pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.01358 · v1 · pith:GNMJNAO4new · submitted 2026-02-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cs.AI· cs.SE

Towards knowledge-based workflows: a semantic approach to atomistic simulations for mechanical and thermodynamic properties

Abril Azocar Guzman , Hoang-Thien Luu , Sarath Menon , Tilmann Hickel , Nina Merkert , Stefan Sandfeld This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 14:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AIcs.SE
keywords atomistic simulationsmolecular dynamicsFAIR dataworkflowsontologiesmechanical propertiesthermodynamic propertiesprovenance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reusable atomistic workflows annotated with application ontologies automatically capture provenance and produce FAIR-compliant outputs for mechanical and thermodynamic properties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces reusable workflows for molecular dynamics simulations that calculate quantities such as equations of state, elastic tensors, thermal properties, defect formation energies, and nanoindentation. These workflows embed metadata drawn from application ontologies so that every step and parameter is recorded automatically. A sympathetic reader would care because the method turns fragmented scripts into shareable templates that maintain full traceability when reused on new materials or interatomic potentials. The authors show the workflows can validate known relations like the Hall-Petch effect and generate data ready for downstream AI use.

Core claim

We present reusable atomistic workflows that incorporate metadata annotation aligned with application ontologies, enabling automatic provenance capture and FAIR-compliant data outputs. The workflows cover key mechanical and thermodynamic quantities, including equation of state, elastic tensors, mechanical loading, thermal properties, defect formation energies, and nanoindentation. We demonstrate validation of structure-property relations such as the Hall-Petch effect and show that the workflows can be reused across different interatomic potentials and materials within a coherent semantic framework.

What carries the argument

Metadata annotation aligned with application ontologies embedded inside reusable workflow templates, which automatically records provenance and produces FAIR-compliant outputs.

If this is right

  • The workflows validate structure-property relations such as the Hall-Petch effect.
  • The same templates can be reused across different interatomic potentials and materials while preserving semantic consistency.
  • The generated data sets are AI-ready and can support emerging agentic AI workflows.
  • The approach supplies a generalizable blueprint for knowledge-based mechanical and thermodynamic simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The semantic layer could be ported to other simulation domains such as electronic structure or multiscale modeling to achieve similar provenance gains.
  • Adoption would lower the effort required for large-scale data aggregation across research groups working on the same class of materials.
  • The ontology-annotated outputs could serve as training data for machine-learning models that predict simulation parameters rather than results alone.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen application ontologies supply enough coverage and precision to represent all relevant simulation metadata without needing major custom extensions or losing critical provenance details for the listed properties.

What would settle it

Executing one of the published workflows on a new material and interatomic potential and checking whether the output metadata file still contains every parameter and step required to reproduce a defect formation energy or nanoindentation result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.01358 by Abril Azocar Guzman, Hoang-Thien Luu, Nina Merkert, Sarath Menon, Stefan Sandfeld, Tilmann Hickel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Data journey proposed for atomistic simulations, representing data resulting from atomistic software codes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Workflow diagram showing the general sequence of steps used in all simulations, from structure creation to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Conceptual dictionary snippet in JSON format. (b) Schematic representation of the RDF serialization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Thermophysical properties of bcc Fe as calculated with the EAM01 potential: (a) Energy-volume curve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Results of SPARQL queries from the knowledge graph: (a) Bulk modulus and (b) elastic constant, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variation of flow stress with inverse square root of the average grain size. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of traditional ad-hoc simulation scripts (left) and knowledge-based workflows (right). Tradi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Mechanical and thermodynamic properties, including the influence of crystal defects, are critical for evaluating materials in engineering applications. Molecular dynamics simulations provide valuable insight into these mechanisms at the atomic scale. However, current practice often relies on fragmented scripts with inconsistent metadata and limited provenance, which hinders reproducibility, interoperability, and reuse. FAIR data principles and workflow-based approaches offer a path to address these limitations. We present reusable atomistic workflows that incorporate metadata annotation aligned with application ontologies, enabling automatic provenance capture and FAIR-compliant data outputs. The workflows cover key mechanical and thermodynamic quantities, including equation of state, elastic tensors, mechanical loading, thermal properties, defect formation energies, and nanoindentation. We demonstrate validation of structure-property relations such as the Hall-Petch effect and show that the workflows can be reused across different interatomic potentials and materials within a coherent semantic framework. The approach provides AI-ready simulation data, supports emerging agentic AI workflows, and establishes a generalizable blueprint for knowledge-based mechanical and thermodynamic simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents reusable atomistic workflows for molecular dynamics simulations that incorporate metadata annotation aligned with application ontologies. This setup enables automatic provenance capture and generates FAIR-compliant data outputs. The workflows address key mechanical and thermodynamic quantities including the equation of state, elastic tensors, mechanical loading, thermal properties, defect formation energies, and nanoindentation. Validation of structure-property relations such as the Hall-Petch effect is claimed, along with demonstration of reuse across different interatomic potentials and materials in a coherent semantic framework. The approach is positioned to provide AI-ready simulation data and support agentic AI workflows.

Significance. Should the ontology-based annotations prove comprehensive for all listed simulation types, the work offers a meaningful step toward knowledge-based workflows in materials modeling. It builds on standard MD techniques by adding semantic layers for better reproducibility and interoperability, which aligns with growing emphasis on FAIR principles in computational science. Explicit credit is due for attempting to create a generalizable blueprint that could facilitate data reuse and integration with AI systems.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the claim that validation of structure-property relations such as the Hall-Petch effect was performed provides no quantitative metrics, error analysis, or details on post-processing or data exclusion. This is load-bearing for the central demonstration that the workflows are effective and reusable.
  2. Sections describing nanoindentation and defect workflows: the manuscript does not document how simulation-specific parameters (indenter tip geometry, loading protocol, thermostat settings, supercell boundary conditions) are represented in the chosen application ontologies or whether custom extensions were required. This directly affects the claim of sufficient coverage and precision for automatic provenance capture without loss of critical details.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: a brief parenthetical mention of the specific application ontologies employed would help readers assess the claimed alignment without needing to consult external references.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback, which has helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened for clarity and completeness. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve the presentation of our results and methods.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the claim that validation of structure-property relations such as the Hall-Petch effect was performed provides no quantitative metrics, error analysis, or details on post-processing or data exclusion. This is load-bearing for the central demonstration that the workflows are effective and reusable.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, due to its brevity, does not include quantitative details on the Hall-Petch validation. The main text demonstrates this relation through comparative plots and tabulated results across grain sizes (Section 4), but we acknowledge that explicit metrics, error bars, and post-processing descriptions would better support the claim. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract to reference the key quantitative findings from the results section and added a new paragraph in the methods describing the post-processing steps, ensemble averaging, and data exclusion criteria used for the validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Sections describing nanoindentation and defect workflows: the manuscript does not document how simulation-specific parameters (indenter tip geometry, loading protocol, thermostat settings, supercell boundary conditions) are represented in the chosen application ontologies or whether custom extensions were required. This directly affects the claim of sufficient coverage and precision for automatic provenance capture without loss of critical details.

    Authors: We concur that explicit documentation of parameter-to-ontology mappings is necessary to substantiate the claim of comprehensive provenance capture. The original manuscript describes the general alignment with application ontologies but does not provide itemized mappings for the listed simulation-specific parameters. In the revised version we have added a new table and accompanying text that details the ontology terms used for each parameter (including indenter geometry and loading protocols), indicates where standard terms were sufficient, and notes the custom extensions introduced to preserve critical details such as thermostat settings and boundary conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: workflows built on external ontologies and standard MD methods

full rationale

The paper describes the construction and reuse of atomistic workflows that annotate simulation outputs with metadata drawn from existing application ontologies. It demonstrates these workflows on standard quantities (equation of state, elastic tensors, defect energies, nanoindentation) and validates known relations such as the Hall-Petch effect. No physical predictions, fitted parameters, or first-principles derivations are claimed; the contribution is the semantic framework itself. Because the central claims rest on external ontologies and conventional molecular-dynamics techniques rather than on quantities defined or fitted by the authors' own prior results, the derivation chain contains no self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-load-bearing steps. The manuscript is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central contribution rests on the existence and adequacy of application ontologies for atomistic simulations plus standard molecular-dynamics methods. No new physical constants or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract; the main added elements are the workflow templates and metadata mappings.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existing application ontologies can accurately annotate simulation metadata for mechanical and thermodynamic properties without loss of critical information.
    Invoked when stating that metadata annotation is aligned with application ontologies to enable provenance capture.
  • standard math Standard molecular-dynamics techniques for equation of state, elastic tensors, defect energies, and nanoindentation are already reliable and well-defined.
    The workflows are built on top of these established simulation methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5729 in / 1592 out tokens · 39614 ms · 2026-05-21T14:23:19.999034+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, K. a. Persson,APL Materials2013,1, 1 011002

    work page

  2. [2]

    M. K. Horton, P. Huck, R. X. Yang, J. M. Munro, S. Dwaraknath, A. M. Ganose, R. S. Kingsbury, M. Wen, J. X. Shen, T. S. Mathis, A. D. Kaplan, K. Berket, J. Riebesell, J. George, A. S. Rosen, E. W. C. Spotte-Smith, M. J. McDermott, O. A. Cohen, A. Dunn, M. C. Kuner, G.-M. Rignanese, G. Petretto, D. Waroquiers, S. M. Griffin, J. B. Neaton, D. C. Chrzan, M. ...

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Curtarolo, W

    S. Curtarolo, W. Setyawan, G. L. Hart, M. Jahnatek, R. V. Chepulskii, R. H. Taylor, S. Wang, J. Xue, K. Yang, O. Levy, M. J. Mehl, H. T. Stokes, D. O. Demchenko, D. Morgan,Compu- tational Materials Science2012,58218

    work page

  4. [4]

    Scheidgen, L

    M. Scheidgen, L. Himanen, A. N. Ladines, D. Sikter, M. Nakhaee, A. Fekete, T. Chang, A. Gol- parvar, J. A. M´ arquez, S. Brockhauser, S. Br¨ uckner, L. M. Ghiringhelli, F. Dietrich, D. Lehm- berg, T. Denell, A. Albino, H. N¨ asstr¨ om, S. Shabih, F. Dobener, M. K¨ uhbach, R. Mozumder, J. F. Rudzinski, N. Daelman, J. M. Pizarro, M. Kuban, C. Salazar, P. On...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Menon, Y

    S. Menon, Y. Lysogorskiy, A. L. M. Knoll, N. Leimeroth, M. Poul, M. Qamar, J. Janssen, M. Mrovec, J. Rohrer, K. Albe, J. Behler, R. Drautz, J. Neugebauer,npj Computational Materials2024,10, 1 261

    work page

  6. [6]

    Himanen, A

    L. Himanen, A. Geurts, A. S. Foster, P. Rinke,Advanced Science2019,6, 21 1900808

    work page

  7. [7]

    M. L. Evans, J. Bergsma, A. Merkys, C. W. Andersen, O. B. Andersson, D. Beltr´ an, E. Blokhin, T. M. Boland, R. Casta˜ neda Balderas, K. Choudhary, A. D´ ıaz D´ ıaz, R. Dom´ ınguez Garc´ ıa, H. Eckert, K. Eimre, M. E. Fuentes Montero, A. M. Krajewski, J. J. Mortensen, J. M. N´ apoles Duarte, J. Pietryga, J. Qi, F. d. J. Trejo Carrillo, A. Vaitkus, J. Yu, ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Bonomi, G

    M. Bonomi, G. Bussi, C. Camilloni, G. A. Tribello, P. Ban´ aˇ s, A. Barducci, M. Bernetti, P. G. Bolhuis, S. Bottaro, D. Branduardi, R. Capelli, P. Carloni, M. Ceriotti, A. Cesari, H. Chen, W. Chen, F. Colizzi, S. De, M. De La Pierre, D. Donadio, V. Drobot, B. Ensing, A. L. Fer- guson, M. Filizola, J. S. Fraser, H. Fu, P. Gasparotto, F. L. Gervasio, F. Gi...

    work page

  9. [9]

    M. D. Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J.-W. Boiten, L. B. da Silva Santos, P. E. Bourne, J. Bouwman, A. J. Brookes, T. Clark, M. Crosas, I. Dillo, O. Dumon, S. Edmunds, C. T. Evelo, R. Finkers, A. Gonzalez- Beltran, A. J. Gray, P. Groth, C. Goble, J. S. Grethe, J. Heringa, P. A. ’t Hoen, R. Hooft, T...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Scheffler, M

    M. Scheffler, M. Aeschlimann, M. Albrecht, T. Bereau, H.-J. Bungartz, C. Felser, M. Greiner, A. Groß, C. T. Koch, K. Kremer, W. E. Nagel, M. Scheidgen, C. W¨ oll, C. Draxl,Nature2022, 604, 7907 635

    work page

  11. [11]

    L. M. Ghiringhelli, C. Baldauf, T. Bereau, S. Brockhauser, C. Carbogno, J. Chamanara, S. Cozzini, S. Curtarolo, C. Draxl, S. Dwaraknath, ´A. Fekete, J. Kermode, C. T. Koch, M. K¨ uhbach, A. N. Ladines, P. Lambrix, M.-O. Himmer, S. V. Levchenko, M. Oliveira, A. Michalchuk, R. E. Miller, B. Onat, P. Pavone, G. Pizzi, B. Regler, G.-M. Rignanese, J. Schaarsch...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Bayerlein, T

    B. Bayerlein, T. Hanke, T. Muth, J. Riedel, M. Schilling, C. Schweizer, B. Skrotzki, A. Todor, B. Moreno Torres, J. F. Unger, C. V¨ olker, J. Olbricht,Advanced Engineering Materials2022, 24, 6 2101176

    work page

  13. [13]

    Bayerlein, M

    B. Bayerlein, M. Schilling, P. von Hartrott, J. Waitelonis,Scientific Data2024,11, 1 434

    work page

  14. [14]

    Ghafarollahi, M

    A. Ghafarollahi, M. J. Buehler,Advanced Materials2025,37, 22 2413523

    work page

  15. [15]

    Janssen, S

    J. Janssen, S. Surendralal, Y. Lysogorskiy, M. Todorova, T. Hickel, R. Drautz, J. Neugebauer, Computational Materials Science2019,16324

    work page

  16. [16]

    A. S. Rosen, M. Gallant, J. George, J. Riebesell, H. Sahasrabuddhe, J.-X. Shen, M. Wen, M. L. Evans, G. Petretto, D. Waroquiers, G.-M. Rignanese, K. A. Persson, A. Jain, A. M. Ganose, Journal of Open Source Software2024,9, 93 5995

    work page

  17. [17]

    S. P. Huber, S. Zoupanos, M. Uhrin, L. Talirz, L. Kahle, R. H¨ auselmann, D. Gresch, T. M¨ uller, A. V. Yakutovich, C. W. Andersen, F. F. Ramirez, C. S. Adorf, F. Gargiulo, S. Kumbhar, E. Passaro, C. Johnston, A. Merkys, A. Cepellotti, N. Mounet, N. Marzari, B. Kozinsky, G. Pizzi,Scientific Data2020,7, 1 300

    work page

  18. [18]

    M. R. Crusoe, S. Abeln, A. Iosup, P. Amstutz, J. Chilton, N. Tijani´ c, H. M´ enager, S. Soiland- Reyes, B. Gavrilovi´ c, C. Goble, The CWL Community,Commun. ACM2022,65, 6 54

    work page

  19. [19]

    Huber, J

    L. Huber, J. Neugebauer, pyiron workflow,https://github.com/pyiron/pyiron_workflow, Accessed: 2025-02-15. 17 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/, W3C Recommendation

    W3C RDF Working Group, Rdf 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax,2014, URLhttps://www. w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/, W3C Recommendation

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    W3C OWL Working Group, Owl 2 web ontology language document overview,2012, URL https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/, W3C Recommendation

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Eberl, M

    C. Eberl, M. Niebel, E. Bitzek, T. Dahmen, F. Fritzen, P. Gumbsch, T. Hickel, S. Klein, F. M¨ ucklich, M. S. M¨ uller, J. Neugebauer, C. Pauly, M. Politze, H. Sack, S. Sandfeld, R. Schwaiger, P. Slusallek, R. Stotzka, A. Streit, M. Zimmermann, Consortium proposal nfdi-matwerk,2021, URLhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5082837

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.5082837 2021

  23. [23]

    A. A. Guzm´ an, S. Sandfeld, Computational Material Sample Ontology (CMSO),2024, URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10805536

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10805536 2024

  24. [24]

    A. A. Guzm´ an, S. Sandfeld, Atomistic Simulation Methods Ontology (ASMO),2024, URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10805591

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10805591 2024

  25. [25]

    org/TR/prov-o/, W3C Recommendation

    W3C Provenance Working Group, Prov-o: The prov ontology,2013, URLhttps://www.w3. org/TR/prov-o/, W3C Recommendation

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Menon, A

    S. Menon, A. A. Guzm´ an, atomRDF, python tool for ontology-based creation, manipulation, and quering of atomic structures.,2024, URLhttps://github.com/pyscal/atomRDF

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Semantic workflows repository, URLhttps://github.com/pyscal/semantic-workflows

    work page

  28. [28]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S. J. Plimpton,Comp. Phys. Comm.2022,271108171

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Lammps unit systems,https://docs.lammps.org/units.html, LAMMPS Documentation, accessed 2025-02-15

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Birch,Phys

    F. Birch,Phys. Rev.1947,71809

    work page 1947

  31. [31]

    LAMMPS Developers, LAMMPS example: Elastic constant calculation, GitHub repository, 2025, URLhttps://github.com/lammps/lammps/tree/develop/examples/ELASTIC, Ac- cessed: 2025-02-17

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Hirel,Computer Physics Communications2015,197212

    P. Hirel,Computer Physics Communications2015,197212

    work page

  33. [33]

    M. P. Allen, D. J. Tildesley,Computer simulation of liquids, Oxford university press, Oxford, 2nd ed edition,2017

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Menon, Y

    S. Menon, Y. Lysogorskiy, J. Rogal, R. Drautz,Phys. Rev. Mater.2021,5103801

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Huang, C

    S. Huang, C. Zhou,JOM – The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society2017, 69, 11 2256

    work page

  36. [36]

    M. S. Daw, M. I. Baskes,Phys. Rev. B1984,296443

    work page

  37. [37]

    Gunkelmann, E

    N. Gunkelmann, E. M. Bringa, K. Kang, G. J. Ackland, C. J. Ruestes, H. M. Urbassek,Phys. Rev. B2012,86, 14 144111

    work page

  38. [38]

    J. J. Adams, D. S. Agosta, R. G. Leisure, H. Ledbetter,Journal of Applied Physics2006,100, 11 113530

    work page

  39. [39]

    Luu, S.-L

    H.-T. Luu, S.-L. Dang, T.-V. Hoang, N. Gunkelmann,Applied Surface Science2021,551 149221

    work page

  40. [40]

    M. W. Chase, C. A. Davies, J. R. Downey, D. J. Frurip, R. A. McDonald, A. N. Syverud,NIST- JANAF Thermochemical Tables, NIST Standard Reference Database 13. National Institute of Standards and Technology, version 1.0 edition,1985. 18 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 1985

  41. [41]

    Y. M. Kozlovskii, S. V. Stankus,J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.2019,1382, 1 012181

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    B. J. Jensen, I. Gray, G. T., R. S. Hixson,Journal of Applied Physics2009,105, 10 103502

    work page

  43. [43]

    Lysogorskiy, A

    Y. Lysogorskiy, A. Bochkarev, R. Drautz, Graph atomic cluster expansion for foundational machine learning interatomic potentials,2025, URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17936

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Hristova, R

    E. Hristova, R. Janisch, R. Drautz, A. Hartmaier,Computational Materials Science2011,50, 3 1088

    work page

  45. [45]

    Y. Sun, F. Zhang, M. I. Mendelev, R. M. Wentzcovitch, K.-M. Ho,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2022,119, 2 e2113059119

    work page

  46. [46]

    Starikov, D

    S. Starikov, D. Smirnova, T. Pradhan, Y. Lysogorskiy, H. Chapman, M. Mrovec, R. Drautz, Phys. Rev. Mater.2021,5063607

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Proville, D

    L. Proville, D. Rodney, M.-C. Marinica,Nature Materials2012,11, 10 845

    work page

  48. [48]

    Chiesa, P

    S. Chiesa, P. M. Derlet, S. L. Dudarev, H. V. Swygenhoven,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2011,23, 20 206001

    work page

  49. [49]

    Malerba, M

    L. Malerba, M. Marinica, N. Anento, C. Bj¨ orkas, H. Nguyen, C. Domain, F. Djurabekova, P. Olsson, K. Nordlund, A. Serra, D. Terentyev, F. Willaime, C. Becquart,Journal of Nuclear Materials2010,406, 1 19, fP6 IP PERFECT Project: Prediction of Irradiation Damage Effects in Reactor Components

    work page

  50. [50]

    P. A. Olsson,Computational Materials Science2009,47, 1 135

    work page

  51. [51]

    Chamati, N

    H. Chamati, N. Papanicolaou, Y. Mishin, D. Papaconstantopoulos,Surface Science2006,600, 9 1793

    work page

  52. [52]

    X. W. Zhou, R. A. Johnson, H. N. G. Wadley,Phys. Rev. B2004,69144113

    work page

  53. [53]

    M. I. Mendelev, S. Han, D. J. Srolovitz, G. J. Ackland, D. Y. Sun, M. Asta,Philosophical Magazine2003,83, 35 3977

    work page

  54. [54]

    Lysogorskiy, C

    Y. Lysogorskiy, C. v. d. Oord, A. Bochkarev, S. Menon, M. Rinaldi, T. Hammerschmidt, M. Mrovec, A. Thompson, G. Cs´ anyi, C. Ortner, R. Drautz,npj Computational Materials 2021,7, 1 97

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Bienvenu, M

    B. Bienvenu, M. Todorova, J. Neugebauer, D. Raabe, M. Mrovec, Y. Lysogorskiy, R. Drautz, npj Computational Materials2025,11, 1 81

    work page

  56. [56]

    A.-C. N. Ngomo, L. B¨ uhmann, C. Unger, J. Lehmann, D. Gerber,Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web2013

    work page

  57. [57]

    Menon, A

    S. Menon, A. A. Guzm´ an, O. Waseda, S. Sandfeld, T. Hickel,Journal of Open Source Software 2026,11, 117 9482

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Jelinek, S

    B. Jelinek, S. Groh, M. F. Horstemeyer, J. Houze, S. G. Kim, G. J. Wagner, A. Moitra, M. I. Baskes,Phys. Rev. B2012,85245102

    work page

  59. [59]

    Kumar, S

    P. Kumar, S. Kabra, J. M. Cole,Scientific Data2022,9, 1 292

    work page

  60. [60]

    Janssen, J

    J. Janssen, J. George, J. Geiger, M. Bercx, X. Wang, C. Ertural, J. Schaarschmidt, A. M. Ganose, G. Pizzi, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer,Digital Discovery2025,43149

    work page

  61. [61]

    Osamu Waseda, Semantikon, URLhttps://github.com/pyiron/semantikon, Accessed: 2025-02-14

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    J. N. Otte, J. Beverley, A. Ruttenberg,Applied Ontology2022,17, 1 17

    work page

  63. [63]

    Prudhomme, G

    T. Prudhomme, G. De Colle, A. Liebers, A. Sculley, P. K. Xie, S. Cohen, J. Beverley,Scientific Data2025,12, 1 282. 19 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page

  64. [64]

    Zimmermann, A

    Y. Zimmermann, A. Bazgir, A. Al-Feghali, M. Ansari, J. Bocarsly, L. C. Brinson, Y. Chiang, D. Circi, M.-H. Chiu, N. Daelman, M. L. Evans, A. S. Gangan, J. George, H. Harb, G. Khaligh- inejad, S. T. Khan, S. Klawohn, M. Lederbauer, S. Mahjoubi, B. Mohr, S. M. Moosavi, A. Naik, A. B. Ozhan, D. Plessers, A. Roy, F. Sch¨ oppach, P. Schwaller, C. Terboven, K. ...

    work page

  65. [65]

    J¨ ulich Supercomputing Centre,Journal of large-scale research facilities2021,7, A182. 20

    work page