Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reading Isn't Believing: Adversarial Attacks On Multi-Modal Neurons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.10480 v1 pith:GGTXQJ6L submitted 2021-03-18 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.CV
keywords modelreadingvisualadversarialattacksbelievingclipfalse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With Open AI's publishing of their CLIP model (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training), multi-modal neural networks now provide accessible models that combine reading with visual recognition. Their network offers novel ways to probe its dual abilities to read text while classifying visual objects. This paper demonstrates several new categories of adversarial attacks, spanning basic typographical, conceptual, and iconographic inputs generated to fool the model into making false or absurd classifications. We demonstrate that contradictory text and image signals can confuse the model into choosing false (visual) options. Like previous authors, we show by example that the CLIP model tends to read first, look later, a phenomenon we describe as reading isn't believing.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Contrastive Spectral Rectification: Test-Time Defense towards Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness of CLIP

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CSR detects and repairs adversarial CLIP inputs by comparing features with a low-pass filtered copy and applying a small contrastive PGD correction, claiming SOTA robust accuracy on 16 benchmarks.

  2. Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety

    cs.CR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive survey that taxonomizes safety threats to large models and agents, reviews defenses and benchmarks, and outlines open challenges.

Pith tools