pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25103 · v1 · pith:GBZD7DKPnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · ✦ hep-ex

Search for low-mass resonances decaying to ττ and measurement of the Upsilon to ττ decay in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13.6 TeV

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords CMS experimentUpsilon to tau taulow-mass resonancestau lepton pairsproton-proton collisions13.6 TeVspin-zero bosons
0
0 comments X

The pith

CMS measures the Υ meson decaying to tau lepton pairs with 5.8 sigma significance for the first time in hadron collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the first measurement of the Υ(1S,2S,3S) decaying to τ⁺τ⁻ in proton-proton collisions using 61.9 fb⁻¹ of data at 13.6 TeV. A specialized trigger and tau reconstruction method make this possible despite the difficult environment. The measured visible cross section is reported, and a search for new spin-zero bosons in the 20-60 GeV range finds no excess, resulting in upper limits on their production rate times branching fraction.

Core claim

The authors report observing the Υ → ττ decay with 5.8σ significance above background, measuring its production cross section as 3.5 ± 0.7 (stat) ± 0.7 (syst) nb for |y_vis| < 1.2 and p_T^vis > 15 GeV, while finding no significant excess for new resonances and setting 95% confidence level upper limits between 40 and 400 pb on the product of cross section and branching fraction to ττ.

What carries the argument

A high-rate trigger stream combined with a novel low-momentum hadronic tau reconstruction algorithm that enables access to the challenging tau pair final state.

If this is right

  • The Υ decay to tau pairs has now been measured at a hadron collider.
  • Upper limits constrain possible new spin-zero resonances decaying to ττ in the 20-60 GeV mass window.
  • The reconstruction technique shows that low-momentum tau identification is feasible in high-rate collider data.
  • No evidence appears for beyond-standard-model particles in this previously unexplored range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This result provides a reference point for testing tau identification performance in higher-luminosity runs.
  • The same methods could extend searches for other rare tau final states or lower-mass structures.
  • Independent confirmation at another experiment would test the background modeling assumptions.

Load-bearing premise

The background model in the ττ invariant mass distribution is accurately described by simulated standard model processes plus data-driven estimates without unaccounted contributions that could mimic or mask a signal.

What would settle it

A measured Υ cross section significantly different from 3.5 nb or a statistically significant excess in the 20-60 GeV ττ mass spectrum would challenge the central claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25103 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The observed mvis(µ, τh ) distributions in the Υ meson (left, middle) and Z boson (right) selection regions are shown with fit results overlaid. The left plot contains prong-only τh while the center contains one-prong-plus-strips τh . The backgrounds for the Υ are estimated using third order Chebychev polynomials, while the Gaussian shape of the Υ is inferred from simulation. A fit to the Υ simulation is o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distributions of mvis(µ, τh ) (points with error bars) in the ϕ boson search region, separated by hadronic decay mode with fit results (lines). All plots contain a Z/γ∗ → ττ component determined by simulations overlaid on the continuum fit. The leftmost plot shows the single-prong final-state with contamination due to Z → µµ events (orange) at 91 GeV. The center and right plots show the three-prong and one… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An inclusive search is presented for spin-zero bosons decaying to $\tau\tau$ in a previously unexplored mass range between 20 and 60 GeV using proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 61.9 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by CMS in 2022$-$2023. A high-rate trigger stream in combination with a novel low-momentum hadronic tau reconstruction algorithm have enabled a measurement of the $\Upsilon$(1S,2S,3S) $\to$ $\tau^+\tau^-$ process in the challenging environment of a hadron collider, with a 5.8$\sigma$ significance above background and production cross section of 3.5 $\pm$ 0.7 (stat) $\pm$ 0.7 (syst) nb for visible rapidity $\lvert y_{\text{vis}}\rvert$ $\lt$ 1.2 and visible transverse momentum $p_\mathrm{T}^\text{vis}$ $\gt$ 15 GeV. No significant excess above the standard model background is observed. Upper limits on the product of the spin-zero resonance production cross section and branching fraction to $\tau\tau$ are set at 95% confidence level between 40 and 400 pb.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an inclusive search for spin-zero bosons decaying to ττ in the 20-60 GeV mass range using 61.9 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV pp collision data recorded by CMS in 2022-2023. It reports a measurement of the Υ(1S,2S,3S) → τ⁺τ⁻ process with 5.8σ significance above background and a production cross section of 3.5 ± 0.7 (stat) ± 0.7 (syst) nb for |y_vis| < 1.2 and p_T^vis > 15 GeV. No significant excess above the standard model background is observed in the search region, and 95% CL upper limits on the product of spin-zero resonance production cross section and branching fraction to ττ are set between 40 and 400 pb.

Significance. If the results hold, the work is significant for demonstrating the first measurement of Υ → ττ at a hadron collider, made possible by a high-rate trigger stream and novel low-momentum hadronic tau reconstruction. This technical achievement enables access to rare decays in a challenging environment and provides new constraints on low-mass resonances. Credit is due for the combination of simulation with data-driven background estimates and the explicit reporting of visible-phase-space cross sections.

major comments (1)
  1. [Background modeling section] Background modeling section: The 5.8σ significance for Υ → ττ and the resonance limits rest on the background model in the m_ττ spectrum. The manuscript describes this as a combination of simulated SM processes plus data-driven estimates, but provides insufficient validation (e.g., no explicit sideband or closure tests) against potential mismodeling from the novel low-pT τ reconstruction in the 9-11 GeV Υ region or 20-60 GeV window; any unaccounted component would directly shift the extracted significance and CLs limits.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results section] The definition of visible rapidity |y_vis| and p_T^vis should be stated explicitly when first introduced in the text, as these enter the reported cross section.
  2. [Notation] Notation for τ⁺τ⁻ versus ττ should be made consistent between the abstract and main body.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on background modeling. We address the point below and will strengthen the presentation accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Background modeling section: The 5.8σ significance for Υ → ττ and the resonance limits rest on the background model in the m_ττ spectrum. The manuscript describes this as a combination of simulated SM processes plus data-driven estimates, but provides insufficient validation (e.g., no explicit sideband or closure tests) against potential mismodeling from the novel low-pT τ reconstruction in the 9-11 GeV Υ region or 20-60 GeV window; any unaccounted component would directly shift the extracted significance and CLs limits.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the background model is essential, particularly given the novel low-p_T hadronic tau reconstruction. The current manuscript describes the background as a combination of simulated irreducible processes (Z/γ* → ττ, tt̄, etc.) normalized to data in control regions and data-driven estimates for reducible backgrounds via the fake-rate method applied to same-sign and anti-isolated control samples. The m_ττ fit is performed simultaneously in the signal and control regions, with the post-fit agreement shown in the m_ττ distribution. However, we acknowledge that dedicated sideband and closure-test results are not presented explicitly. We will add a new subsection (or appendix) containing: (i) background predictions in high-mass sidebands (m_ττ > 70 GeV) and in tau-ID inverted control regions, (ii) quantitative closure tests in which the data-driven fake-rate is applied to an independent sample and compared to observed yields, and (iii) the impact of any observed discrepancies on the extracted Υ significance and resonance limits. These additions will be included in the revised manuscript without altering the central results or uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental result extracted directly from data

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental measurement of the Υ(1S,2S,3S) → τ⁺τ⁻ cross section and sets limits on spin-zero resonances decaying to ττ using 61.9 fb⁻¹ of 13.6 TeV pp collision data. The central results (5.8σ significance, 3.5 ± 0.7 ± 0.7 nb cross section, and 40–400 pb limits) are obtained by comparing observed event yields in data to background expectations constructed from simulated SM processes plus data-driven estimates, with no load-bearing mathematical derivation, self-referential fit, or ansatz that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Background modeling and the novel low-pT τ reconstruction are described as analysis choices whose validity is tested against the data itself rather than assumed via prior self-citation chains. The result remains falsifiable by the collision data and contains no self-definitional or fitted-input-called-prediction steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard model background modeling and detector response assumptions typical of LHC analyses; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model processes plus data-driven estimates fully describe the background in the ττ mass spectrum.
    The 5.8σ significance and upper limits are obtained after background subtraction; any mismodeling would directly affect both results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5789 in / 1529 out tokens · 34540 ms · 2026-06-29T23:33:14.245860+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hiding in the Shadow of the Upsilon: Ditaus from a Light Pseudoscalar

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A light pseudoscalar near the Υ(1S) mass, mixing with two Higgs doublets in the alignment limit, accounts for the anomalous ditau rate while evading existing constraints.

  2. Signals of New Resonances from Di-Lepton Non-Universality in the Bottomonium Mass Region at the Large Hadron Collider

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Narrow spin-zero bosons with chirality-violating couplings can produce large di-tau non-universality in the bottomonium mass region at the LHC while preserving universality at e+e- colliders.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020,arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  2. [2]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021,arXiv:1207.7235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV”,JHEP06(2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081,arXiv:1303.4571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  4. [4]

    Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, “Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos”, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 1562,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1562, arXiv:hep-ex/9807003. 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1562 1998

  5. [5]

    Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm

    Muon g-2 Collaboration, “Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm”,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 141801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141801,arXiv:2104.03281

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.141801 2021

  6. [6]

    Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays

    LHCb Collaboration, “Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays”,Nature Phys. 18(2022) 277,doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01478-8,arXiv:2103.11769

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01478-8 2022

  7. [7]

    Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino

    P . Fayet, “Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino”,Nucl. Phys. B90(1975) 104, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7 1975

  8. [8]

    Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions

    P . Fayet, “Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions”,Phys. Lett. B69(1977) 489, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90852-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90852-8 1977

  9. [9]

    A model of leptons

    S. Weinberg, “A model of leptons”,Phys. Rev. Lett.19(1967) 1264, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.1264 1967

  10. [10]

    Exotic Decays of the 125 GeV Higgs Boson

    D. Curtin et al., “Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson”,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 075004,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.075004,arXiv:1312.4992

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.075004 2014

  11. [11]

    Luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 13.6 TeV in 2022 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 13.6 TeV in 2022 at CMS”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-22-001, 2024

    2022

  12. [12]

    Measurement of the offline integrated luminosity for the CMS proton-proton collision dataset recorded in 2023

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the offline integrated luminosity for the CMS proton-proton collision dataset recorded in 2023”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2024-068, 2024

    2023

  13. [13]

    Enriching the physics program of the CMS experiment via data scouting and data parking

    CMS Collaboration, “Enriching the physics program of the CMS experiment via data scouting and data parking”,Phys. Rept.1115(2025) 678, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.006,arXiv:2403.16134

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.006 2025

  14. [14]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  15. [15]

    Search for the neutral Higgs bosons of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for the neutral Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP02(2013) 095,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)095, arXiv:1211.6956

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)095 2013

  16. [16]

    Search for neutral Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for neutral Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP11 (2014) 056,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)056,arXiv:1409.6064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2014)056 2014

  17. [17]

    Search for Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model Higgs bosons $H/A$ and for a $Z^{\prime}$ boson in the $\tau \tau$ final state produced in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS Detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for minimal supersymmetric standard model Higgs bosonsH/Aand for aZ ′ boson in theττfinal state produced inppcollisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 585, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4400-6,arXiv:1608.00890

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4400-6 2016

  18. [18]

    Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36 fb −1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP01(2018) 055,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)055, arXiv:1709.07242. References 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2018)055 2018

  19. [19]

    Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector usingppcollisions at √s=13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector usingppcollisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 051801,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.051801,arXiv:2002.12223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.051801 2020

  20. [20]

    Search for a light CP-odd Higgs boson decaying into a pair of τ-leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for a light CP-odd Higgs boson decaying into a pair of τ-leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP12 (2024) 126,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)126,arXiv:2409.20381

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)126 2024

  21. [21]

    Search for Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons Decaying to Tau Pairs in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs inpp collisions at √s=7 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 231801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.231801,arXiv:1104.1619

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.231801 2011

  22. [22]

    Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs inpp collisions at √s=7 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B713(2012) 68, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.028,arXiv:1202.4083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.028 2012

  23. [23]

    Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to a pair of tau leptons in pp collisions

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to a pair of tau leptons in pp collisions”,JHEP10(2014) 160,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)160, arXiv:1408.3316

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2014)160 2014

  24. [24]

    Search for a low-mass pseudoscalar Higgs boson produced in association with a b b-bar pair in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a low-mass pseudoscalar Higgs boson produced in association with ab ¯bpair inppcollisions at √s=8 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B758(2016) 296, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.003,arXiv:1511.03610

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.003 2016

  25. [25]

    Search for additional neutral MSSM Higgs bosons in the $\tau\tau$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for additional neutral MSSM Higgs bosons in theττfinal state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP09(2018) 007, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)007,arXiv:1803.06553

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)007 2018

  26. [26]

    Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks in ττfinal states in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks in ττfinal states in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP07(2023) 073, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)073,arXiv:2208.02717

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)073 2023

  27. [27]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.167050

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.167050 2026

  28. [28]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  29. [29]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  30. [30]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  31. [31]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  32. [32]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  33. [33]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  34. [34]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  35. [35]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  36. [36]

    Performance of reconstruction and identification of $\tau$ leptons decaying to hadrons and $\nu_\tau$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P10005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10005,arXiv:1809.02816

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/p10005 2018

  37. [37]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment inpp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017

  38. [38]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019

  39. [39]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  40. [40]

    Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions

    J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”,Eur. Phys. J. C53(2008) 473, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5,arXiv:0706.2569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5 2008

  41. [41]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  42. [42]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  43. [43]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  44. [44]

    NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG”,JHEP07(2008) 060, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060,arXiv:0805.4802

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060 2008

  45. [45]

    A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and G. Ridolfi, “A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction”,JHEP09(2007) 126, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126,arXiv:0707.3088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126 2007

  46. [46]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  47. [47]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179. References 11

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 2020

  48. [48]

    Parton distributions for the LHC Run II

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”,JHEP04(2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040,arXiv:1410.8849

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015

  49. [49]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  50. [50]

    Deep Sets

    M. Zaheer et al., “Deep Sets”, 2017.arXiv:1703.06114

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Energy flow networks: Deep sets for particle jets

    P . T. Komiske, E. M. Metodiev, and J. Thaler, “Energy flow networks: Deep sets for particle jets”,JHEP01(2019) 121,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)121, arXiv:1810.05165

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)121 2019

  52. [52]

    Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs in p-pbar collisions at sqrt(s)=1.96 TeV

    CDF Collaboration, “Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs inp ¯p collisions at √s=1.96 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 011802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.011802,arXiv:hep-ex/0508051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.011802 2006

  53. [53]

    Measurements of the inclusive W and Z boson production cross sections and their ratios in proton-proton collisions at √s=13.6 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of the inclusive W and Z boson production cross sections and their ratios in proton-proton collisions at √s=13.6 TeV”,JHEP01(2026) 047,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)047,arXiv:2503.09742

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2026)047 2026

  54. [54]

    A measurement of two jet decays of theWandZbosons at the CERN ¯ppcollider

    UA2 Collaboration, “A measurement of two jet decays of theWandZbosons at the CERN ¯ppcollider”,Z. Phys. C49(1991) 17,doi:10.1007/BF01570793

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01570793 1991

  55. [55]

    Search for low-mass dijet resonances using trigger-level jets with the ATLAS detector inppcollisions at √s=13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for low-mass dijet resonances using trigger-level jets with the ATLAS detector inppcollisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 081801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.081801,arXiv:1804.03496

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.081801 2018

  56. [56]

    A new look at the statistical model identification

    H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification”,IEEE T rans. Automatic Control19(1974) 716,doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    work page doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 1974

  57. [57]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024

  58. [58]

    Presentation of search results: The CL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: The CL s technique”,J. Phys. G28(2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313 2002

  59. [59]

    Confidence Level Computation for Combining Searches with Small Statistics

    T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434(1999) 435,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00498-2 1999

  60. [60]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0,arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011

  61. [61]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  62. [62]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:1111.6097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012

  63. [63]

    Dispelling the N^3 myth for the Kt jet-finder

    M. Cacciari and G. P . Salam, “Dispelling theN 3 myth for thek T jet-finder”,Phys. Lett. B 641(2006) 57,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.037,arXiv:hep-ph/0512210. 12 A Scouting HPS tau reconstruction The standard HPS algorithm [36] clusters PFγand e ± candidates into “strips” in order to identifyπ 0 candidates fromτ h decays. We implement the strip clusteri...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.037 2006