REVIEW 3 cited by
Ask LLMs Directly, "What shapes your bias?": Measuring Social Bias in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Social bias is shaped by the accumulation of social perceptions towards targets across various demographic identities. To fully understand such social bias in large language models (LLMs), it is essential to consider the composite of social perceptions from diverse perspectives among identities. Previous studies have either evaluated biases in LLMs by indirectly assessing the presence of sentiments towards demographic identities in the generated text or measuring the degree of alignment with given stereotypes. These methods have limitations in directly quantifying social biases at the level of distinct perspectives among identities. In this paper, we aim to investigate how social perceptions from various viewpoints contribute to the development of social bias in LLMs. To this end, we propose a novel strategy to intuitively quantify these social perceptions and suggest metrics that can evaluate the social biases within LLMs by aggregating diverse social perceptions. The experimental results show the quantitative demonstration of the social attitude in LLMs by examining social perception. The analysis we conducted shows that our proposed metrics capture the multi-dimensional aspects of social bias, enabling a fine-grained and comprehensive investigation of bias in LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
An Empirical Study of Group Conformity in Multi-Agent Systems
In multi-agent LLM debates, neutral agents conform to both numerical majority and higher-intelligence agents, with a single smart agent often outweighing a larger group.
-
Unmasking Conversational Bias in AI Multiagent Systems
In simulated echo-chamber chats, conservative-aligned LLM agents often shift to liberal-aligned messages, a drift that one-shot questionnaire tests do not detect.
-
Implicit Priors Editing in Stable Diffusion via Targeted Token Adjustment
EMBEDIT edits a single word token embedding in Stable Diffusion to steer implicit visual priors (e.g., making 'bear' generate 'polar bear'), reporting better accuracy than cross-attention editing while using far fewer...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.