Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Practical Guidance for Bayesian Inference in Astronomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04703 v1 pith:GIS6BFJX submitted 2023-02-09 astro-ph.IM stat.AP

classification astro-ph.IMstat.AP
keywords bayesianastronomyinferencestatisticsliteraturenotationastrostatisticschoice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the last two decades, Bayesian inference has become commonplace in astronomy. At the same time, the choice of algorithms, terminology, notation, and interpretation of Bayesian inference varies from one sub-field of astronomy to the next, which can lead to confusion to both those learning and those familiar with Bayesian statistics. Moreover, the choice varies between the astronomy and statistics literature, too. In this paper, our goal is two-fold: (1) provide a reference that consolidates and clarifies terminology and notation across disciplines, and (2) outline practical guidance for Bayesian inference in astronomy. Highlighting both the astronomy and statistics literature, we cover topics such as notation, specification of the likelihood and prior distributions, inference using the posterior distribution, and posterior predictive checking. It is not our intention to introduce the entire field of Bayesian data analysis -- rather, we present a series of useful practices for astronomers who already have an understanding of the Bayesian "nuts and bolts" and wish to increase their expertise and extend their knowledge. Moreover, as the field of astrostatistics and astroinformatics continues to grow, we hope this paper will serve as both a helpful reference and as a jumping off point for deeper dives into the statistics and astrostatistics literature.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. pop-cosmos: Disentangling galaxy properties from observables using data-driven approaches

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A beta-VAE analysis of pop-cosmos models finds that five latent dimensions capture the rest-frame optical SED, corresponding to stellar mass, recent star formation, dust, and two gas ionization states.

  2. pop-cosmos: Disentangling galaxy properties from observables using data-driven approaches

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rest-frame optical galaxy SEDs from a 16-parameter SPS model are captured by five disentangled VAE latents (mass, young stars, dust, soft/hard ionization); metallicity and age are not independent drivers.

  3. pop-cosmos: Galaxy size evolution across structural and star-formation classifications in COSMOS-Web

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Galaxy size-mass relations exhibit double power-law breaks at different pivot masses for quiescent versus bulge-dominated samples, coinciding with AGN activity scales.

  4. Precise and Rapid Parameter Inference of Kilonova with Conditional Variational Autoencoder

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A conditional variational autoencoder is trained on public kilonova light curves to enable rapid parameter inference for binary neutron star merger models in under three hours total.

Pith tools