REVIEW 2 cited by
Detecting Spurious Correlations via Robust Visual Concepts in Real and AI-Generated Image Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Detecting Spurious Correlations via Robust Visual Concepts in Real and AI-Generated Image Classification
read the original abstract
Often machine learning models tend to automatically learn associations present in the training data without questioning their validity or appropriateness. This undesirable property is the root cause of the manifestation of spurious correlations, which render models unreliable and prone to failure in the presence of distribution shifts. Research shows that most methods attempting to remedy spurious correlations are only effective for a model's known spurious associations. Current spurious correlation detection algorithms either rely on extensive human annotations or are too restrictive in their formulation. Moreover, they rely on strict definitions of visual artifacts that may not apply to data produced by generative models, as they are known to hallucinate contents that do not conform to standard specifications. In this work, we introduce a general-purpose method that efficiently detects potential spurious correlations, and requires significantly less human interference in comparison to the prior art. Additionally, the proposed method provides intuitive explanations while eliminating the need for pixel-level annotations. We demonstrate the proposed method's tolerance to the peculiarity of AI-generated images, which is a considerably challenging task, one where most of the existing methods fall short. Consequently, our method is also suitable for detecting spurious correlations that may propagate to downstream applications originating from generative models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Current validation practice undermines surgical AI development
A consensus-based catalog of 18 validation pitfalls, with evidence that common practices understate uncertainty, hide failures, and flip algorithm rankings in surgical video AI.
-
Current validation practice undermines surgical AI development
A multi-stage Delphi consensus with 92 experts catalogs widespread validation pitfalls in surgical AI video analysis across data, metrics, and reporting, supported by a systematic review and empirical experiments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.