Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 83 references

A temporary boost of the extra-dimensional axion decay constant during inflation can suppress isocurvature enough to allow higher inflationary scales.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 14:14 UTC pith:GDRY43ZT

load-bearing objection Clean 5D realization of dynamical f_a that reopens high-scale inflation for extra-dimensional axions, with the usual engineered UV operator as the main soft spot. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09969 v1 pith:GDRY43ZT submitted 2026-07-10 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Suppressing Extra-Dimensional Axion Isocurvature Dynamically

Gongjun Choi , Tony Gherghetta This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords extra-dimensional axionisocurvature perturbationswarped extra dimensionsradion dynamicsGoldberger-Wise stabilizationQCD axioninflation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Extra-dimensional QCD axions are attractive because higher-form symmetries protect them against quality-violating effects, yet if they exist during inflation their quantum fluctuations produce isocurvature perturbations that force the inflationary Hubble scale uncomfortably low. This paper shows that, in a warped five-dimensional model, a coupling between the inflaton and the Goldberger-Wise bulk scalar can shift the radion minimum so that the inter-brane separation is temporarily small. The resulting larger warp factor raises the effective four-dimensional axion decay constant during inflation, suppressing the angular fluctuations that source isocurvature. After inflation the radion relaxes to its ordinary late-time minimum, restoring a decay constant inside the standard QCD window. In a concrete warped orbifold GUT the mechanism satisfies present CMB bounds while permitting inflationary scales well above the conventional pre-inflationary limit, without requiring entropy dilution or a finely tuned initial misalignment angle.

Core claim

In a warped orbifold GUT with Goldberger-Wise stabilization, a radion-inflaton coupling that sets a smaller inter-brane separation during inflation can raise the effective axion decay constant to O(10^16) GeV, allowing Hubble scales up to about 10^12 GeV (and higher with mild dilution) while keeping the late-time decay constant inside the QCD window and satisfying the CMB isocurvature bound beta_iso < 0.036.

What carries the argument

The inflation-induced shift of the radion minimum: an inflaton-dependent UV boundary value for the Goldberger-Wise scalar temporarily moves the radion to a smaller inter-brane separation, which exponentially enhances the four-dimensional axion decay constant via the warp factor.

Load-bearing premise

The whole effect rests on the assumption that a particular UV-brane operator couples the inflaton potential to the Goldberger-Wise scalar strongly enough to raise its boundary value throughout inflation and keep that value nearly constant.

What would settle it

If explicit computation of the radion mass and the slow-roll parameters for the operators of Eq. (28) shows that either m_sigma,eff remains below H_inf or the corrections to epsilon and eta exceed the observed n_s window for every parameter choice that produces f_inf >> f_a, the proposed dynamical enhancement fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a dynamical mechanism to suppress pre-inflationary isocurvature perturbations of an extra-dimensional QCD axion in a warped 5D orbifold GUT. A UV-brane operator couples the inflaton potential to the Goldberger-Wise scalar, shifting its UV boundary value during inflation so that the radion minimum sits at smaller inter-brane separation. This temporarily enhances the effective 4D axion decay constant f_inf relative to its late-time value f_a. After inflation the radion relaxes to the standard Goldberger-Wise minimum, restoring the QCD axion window. Consistency conditions C1 (radion mass ≳ H_inf) and C2 (small slow-roll corrections) are imposed; numerical scans for benchmark α = −0.3, c_V = 1, ξ = 0.99 show f_inf reaching O(10^16) GeV and allow H_inf ∼ 10^12 GeV (higher with mild dilution or small heta_a,i) while satisfying eta_iso < 0.036 for f_a in the canonical window. Small-scale fluctuations during the f_inf o f_a transition are argued not to produce domain walls provided T_RH ≳ O(10^5) GeV.

Significance. If the construction holds, it reopens a substantial region of high-scale inflation for extra-dimensional axions that is otherwise excluded by CMB isocurvature bounds, without requiring entropy dilution or a tuned initial misalignment. The mechanism is concrete: it is embedded in an existing warped-orbifold-GUT axion model, uses standard Goldberger-Wise stabilization plus de-Sitter brane detunings, and supplies explicit consistency conditions and numerical benchmarks (Figs. 2–3). The dual CFT interpretation (temporary raise of the confinement scale) and the domain-wall avoidance estimate further strengthen the result. The work therefore constitutes a useful, falsifiable extension of dynamical-decay-constant solutions to the axion isocurvature problem in a higher-dimensional setting.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. III A, Eq. (28) and the paragraph following Eq. (34): the entire enhancement of f_inf rests on the assumption that the UV-brane operator induces Φ(y_UV) ≃ c_V V_inf^{3/8} that remains approximately constant throughout the ∼50–60 e-folds relevant for CMB modes. Residual χ-dependence is asserted to be negligible for both m_σ,eff (C1) and the slow-roll shifts (C2), and the Coleman-Weinberg correction (44) is claimed to be only an overall height renormalization. No explicit estimate of δΦ/Φ or of the resulting drift in σ_min across the CMB window is provided. If V_inf(χ) varies appreciably, f_inf becomes time-dependent and the H_inf/f_inf ratios of Fig. 2 (and therefore the eta_iso contours of Fig. 3) are no longer reliable. A short calculation quantifying the residual variation for a representative slow-roll potential is needed to close this load-bearing gap.
  2. Sec. III B, Eqs. (48)–(55): the reported moderate shifts ε_inf = (0.8–0.9)ε_χ,0 and η_inf = (0.9–0.95)η_χ,0 are obtained after imposing C1 and scanning only over c_IR for fixed (α, c_V, ξ). Because the multi-field η_inf depends on the polar angle heta determined by V_eff,σχ / V_eff,σσ, a more systematic exploration of the residual χ-dependence of the UV boundary value (or an analytic bound on | heta|) is required before one can claim that a broad class of inflationary models remains compatible with the observed n_s.
minor comments (4)
  1. Fig. 2 caption and surrounding text: the observational upper bound H_inf ≤ 5 imes 10^13 GeV is quoted from the tensor power spectrum; a brief citation to the precise Planck/BICEP constraint used would help the reader.
  2. Eq. (7) and the dual-CFT paragraph in Sec. III A: the relation 8π^{2}/(g_5C^{2} k) ≃ N_CFT is used without a reference or short derivation; a pointer to the earlier warped-orbifold-GUT paper would improve readability.
  3. Sec. V, Eq. (67): the estimate n ≃ 9/(8|α|) assumes a quadratic inflaton potential after the end of inflation; a sentence noting the sensitivity to the post-inflationary equation of state would clarify the domain of validity of the domain-wall bound (70).
  4. Typographical: the arXiv identifier in the header is 2607.09969 while the abstract date is July 14, 2026; consistency checks on numbering of equations after (43) would also be useful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of authors' prior warped-orbifold axion model supplies the late-time fa formula and GUT setup; the dynamical radion shift, Veff, and beta_iso results are independently derived and do not reduce by construction.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. I, paragraph containing Eq. (7) and citation [33]]
    "we explore a resolution of the isocurvature problem for extra-dimensional axions by considering a 1-form axion embedded within a five-dimensional (5D) warped orbifold GUT framework, as proposed in [33] ... the 4D effective axion decay constant takes the form fa = sqrt(k/(4 g_5C^2)) 1/(e^{2 pi k rc}-1) ..."

    The concrete late-time fa expression and the claim that the QCD window is compatible with GUT-scale unification without entropy dilution are imported from the authors' own prior paper rather than re-derived. While this supplies the background model in which the new dynamical mechanism is embedded, it is not used to force the isocurvature suppression result itself; the latter follows from the independent radion-inflaton analysis of Secs. II-IV.

full rationale

The paper is a model-building proposal that introduces a new UV-brane operator (Eq. 28) coupling the inflaton to the Goldberger-Wise scalar, derives the resulting time-dependent radion potential Veff (Eq. 39), obtains the transient minimum (Eq. 41), and computes the consequent enhancement of finf together with the isocurvature fraction beta_iso. These steps follow from the 5D action and standard Goldberger-Wise/RS techniques; they are not tautological rearrangements of the inputs. The only self-citation of note is Ref. [33] (same authors), which supplies the concrete 5D warped-orbifold-GUT axion realization and the explicit fa formula (Eq. 7). That reference is used as a geometric framework, not as a uniqueness theorem or as a fitted result that forces the present isocurvature claims. No parameters are fitted to data and then re-presented as predictions; no ansatz is smuggled in via citation; and the numerical scans over cIR simply map the region where the consistency conditions C1-C2 hold. The central mechanism therefore stands on its own derivation. A score of 2 registers the mild, non-load-bearing self-citation while recognizing that the paper is otherwise self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard RS + Goldberger-Wise framework plus one new UV-brane operator that couples the inflaton to the bulk scalar. Free parameters are the usual dimensionless GW and brane-tension coefficients, scanned numerically; no data fitting occurs. The only invented ingredient is the specific form of that operator, introduced to generate the desired time-dependent boundary value.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha = m_Phi^2/(4k^2) = -0.3 (benchmark)
    Bulk mass parameter of the Goldberger-Wise scalar; benchmark alpha = -0.3 chosen by hand to obtain a stable minimum for alpha < 0 and to control the scaling exponent n ~ 9/(8|alpha|).
  • c_IR, c_V, c_inf, xi, b_CFT = c_V=1, xi=0.99, b_CFT=5 or 10; c_IR scanned ~10^{-4}–10^{-2}
    Dimensionless coefficients controlling IR VEV, inflaton-induced UV VEV, inflationary vacuum energy, residual vacuum-energy fraction, and dual CFT degrees of freedom. Scanned or fixed by hand to satisfy the stationary-minimum conditions (38) and C1–C2.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption 5D Einstein equations with detuned brane tensions admit a warped de-Sitter slicing with Hubble parameter H(y) given by Eq. (23).
    Standard result for RS geometry with positive UV and negative IR detunings (cited Refs. 64–67); used throughout Sec. II B.
  • domain assumption Back-reaction of the Goldberger-Wise scalar on the 5D geometry is negligible when v_UV,IR^2 << M_5^3.
    Standard GW assumption stated after Eq. (11); required for the metric to remain pure AdS_5.
  • ad hoc to paper The inflaton couples to the GW scalar only through the UV-brane operator of Eq. (28) (or an equivalent operator that yields the same VEV scaling), and this operator preserves the symmetries of the inflaton sector.
    Introduced in Sec. III A to generate the time-dependent UV boundary value; not derived from a more fundamental principle.
  • domain assumption Quadratic divergences in the Coleman-Weinberg correction to V_inf are canceled (e.g., by supersymmetry), leaving only a negligible logarithmic piece.
    Stated in footnote 6; needed so that the radion loop does not spoil slow-roll.
invented entities (1)
  • Inflaton-dependent UV boundary condition for the Goldberger-Wise scalar (Eq. 28) no independent evidence
    purpose: Shifts the radion minimum to smaller inter-brane separation during inflation, thereby enhancing f_inf.
    The specific operator is postulated; no independent experimental handle is given beyond the cosmological consequences derived in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 25801 in / 3146 out tokens · 34470 ms · 2026-07-14T14:14:06.834996+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Extra-dimensional QCD axion is well motivated by string compactifications and enjoys enhanced protection against quality-violating effects. If present during inflation, however, its quantum fluctuations generate isocurvature perturbations that strongly constrain the inflationary scale. We propose a dynamical suppression mechanism in warped five-dimensional models, where a radion-inflaton coupling sets the radion minimum at small inter-brane separation during inflation, temporarily enhancing the effective four-dimensional axion decay constant. After inflation, the radion minimum shifts to larger separation, restoring the standard QCD axion window. In a warped orbifold GUT with Goldberger-Wise stabilization, this mechanism can satisfy CMB isocurvature bounds while allowing substantially higher inflationary scales than in conventional pre-inflationary axion cosmology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09969 by Gongjun Choi, Tony Gherghetta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic plot showing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The inflationary Hubble scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 61 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Throughout this work, we assumev 2 UV,IR ≪M 3 5 to ensure that the backreaction of Φ on the 5D geometry is negligible

    The parametersv UV andv IR are the brane- localized VEVs, which in the largeλi limit, fix the bound- ary values Φ(yIR) =v IR ≡c IRk 3 2 ,Φ(y UV) =v UV ≡c UVk 3 2 , (11) wherec IR,UV are dimensionless constants. Throughout this work, we assumev 2 UV,IR ≪M 3 5 to ensure that the backreaction of Φ on the 5D geometry is negligible. For|α| ≪1, whereα≡m 2 Φ/(4k...

  2. [2]

    For 2See also [68–72] for other time dependent solutions for the bulk geometry

    be satisfied at both the UV and IR boundaries: TUV,c +T (0) UV +δT dS UV = 6M 3 5 kcoth(ky c) +T (0) UV , TIR,c +δT dS IR =−6M 3 5 kcoth[k(y c −y IR)](21) whereT UV,c =−T IR,c = 6M 3 5 kare the critically tuned tensions of the static RS solution (9) in the absence of detunings andT (0) UV represents additional tuning needed to obtain the observed 4D cosmo...

  3. [3]

    C. A. Baker et al.,An Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 131801, [hep-ex/0602020]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 127–132

    1983

  5. [5]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 133–136

    1983

  6. [6]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137–141

    1983

  7. [7]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  8. [8]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  9. [9]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223–226

    1978

  10. [10]

    Wilczek,Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282, [none]

    1978

  11. [11]

    Vafa and E

    C. Vafa and E. Witten,Parity Conservation in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 535

    1984

  12. [12]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,Phys. Lett. B 282(1992) 137–141, [hep-th/9202003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  13. [13]

    Holman, S

    R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins, and L. M. Widrow,Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,Phys. Lett. B282 (1992) 132–136, [hep-ph/9203206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  14. [14]

    S. M. Barr and D. Seckel,Planck scale corrections to axion models,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 539–549

    1992

  15. [15]

    Ghigna, M

    S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli, and M. Roncadelli,Instability of the invisible axion,Phys. Lett. B283(1992) 278–281

    1992

  16. [16]

    Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys

    E. Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 351–356

    1984

  17. [17]

    Choi and J

    K. Choi and J. E. Kim,Harmful Axions in Superstring Models,Phys. Lett. B154(1985) 393. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 156, 452 (1985)]

    1985

  18. [18]

    S. M. Barr,Harmless Axions in Superstring Theories, Phys. Lett. B158(1985) 397–400

    1985

  19. [19]

    Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys

    K.-w. Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 101602, [hep-ph/0308024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [20]

    Dvali,Three-form gauging of axion symmetries and gravity,hep-th/0507215

    G. Dvali,Three-form gauging of axion symmetries and gravity,hep-th/0507215

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Flacke, B

    T. Flacke, B. Gripaios, J. March-Russell, and D. Maybury,Warped axions,JHEP01(2007) 061, [hep-ph/0611278]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530, [arXiv:0905.4720]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta, and M. D. Nguyen,A Holographic Perspective on the Axion Quality Problem, JHEP01(2020) 188, [arXiv:1911.09385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Bonnefoy, P

    Q. Bonnefoy, P. Cox, E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, and M. D. Nguyen,Flavoured Warped Axion,JHEP04 (2021) 084, [arXiv:2012.09728]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Gherghetta, V

    T. Gherghetta, V. V. Khoze, A. Pomarol, and Y. Shirman,The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instantons,JHEP03(2020) 063, [arXiv:2001.05610]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai, and M. Suzuki,High quality axion via a doubly composite dynamics,JHEP03(2022) 038, [arXiv:2112.08083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoSTASI2022(2024) 008, [arXiv:2304.08512]

    M. Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoSTASI2022(2024) 008, [arXiv:2304.08512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    C. P. Burgess, G. Choi, and F. Quevedo,UV and IR effects in axion quality control,JHEP03(2024) 051, [arXiv:2301.00549]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Choi and J

    G. Choi and J. Leedom,Implications of protecting the QCD axion in the dual description,JHEP09(2023) 175, [arXiv:2307.08733]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Craig and M

    N. Craig and M. Kongsore,High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 1 015047, [arXiv:2408.10295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    de Giorgi and M

    A. de Giorgi and M. Ramos,Extra-dimensional axion patterns,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 7 075006, [arXiv:2412.00179]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP 07(2025) 130, [arXiv:2406.08543]

    M. Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP 07(2025) 130, [arXiv:2406.08543]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open string axiverse,JHEP07(2025) 049, [arXiv:2503.16387]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    J. N. Benabou, K. Fraser, M. Reig, and B. R. Safdi, String theory and grand unification suggest a submicroelectronvolt QCD axion,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025), no. 6 066003, [arXiv:2505.15884]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Choi and T

    G. Choi and T. Gherghetta,An extra-dimensional axion in a 5D warped orbifold GUT,JHEP03(2026) 169, [arXiv:2512.15666]

    arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Loladze, A

    V. Loladze, A. Platschorre, and M. Reig,Higher axion strings,JHEP08(2025) 182, [arXiv:2503.18707]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig,Axion couplings in Orbifold GUTs,arXiv:2511.21830

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Chakraborty, J

    P. Chakraborty, J. Cheng, M. Reece, and Z. Wang,A step in flux to suppress axion isocurvature,JHEP03 (2026) 046, [arXiv:2507.12519]

    arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Cs´ aki, E

    C. Cs´ aki, E. Kuflik, W. Xue, and T. Youn,The Holographic QCD Axion in Five Dimensions, arXiv:2604.02411

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    K. Choi, C. H. Lee, and C. S. Shin,Axion Quality in Warped Extra-Dimension,arXiv:2604.08700

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    S. Hor, Y. Nakai, M. Suzuki, and J. Xu,Deconstructing the Extra-Dimensional Axion,arXiv:2606.02728

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Planck Collaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, [arXiv:1807.06211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 3370–3373, [hep-ph/9905221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  44. [44]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to Compactification,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4690–4693, [hep-th/9906064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  45. [45]

    Kawasaki, M

    M. Kawasaki, M. Yamada, and T. T. Yanagida, Cosmologically safe QCD axion as a present from extra dimension,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 12–16, [arXiv:1506.05214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Kitano, M

    R. Kitano, M. Suzuki, and W. Yin,Role of QCD in moduli stabilization during inflation and axion dark matter,JHEP11(2023) 103, [arXiv:2307.15059]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise,Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 4922–4925, [hep-ph/9907447]. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  48. [48]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise,Phenomenology of a Stabilized Modulus,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 275–279, [hep-ph/9911457]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  49. [49]

    A. D. Linde,Axions in inflationary cosmology,Phys. Lett. B259(1991) 38–47

    1991

  50. [50]

    A. D. Linde and D. H. Lyth,Axionic domain wall production during inflation,Phys. Lett. B246(1990) 353–358

    1990

  51. [51]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida,Cosmological axion problem in chaotic inflationary universe,Phys. Lett. B409(1997) 94–100, [hep-ph/9608405]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  52. [52]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida,Domain wall problem of axion and isocurvature fluctuations in chaotic inflation models,Phys. Lett. B415(1997) 117–121, [hep-ph/9709202]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Folkerts, C

    S. Folkerts, C. Germani, and J. Redondo,Axion Dark Matter and Planck favor non-minimal couplings to gravity,Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 532–536, [arXiv:1304.7270]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Kawasaki, T

    M. Kawasaki, T. T. Yanagida, and K. Yoshino,Domain wall and isocurvature perturbation problems in axion models,JCAP11(2013) 030, [arXiv:1305.5338]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [55]

    Higaki, K

    T. Higaki, K. S. Jeong, and F. Takahashi,Solving the Tension between High-Scale Inflation and Axion Isocurvature Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B734(2014) 21–26, [arXiv:1403.4186]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    E. J. Chun,Axion Dark Matter with High-Scale Inflation,Phys. Lett. B735(2014) 164–167, [arXiv:1404.4284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    Fairbairn, R

    M. Fairbairn, R. Hogan, and D. J. E. Marsh,Unifying inflation and dark matter with the Peccei-Quinn field: observable axions and observable tensors,Phys. Rev. D 91(2015), no. 2 023509, [arXiv:1410.1752]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Nakayama and M

    K. Nakayama and M. Takimoto,Higgs inflation and suppression of axion isocurvature perturbation,Phys. Lett. B748(2015) 108–112, [arXiv:1505.02119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Harigaya, M

    K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, M. Kawasaki, and T. T. Yanagida, Dynamics of Peccei-Quinn Breaking Field after Inflation and Axion Isocurvature Perturbations,JCAP 11(2015) 003, [arXiv:1507.00119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Kearney, N

    J. Kearney, N. Orlofsky, and A. Pierce,High-Scale Axions without Isocurvature from Inflationary Dynamics,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 9 095026, [arXiv:1601.03049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    I. J. Allali, M. P. Hertzberg, and Y. Lyu,Altered axion abundance from a dynamical Peccei-Quinn scale,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 12 123517, [arXiv:2203.15817]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    J. P. Conlon and F. Revello,Catch-me-if-you-can: the overshoot problem and the weak/inflation hierarchy, JHEP11(2022) 155, [arXiv:2207.00567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08(2001) 017, [hep-th/0012148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  64. [64]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model, JHEP04(2001) 021, [hep-th/0012248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  65. [65]

    Creminelli, A

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi,Holography and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP03(2002) 051, [hep-th/0107141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  66. [66]

    Kaloper,Bent domain walls as brane worlds,Phys

    N. Kaloper,Bent domain walls as brane worlds,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 123506, [hep-th/9905210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    Nihei,Inflation in the five-dimensional universe with an orbifold extra dimension,Phys

    T. Nihei,Inflation in the five-dimensional universe with an orbifold extra dimension,Phys. Lett. B465(1999) 81–85, [hep-ph/9905487]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  68. [68]

    H. B. Kim and H. D. Kim,Inflation and gauge hierarchy in Randall-Sundrum compactification,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 064003, [hep-th/9909053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [69]

    DeWolfe, D

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, and A. Karch,Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 046008, [hep-th/9909134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  70. [70]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. Graesser, C. F. Kolda, and J. Terning, Cosmology of one extra dimension with localized gravity, Phys. Lett. B462(1999) 34–40, [hep-ph/9906513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  71. [71]

    J. M. Cline, C. Grojean, and G. Servant,Cosmological expansion in the presence of extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4245, [hep-ph/9906523]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  72. [72]

    Kanti, I

    P. Kanti, I. I. Kogan, K. A. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Cosmological three-brane solutions,Phys. Lett. B468 (1999) 31–39, [hep-ph/9909481]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  73. [73]

    J. M. Cline, C. Grojean, and G. Servant,Inflating intersecting branes and remarks on the hierarchy problem,Phys. Lett. B472(2000) 302–308, [hep-ph/9909496]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  74. [74]

    R. K. Mishra, M. Nee, and L. Randall,Inflation with a growing fifth dimension,JHEP05(2026) 169, [arXiv:2512.04177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim. B44S10(1966) 1. [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

    1966

  76. [76]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888–1910

    1973

  77. [77]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. L. Graesser, and G. D. Kribs,Radion dynamics and electroweak physics,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 065002, [hep-th/0008151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  78. [78]

    Csaki, J

    C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, and S. J. Lee,Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 125015, [arXiv:0705.3844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  79. [79]

    Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,arXiv:2512.10613

    L. Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,arXiv:2512.10613. [78]Particle Data Group, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 030001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Kobayashi and F

    T. Kobayashi and F. Takahashi,Cosmological Perturbations of Axion with a Dynamical Decay Constant,JCAP08(2016) 056, [arXiv:1607.04294]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.