Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evade ChatGPT Detectors via A Single Space

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.02599 v2 pith:FXF2GB2S submitted 2023-07-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords detectorschatgptai-generateddetectiongapstextassumptionchallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

ChatGPT brings revolutionary social value but also raises concerns about the misuse of AI-generated text. Consequently, an important question is how to detect whether texts are generated by ChatGPT or by human. Existing detectors are built upon the assumption that there are distributional gaps between human-generated and AI-generated text. These gaps are typically identified using statistical information or classifiers. Our research challenges the distributional gap assumption in detectors. We find that detectors do not effectively discriminate the semantic and stylistic gaps between human-generated and AI-generated text. Instead, the "subtle differences", such as an extra space, become crucial for detection. Based on this discovery, we propose the SpaceInfi strategy to evade detection. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this strategy across multiple benchmarks and detectors. We also provide a theoretical explanation for why SpaceInfi is successful in evading perplexity-based detection. And we empirically show that a phenomenon called token mutation causes the evasion for language model-based detectors. Our findings offer new insights and challenges for understanding and constructing more applicable ChatGPT detectors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors Retain Stylistic Fingerprints

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A style-aware paraphrasing attack evades all nine tested AI-text detectors at the single-document level, but multi-document analysis makes the attack detectable again.

  2. GenAI Content Detection Task 3: Cross-Domain Machine-Generated Text Detection Challenge

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Top detectors in the shared task achieved above 99% true positive rate at 5% false positive rate on the RAID benchmark when all domains and models were seen during training.

Pith tools