Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18571 v3 pith:GBQR6C6C submitted 2024-02-28 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML
keywords controlpreferencediversemethodrewardrlhfuseralignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fine-grained control over large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge, hindering their adaptability to diverse user needs. While Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) shows promise in aligning LLMs, its reliance on scalar rewards often limits its ability to capture diverse user preferences in real-world applications. To address this limitation, we introduce the Directional Preference Alignment (DPA) framework. Unlike the scalar-reward RLHF, DPA incorporates multi-objective reward modeling to represent diverse preference profiles. Additionally, DPA models user preferences as directions (i.e., unit vectors) in the reward space to achieve user-dependent preference control. Our method involves training a multi-objective reward model and then fine-tuning the LLM with a preference-conditioned variant of Rejection Sampling Finetuning (RSF), an RLHF method adopted by Llama 2. This method enjoys a better performance trade-off across various reward objectives. In comparison with the scalar-reward RLHF, DPA offers users intuitive control over LLM generation: they can arithmetically specify their desired trade-offs (e.g., more helpfulness with less verbosity). We also validate the effectiveness of DPA with real-world alignment experiments on Mistral-7B. Our method provides straightforward arithmetic control over the trade-off between helpfulness and verbosity while maintaining competitive performance with strong baselines such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  2. CALMA: A Process for Deriving Context-aligned Axes for Language Model Alignment

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CALMA is a grounded-theory, participatory method for deriving community-specific language model alignment axes from open-ended user interactions and group discussion, piloted with two small groups.

  3. OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper advocates protecting and leveraging OpenReview's peer review corpus as a community asset for LLM-based review assistance, benchmarks, and alignment.

  4. Bridging HCI and AI Research for the Evaluation of Conversational SE Assistants

    cs.SE 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper proposing that combining simulated users and LLM-as-a-Judge can meet the requirements for human-centered automatic evaluation of conversational SE assistants, without empirical validation.

Pith tools