REVIEW 3 cited by
SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHF
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Model alignment with human preferences is an essential step in making Large Language Models (LLMs) helpful and consistent with human values. It typically consists of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) stages. However, RLHF faces inherent limitations stemming from a complex training setup and its tendency to align the model with implicit values that end users cannot control at run-time. Moreover, reward models in RLHF stage commonly rely on single-dimensional feedback as opposed to explicit, multifaceted signals that indicate attributes such as helpfulness, humor, and toxicity. To address these limitations, we propose SteerLM, a supervised fine-tuning method that empowers end-users to control responses during inference. SteerLM conditions responses to conform to an explicitly defined multi-dimensional set of attributes, thereby empowering a steerable AI capable of generating helpful and high-quality responses while maintaining customizability. Experiments show that SteerLM trained on open source datasets generates responses that are preferred by human and automatic evaluators to many state-of-the-art baselines trained with RLHF while being much easier to train. Try SteerLM at https://huggingface.co/nvidia/SteerLM-llama2-13B
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Step-Level Preference Learning for Generative Agents in Social Simulations
Step-level human preference data collected via SimPref, then SFT+DPO, improves long-horizon social-simulation behavior of open-weight LLM agents on held-out events.
-
AI Alignment at Your Discretion
The paper formalizes alignment discretion and shows empirically that annotators and models exercise substantial, often arbitrary, and mutually divergent discretion when applying alignment principles.
-
CALMA: A Process for Deriving Context-aligned Axes for Language Model Alignment
CALMA is a grounded-theory, participatory method for deriving community-specific language model alignment axes from open-ended user interactions and group discussion, piloted with two small groups.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.