Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Transfer Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.13628 v1 pith:G24YWQ35 submitted 2019-05-31 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Transfer Learning

classification cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML
keywords seriestimeanomalydetectiondatalearningnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series anomaly detection plays a critical role in automated monitoring systems. Most previous deep learning efforts related to time series anomaly detection were based on recurrent neural networks (RNN). In this paper, we propose a time series segmentation approach based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) for anomaly detection. Moreover, we propose a transfer learning framework that pretrains a model on a large-scale synthetic univariate time series data set and then fine-tunes its weights on small-scale, univariate or multivariate data sets with previously unseen classes of anomalies. For the multivariate case, we introduce a novel network architecture. The approach was tested on multiple synthetic and real data sets successfully.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MBDiff: Multi-view Behavior-aware Diffusion Model for Probabilistic Utility Data Imputation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A multi-view behavior-aware conditional diffusion model for imputing missing utility-meter data is claimed to beat ten baselines on a Florida utility dataset, though the paper's own tables conflict with parts of the claim.