Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dealing with Semantic Underspecification in Multimodal NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05240 v1 pith:GOJMGLNK submitted 2023-06-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords languagesemanticunderspecificationinformationmultimodalapplicationscrucialhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Intelligent systems that aim at mastering language as humans do must deal with its semantic underspecification, namely, the possibility for a linguistic signal to convey only part of the information needed for communication to succeed. Consider the usages of the pronoun they, which can leave the gender and number of its referent(s) underspecified. Semantic underspecification is not a bug but a crucial language feature that boosts its storage and processing efficiency. Indeed, human speakers can quickly and effortlessly integrate semantically-underspecified linguistic signals with a wide range of non-linguistic information, e.g., the multimodal context, social or cultural conventions, and shared knowledge. Standard NLP models have, in principle, no or limited access to such extra information, while multimodal systems grounding language into other modalities, such as vision, are naturally equipped to account for this phenomenon. However, we show that they struggle with it, which could negatively affect their performance and lead to harmful consequences when used for applications. In this position paper, we argue that our community should be aware of semantic underspecification if it aims to develop language technology that can successfully interact with human users. We discuss some applications where mastering it is crucial and outline a few directions toward achieving this goal.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VIKSER: Visual Knowledge-Driven Self-Reinforcing Reasoning Framework

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VIKSER combines fine-grained visual relationship captions, question paraphrasing, evidence-based prompting, and self-reflection to reach state-of-the-art results on six visual reasoning datasets.

Pith tools