pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21326 · v1 · pith:GFP5U2Z2new · submitted 2026-05-20 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech

Matching A with F in long-range QFTs

Lorenzo Benfatto , Omar Zanusso This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 03:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords long-range QFTrenormalization group flowA-theoremF-theoremnonunitary CFTmultiscalar modelsperturbation theoryconformal invariance
0
0 comments X

The pith

In long-range multiscalar theories the renormalization group flow obeys a gradient structure up to third loop order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the renormalization group flow in the long-range multiscalar φ^4 theory, a nonunitary model believed to be conformally invariant at fixed points. It establishes that the flow satisfies the gradient equation with a scalar A and positive metric G_IJ up to the third order in the coupling constant. The authors further match these RG quantities to the sphere free-energy and Zamolodchikov's metric of the associated conformal field theory at the leading nontrivial order, using examples of the long-range vector O(N) and hypercubic H_N models. This matching yields a perturbative proof of the tilde F theorem at that order. The discussion extends to whether the structure persists at higher perturbative orders.

Core claim

In the long-range multiscalar φ^4 theory the renormalization group flow satisfies the gradient structure ∂_I A = G_IJ β^J up to the third loop order in the coupling. A and G_IJ match to the leading nontrivial order with the sphere free-energy F̃ and Zamolodchikov's metric C_IJ of the corresponding conformal theory in the examples of the long-range vector O(N) and hypercubic H_N models. This provides a perturbative proof of the F̃-theorem at the leading nontrivial order.

What carries the argument

The gradient flow equation ∂_I A = G_IJ β^J with A a scalar function and G_IJ a positive definite metric on coupling space, which is matched to the CFT quantities F̃ and C_IJ.

If this is right

  • The A function decreases monotonically along the RG flow in these nonunitary models.
  • A perturbative version of the F̃-theorem is established at leading order for the O(N) and H_N models.
  • The gradient structure holds at least through three loops in the coupling.
  • Matching between RG and CFT quantities is possible at the first nontrivial order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gradient structure persists beyond third order it would suggest an all-order A-theorem for these long-range theories.
  • Similar gradient flows might exist in other nonunitary or long-range models where conformal invariance holds at fixed points.
  • Explicit computations at fourth loop order could test whether the matching to F̃ continues to hold.
  • The result connects the irreversibility of RG flow to CFT data even without unitarity.

Load-bearing premise

The long-range multiscalar φ^4 theory remains conformally invariant at its fixed points even though it is non-unitary.

What would settle it

A fourth-order perturbative calculation in which the gradient equation fails to hold or the matching of A to F̃ breaks down would show that the result does not extend beyond third order.

read the original abstract

Unitarity is often a crucial ingredient in establishing theorems -- such as the $A$-theorem -- on the irreversibility of the renormalization group flow. The strongest thesis of this type of theorems would be that there exists a scalar function $A$ and a positive definite metric $G_{IJ}$ in the space of couplings such that the renormalization group flow satisfies a gradient equation, $\partial_I A= G_{IJ}\beta^J$, in which case $A$ is locally monotonic along the flow. In this paper we consider the long-range multiscalar $\phi^4$ theory, which is a nonunitary model that is believed to be conformally invariant at fixed points, and show that its renormalization group flow satisfies the gradient structure up to the third loop order in the coupling. We also show that $A$ and $G_{IJ}$ can be matched to the leading nontrivial order with the sphere free-energy $\tilde{F}$ and Zamolodchikov's metric $C_{IJ}$ of the corresponding conformal theory concentrating on the examples of the long-range vector $O(N)$ and hypercubic $H_N$ models. Our results imply a perturbative proof of the $\tilde{F}$-theorem at the leading nontrivial order. We conclude the paper discussing briefly whether this result should hold to the next orders in perturbation theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the long-range multiscalar φ^4 theory in a non-unitary setting believed to possess conformal invariance at its fixed points. It establishes that the renormalization group beta functions satisfy a gradient flow equation ∂_I A = G_IJ β^J up to third order in perturbation theory. Furthermore, it demonstrates a matching between the RG function A and metric G_IJ with the sphere free energy F̃ and Zamolodchikov metric C_IJ at the leading nontrivial order for the O(N) vector and hypercubic H_N models, thereby providing a perturbative proof of the F̃-theorem at that order.

Significance. Should the central claims hold, this work contributes to the understanding of RG irreversibility in non-unitary quantum field theories by verifying a gradient structure perturbatively. The explicit matching to CFT quantities in specific models offers concrete evidence for the F̃-theorem in long-range theories, which may inform broader studies of conformal invariance and monotonicity in RG flows beyond unitary cases. The focus on third-loop calculations and leading-order matching provides a solid foundation for further investigations into higher orders.

major comments (2)
  1. Introduction: The conformal invariance of the fixed points, required to equate the RG quantities A and G_IJ with the CFT quantities F̃ and C_IJ, is assumed based on prior literature rather than explicitly verified within the perturbative framework of this paper (e.g., via computation of the trace anomaly or stress-tensor conservation). This assumption is load-bearing for the matching claim.
  2. Section 3: While the gradient structure is claimed up to three loops, the explicit three-loop beta-function expressions and the verification of ∂_I A = G_IJ β^J are not presented in detail in the main text; they appear to be relegated to appendices, which hinders direct assessment of the cancellations involved in establishing the gradient flow.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation throughout: The distinction between A and F̃, and G_IJ and C_IJ, should be clarified more explicitly in the abstract and introduction to avoid potential confusion for readers unfamiliar with the long-range model.
  2. Discussion section: The brief discussion on whether the result holds to higher orders could be expanded with a specific conjecture or outline of potential obstructions at four loops.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we intend to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Introduction: The conformal invariance of the fixed points, required to equate the RG quantities A and G_IJ with the CFT quantities F̃ and C_IJ, is assumed based on prior literature rather than explicitly verified within the perturbative framework of this paper (e.g., via computation of the trace anomaly or stress-tensor conservation). This assumption is load-bearing for the matching claim.

    Authors: We agree that conformal invariance of the fixed points is an assumption required for the identification of the RG functions A and G_IJ with the CFT quantities F̃ and C_IJ. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit statement in the introduction clarifying that conformal invariance is assumed on the basis of prior literature on long-range models, with appropriate references. A direct perturbative check of conformal invariance (for instance via the trace anomaly or stress-tensor conservation) lies outside the scope of the present work; our results remain consistent with the assumed conformal fixed points and provide a perturbative test of the F̃-theorem under that assumption. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Section 3: While the gradient structure is claimed up to three loops, the explicit three-loop beta-function expressions and the verification of ∂_I A = G_IJ β^J are not presented in detail in the main text; they appear to be relegated to appendices, which hinders direct assessment of the cancellations involved in establishing the gradient flow.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the placement of the three-loop expressions and the explicit verification of the gradient-flow relation in the appendices makes it harder to follow the cancellations. In the revised version we will move the three-loop beta-function expressions for the O(N) and H_N models into Section 3, together with a concise summary of the key cancellation steps that establish ∂_I A = G_IJ β^J. The full algebraic details will remain in the appendices for completeness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; perturbative RG gradient and CFT matching are independent calculations

full rationale

The paper computes the beta functions of the long-range multiscalar model and verifies the gradient-flow relation ∂_I A = G_IJ β^J explicitly up to three loops as an internal perturbative result. Separately, it evaluates the sphere free energy F̃ and Zamolodchikov metric C_IJ in the conformal theory at the fixed points and shows numerical matching at leading nontrivial order. The conformal invariance of the fixed points is stated as a prior belief rather than derived inside the calculation, but the matching itself is not obtained by re-labeling or fitting one quantity to the other; both sides are computed from distinct expansions. No self-definitional reduction, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain appears in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the long-range φ^4 theory remains conformally invariant at fixed points even though it is non-unitary; this assumption is used to equate RG quantities with CFT quantities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The long-range multiscalar φ^4 theory is conformally invariant at its fixed points despite being non-unitary.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify matching A and G_IJ to F̃ and C_IJ of the corresponding conformal theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5771 in / 1233 out tokens · 50563 ms · 2026-05-21T03:25:50.673854+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,” JETP Lett.43(1986), 730-732

    1986

  2. [2]

    C theorem and spectral representation,

    A. Cappelli, D. Friedan and J. I. Latorre, “C theorem and spectral representation,” Nucl. Phys. B352(1991), 616-670

    1991

  3. [3]

    The c and a-theorems and the Local Renormalisation Group

    G. M. Shore, “The c and a-theorems and the Local Renormalisation Group,” Springer, 2017, ISBN 978-3-319-53999-7, 978-3-319-54000-9 [arXiv:1601.06662 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Weyl consistency conditions and a local renormalization group equation for general renormalizable field theories,

    H. Osborn, “Weyl consistency conditions and a local renormalization group equation for general renormalizable field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B363(1991), 486-526

    1991

  5. [5]

    A c-theorem for the entanglement entropy

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, “A c-theorem for the entanglement entropy,” J. Phys. A40(2007), 7031-7036 [arXiv:cond-mat/0610375 [cond-mat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    F-Theorem without Supersymmetry

    I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu and B. R. Safdi, “F-Theorem without Supersymmetry,” JHEP10 (2011), 038 [arXiv:1105.4598 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, “On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle,” Phys. Rev. D85(2012), 125016 [arXiv:1202.5650 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Is There a c Theorem in Four-Dimensions?,

    J. L. Cardy, “Is There a c Theorem in Four-Dimensions?,” Phys. Lett. B215(1988), 749-752

    1988

  9. [9]

    Derivation of a Four-dimensionalcTheorem,

    H. Osborn, “Derivation of a Four-dimensionalcTheorem,” Phys. Lett. B222(1989), 97-102

    1989

  10. [10]

    Analogs for thecTheorem for Four-dimensional Renormalizable Field Theories,

    I. Jack and H. Osborn, “Analogs for thecTheorem for Four-dimensional Renormalizable Field Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B343(1990), 647-688 – 26 –

    1990

  11. [11]

    On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions

    Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, “On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions,” JHEP12(2011), 099 [arXiv:1107.3987 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    The Constraints of Conformal Symmetry on RG Flows

    Z. Komargodski, “The Constraints of Conformal Symmetry on RG Flows,” JHEP07(2012), 069 [arXiv:1112.4538 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    The $a$-theorem and the Asymptotics of 4D Quantum Field Theory

    M. A. Luty, J. Polchinski and R. Rattazzi, “Thea-theorem and the Asymptotics of 4D Quantum Field Theory,” JHEP01(2013), 152 d[arXiv:1204.5221 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    A Constraint on Defect and Boundary Renormalization Group Flows

    K. Jensen and A. O’Bannon, “Constraint on Defect and Boundary Renormalization Group Flows,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.9, 091601 [arXiv:1509.02160 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Towards a $C$-theorem in defect CFT

    N. Kobayashi, T. Nishioka, Y. Sato and K. Watanabe, “Towards aC-theorem in defect CFT,” JHEP01(2019), 039 [arXiv:1810.06995 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Irreversibility in quantum field theories with boundaries

    H. Casini, I. Salazar Landea and G. Torroba, “Irreversibility in quantum field theories with boundaries,” JHEP04(2019), 166 [arXiv:1812.08183 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Revisiting thek-theorem with the ANEC,

    N. Nakamura, Y. Nakayama and U. Nguyen, “Revisiting thek-theorem with the ANEC,” [arXiv:2511.17072 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    On renormalization group flows and the a-theorem in 6d

    H. Elvang, D. Z. Freedman, L. Y. Hung, M. Kiermaier, R. C. Myers and S. Theisen, “On renormalization group flows and the a-theorem in 6d,” JHEP10(2012), 011 [arXiv:1205.3994 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    A challenge to the $a$-theorem in six dimensions

    B. Grinstein, D. Stone, A. Stergiou and M. Zhong, “Challenge to theaTheorem in Six Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) no.23, 231602 [arXiv:1406.3626 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Anomalies, Renormalization Group Flows, and the a-Theorem in Six-Dimensional (1,0) Theories

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, “Anomalies, renormalization group flows, and the a-theorem in six-dimensional (1, 0) theories,” JHEP10(2016), 080 [arXiv:1506.03807 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Constraints on Perturbative RG Flows in Six Dimensions

    A. Stergiou, D. Stone and L. G. Vitale, “Constraints on Perturbative RG Flows in Six Dimensions,” JHEP08(2016), 010 [arXiv:1604.01782 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Irreversibility of the renormalization group flow in non-unitary quantum field theory

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon and F. Ravanini, “Irreversibility of the renormalization group flow in non-unitary quantum field theory,” J. Phys. A50(2017) no.42, 424002 [arXiv:1706.01871 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric Field Theories at Finite Temperature

    O. Diatlyk, A. Katsevich and F. K. Popov, “PT-symmetric Field Theories at Finite Temperature,” [arXiv:2604.08459 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Unitarity violation at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in 4-epsilon dimensions

    M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov and B. C. van Rees, “Unitarity violation at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in 4-ϵdimensions,” Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.12, 125025 [arXiv:1512.00013 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Conformal Invariance in the Long-Range Ising Model

    M. F. Paulos, S. Rychkov, B. C. van Rees and B. Zan, “Conformal Invariance in the Long-Range Ising Model,” Nucl. Phys. B902(2016), 246-291 [arXiv:1509.00008 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Interpolating between $a$ and $F$

    S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov, “Interpolating betweenaandF,” JHEP03(2015), 117 [arXiv:1409.1937 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Generalized $F$-Theorem and the $\epsilon$ Expansion

    L. Fei, S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, “GeneralizedF-Theorem and theϵ Expansion,” JHEP12(2015), 155 [arXiv:1507.01960 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Conformal QED$_d$, $F$-Theorem and the $\epsilon$ Expansion

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, “Conformal QED d,F-Theorem and theϵ Expansion,” J. Phys. A49(2016) no.13, 135403 [arXiv:1508.06354 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Critical Exponents for Long-Range Interactions,

    M. E. Fisher, S. k. Ma and B. G. Nickel, “Critical Exponents for Long-Range Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972), 917-920 – 27 –

    1972

  30. [30]

    Relations between short-range and long-range Ising models,

    M. C. Angelini, G. Parisi and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, “Relations between short-range and long-range Ising models,” Phys. Rev. E89(2014) no.6, 062120

    2014

  31. [31]

    The crossover region between long-range and short-range interactions for the critical exponents

    E. Brezin, G. Parisi and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, “The Crossover Region Between Long-Range and Short-Range Interactions for the Critical Exponents,” J. Statist. Phys.157(2014) no.4-5, 855-868 [arXiv:1407.3358 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Long-range critical exponents near the short-range crossover

    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, “Long-range critical exponents near the short-range crossover,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) no.24, 241601 [arXiv:1703.03430 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality

    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, “A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality,” J. Phys. A50(2017) no.35, 354002 [arXiv:1703.05325 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Fixed Points Structure & Effective Fractional Dimension for O(N) Models with Long-Range Interactions

    N. Defenu, A. Trombettoni and A. Codello, “Fixed-point structure and effective fractional dimensionality for O(N) models with long-range interactions,” Phys. Rev. E92(2015) no.5, 052113 [arXiv:1409.8322 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Long-range vector models at large N,

    N. Chai, M. Goykhman and R. Sinha, “Long-range vector models at large N,” JHEP09 (2021), 194 [arXiv:2107.08052 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Analytic and numerical bootstrap for the long-range Ising model,

    C. Behan, E. Lauria, M. Nocchi and P. van Vliet, “Analytic and numerical bootstrap for the long-range Ising model,” JHEP03(2024), 136 [arXiv:2311.02742 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    One-Dimensional Ising Model with 1/r1.99 Interaction,

    D. Benedetti, E. Lauria, D. Maz´ aˇ c and P. van Vliet, “One-Dimensional Ising Model with 1/r1.99 Interaction,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) no.20, 201602 [arXiv:2412.12243 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    The sphere free energy of the vector models to order 1/N,

    L. Fraser-Taliente, “The sphere free energy of the vector models to order 1/N,” [arXiv:2507.16896 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Long range, large charge, large N,

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger and H. Khanchandani, “Long range, large charge, large N,” JHEP01, 166 (2023) [arXiv:2205.00500 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Long-range multi-scalar models at three loops,

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, S. Harribey and K. Suzuki, “Long-range multi-scalar models at three loops,” J. Phys. A53(2020) no.44, 445008 [erratum: J. Phys. A58(2025), 129401] [arXiv:2007.04603 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    O(N) models with boundary interactions and their long range generalizations,

    S. Giombi and H. Khanchandani, “O(N) models with boundary interactions and their long range generalizations,” JHEP08(2020) no.08, 010 [arXiv:1912.08169 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Long-range minimal models,

    C. Behan, D. Benedetti, F. Eustachon and E. Lauria, “Long-range minimal models,” JHEP 02(2026), 001 [arXiv:2509.26372 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Constraints on RG Flow for Four Dimensional Quantum Field Theories

    I. Jack and H. Osborn, “Constraints on RG Flow for Four Dimensional Quantum Field Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B883(2014), 425-500 [arXiv:1312.0428 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Gradient-flow equations for general Quantum Field Theories,

    C. W. Poole, “Gradient-flow equations for general Quantum Field Theories,”

  45. [45]

    Consequences of Weyl Consistency Conditions

    B. Grinstein, A. Stergiou and D. Stone, “Consequences of Weyl Consistency Conditions,” JHEP11(2013), 195 [arXiv:1308.1096 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    Consistency of local renormalization group in d=3

    Y. Nakayama, “Consistency of local renormalization group in d=3,” Nucl. Phys. B879 (2014), 37-64 [arXiv:1307.8048 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    The a-function for gauge theories

    I. Jack and C. Poole, “The a-function for gauge theories,” JHEP01(2015), 138 [arXiv:1411.1301 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Constraints on 3- and 4-loopβ-functions in a general four-dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    C. Poole and A. E. Thomsen, “Constraints on 3- and 4-loopβ-functions in a general four-dimensional Quantum Field Theory,” JHEP09(2019), 055 [arXiv:1906.04625 [hep-th]]. – 28 –

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Gradient Flow and the Renormalization Group,

    D. J. Wallace and R. K. P. Zia, “Gradient Flow and the Renormalization Group,” Phys. Lett. A48(1974), 325

    1974

  50. [50]

    The a-function in six dimensions

    J. A. Gracey, I. Jack and C. Poole, “The a-function in six dimensions,” JHEP01(2016), 174 [arXiv:1507.02174 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Gradient properties ofφ3 in d=6-ϵ,

    L. Benfatto and O. Zanusso, “Gradient properties ofφ3 in d=6-ϵ,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.10, 105009 [arXiv:2507.20761 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Gradient RG Flow in Scalar-Fermion QFTs,

    W. H. Pannell, W. P. Ronayne and A. Stergiou, “Gradient RG Flow in Scalar-Fermion QFTs,” [arXiv:2511.01971 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Gradient properties of perturbative multiscalar RG flows to six loops,

    W. H. Pannell and A. Stergiou, “Gradient properties of perturbative multiscalar RG flows to six loops,” Phys. Lett. B853(2024), 138701 [arXiv:2402.17817 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Gradient flows and the curvature of theory space,

    W. H. Pannell and A. Stergiou, “Gradient flows and the curvature of theory space,” JHEP 09(2025), 117 [arXiv:2502.06940 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions,

    K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher, “Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.28 (1972), 240-243

    1972

  56. [56]

    The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion,

    K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, “The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion,” Phys. Rept.12(1974), 75-199

    1974

  57. [57]

    Sphere free energy of scalar field theories with cubic interactions,

    S. Giombi, E. Himwich, A. Katsevich, I. Klebanov and Z. Sun, “Sphere free energy of scalar field theories with cubic interactions,” JHEP12(2025), 133 [arXiv:2412.14086 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Local CFTs extremise $F$

    L. Fraser-Taliente, “Local CFTs extremiseF,” [arXiv:2604.15420 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Dynamical theory of groups and fields,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Dynamical theory of groups and fields,” Conf. Proc. C630701(1964), 585-820 1964,

    1964

  60. [60]

    On ambiguities and divergences in perturbative renormalization group functions,

    F. Herren and A. E. Thomsen, “On ambiguities and divergences in perturbative renormalization group functions,” JHEP06, 116 (2021) [arXiv:2104.07037 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Analytic tools for Feynman integrals,

    V. A. Smirnov, “Analytic tools for Feynman integrals,” Springer Tracts Mod. Phys.250 (2012), 1-296

    2012

  62. [62]

    Mellin-Barnes Integrals: A Primer on Particle Physics Applications,

    I. Dubovyk, J. Gluza and G. Somogyi, “Mellin-Barnes Integrals: A Primer on Particle Physics Applications,” Lect. Notes Phys.1008(2022), pp. [arXiv:2211.13733 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Automatized analytic continuation of Mellin-Barnes integrals

    M. Czakon, “Automatized analytic continuation of Mellin-Barnes integrals,” Comput. Phys. Commun.175(2006), 559-571 [arXiv:hep-ph/0511200 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  64. [64]

    Kosower,barnesroutines.mathttps://mbtools.hepforge.org/

    D. Kosower,barnesroutines.mathttps://mbtools.hepforge.org/. – 29 –