Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Sens-Merging: Sensitivity-Guided Parameter Balancing for Merging Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.12420 v2 pith:GJMK4BY6 submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords mergingmodelstasksacrosscross-taskexistingmethodmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models have led to numerous task-specialized fine-tuned variants, creating a need for efficient model merging techniques that preserve specialized capabilities while avoiding costly retraining. While existing task vector-based merging methods show promise, they typically apply uniform coefficients across all parameters, overlooking varying parameter importance both within and across tasks. We present Sens-Merging, a sensitivity-guided coefficient adjustment method that enhances existing model merging techniques by operating at both task-specific and cross-task levels. Our method analyzes parameter sensitivity within individual tasks and evaluates cross-task transferability to determine optimal merging coefficients. Extensive experiments on Mistral 7B and LLaMA2-7B/13B models demonstrate that Sens-Merging significantly improves performance across general knowledge, mathematical reasoning, and code generation tasks. Notably, when combined with existing merging techniques, our method enables merged models to outperform specialized fine-tuned models, particularly in code generation tasks. Our findings reveal important trade-offs between task-specific and cross-task scalings, providing insights for future model merging strategies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Efficient Reasoning in LLM-Based Recommender Systems via Model Merging

    cs.IR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    REAM merges slow- and fast-thinking recommender models at the per-attention-head level, cutting reasoning length by up to 24.3% while preserving rating accuracy.

  2. ReCatcher: Towards LLMs Regression Testing for Code Generation

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReCatcher systematically measures regressions in LLM code generation across correctness, static quality, and performance, and its evaluation shows fine-tuning, merging, and new releases each introduce specific regressions.

  3. Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review that categorizes methods for shortening and adaptively triggering chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models.

Pith tools