Integrating Large Language Models for Automated Structural Analysis
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:GOOUZV2Xrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Automated analysis for engineering structures offers considerable potential for boosting efficiency by minimizing repetitive tasks. Although AI-driven methods are increasingly common, no systematic framework yet leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for automatic structural analysis. To address this gap, we propose a novel framework that integrates LLMs with structural analysis software. LLMs serve as the core engine: they parse structural descriptions from text and translate them into executable Python scripts. Moreover, the framework integrates the generative capabilities of LLMs with code-based finite element (FE) tools like OpenSeesPy. It employs domain-specific prompt design and in-context learning strategies to enhance the LLM's problem-solving capabilities and generative stability, enabling fully automated structural analysis from descriptive text to model outputs. In our experiments, we introduce a well-curated small-scale benchmark dataset of 20 structural analysis word problems (SAWPs) with ground-truth solutions and evaluate the performance of different LLMs within our framework in solving these SAWPs. The role of system instructions, crafted by structural engineers, is also investigated to understand their impact on LLM-driven structural analysis. Additionally, the generative stability of our framework is examined. Through multiple validation experiments on the benchmark, our results demonstrate that the proposed framework can substantially increase the level of automation in solving SAWPs compared to traditional methods. Quantitatively, the framework, built on GPT-4o, achieved 100% accuracy, surpassing GPT-4 (85%), Gemini 1.5 Pro (80%), and Llama-3.3 (30%) on the test examples. Furthermore, integrating domain-specific instructions enhanced performance by 30% on problems with asymmetrical structural configurations.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
A Constrained Natural-Language Interface for Variational Multi-Physics Finite Element Simulations in FEniCS
A constrained LLM front-end for FEniCS multi-physics simulations dispatches to human-written templates and achieves 100% valid parses plus 90-100% geometry success on benchmarks while avoiding LLM-generated solver code.
-
Agentic Large Language Models for Automated Structural Analysis of 3D Frame Systems
A multi-agent LLM system using 2D grid projection and specialized agents for nodes, girders, columns, and loads generates executable scripts for 3D frame analysis, achieving 90% accuracy on ten test cases.
-
Automating Structural Analysis Across Multiple Software Platforms Using Large Language Models
A two-stage multi-agent LLM converts structural inputs to JSON then platform-specific scripts for ETABS, SAP2000, and OpenSees, achieving over 90% accuracy on 20 frame problems across ten trials.
-
IterSIMP-{\sigma}: Evaluating LLM-Assisted Spatial Interventions in Stress-Aware Topology Optimization
IterSIMP-σ integrates multimodal LLMs for proposing spatial density interventions in stress-aware SIMP topology optimization, yielding comparable but statistically non-significant performance gains over rule-based bas...
-
Prompt Governance? On Governing Technologies Governed by Natural Language
Literature on system prompts for AI shows fragmented and contradictory claims that complicate policy efforts to use them as reliable governance mechanisms.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.