REVIEW 2 cited by
Hard Encoding of Physics for Learning Spatiotemporal Dynamics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Modeling nonlinear spatiotemporal dynamical systems has primarily relied on partial differential equations (PDEs). However, the explicit formulation of PDEs for many underexplored processes, such as climate systems, biochemical reaction and epidemiology, remains uncertain or partially unknown, where very limited measurement data is yet available. To tackle this challenge, we propose a novel deep learning architecture that forcibly encodes known physics knowledge to facilitate learning in a data-driven manner. The coercive encoding mechanism of physics, which is fundamentally different from the penalty-based physics-informed learning, ensures the network to rigorously obey given physics. Instead of using nonlinear activation functions, we propose a novel elementwise product operation to achieve the nonlinearity of the model. Numerical experiment demonstrates that the resulting physics-encoded learning paradigm possesses remarkable robustness against data noise/scarcity and generalizability compared with some state-of-the-art models for data-driven modeling.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PDE-DKL: PDE-constrained deep kernel learning in high dimensionality
A neural network compresses high-dimensional PDE coordinates into a low-dimensional latent space, where a PDE-constrained Gaussian process achieves accurate solutions and uncertainty estimates on test problems up to 5...
-
Physics-Encoded Inverse Modeling for Arctic Snow Depth Estimation
PhysE-Inv predicts a snow-depth proxy generated from the same ERA5 inputs the model sees, so its accuracy against real Arctic snow depth is unestablished.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.