Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Prompt-Based Editing for Text Style Transfer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.11997 v2 pith:GJPJ2ILU submitted 2023-01-27 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords styleapproachclassificationeditinggenerationprompt-basedtexttransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Prompting approaches have been recently explored in text style transfer, where a textual prompt is used to query a pretrained language model to generate style-transferred texts word by word in an autoregressive manner. However, such a generation process is less controllable and early prediction errors may affect future word predictions. In this paper, we present a prompt-based editing approach for text style transfer. Specifically, we prompt a pretrained language model for style classification and use the classification probability to compute a style score. Then, we perform discrete search with word-level editing to maximize a comprehensive scoring function for the style-transfer task. In this way, we transform a prompt-based generation problem into a classification one, which is a training-free process and more controllable than the autoregressive generation of sentences. In our experiments, we performed both automatic and human evaluation on three style-transfer benchmark datasets, and show that our approach largely outperforms the state-of-the-art systems that have 20 times more parameters. Additional empirical analyses further demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ELI-Why: Evaluating the Pedagogical Utility of Language Model Explanations

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ELI-Why shows GPT-4's grade-tailored explanations often miss the intended educational level and are less informative than human-curated explanations.

Pith tools