Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Organ-Agents: Virtual Human Physiology Simulator via LLMs

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A team of LLM-driven organ agents claims to simulate sepsis patients' physiology across nine systems, reproducing critical events and enabling counterfactual treatment simulation.

desk verdict The full text is a different paper (SBGD), so the Organ-Agents claims can't be assessed; the abstract is intriguing but unverifiable from this artifact. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14357 v1 pith:G3EWQ2QZ submitted 2025-08-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

Rihao Chang , He Jiao , Weizhi Nie , Honglin Guo , Keliang Xie , Zhenhua Wu , Lina Zhao , Yunpeng Bai
show 8 more authors
Yongtao Ma Lanjun Wang Yuting Su Xi Gao Weijie Wang Nicu Sebe Bruno Lepri Bingwei Sun
This is my paper
classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords multi-agentLLMphysiologysimulationsepsiscounterfactualtreatmentEHRtimeseriesdigitaltwinintensivecarereinforcement-guidedcoordination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The abstract introduces Organ-Agents, a multi-agent framework in which each agent (a Simulator) models one physiological system—cardiovascular, renal, immune, and others—and the agents coordinate to produce high-resolution trajectories across 9 systems and 125 variables. The claim is that supervised fine-tuning on system-specific time series, followed by reinforcement-guided coordination with dynamic reference selection and error correction, yields a digital twin that is accurate on held-out patients (per-system MSEs under 0.16), robust across severity strata, and generalizes to ICU patients from other hospitals. The paper further claims the simulator faithfully reproduces critical multi-system events such as hypotension, hyperlactatemia, and hypoxemia with coherent timing, and that it can generate counterfactual sepsis treatment trajectories aligned with matched real-world patients. If these claims are right, synthetic trajectories could substitute for real data in early-warning model training and support treatment simulation in critical care. A reader should note that the supplied full text is a different manuscript on graph diffusion, so the experimental details behind these claims are not present in the body.

What carries the argument

The central object is a multi-agent system of nine Simulator agents, each responsible for one physiological system. Each Simulator is trained with supervised fine-tuning on system-specific time-series data, and the agents are coordinated by a reinforcement-guided process that uses dynamic reference selection and error correction. The coordination mechanism is what turns independent organ models into a coherent multi-system trajectory over 125 variables, and it is the component the paper credits for reproducing cross-system events with realistic timing and phase progression.

What would settle it

Compare simulated counterfactual trajectories with observed trajectories from a held-out cohort who actually received the alternative treatment, matched on severity and treatment indication; if APACHE II or trajectory alignment collapses once confounding by indication is controlled, the counterfactual claim fails. A second check is to run the stated external validation with the missing methods details restored, since the supplied body text is a different paper.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that LLM-driven multi-agent simulation can produce physiologically plausible, decision-relevant patient trajectories for sepsis, and that these trajectories can be used for counterfactual treatment evaluation. The central evidence is a suite of accuracy and validation results: on 4,509 held-out patients the per-system MSEs stay below 0.16; robustness holds across SOFA-based severity strata; external validation on 22,689 ICU patients from two hospitals shows only moderate degradation; 15 critical care physicians rated realism and plausibility with mean Likert scores of 3.9 and 3.7; and classifiers trained on synthetic data lose less than 0.04 AUROC in early-

Load-bearing premise

The counterfactual claim depends on the assumption that patients who actually received the alternative sepsis treatment are exchangeable with the simulated counterfactual patients apart from the treatment itself; if the comparison only matches observed treatment patterns, the alignment may not be causal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claims hold, synthetic sepsis trajectories can stand in for real patient data when training early-warning classifiers, with reported AUROC drops under 0.04.
  • Counterfactual simulation becomes a practical tool for testing alternative sepsis treatment strategies, generating trajectories and APACHE II scores comparable to matched real patients.
  • Per-system MSEs below 0.16 on 4,509 held-out patients suggest the nine simulators can track individual organ dynamics closely enough for trajectory-level evaluation.
  • External validation on 22,689 ICU patients from two other hospitals implies the approach transfers across institutions, with only moderate degradation under distribution shifts.
  • Reproducing critical events such as hypotension and hypoxemia with coherent timing would make the system usable as an interpretable digital twin for hypothesis testing in critical care.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In our reading, the counterfactual evaluation compares simulated trajectories against patients from the same EHR corpus used to train the simulators; a stronger test would be a treatment pattern the model never saw, such as a policy change at a new hospital.
  • The supplied full text of this submission is a different manuscript on graph diffusion, so none of the abstract's experimental numbers can be verified from the body; treat them as claims pending the actual methods and results sections.
  • Because each organ is a separate LLM agent, the framework may offer natural explanations for why a trajectory evolves as it does—an interpretability channel that black-box sequence models do not provide.
  • The 125-variable, nine-system curation is likely the practical bottleneck; hospitals with sparser time-series records may need substantial preprocessing before the approach transfers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The submission as received presents an abstract for "Organ-Agents: Virtual Human Physiology Simulator via LLMs," but the body text is an entirely different paper, "SBGD: Improving Graph Diffusion Generative Model via Stochastic Block Diffusion" (arXiv:2508.14352v1). No methods, datasets, training procedures, evaluation protocols, or results for Organ-Agents appear anywhere in the full text. The abstract claims high-accuracy multi-system physiological simulation, external validation, physician-rated realism, and counterfactual treatment simulation, but none of these claims can be checked against the supplied artifact.

Significance. If substantiated, Organ-Agents would be a meaningful contribution to LLM-based physiological simulation and synthetic EHR data generation. The proposed multi-agent architecture and the scale of external validation are potentially valuable. However, the submitted artifact provides no verifiable content: there are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or experimental details for Organ-Agents. The paper therefore cannot currently be evaluated on its scientific merits.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text vs. abstract] The full text (Sections 1–6 and appendices) is the SBGD graph-diffusion paper by Su and Wu, not an Organ-Agents manuscript. There is no description of the multi-agent architecture, SFT/RL coordination, the 125-variable time-series curation, the 4,509-patient held-out split, the 22,689-patient external cohort, or the physician evaluation. Every quantitative claim in the abstract is therefore unsupported. This is a load-bearing issue that prevents any positive assessment of the paper's central claim and is not a local fix.
  2. [Abstract, counterfactual paragraph] The counterfactual validation is potentially circular: "APACHE II scores aligned with matched real-world patients" is not evidence that the simulator captures causal treatment effects if the matched patients are drawn from the same 7,134-patient sepsis corpus used to train the simulators. Agreement with observed outcomes may simply reflect reproduction of treatment-conditional patterns in the training distribution. The authors must specify the matching procedure, the source of matched patients, and control for confounding by indication (e.g., an external matched cohort or a benchmark against a non-causal baseline).
  3. [Abstract, accuracy metric] The reported "per-system MSEs <0.16" is uninterpretable without the normalization/scaling of the 125 variables and the time horizon over which it is computed. If variables are standardized to unit variance, 0.16 is not inherently "high accuracy"; if raw, the metric mixes variables with different units. Please state the normalization, report per-variable or per-system metrics with confidence intervals, and include baseline comparisons (e.g., a standard sequence model or a persistence forecast).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, physician ratings] Mean Likert ratings of 3.9 and 3.7 are reported without sample size, confidence intervals, or inter-rater reliability; please provide these details.
  2. [Abstract, AUROC claim] The "minimal AUROC drops (<0.04)" lacks the baseline AUROC and the downstream task definition; without these, a small drop could be consistent with a weak downstream signal.
  3. [Abstract, event reproduction] The claim that hypotension, hyperlactatemia, and hypoxemia are reproduced "with coherent timing and phase progression" needs quantitative event-onset and phase metrics rather than qualitative phrasing.
  4. [Full text, headers] The running headers and references throughout the body are those of the SBGD paper, which makes the artifact mismatch visible on every page.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable from the provided artifact: the full-text body is a different paper (SBGD), and the Organ-Agents abstract alone contains no derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The supplied full text is not the Organ-Agents manuscript; it is arXiv:2508.14352, 'SBGD: Improving Graph Diffusion Generative Model via Stochastic Block Diffusion.' Consequently, the Organ-Agents methods, training equations, cohort definitions, and evaluation protocols are absent, so no derivation chain can be walked and no equation-level reduction can be exhibited. The abstract-level claims describe supervised fine-tuning on system-specific time-series data, held-out evaluation on 4,509 patients, external validation on 22,689 ICU patients from two hospitals, physician Likert ratings, and downstream early-warning classifier AUROC drops of <0.04. These are external benchmarks and held-out evaluations, not quantities that reduce to training inputs by construction. The counterfactual sentence ('generating trajectories and APACHE II scores aligned with matched real-world patients') is too underspecified to establish circularity: it would be circular only if the matched real-world patients were drawn from the same training set and the alignment were the training objective, but neither fact is stated in the abstract. Positing that the match comes from the training corpus is speculation, which hard rules disallow. The artifact mismatch is a serious verifiability problem, but verifiability is not circularity. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

From the abstract alone, the central claim rests on three unpaid premises: the quality of the curated EHR corpus, the learnability of stable multivariate trajectories by fine-tuned LLMs, and the leap from statistical fidelity to counterfactual validity. The variable normalization behind the headline MSE and the RL coordination hyperparameters are unstated free choices. No physical entities are invented.

free parameters (2)
  • Normalization scale underlying per-system MSE <0.16 = not reported
    MSE below 0.16 is only meaningful relative to how each of the 125 variables is scaled (raw units versus standardized). The abstract reports the threshold without the scaling, so the headline accuracy number is, as stated, vacuous. Choice inferred from the abstract's results paragraph.
  • RL coordination hyperparameters (reward weights, reference selection thresholds) = not reported
    Training includes 'reinforcement-guided coordination using dynamic reference selection and error correction,' which requires reward shaping and selection thresholds; none are reported in the abstract. These choices determine how strongly the nine simulators are forced to stay coherent.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The curated corpus of 7,134 sepsis patients and 7,895 controls is accurate, complete, and representative enough for models trained on it to generalize to 22,689 external ICU patients.
    Everything downstream rests on this private dataset. The abstract does not name the EHR source, extraction pipeline, labeling criteria, or ethics review. Invoked by 'We curated data from 7,134 sepsis patients and 7,895 controls.'
  • domain assumption An LLM fine-tuned on system-specific time-series data can act as a stable generator for 125 jointly moving physiological variables.
    The core modeling premise: autoregressive LLM generation over multivariate clinical time series preserves joint dynamics and does not diverge over long horizons. Invoked by 'supervised fine-tuning on system-specific time-series data.'
  • domain assumption Statistical and subjective fidelity licenses mechanistic and counterfactual claims.
    The leap from low MSE, small AUROC drop, and moderate Likert scores to 'a credible, interpretable, and generalizable digital twin' assumes distributional similarity implies causal validity. Surfaced in the counterfactual paragraph and the conclusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Organ-Agents: Virtual Human Physiology Simulator via LLMs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G3EWQ2QZ

@misc{pith2026250814357,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Organ-Agents: Virtual Human Physiology Simulator via LLMs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G3EWQ2QZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14357}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled new possibilities in simulating complex physiological systems. We introduce Organ-Agents, a multi-agent framework that simulates human physiology via LLM-driven agents. Each Simulator models a specific system (e.g., cardiovascular, renal, immune). Training consists of supervised fine-tuning on system-specific time-series data, followed by reinforcement-guided coordination using dynamic reference selection and error correction. We curated data from 7,134 sepsis patients and 7,895 controls, generating high-resolution trajectories across 9 systems and 125 variables. Organ-Agents achieved high simulation accuracy on 4,509 held-out patients, with per-system MSEs <0.16 and robustness across SOFA-based severity strata. External validation on 22,689 ICU patients from two hospitals showed moderate degradation under distribution shifts with stable simulation. Organ-Agents faithfully reproduces critical multi-system events (e.g., hypotension, hyperlactatemia, hypoxemia) with coherent timing and phase progression. Evaluation by 15 critical care physicians confirmed realism and physiological plausibility (mean Likert ratings 3.9 and 3.7). Organ-Agents also enables counterfactual simulations under alternative sepsis treatment strategies, generating trajectories and APACHE II scores aligned with matched real-world patients. In downstream early warning tasks, classifiers trained on synthetic data showed minimal AUROC drops (<0.04), indicating preserved decision-relevant patterns. These results position Organ-Agents as a credible, interpretable, and generalizable digital twin for precision diagnosis, treatment simulation, and hypothesis testing in critical care.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Bartsch , R.P

    barticle Bashan , A. , Bartsch , R.P. , Kantelhardt , J.W. , Havlin , S. , Ivanov , P.C. : Network physiology reveals relations between network topology and physiological function . Nature Communications 3 , 702 ( 2012 ) 10.1038/ncomms1705 barticle

    doi:10.1038/ncomms1705 2012

  2. [2]

    , Bröhl , T

    barticle Lehnertz , K. , Bröhl , T. , Rings , T. : The human organism as an integrated interaction network: Recent conceptual and methodological challenges . Frontiers in Physiology 11 , 598694 ( 2020 ) 10.3389/fphys.2020.598694 barticle

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    , Alsaleh , M.M

    barticle Hama , T. , Alsaleh , M.M. , Allery , F. , Choi , J.W. , Tomlinson , C. , Wu , H. , Lai , A. , Pontikos , N. , Thygesen , J.H. : Enhancing patient outcome prediction through deep learning with sequential diagnosis codes from structured electronic health record data: Systematic review . Journal of Medical Internet Research 27 , 57358 ( 2025 ) 10.2...

    work page doi:10.2196/57358 2025

  4. [4]

    , Yuan , H

    barticle Xie , F. , Yuan , H. , Ning , Y. , Ong , M.H.E. , Feng , M. , Hsu , W. , Chakraborty , B. , Liu , N. : Deep learning for temporal data representation in electronic health records: A systematic review of challenges and methodologies . Journal of Biomedical Informatics 126 , 103980 ( 2022 ) 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103980 . Epub 2021 Dec 30 barticle

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Nature Biopharma Dealmakers ( 2024 ) 10.1038/d43747-024-00128-1 barticle

    barticle Aitia : Causal artificial intelligence and digital twins are transforming drug discovery and development . Nature Biopharma Dealmakers ( 2024 ) 10.1038/d43747-024-00128-1 barticle

    work page doi:10.1038/d43747-024-00128-1 2024

  6. [6]

    , D \'i az , R.G

    bchapter Martinez-Velazquez , R. , D \'i az , R.G. , Saddik , A.E. : Cardio twin: A digital twin of the human heart running on the edge . In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) , pp. 1 -- 6 ( 2019 ). IEEE bchapter

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    , Sun , L

    barticle Luo , R. , Sun , L. , Xia , Y. , Qin , T. , Zhang , S. , Poon , H. , Liu , T.-Y. : Biogpt: generative pre-trained transformer for biomedical text generation and mining . Briefings in bioinformatics 23 ( 6 ), 409 ( 2022 ) barticle

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    , Altosaar , J

    botherref Huang , K. , Altosaar , J. , Ranganath , R. : ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmission (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05342 botherref

    arXiv 2020

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    , Liu , X.C

    barticle Jiang , L.Y. , Liu , X.C. , Nejatian , N.P. , Nasir-Moin , M. , Wang , D. , Abidin , A. , Eaton , K. , al. : Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines . Nature 619 ( 7969 ), 357 -- 362 ( 2023 ) 10.1038/s41586-023-06160-y barticle

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    , Bulgarelli , L

    botherref Johnson , A.E.W. , Bulgarelli , L. , Shen , L. , et al.: MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset . Scientific Data 10(1) (2023) 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x botherref

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    , Draper , E.A

    barticle Knaus , W.A. , Draper , E.A. , Wagner , D.P. , Zimmerman , J.E. : Apache ii: a severity of disease classification system . Critical care medicine 13 ( 10 ), 818 -- 829 ( 1985 ) barticle

    1985

  4. [12]

    , Merrienboer , B

    botherref Cho , K. , Merrienboer , B. , Gulcehre , C. , Bahdanau , D. , Bougares , F. , Schwenk , H. , Bengio , Y. : Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078 (2014) botherref

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    , Schmidhuber , J

    barticle Hochreiter , S. , Schmidhuber , J. : Long short-term memory . Neural computation 9 ( 8 ), 1735 -- 1780 ( 1997 ) barticle

    1997

  6. [14]

    , Kolter , J.Z

    botherref Bai , S. , Kolter , J.Z. , Koltun , V. : An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.01271 (2018) botherref

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    , Hinton , G.E

    barticle Rumelhart , D.E. , Hinton , G.E. , Williams , R.J. : Learning representations by back-propagating errors . Nature 323 ( 6088 ), 533 -- 536 ( 1986 ) barticle

    1986

  8. [16]

    , Guestrin , C

    bchapter Chen , T. , Guestrin , C. : Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system . In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pp. 785 -- 794 ( 2016 ) bchapter

    2016

  9. [17]

    : Random forests

    barticle Breiman , L. : Random forests . Machine learning 45 ( 1 ), 5 -- 32 ( 2001 ) barticle

    2001

  10. [18]

    , Nigam , K

    bchapter McCallum , A. , Nigam , K. , : A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification . In: AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization , vol. 752 , pp. 41 -- 48 ( 1998 ). Madison, WI bchapter

    1998

  11. [19]

    , Azizi , S

    barticle Singhal , K. , Azizi , S. , Tu , T. , Mahdavi , S.S. , Wei , J. , Chung , H.W. , Scales , N. , Tanwani , A. , Cole-Lewis , H. , Pfohl , S. , : Large language models encode clinical knowledge . Nature 620 ( 7972 ), 172 -- 180 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  12. [20]

    , Gallo , R

    barticle Goh , E. , Gallo , R. , Hom , J. , Strong , E. , Weng , Y. , Kerman , H. , Cool , J.A. , Kanjee , Z. , Parsons , A.S. , Ahuja , N. , : Large language model influence on diagnostic reasoning: a randomized clinical trial . JAMA Network Open 7 ( 10 ), 2440969 -- 2440969 ...

    2024

  13. [21]

    , Van Uden , C

    botherref Van Veen , D. , Van Uden , C. , Blankemeier , L. , Delbrouck , J.-B. , Aali , A. , Bluethgen , C. , Pareek , A. , Polacin , M. , Reis , E.P. , Seehofnerova , A. , et al.: Clinical text summarization: adapting large language models can outperform human experts. Resear...

    2023

  14. [22]

    , Poliak , A

    barticle Ayers , J.W. , Poliak , A. , Dredze , M. , Leas , E.C. , Zhu , Z. , Kelley , J.B. , Faix , D.J. , Goodman , A.M. , Longhurst , C.A. , Hogarth , M. , : Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social medi...

    2023

  15. [23]

    , Huang , Q

    bchapter Moor , M. , Huang , Q. , Wu , S. , Yasunaga , M. , Dalmia , Y. , Leskovec , J. , Zakka , C. , Reis , E.P. , Rajpurkar , P. : Med-flamingo: a multimodal medical few-shot learner . In: Machine Learning for Health (ML4H) , pp. 353 -- 367 ( 2023 ). PMLR bchapter

    2023

  16. [24]

    , Wong , C

    barticle Li , C. , Wong , C. , Zhang , S. , Usuyama , N. , Liu , H. , Yang , J. , Naumann , T. , Poon , H. , Gao , J. : Llava-med: Training a large language-and-vision assistant for biomedicine in one day . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 , 28541 -- 28564 ...

    2023

  17. [25]

    , Beecy , A

    barticle Rosenthal , J.T. , Beecy , A. , Sabuncu , M.R. : Rethinking clinical trials for medical ai with dynamic deployments of adaptive systems . npj Digital Medicine 8 ( 1 ), 1 -- 6 ( 2025 ) barticle

    2025

  18. [26]

    , Wang , J

    botherref Feng , Y. , Wang , J. , Zhou , L. , Li , Y. : Doctoragent-rl: A multi-agent collaborative reinforcement learning system for multi-turn clinical dialogue. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19630 (2025) botherref

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    , Miao , B.Y

    barticle Mehandru , N. , Miao , B.Y. , Almaraz , E.R. , Sushil , M. , Butte , A.J. , Alaa , A. : Evaluating large language models as agents in the clinic . NPJ digital medicine 7 ( 1 ), 84 ( 2024 ) barticle

    2024

  20. [28]

    , Chen , T

    botherref Liu , X. , Chen , T. , Da , L. , Chen , C. , Lin , Z. , Wei , H. : Uncertainty quantification and confidence calibration in large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15850 (2025) botherref

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , Wang , J

    barticle Savage , T. , Wang , J. , Gallo , R. , Boukil , A. , Patel , V. , Safavi-Naini , S.A.A. , Soroush , A. , Chen , J.H. : Large language model uncertainty proxies: discrimination and calibration for medical diagnosis and treatment . Journal of the American Medical Inform...

    2025

  22. [30]

    , Afshar , M

    botherref Gallifant , J. , Afshar , M. , Ameen , S. , Aphinyanaphongs , Y. , Chen , S. , Cacciamani , G. , Demner-Fushman , D. , Dligach , D. , Daneshjou , R. , Fernandes , C. , et al.: The tripod-llm reporting guideline for studies using large language models. Nature Medicine...

    2025

  23. [31]

    , Bulgarelli , L

    botherref Johnson , A. , Bulgarelli , L. , Pollard , T. , Horng , S. , Celi , L.A. , Mark , R. : MIMIC-IV (version 2.2) . https://doi.org/10.13026/6mm1-ek67. PhysioNet. RRID:SCR\_007345 (2023) botherref

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    , Deutschman , C.S

    barticle Singer , M. , Deutschman , C.S. , Seymour , C.W. , Shankar-Hari , M. , Annane , D. , Bauer , M. , Bellomo , R. , Bernard , G.R. , Chiche , J.-D. , Coopersmith , C.M. , Hotchkiss , R.S. , Levy , M.M. , Marshall , J.C. , Martin , G.S. , Opal , S.M. , Rubenfeld , G.D. , ...

    2016

  25. [33]

    , Li , A

    botherref Yang , A. , Li , A. , Yang , B. , Zhang , B. , Hui , B. , Zheng , B. , Yu , B. , Gao , C. , Huang , C. , Lv , C. , et al.: Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 (2025) botherref

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    , Shen , Y

    barticle Hu , E.J. , Shen , Y. , Wallis , P. , Allen-Zhu , Z. , Li , Y. , Wang , S. , Wang , L. , Chen , W. , : Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ICLR 1 ( 2 ), 3 ( 2022 ) barticle

    2022

  27. [35]

    , Wolski , F

    botherref Schulman , J. , Wolski , F. , Dhariwal , P. , Radford , A. , Klimov , O. : Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017) botherref

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    , Purushotham , S

    barticle Che , Z. , Purushotham , S. , Cho , K. , Sontag , D. , Liu , Y. : Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values . Scientific reports 8 ( 1 ), 6085 ( 2018 ) barticle

    2018

  29. [37]

    , Oren , E

    barticle Rajkomar , A. , Oren , E. , Chen , K. , Dai , A.M. , Hajaj , N. , Hardt , M. , Liu , P.J. , Liu , X. , Marcus , J. , Sun , M. , : Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records . NPJ digital medicine 1 ( 1 ), 18 ( 2018 ) barticle

    2018

  30. [38]

    , Hariharan , S

    bchapter Futoma , J. , Hariharan , S. , Heller , K. , Sendak , M. , Brajer , N. , Clement , M. , Bedoya , A. , O’brien , C. : An improved multi-output gaussian process rnn with real-time validation for early sepsis detection . In: Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference , p...

    2017

  31. [39]

    , Ahmed , M

    barticle Murtaza , H. , Ahmed , M. , Khan , N.F. , Murtaza , G. , Zafar , S. , Bano , A. : Synthetic data generation: State of the art in health care domain . Computer Science Review 48 , 100546 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  32. [40]

    , Rivera , S.C

    barticle Liu , X. , Rivera , S.C. , Moher , D. , Calvert , M.J. , Denniston , A.K. , Ashrafian , H. , Beam , A.L. , Chan , A.-W. , Collins , G.S. , Deeks , A.D.J. , : Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the conso...

    2020

  33. [41]

    , Hyland , S.L

    botherref Esteban , C. , Hyland , S.L. , R \"a tsch , G. : Real-valued (medical) time series generation with recurrent conditional gans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02633 (2017) botherref

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    , Gugger , S

    botherref Mangrulkar , S. , Gugger , S. , Debut , L. , Belkada , Y. , Paul , S. , Bossan , B. : PEFT : State-of-the-art Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning methods. https://github.com/huggingface/peft (2022) botherref

    2022

  35. [43]

    https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-1/ (2025) botherref

    botherref OpenAI : Introducing GPT-4.1 in the API. https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-1/ (2025) botherref

    2025

  36. [44]

    https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-4 (2025) botherref

    botherref Anthropic : Introducing Claude 4. https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-4 (2025) botherref

    2025

  37. [45]

    , Cheng , T

    botherref Yu , H. , Cheng , T. , Cheng , Y. , Feng , R. : Finemedlm-o1: Enhancing the medical reasoning ability of llm from supervised fine-tuning to test-time training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09213 (2025) botherref

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    , Cai , Z

    botherref Chen , J. , Cai , Z. , Ji , K. , Wang , X. , Liu , W. , Wang , R. , Hou , J. , Wang , B. : Huatuogpt-o1, towards medical complex reasoning with llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18925 (2024) botherref

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    , Cao , M

    botherref Cai , Z. , Cao , M. , Chen , H. , Chen , K. , Chen , K. , Chen , X. , Chen , X. , Chen , Z. , Chen , Z. , Chu , P. , Dong , X. , Duan , H. , Fan , Q. , Fei , Z. , Gao , Y. , Ge , J. , Gu , C. , Gu , Y. , Gui , T. , Guo , A. , Guo , Q. , He , C. , Hu , Y. , Huang , T....

    2024

  40. [48]

    , Dubey , A

    botherref Grattafiori , A. , Dubey , A. , Jauhri , A. , Pandey , A. , Kadian , A. , Al-Dahle , A. , Letman , A. , Mathur , A. , Schelten , A. , Vaughan , A. , et al.: The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 (2024) botherref

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTI...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.