Metzger, B

    Fernández, R. & Metzger, B. D. Delayed outflows from black hole accretion tori following neutron star binary coalescence. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 435, 502, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1312 (2013). 1304.6720

    2013 arXiv

  132. [140]

    & Schramm, D

    Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T. & Schramm, D. N. Nucleosynthesis, Neutrino Bursts and Gamma-Rays from Coalescing Neutron Stars. Nature 340, 126–128, DOI: 10.1038/340126a0 (1989)

    1989 doi

  133. [141]

    Rastinejad, J. C. et al. A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc. Nature 612, 223–227, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05390-w (2022). 2204.10864

    2022 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Gottlieb, O. et al. A Unified Picture of Short and Long Gamma-Ray Bursts from Compact Binary Mergers. Astrophys. J. Lett. 958, L33, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad096e (2023). 2309.00038

    2023 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Chi-Kit Cheong, P., Pitik, T., Longo Micchi, L. F. & Radice, D. Gamma-Ray Bursts and Kilonovae from the Accretion- induced Collapse of White Dwarfs. Astrophys. J. Lett. 978, L38, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada1cc (2025). 2410.10938

    2025 arXiv

  136. [144]

    & Kashiyama, K

    Kyutoku, K. & Kashiyama, K. Detectability of thermal neutrinos from binary-neutron-star mergers and implication to neutrino physics. Phys. Rev. D 97, 103001, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103001 (2018). 1710.05922

    2018 arXiv

  137. [145]

    P., McLaughlin, G

    Malkus, A., Kneller, J. P., McLaughlin, G. C. & Surman, R. Neutrino oscillations above black hole accretion disks: disks with electron-flavor emission. Phys. Rev. D 86, 085015, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.085015 (2012). 1207.6648

    2012 arXiv

  138. [146]

    & Tamborra, I

    Padilla-Gay, I., Shalgar, S. & Tamborra, I. Symmetry breaking due to multi-angle matter-neutrino resonance in neutron star merger remnants. JCAP 05, 037, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/037 (2024). 2403.15532

    2024 arXiv

  139. [147]

    & Fahlman, S

    Fernández, R., Richers, S., Mulyk, N. & Fahlman, S. Fast flavor instability in hypermassive neutron star disk outflows. Phys. Rev. D 106, 103003, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103003 (2022). 2207.10680

    2022 arXiv

  140. [148]

    The key role of magnetic fields in binary neutron star mergers

    Ciolfi, R. The key role of magnetic fields in binary neutron star mergers. Gen. Rel. Grav. 52, 59, DOI: 10.1007/ s10714-020-02714-x (2020). 2003.07572

    2020 arXiv

  141. [149]

    & Shibata, M

    Hayashi, K., Kiuchi, K., Kyutoku, K., Sekiguchi, Y . & Shibata, M. General-relativistic neutrino-radiation magnetohydro- dynamics simulation of seconds-long black hole-neutron star mergers: Dependence on the initial magnetic field strength, configuration, and neutron-star equa...

    2023 arXiv

  142. [150]

    & Broekgaarden, F

    Mandel, I. & Broekgaarden, F. S. Rates of compact object coalescences. Living Rev. Rel. 25, 1, DOI: 10.1007/ s41114-021-00034-3 (2022). 2107.14239

    2022 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Schilbach, T. S. H., Caballero, O. L. & McLaughlin, G. C. Black Hole Accretion Disk Diffuse Neutrino Background. Phys. Rev. D 100, 043008, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043008 (2019). 1808.03627

    2019 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Abbasi, R. et al. IceCat-1: The IceCube Event Catalog of Alert Tracks. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 269, 25, DOI: 10.3847/ 1538-4365/acfa95 (2023). 2304.01174

    2023

  145. [153]

    Abbasi, R. et al. Time-Integrated Southern-Sky Neutrino Source Searches with 10 Years of IceCube Starting-Track Events at Energies Down to 1 TeV. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2501.16440, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.16440 (2025). 2501.16440

    2025 doi

  146. [154]

    & Ramirez-Ruiz, E

    Guarini, E., Tamborra, I., Margutti, R. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. Transients stemming from collapsing massive stars: The missing pieces to advance joint observations of photons and high-energy neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D 108, 083035, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.083035 (2023). 2308.03840

    2023 arXiv

  147. [155]

    D., Vurm, I., Aydi, E

    Fang, K., Metzger, B. D., Vurm, I., Aydi, E. & Chomiuk, L. High-energy Neutrinos and Gamma Rays from Nonrelativistic Shock-powered Transients. Astrophys. J. 904, 4, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbc6e (2020). 2007.15742

    2020 arXiv

  148. [156]

    R., Aharonian, F

    Kelner, S. R., Aharonian, F. A. & Bugayov, V . V . Energy spectra of gamma-rays, electrons and neutrinos produced at proton-proton interactions in the very high energy regime. Phys. Rev. D 74, 034018, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034018 (2006). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 039901 (200...

    2006 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Kelner, S. R. & Aharonian, F. A. Energy spectra of gamma-rays, electrons and neutrinos produced at interactions of relativistic protons with low energy radiation. Phys. Rev. D 78, 034013, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.099901 (2008). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 82, 099901 (2010)], 0803.0688

    2008 arXiv

  150. [158]

    A., Lacki, B

    Murase, K., Thompson, T. A., Lacki, B. C. & Beacom, J. F. New Class of High-Energy Transients from Crashes of Supernova Ejecta with Massive Circumstellar Material Shells. Phys. Rev. D 84, 043003, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84. 043003 (2011). 1012.2834

    2011 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Abbasi, R. et al. Constraining High-energy Neutrino Emission from Supernovae with IceCube. Astrophys. J. Lett. 949, L12, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd2c9 (2023). 2303.03316

    2023

  152. [160]

    & Petropoulou, M

    Pitik, T., Tamborra, I. & Petropoulou, M. Neutrino signal dependence on gamma-ray burst emission mechanism. JCAP 05, 034, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/034 (2021). 2102.02223

    2021 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Pitik, T., Tamborra, I., Angus, C. R. & Auchettl, K. Is the High-energy Neutrino Event IceCube-200530A Associated with a Hydrogen-rich Superluminous Supernova? Astrophys. J. 929, 163, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5ab1 (2022). 2110.06944

    2022 arXiv

  154. [162]

    & Margutti, R

    Guarini, E., Tamborra, I. & Margutti, R. Neutrino Emission from Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients. Astrophys. J. 935, 157, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7fa0 (2022). 2205.12282

    2022 arXiv

  155. [163]

    & Gal-Yam, A

    Waxman, E., Wasserman, T., Ofek, E. & Gal-Yam, A. Shock Breakouts from Compact Circumstellar Medium Surrounding Core-collapse Supernova Progenitors May Contribute Significantly to the Observed ≳10 TeV Neutrino Background. Astrophys. J. 978, 133, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a6b (...

    2025 arXiv

  156. [164]

    D., Murase, K., Bartos, I

    Fang, K., Metzger, B. D., Murase, K., Bartos, I. & Kotera, K. Multimessenger Implications of AT2018cow: High-energy Cosmic-Ray and Neutrino Emissions from Magnetar-powered Superluminous Transients. Astrophys. J. 878, 34, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b72 (2019). 1812.11673

    2019 arXiv

  157. [165]

    & Globus, N

    Gottlieb, O. & Globus, N. The Role of Jet–Cocoon Mixing, Magnetization, and Shock Breakout in Neutrino and Cosmic-Ray Emission from Short Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L4, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac05c5 (2021). 2105.01076

    2021 arXiv

  158. [166]

    & Gottlieb, O

    Guarini, E., Tamborra, I. & Gottlieb, O. State-of-the-art collapsar jet simulations imply undetectable subphotospheric neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D 107, 023001, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023001 (2023). 2210.03757

    2023 arXiv

  159. [167]

    & Gottlieb, O

    Rudolph, A., Tamborra, I. & Gottlieb, O. Subphotospheric Emission from Short Gamma-Ray Bursts: Protons Mold the Multimessenger Signals. Astrophys. J. Lett. 961, L7, DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1525 (2024). 2309.08667

    2024 arXiv

  160. [168]

    & Mészáros, P

    Horiuchi, S., Murase, K., Ioka, K. & Mészáros, P. The survival of nuclei in jets associated with core-collapse supernovae and gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 753, 69, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/69 (2012). 1203.0296

    2012 arXiv

  161. [169]

    & Tamborra, I

    De Lia, V . & Tamborra, I. High energy neutrino production in gamma-ray bursts: dependence of the neutrino signal on the jet composition. JCAP 10, 054, DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/054 (2024). 2406.14975

    2024 arXiv

  162. [170]

    & Winter, W

    Biehl, D., Boncioli, D., Fedynitch, A. & Winter, W. Cosmic-Ray and Neutrino Emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts with a Nuclear Cascade. Astron. Astrophys. 611, A101, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731337 (2018). 1705.08909

    2018 arXiv

  163. [171]

    Abbasi, R. et al. Search for 10–1000 GeV Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts with IceCube. Astrophys. J. 964, 126, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad220b (2024). 2312.11515

    2024

  164. [172]

    Ho, A. Y . Q.et al. Minutes-duration optical flares with supernova luminosities. Nature 623, 927–931, DOI: 10.1038/ s41586-023-06673-6 (2023). 2311.10195

    2023

  165. [173]

    G., Wen, S

    Cao, Z., Jonker, P. G., Wen, S. & Zabludoff, A. I. Slim-disk modeling reveals an accreting intermediate-mass black hole in the luminous fast blue optical transient AT2018cow. Astron. Astrophys. 691, A228, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451297 (2024). 2409.17695

    2024 arXiv

  166. [174]

    & Margutti, R

    Gottlieb, O., Tchekhovskoy, A. & Margutti, R. Shocked jets in CCSNe can power the zoo of fast blue optical transients. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 513, 3810–3817, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac910 (2022). 2201.04636. 21/23

    2022 arXiv

  167. [175]

    & Metzger, B

    Fang, K. & Metzger, B. D. High-Energy Neutrinos from Millisecond Magnetars formed from the Merger of Binary Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. 849, 153, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b6a (2017). 1707.04263

    2017 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Mukhopadhyay, M., Kimura, S. S. & Metzger, B. D. High-energy neutrino signatures from pulsar remnants of binary neutron-star mergers: coincident detection prospects with gravitational waves. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2407.04767, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04767 (2024). 2407.04767

    2024 doi arXiv

  169. [177]

    & Wu, M.-R

    Guo, G., Qian, Y .-Z. & Wu, M.-R. Effects of annihilation with low-energy neutrinos on high-energy neutrinos from binary neutron star mergers and rare core-collapse supernovae. Phys. Rev. D 109, 083020, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083020 (2024). 2310.05137

    2024 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Hambleton, K. M. et al. Rubin Observatory LSST Transients and Variable Stars Roadmap. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 135, 105002, DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/acdb9a (2023). 2208.04499

    2023 arXiv

  171. [179]

    ULTRASAT: A Wide-field Time-domain UV Space Telescope

    Shvartzvald, Y .et al. ULTRASAT: A Wide-field Time-domain UV Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 964, 74, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2704 (2024). 2304.14482

    2024 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Cosmology with the High Latitude Survey

    Doré, O. et al. WFIRST Science Investigation Team “Cosmology with the High Latitude Survey” Annual Report 2017. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1804.03628, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1804.03628 (2018). 1804.03628

    2018 doi arXiv

  173. [181]

    Actis, M. et al. Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: An advanced facility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astronomy. Exper. Astron. 32, 193–316, DOI: 10.1007/s10686-011-9247-0 (2011). 1008.3703

    2011 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Dekany, R. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: Observing System. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 132, 038001, DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab4ca2 (2020). 2008.04923

    2020

  175. [183]

    Chambers, K. C. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1612.05560, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560 (2016). 1612.05560

    2016 doi arXiv

  176. [184]

    Roming, P. W. A. et al. The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 95–142, DOI: 10.1007/ s11214-005-5095-4 (2005). astro-ph/0507413

    2005 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Levan, A. J. et al. Heavy-element production in a compact object merger observed by JWST. Nature 626, 737–741, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1 (2024). 2307.02098

    2024 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Evans, M. et al. Cosmic Explorer: A Submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW Subcommittee. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2306.13745, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.13745 (2023). 2306.13745

    2023 doi arXiv

  179. [187]

    Einstein Telescope: Science and technology

    Badaracco, F. Einstein Telescope: Science and technology. Nuovo Cim. C 47, 66, DOI: 10.1393/ncc/i2024-24066-3 (2024)

    2024 doi

  180. [188]

    Abbott, B. P. et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA. Living Rev. Rel. 19, 1, DOI: 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 (2016). 1304.0670

    2016 arXiv

  181. [189]

    & Santander, M

    Kurahashi, N., Murase, K. & Santander, M. High-Energy Extragalactic Neutrino Astrophysics. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 365, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-011122-061547 (2022). 2203.11936

    2022 arXiv

  182. [190]

    Aiello, S. et al. Astronomy potential of KM3NeT/ARCA. Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 885, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-024-13137-2 (2024). 2402.08363

    2024 arXiv

  183. [191]

    Aartsen, M. G. et al. IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe. J. Phys. G 48, 060501, DOI: 10.1088/ 1361-6471/abbd48 (2021). 2008.04323

    2021

  184. [192]

    Álvarez-Muñiz, J. et al. The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND): Science and Design. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 219501, DOI: 10.1007/s11433-018-9385-7 (2020). 1810.09994

    2020 arXiv

  185. [193]

    Agostini, M. et al. The Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment. Nat. Astron. 4, 913–915, DOI: 10.1038/s41550-020-1182-4 (2020). 2005.09493

    2020 arXiv

  186. [194]

    & Oikonomou, F

    Guépin, C., Kotera, K. & Oikonomou, F. High-energy neutrino transients and the future of multi-messenger astronomy. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 697–712, DOI: 10.1038/s42254-022-00504-9 (2022). 2207.12205. 22/23

    2022 arXiv

  187. [195]

    Abbasi, R. et al. Follow-up of Astrophysical Transients in Real Time with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory.Astrophys. J. 910, 4, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe123 (2021). 2012.04577

    2021

  188. [196]

    Stein, R. et al. Neutrino follow-up with the Zwicky Transient Facility: Results from the first 24 campaigns. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521, 4, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad767 (2023). 2203.17135

    2023 arXiv

  189. [197]

    Kankare, E. et al. Search for transient optical counterparts to high-energy IceCube neutrinos with Pan-STARRS1. Astron. Astrophys. 626, A117, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935171 (2019). 1901.11080

    2019

  190. [198]

    Necker, J. et al. ASAS-SN follow-up of IceCube high-energy neutrino alerts. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 516, 2455– 2469, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2261 (2022). 2204.00500

    2022 arXiv

  191. [199]

    Morgan, R. et al. A DECam Search for Explosive Optical Transients Associated with IceCube Neutrinos. Astrophys. J. 883, 125, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a45 (2019). 1907.07193

    2019 arXiv

  192. [200]

    Acciari, V . A.et al. Searching for VHE gamma-ray emission associated with IceCube neutrino alerts using FACT, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS. PoS ICRC2021, 960, DOI: 10.22323/1.395.0960 (2021). 2109.04350

    2021 arXiv

  193. [201]

    Garrappa, S. et al. Fermi-LAT realtime follow-ups of high-energy neutrino alerts. PoS ICRC2021, 956, DOI: 10.22323/1. 395.0956 (2021). 2112.11586

    2021 arXiv

  194. [202]

    Baxter, A. L. et al. Collaborative Experience between Scientific Software Projects using Agile Scrum Development. Softw. Pract. Exper. 52, 2077–2096, DOI: 10.1002/spe.3120 (2022). 2101.07779

    2022 arXiv

  195. [203]

    Smale, A. et al. Time-domain Astronomy Coordination Hub (TACH). In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #235, vol. 235 ofAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 107.15 (2020). 23/23

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.