Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Curious Case of Searching for the Correlation between Training Data and Adversarial Robustness of Transformer Textual Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11469 v2 pith:G6VKC7OQ submitted 2024-02-18 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.CR
keywords modelsrobustnessadversarialtrainingcorrelationdatafeaturestransformer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing works have shown that fine-tuned textual transformer models achieve state-of-the-art prediction performances but are also vulnerable to adversarial text perturbations. Traditional adversarial evaluation is often done \textit{only after} fine-tuning the models and ignoring the training data. In this paper, we want to prove that there is also a strong correlation between training data and model robustness. To this end, we extract 13 different features representing a wide range of input fine-tuning corpora properties and use them to predict the adversarial robustness of the fine-tuned models. Focusing mostly on encoder-only transformer models BERT and RoBERTa with additional results for BART, ELECTRA, and GPT2, we provide diverse evidence to support our argument. First, empirical analyses show that (a) extracted features can be used with a lightweight classifier such as Random Forest to predict the attack success rate effectively, and (b) features with the most influence on the model robustness have a clear correlation with the robustness. Second, our framework can be used as a fast and effective additional tool for robustness evaluation since it (a) saves 30x-193x runtime compared to the traditional technique, (b) is transferable across models, (c) can be used under adversarial training, and (d) robust to statistical randomness. Our code is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/CaptainCuong/RobustText_ACL2024}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLMs cannot spot math errors, even when allowed to peek into the solution

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even with the gold solution in hand, large language models locate the first error step in student math solutions poorly; providing a generated corrected student solution improves accuracy.

Pith tools