Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Artificial Intelligence in Rural Healthcare Delivery: Bridging Gaps and Enhancing Equity through Innovation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review of 109 studies argues that AI can reduce rural-urban health gaps by delivering specialist-level screening and diagnosis where specialists are absent, and that LLMs and multimodal models could extend access once validation and in

desk verdict A useful, well-structured review that maps the rural-health AI landscape but overstates its case with pooled accuracy numbers; worth refereeing with a required tempering of conclusions. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11738 v1 pith:GSGAI3OT submitted 2025-08-15 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CV

Kiruthika Balakrishnan , Durgadevi Velusamy , Hana E. Hinkle , Zhi Li , Karthikeyan Ramasamy , Hikmat Khan , Srini Ramaswamy , Pir Masoom Shah This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CV
keywords artificialintelligenceruralhealthcarehealthequitydiagnosticscreeningtelemedicinemachinelearningdisparitiessystematicreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a systematic review of 109 studies on artificial intelligence in rural healthcare. It argues that AI-based screening, diagnostic, predictive, and telemedicine tools perform strongly enough—most studies report accuracies above 85 percent—to reduce rural-urban disparities and compensate for missing specialists. The authors conclude that AI can improve access, quality, and efficiency in rural systems, and that large language models and multimodal foundation models are the next step for documentation, triage, translation, and virtual assistance. The significance for a general reader: the review offers a map of where AI is already close to deployable in rural care and what must happen—external validation, infrastructure investment, training, and regulation—before the promise becomes routine.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument is the pooled performance evidence. The review collects accuracy, AUC, and F1 scores from 109 heterogeneous studies, groups them into six application domains (chronic and non-communicable disease, maternal/pediatric/elderly care, infectious disease, telemedicine, specialized care, and population health), and uses the reported ranges as the ground for its 'promise' claim. Validation strategy is the second component: 89.9 percent of studies rely on internal validation only and 10.1 percent use external validation, a distribution the paper itself flags as the main reason its evidence base is not yet generalizable. The argument's forward-looking machinery is the multi

What would settle it

Take the diabetic retinopathy CNN that reported an AUC above 0.90 in one of the reviewed studies and run it, without retraining, on fundus images from a different rural region with a different camera and population; if its AUC falls to 0.60 or below—or fails to beat the local optometrist's referral rule—the pooled 'significant promise' claim for rural screening loses its force. The same test applies to the 91.2 percent mean Random Forest accuracy across 18 studies: re-running those models on independent external data would reveal how much of that number is dataset-specific.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Across 109 studies published between 2019 and 2024, the paper claims that AI applications in rural healthcare have demonstrated significant promise: chronic-disease models report accuracy from 81.2 to 97.5 percent, area-under-the-curve (AUC) scores from 0.78 to 0.96, and F1-scores from 0.74 to 0.93; maternal, pediatric, and elderly-care models report accuracy up to 94.7 percent; infectious-disease tools report accuracies from 84.3 to 96.1 percent. The review treats these pooled numbers as evidence that AI can handle tasks that rural clinics normally cannot staff—most prominently diabetic retinopathy screening and automated prenatal ultrasound, which it describes as approaching specialist-lev

Load-bearing premise

The review's central claim depends on treating the accuracy rates reported by 109 studies—measured on different diseases, populations, and datasets—as comparable evidence of AI's overall promise, even though nearly 90 percent of those studies were validated only on their own internal data and never tested in an independent rural setting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the pooled evidence holds, AI screening for diabetic retinopathy, prenatal ultrasound, and other image-based tasks can be deployed in rural primary-care sites and match or approach specialist-level accuracy, cutting referral delays.
  • Predictive models for chronic disease, missed appointments, and emergency-department crowding would allow rural systems to shift from reactive care to early intervention and better allocation of scarce staff and beds.
  • LLM-driven documentation, triage, translation, and patient-facing assistants would reduce administrative load on rural providers and make health information accessible in local languages.
  • These benefits are conditional: models trained and validated on one rural population cannot be assumed to work in another, so external and multi-site validation becomes a prerequisite for equity rather than a technical nicety.
  • Federated learning, synthetic rural data, offline-capable models, and low-bandwidth telemedicine are the concrete routes the paper names for turning reported accuracy into sustained rural deployment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A uniform re-evaluation of all 109 models on independent rural datasets—rather than each study reporting its best configuration—would show how much of the pooled accuracy is dataset-specific; that is the natural next experiment.
  • The evidence base is much stronger for image-based tasks such as diabetic retinopathy, prenatal ultrasound, and chest X-rays than for structured-data tasks like appointment prediction, so the paper's general 'AI transforms rural care' framing is more secure in imaging than elsewhere.
  • The paper's own barrier list implies that after validation, the binding constraint will be workflow integration and trust rather than model accuracy; offline-capable AI can help only if staff are trained to interpret its outputs and communities accept it.
  • Claims about LLMs and multimodal foundation models are extrapolations: the reviewed studies mostly test narrower, task-specific models, so the foundation-model role is a research agenda rather than current rural practice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a systematic literature review of 109 studies (2019–2024) on artificial intelligence applications in rural healthcare delivery. The authors searched five databases, screened records with Covidence following a PRISMA-style workflow, and grouped the included studies into thematic areas: chronic and non-communicable diseases, maternal/pediatric/elderly care, infectious diseases, telemedicine and health technology, specialized/preventive care, and population health. The review reports summary statistics on study design, validation type, and model performance, and it concludes that AI can 'drive a paradigm shift in rural healthcare delivery, reducing disparities and strengthening healthcare systems.' The Discussion and Recommendations sections qualify this by listing barriers such as data scarcity, limited external validation, infrastructure deficits, and ethical concerns, and by calling for longitudinal studies and real-world implementation.

Significance. The review addresses an important and timely question: whether AI can reduce rural–urban health inequities. Its strengths include a reproducible search strategy across five databases, a reported PRISMA flow (1,691 records to 109 included studies), and a clear thematic organization of the heterogeneous literature. The paper is also honest in several places about the evidence base, explicitly noting that only 10.1% of studies used external validation and that real-world deployment was rare. If the synthesizing claims were adequately supported, the paper would be valuable to researchers, policymakers, and funders working on AI in low-resource settings. However, the gap between the reported evidence—mostly model-level accuracy metrics from internally validated, retrospective/cross-sectional studies—and the conclusion that AI will reduce disparities and transform rural healthcare is substantial. The useful contribution of the paper is therefore more as a scoping map of current AI applications than as a demonstration of effectiveness or equity impact.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, AI applications for chronic and non-communicable diseases] The pooled performance statistics are not a valid quantitative synthesis. The paper states that Random Forest had a 'mean accuracy of 91.2% (SD=3.1%)' across 18 studies and Logistic Regression an 'average accuracy of 85.4% (SD=4.7%)' across 12 studies. These studies differ by disease, population, data modality, sample size, and clinical task, so an unweighted arithmetic mean is not an appropriate summary. No heterogeneity assessment, meta-analytic weighting, or comparability argument is provided. This aggregate number is then used in the Results and Conclusion as evidence of 'significant promise'; it should either be removed or replaced with a range-plus-context presentation that avoids implying that a single summary measure can be pooled across tasks.
  2. [Figure 9 and Conclusion] The headline claim that AI can 'drive a paradigm shift in rural healthcare delivery, reducing disparities and strengthening healthcare systems' is not supported by the outcome evidence reported in the review. The paper's own data show that 89.9% of studies used only internal validation and that 38.5% were cross-sectional and 32.1% retrospective. No included study is reported as directly measuring rural–urban disparity reduction, health-system strengthening, or population-level equity outcomes; the reported outcomes are predominantly model metrics (accuracy, AUC, F1). The conclusion therefore extrapolates from surrogate technical performance to population-level impact without a causal or implementation evidence chain. I recommend that the Conclusion and Abstract be reframed to state that AI shows 'potential' in advance of real-world validation, and that the evidence gap be made explicit.
  3. [Section 2.5, Data synthesis] The paper claims that 'the quality of each study was meticulously assessed' and that 'the quality assessment criteria included...' but no quality assessment results are presented anywhere in the Results. There is no risk-of-bias table, no scoring rubric, no summary of how many studies met which criteria, and no sensitivity analysis excluding low-quality studies. For a review whose credibility rests on the reliability of its included studies, this is a load-bearing omission. The authors should either provide the quality-assessment instrument and the per-study results in the supplementary material, or temper the claim that the evidence base is robust.
  4. [Section 2, Methods] There is an internal inconsistency between the stated methodological frameworks. The text says the review 'followed the Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews' and also applied PRISMA-ScR, which is a reporting guideline for scoping reviews, not for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane systematic reviews typically require a registered protocol, a risk-of-bias assessment, and (where appropriate) meta-analysis; this review does none of these. The authors should clarify which type of review this is (a scoping review or a systematic review) and justify the label. If it is a systematic review without meta-analysis, a PRISMA 2020 checklist and protocol registration would be expected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References 11 and 16] The same reference appears twice: reference [11] and reference [16] are identical citations to the same paper by Velusamy, Pugalendhi, and Ramasamy. Duplicate entries in the reference list should be removed.
  2. [Section 2.2, Search strategy] The phrase 'documents generated by non-humans (e.g., ChatGpt)' is informal and probably unnecessary in the exclusion criteria. It would be clearer to say 'AI-generated documents without human authorial oversight' or simply drop this category, as it is unlikely to appear in the databases searched.
  3. [Data Availability Statement] For a systematic review, the data availability statement saying 'available from the corresponding author on reasonable request' is less transparent than providing the full data extraction table and quality assessments as supplementary files. The paper states that metadata for all 109 studies is in a supplementary table, so consider also publishing the extraction spreadsheet.
  4. [Figure 11] Figure 11 ranks 'the top 50 AI applications by best performance metrics.' Ranking single best metrics across heterogeneous studies can be misleading because the highest values may reflect easy tasks, small samples, or overly optimistic internal validation. The caption should clarify that these are not comparable estimates of clinical effectiveness.
  5. [Abstract, 'MFMs and LLMs'] The Abstract and Conclusion give prominence to Multimodal Foundation Models and Large Language Models as 'particularly transformative,' but the Results do not appear to contain a dedicated synthesis of evidence on these model types. Either add a subsection describing which of the 109 studies used MFMs or LLMs and what their reported performance was, or soften this claim in the Abstract so it does not outrun the included evidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: a self-contained literature review whose conclusions rest on externally published primary studies; the authors' self-citations are peripheral and not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a systematic literature review, not a derivation from first principles. The central claim that AI shows 'significant promise' and 'transformative potential' for rural healthcare is synthesized from 109 externally published primary studies (e.g., diagnostic accuracy, AUC, F1-scores reported in those studies). No parameter is fitted by the authors and then renamed as a prediction; there is no equation or construction that equates an output with an input; and no external uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The authors' self-citations (refs 11–16, 18, 22) appear only in the introduction as background examples of AI applications (smart grids, ECG classification, solar prediction, etc.) and are not used as evidence for the review's synthesized findings; the conclusions would be unchanged if those citations were removed. The paper explicitly flags the limitations of its evidence base—89.9% of included studies used only internal validation, and real-world deployment and longitudinal evaluation were rare—which is a correctness/validity concern about extrapolating from model metrics to population-level impact, not a circular dependency. The synthesis is therefore self-contained against the external primary literature and exhibits no circularity. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities, as this is a review. The central claims rest on the reliability of the included primary studies and the correctness of the authors' thematic coding.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 109 included studies are accurately classified into the six thematic categories
    The authors group studies under 'chronic disease,' 'maternal,' 'infectious disease,' etc., but the classification criteria are not fully specified and could be subjective.
  • domain assumption The performance metrics reported in the primary studies are accurate and comparable across studies
    The review pools accuracy, AUC, and F1 scores from studies with different tasks, populations, and metrics, assuming these can be meaningfully summarized.
  • domain assumption The PRISMA screening was correctly applied with consistent reviewer decisions
    Two reviewers screened, but inter-rater reliability or resolution process is only briefly described.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Artificial Intelligence in Rural Healthcare Delivery: Bridging Gaps and Enhancing Equity through Innovation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GSGAI3OT

@misc{pith2026250811738,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Artificial Intelligence in Rural Healthcare Delivery: Bridging Gaps and Enhancing Equity through Innovation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GSGAI3OT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11738}
}
read the original abstract

Rural healthcare faces persistent challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, workforce shortages, and socioeconomic disparities that hinder access to essential services. This study investigates the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing these issues in underserved rural areas. We systematically reviewed 109 studies published between 2019 and 2024 from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus. Articles were screened using PRISMA guidelines and Covidence software. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify key patterns and insights regarding AI implementation in rural healthcare delivery. The findings reveal significant promise for AI applications, such as predictive analytics, telemedicine platforms, and automated diagnostic tools, in improving healthcare accessibility, quality, and efficiency. Among these, advanced AI systems, including Multimodal Foundation Models (MFMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs), offer particularly transformative potential. MFMs integrate diverse data sources, such as imaging, clinical records, and bio signals, to support comprehensive decision-making, while LLMs facilitate clinical documentation, patient triage, translation, and virtual assistance. Together, these technologies can revolutionize rural healthcare by augmenting human capacity, reducing diagnostic delays, and democratizing access to expertise. However, barriers remain, including infrastructural limitations, data quality concerns, and ethical considerations. Addressing these challenges requires interdisciplinary collaboration, investment in digital infrastructure, and the development of regulatory frameworks. This review offers actionable recommendations and highlights areas for future research to ensure equitable and sustainable integration of AI in rural healthcare systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MorphGen: Morphology-Guided Representation Learning for Robust Single-Domain Generalization in Histopathological Cancer Classification

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MorphGen uses supervised contrastive learning to align histopathology images with nuclear masks and applies SWA, reporting improved out-of-domain cancer classification accuracy on CAMELYON17, BCSS, and OCELOT.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Efforts should focus on reducing algorithmic bias, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and establishing stan- dardized protocols for clinical evaluation

    Model Development and Validation: Prioritize the development of AI models tailored to diverse populations and healthcare settings by integrating diverse 27 datasets, including socio-demographic and omics data. Efforts should focus on reducing algorithmic bias, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and establishing stan- dardized protocols for clinical evaluation...

  2. [2]

    TechnologyIntegrationandUsability:Developuser-friendlyinterfacesandoffline- compatible solutions to address connectivity challenges in rural areas. Efforts should focus on seamlessly integrating AI tools into telemedicine platforms and EHRs to enhance usability and foster collaborative workflows between AI systems and healthcare professionals

  3. [3]

    Chronic Disease Management: Validate AI interventions for screening, predict- ing, and managing chronic conditions like diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Research should explore the cost-effectiveness and scalability of these interven- tions in underserved regions, while expanding to understudied areas such as mental health disorders prevalent in rural...

  4. [4]

    Community Engagement and Education: Design and implement community- based education programs to improve health literacy and awareness of AI technologies. Tailored training for healthcare workers is essential to build trust and acceptance of AI solutions, particularly for hybrid models combining AI decision-support with human oversight

  5. [5]

    Collaborate with policymakers to integrate AI into national health programs, focusing on targeted interventions for underserved populations and longitudinal evaluation frameworks

    Real-World Implementation and Policy Integration: Conduct pilot studies to assess the usability of AI tools and incorporate feedback from diverse stakehold- ers. Collaborate with policymakers to integrate AI into national health programs, focusing on targeted interventions for underserved populations and longitudinal evaluation frameworks

  6. [6]

    Longitudinal Studies and Generalizability: Conduct long-term studies to evaluate AI’s impact on health outcomes and system resilience. Use longitudinal datasets and causal inference methods to improve the sustainability of AI applications, with particular attention to real-world validation in diverse rural settings

  7. [7]

    Privacy, Security, and Ethical Considerations: Develop robust frameworks to addressdataprivacy,security,andalgorithmicfairness.Transparentpoliciesmust guide the ethical deployment of AI in rural settings, including specific provisions for mental health applications and human-AI collaboration models

  8. [8]

    Cultural relevance and community-level solu- tions are critical for acceptance, particularly for sensitive applications like mental health screening

    Population-Specific and Localized Interventions: Tailor AI tools to meet the unique needs of rural populations, emphasizing localized screening strategies and disease-specific interventions. Cultural relevance and community-level solu- tions are critical for acceptance, particularly for sensitive applications like mental health screening

Show all 145 references
  1. [9]

    Cost-Effectiveness and Scalability: Evaluate the economic implications of AI adoption and prioritize scalable, low-cost models to maximize accessibility and sustainability, including hybrid approaches that optimize resource use in low-infrastructure settings

  2. [10]

    Mechanisms for oversight, trans- parency, and iterative improvements must be developed to adapt to emerging challenges in human-AI collaboration and mental health applications

    Regulation and Governance: Establish comprehensive regulatory frameworks for the ethical deployment of AI in healthcare. Mechanisms for oversight, trans- parency, and iterative improvements must be developed to adapt to emerging challenges in human-AI collaboration and mental ...

  3. [11]

    Generative AI for Health Literacy and Self-Help: Leverage generative AI tools such as medical-specific large language models (e.g., Med-PaLM, BioGPT) and multilingual chatbots to support self-help, health education, and patient engage- ment in rural settings. These tools can p...

  4. [12]

    & Velusamy, D

    Ramasamy, K., Balakrishnan, K. & Velusamy, D. Detection of cardiac arrhyth- mias from ECG signals using FBSE and Jaya optimized ensemble random subspace K-nearest neighbor algorithm. Biomed Signal Process Control 76, (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    https://www.who.int/activities/addressing-health-inequities-among-people- living-in-rural-and-remote-areas

  6. [14]

    S., Locock, L., Skea, Z., Skatun, D

    Maclaren, A. S., Locock, L., Skea, Z., Skatun, D. & Wilson, P. Rurality, health- care and crises: Investigating experiences, differences, and changes to medical care for people living in rural areas. Health Place 87, (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Mapari, S. A. et al. Revolutionizing Maternal Health: The Role of Arti- ficial Intelligence in Enhancing Care and Accessibility. Cureus (2024) doi:10.7759/cureus.69555. 30

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Krittanawong,C.,Zhang,H.,Wang,Z.,Aydar,M.&Kitai,T.REVIEWTOPIC OF THE WEEK Artificial Intelligence in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine. (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Andishgar, A. et al. Machine learning-based models to predict the conversion of normal blood pressure to hypertension within 5-year follow-up. PLoS One 19, (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    T., Sandhya, M

    Ahmed, S. T., Sandhya, M. & Sankar, S. TelMED: Dynamic User Clus- tering Resource Allocation Technique for MooM Datasets Under Optimizing Telemedicine Network. Wirel Pers Commun 112, 1061-1077 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    O., Oluwagbemi, F

    Oluwagbemi, O. O., Oluwagbemi, F. E., Jatto, A. & Hui, C. MAVSCOT: A fuzzy logic-based HIV diagnostic system with indigenous multi-lingual interfaces for rural Africa. PLoS One 15, (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    & Khasawneh, M

    Abu Lekham, L., Wang, Y., Hey, E. & Khasawneh, M. T. Multi-criteria text mining model for COVID-19 testing reasons and symptoms and temporal pre- dictive model for COVID-19 test results in rural communities. Neural Comput Appl 34, 7523-7536 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Abu Lekham, L., Wang, Y., Hey, E., Lam, S. S. & Khasawneh, M. T. A Multi- Stage predictive model for missed appointments at outpatient primary care settings serving rural areas. IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng 11, 79-94 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    J., Haynatzki, G

    Jones, K. J., Haynatzki, G. & Sabalka, L. Evaluation of Automated Video Mon- itoring to Decrease the Risk of Unattended Bed Exits in Small Rural Hospitals. www.journalpatientsafety.com (2020)

    2020

  15. [24]

    K., Sharma, M

    Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M. & Kaushik, S. Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. J Big Data 6, (2019)

    2019

  16. [25]

    & Velusamy, D

    Ramasamy, K., Balakrishnan, K. & Velusamy, D. Classification of inter-patient’s cardiac arrhythmias in ECG signals with enhanced Jaya optimized TQWT parameters and stacked ensemble algorithm. Soft comput 27, 11341-11356 (2023)

    2023

  17. [26]

    & Velusamy, D

    Ramasamy, K., Sundaramurthy, A. & Velusamy, D. Assessment and classifica- tion of grid stability with cost-sensitive stacked ensemble classifier. Automatika 64, 783-797 (2023). 31

    2023

  18. [27]

    & Velusamy, D

    Alagappan, C., Ramasamy, K. & Velusamy, D. Bagging ensemble of artifi- cial neural networks with weighted averaging and grey wolf optimization for solar photovoltaic power generation prediction. Int J Green Energy (2024) doi:10.1080/15435075.2024.2436535

    2024

  19. [28]

    & Ramasamy, K

    Velusamy, D., Pugalendhi, G. & Ramasamy, K. A cross-layer trust evaluation protocol for secured routing in communication network of smart grid. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 38, 193-204 (2020)

    2020

  20. [29]

    Raghavendra, U., Acharya, U. R. & Adeli, H. Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Automated Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders. Eur Neurol 82, 41-64 (2020)

    2020

  21. [30]

    & Ramasamy, K

    Velusamy, D. & Ramasamy, K. Ensemble of heterogeneous classifiers for diag- nosis and prediction of coronary artery disease with reduced feature subset. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 198, (2021)

    2021

  22. [31]

    & Atienza, D

    Surrel, G., Aminifar, A., Rincon, F., Murali, S. & Atienza, D. Online Obstruc- tive Sleep Apnea Detection on Medical Wearable Sensors. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 12, 762-773 (2018)

    2018

  23. [32]

    Hosni, M., Abnane, I., Idri, A., Carrillo de Gea, J. M. & Fernandez Aleman, J. L. Reviewing ensemble classification methods in breast cancer. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 177, 89-112 (2019)

    2019

  24. [33]

    & Song, X

    Pan, D., Huang, Y., Zeng, A., Jia, L. & Song, X. Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Deep Learning and GWAS. Communications in Computer and Information Science 1072, 52-68 (2019)

    2019

  25. [34]

    & Pruinelli, L

    Balakrishnan, K., Olson, S., Simon, G. & Pruinelli, L. Machine learning for post-liver transplant survival: Bridging the gap for long-term outcomes through temporal variation features. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 257, (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    Alowais, S. A. et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intel- ligence in clinical practice. BMC Medical Education vol. 23 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z (2023)

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    Bruzelius, E. et al. Satellite images and machine learning can identify remote communities to facilitate access to health services. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 26, 806-812 (2019). 33

    2019

  28. [37]

    Guo, J. & Li, B. The Application of Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology in Rural Areas of Developing Countries. Health Equity 2, 174-181 (2018)

    2018

  29. [38]

    & Wang, H

    Wu, H., Lu, X. & Wang, H. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Resource Allocation Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. Jmir Ai 2, e38397 (2023). 32

    2023

  30. [39]

    & Batenburg, R

    Strika, Z., Petkovic, K., Likic, R. & Batenburg, R. Bridging healthcare gaps: a scoping review on the role of artificial intelligence, deep learning, and large language models in alleviating problems in medical deserts. Postgraduate med- ical journal vol. 101 4-16 Preprint at ...

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    M., Harris, M

    Ansari, R. M., Harris, M. F., Hosseinzadeh, H. & Zwar, N. Application of Arti- ficial Intelligence in Assessing the Self-Management Practices of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Healthcare (Switzerland) 11, (2023)

    2023

  32. [41]

    Arroyo, J. et al. No sonographer, no radiologist: New system for automatic prenatal detection of fetal biometry, fetal presentation, and placental location. PLoS One 17, (2022)

    2022

  33. [42]

    Al & Hasan, M

    Assaduzzaman, M., Mamun, A. Al & Hasan, M. Z. Early Predic- tion of Maternal Health Risk Factors Using Machine Learning Tech- niques. in 2023 International Conference for Advancement in Technology, ICONAT 2023 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2023). doi...

    2023

  34. [43]

    A., Lockwood, K

    Auster-Gussman, L. A., Lockwood, K. G., Graham, S. A., Stein, N. & Branch, O. L. H. Reach of a Fully Digital Diabetes Prevention Program in Health Professional Shortage Areas. Popul Health Manag 25, 441-448 (2022)

    2022

  35. [44]

    Benitez, A. E. et al. Super learner analysis of real-time electronically monitored adherence to antiretroviral therapy under constrained optimization and compar- ison to non-differentiated care approaches for persons living with HIV in rural Uganda. (2020) doi:10.1002/jia2.25467/full

    2020 doi

  36. [45]

    Bharti, U. et al. Medbot: Conversational artificial intelligence powered chatbot for delivering tele-health after covid-19. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems, ICCES 2020 870-875 (2020) doi:10.1109/ICCES48766.2020.09137944

    2020

  37. [46]

    Birk, N. et al. Exploration of Machine Learning and Statistical Techniques in Development of a Low-Cost Screening Method Featuring the Global Diet Qual- ity Score for Detecting Prediabetes in Rural India. Journal of Nutrition 151, 110S-118S (2021)

    2021

  38. [47]

    Bouchouar, E., Hetman, B. M. & Hanley, B. Development and validation of an automated emergency department-based syndromic surveillance system to enhance public health surveillance in Yukon: a lower-resourced and remote setting. BMC Public Health 21, (2021)

    2021

  39. [48]

    Djawad, Y. A. et al. Development of an Intelligent Mobile Health Monitoring System for the Health Surveillance System in Indonesia. IRBM 42, 28-34 (2021)

    2021

  40. [49]

    Bustos, N. et al. Machine learning techniques as an efficient alternative diagnostic tool for COVID-19 cases. Signa Vitae 18, 23-33 (2022)

    2022

  41. [50]

    Factors Influencing the Utilization of Diabetes Complication Tests Under the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach

    Byeon, H. Factors Influencing the Utilization of Diabetes Complication Tests Under the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13, (2022)

    2022

  42. [51]

    Carvalho, J. C. S., Pimenta, T. C., Silverio, A. C. P., Carvalho, M. A. & Car- valho, J. P. C. S. A New Data Science Model With Supervised Learning and its Application on Pesticide Poisoning Diagnosis in Rural Workers. IEEE Access 12, 40871-40882 (2024)

    2024

  43. [52]

    A., Bhardwaj, N., Murughiyan, U., Kothakapu, G

    Cecchetti, A. A., Bhardwaj, N., Murughiyan, U., Kothakapu, G. & Sundaram, U.Fueling clinicalandtranslational researchin appalachia:Informatics platform approach. JMIR Med Inform 8, (2020)

    2020

  44. [53]

    Chen, A. et al. Building Practical Risk Prediction Models for Nasopharyn- geal Carcinoma Screening with Patient Graph Analysis and Machine Learning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 32, 274-280 (2023)

    2023

  45. [54]

    Chiramal, J. A. et al. Artificial Intelligence-based automated CT brain inter- pretation to accelerate treatment for acute stroke in rural India: An interrupted time series study. PLOS Global Public Health 4, (2024)

    2024

  46. [55]

    Cui, T. et al. Deep Learning Performance of Ultra-Widefield Fundus Imaging for Screening Retinal Lesions in Rural Locales. JAMA Ophthalmol 141, 1045-1051 (2023)

    2023

  47. [56]

    & Mitra, M

    Das, S., Pal, S. & Mitra, M. Deep learning approach of murmur detection using Cochleagram. Biomed Signal Process Control 77, (2022)

    2022

  48. [57]

    & Sil, J

    Das, S. & Sil, J. Managing uncertainty in imputing missing symptom value for healthcare of rural India. Health Inf Sci Syst 7, (2019)

    2019

  49. [58]

    K., Lal Chowdhary, C

    Das, T. K., Lal Chowdhary, C. & Gao, X. Z. Chest X-ray investigation: A convolutional neural network approach. Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering 45, 58-70 (2020)

    2020

  50. [59]

    Ding, Z. et al. Stroke prevention in rural residents: development of a simplified risk assessment tool with artificial intelligence. Neurological Sciences 44, 1687- 1694 (2023)

    2023

  51. [60]

    Huang, X. M. et al. Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural China. BMC Health Serv Res 22, (2022)

    2022

  52. [61]

    Fazlalizadeh, H. et al. Closing the Last Mile Gap in Access to Multimodality Imaging in Rural Settings: Design of the Imaging Core of the Risk Underlying 34 Rural Areas Longitudinal Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 17, (2024)

    2024

  53. [62]

    Ghilardi, F. D. R. et al. Machine learning for predicting Chagas disease infection in rural areas of Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 18, (2024)

    2024

  54. [63]

    & Misra, S

    Ghosh, A., Saha, R. & Misra, S. Persistent Service Provisioning Framework for IoMT Based Emergency Mobile Healthcare Units. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 26, 5851-5858 (2022)

    2022

  55. [64]

    A., Auster-Gussman, L

    Graham, S. A., Auster-Gussman, L. A., Lockwood, K. G. & Branch, O. L. H. Weight Loss in a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program for People in Health Professional Shortage and Rural Areas. Popul Health Manag 26, 149-156 (2023)

    2023

  56. [65]

    Guo, X. et al. Smartphone-based DNA diagnostics for malaria detection using deep learning for local decision support and blockchain technology for security. Nat Electron 4, 615-624 (2021)

    2021

  57. [66]

    Malar J 23, (2024)

    Hamid,M.M.A.etal.Diagnosticaccuracyofanautomatedmicroscopesolution (miLabTM) in detecting malaria parasites in symptomatic patients at point-of- care in Sudan: a case-control study. Malar J 23, (2024)

    2024

  58. [67]

    Hao, S. et al. Clinical evaluation of AI-assisted screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural areas of midwest China. PLoS One 17, (2022)

    2022

  59. [68]

    &Khatri, S.K

    Harjai,S. &Khatri, S.K. AnIntelligentClinical Decision Support System Based on Artificial Neural Network for Early Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases in Rural Areas. Proceedings - 2019 Amity International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AICAI 2019 729-736 (2019) doi:1...

    2019

  60. [69]

    He, P. et al. Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion Classification on Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Radiologists Without Breast Ultrasound Expertise. American Journal of Roentgenology 221, 450-459 (2023)

    2023

  61. [70]

    Holmstrom, O. et al. Point-of-Care Digital Cytology with Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Resource-Limited Setting. JAMA Netw Open 4, (2021)

    2021

  62. [71]

    Holmstrom, O. et al. A novel deep learning-based point-of-care diagnos- tic method for detecting Plasmodium falciparum with fluorescence digital microscopy. PLoS One 15, (2020)

    2020

  63. [72]

    Provider Satisfaction With Artificial Intelligence-Based Hand Hygiene Monitoring System During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Study of a Rural Medical Center

    Lintz, J. Provider Satisfaction With Artificial Intelligence-Based Hand Hygiene Monitoring System During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Study of a Rural Medical Center. J Chiropr Med 22, 197-203 (2023)

    2023

  64. [73]

    F., Al-Quayed, F., Alateyah, S

    Humayun, M., Almufareh, M. F., Al-Quayed, F., Alateyah, S. A. & Alatiyyah, M. Improving Healthcare Facilities in Remote Areas Using Cutting-Edge 35 Technologies. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 13, (2023)

    2023

  65. [74]

    Jasim, A. A. et al. e-Diagnostic system for diabetes disease prediction on an IoMT environment-based hyper AdaBoost machine learning model. Journal of Supercomputing 80, 15664-15689 (2024)

    2024

  66. [75]

    K., Bag, S., Koley, D., Bojja, G

    Jha, R. K., Bag, S., Koley, D., Bojja, G. R. & Barman, S. An appropriate and cost-effective hospital recommender system for a patient of rural area using deep reinforcement learning. Intelligent Systems with Applications 18, (2023)

    2023

  67. [76]

    Jin, F. Q. et al. A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach to Identify Preventable Childhood Hearing Loss. Ear Hear 44, 1262-1270 (2023)

    2023

  68. [77]

    Jin, S. et al. Identification of the Optimal Model for the Prediction of Diabetic Retinopathy in Chinese Rural Population: Handan Eye Study. J Diabetes Res 2022, (2022)

    2022

  69. [78]

    Karlo Tolentino, L. S. et al. CAREdio: Health Screening and Heart Disease Prediction System for Rural Communities in the Philippines. IJACSA) Inter- national Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications vol. 11 www.ijacsa.thesai.org (2020)

    2020

  70. [79]

    H., Kim, S

    Kim, J., Gwak, D. H., Kim, S. & Gang, M. Identifying the suicidal ideation risk group among older adults in rural areas: Developing a predictive model using machine learning methods. J Adv Nurs 79, 641-651 (2023)

    2023

  71. [80]

    Koech, A. et al. Acceptability and Feasibility of a Low-Cost Device for Ges- tational Age Assessment in a Low-Resource Setting: Qualitative Study. JMIR Hum Factors 9, (2022)

    2022

  72. [81]

    & George, B

    Krishna, S. & George, B. An affordable solution for the recognition of abnor- mality in breast thermogram. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 28303-28328 (2021)

    2021

  73. [82]

    Kwizera, A. et al. A Machine Learning-Based Triage Tool for Children with Acute Infection in a Low Resource Setting. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 20, e524-e530 (2019)

    2019

  74. [83]

    Li, H. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in rural China based on the Markov model. PLoS One 18, (2023)

    2023

  75. [84]

    Namahoot, C. S. & Bruckner, M. SUPPORTING RURAL OUTPATIENTS THROUGH A WEB-BASED CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACE. ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications 14, 1-11 (2023). 37

    2023

  76. [85]

    Liu, H. et al. Economic evaluation of combined population-based screening for multiple blindness-causing eye diseases in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis. 36 Lancet Glob Health 11, e456-e465 (2023)

    2023

  77. [86]

    Liu, J. et al. The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Diabetic Retinopathy: Screen- ing and Prophylaxis Project in 6 Provinces of China. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity 15, 2911-2925 (2022)

    2022

  78. [87]

    Lundin, J. et al. Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infections with digital mobile microscopy and artificial intelligence in a resource-limited setting. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 18, (2024)

    2024

  79. [88]

    & Wan, J

    Luo, Z., Ding, X., Hou, N. & Wan, J. A Deep-Learning-Based Collaborative Edge-Cloud Telemedicine System for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Sensors 23, (2023)

    2023

  80. [89]

    T., Kabudula, C

    Mapundu, M. T., Kabudula, C. W., Musenge, E., Olago, V. & Celik, T. Per- formance evaluation of machine learning and Computer Coded Verbal Autopsy (CCVA) algorithms for cause of death determination: A comparative analysis of data from rural South Africa. Front Public Health 10, (2022)

    2022

  81. [90]

    Mathenge, W. et al. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assessment of Dia- betic Retinopathy on Referral Service Uptake in a Low-Resource Setting: The RAIDERS Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology Science 2, (2022)

    2022

  82. [91]

    Mena, L. J. et al. Mobile personal health care system for noninvasive, pervasive, and continuous blood pressure monitoring: Development and usability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8, (2020)

    2020

  83. [92]

    Meulah, B. et al. Validation of artificial intelligence-based digital microscopy for automated detection of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in urine in Gabon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2024, (2024)

    2024

  84. [93]

    & Musenge, E

    Mlandu, C., Matsena-Zingoni, Z. & Musenge, E. Predicting the drop out from the maternal, newborn and child healthcare continuum in three East African Community countries: application of machine learning models. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 23, (2023)

    2023

  85. [94]

    I., Jarde, A., Mackenzie, G., D’Alessandro, U

    Mohammed, N. I., Jarde, A., Mackenzie, G., D’Alessandro, U. & Jeffries, D. Deploying Machine Learning Models Using Progressive Web Applications: Implementation Using a Neural Network Prediction Model for Pneumonia Related Child Mortality in The Gambia. Front Public Health 9, (2022)

    2022

  86. [95]

    Monroy, B. et al. Automated chronic wounds medical assessment and tracking framework based on deep learning. Comput Biol Med 165, (2023)

    2023

  87. [96]

    Ramos, E. et al. Mobil Monitoring Doppler Ultrasound (MoMDUS) study: pro- tocol for a prospective, observational study investigating the use of artificial intelligence and low-cost Doppler ultrasound for the automated quantification of hypertension, pre-eclampsia and fetal gro...

    2024

  88. [97]

    M., DayBranch, E

    Nolan, B. M., DayBranch, E. R., Barton, K. & Korsen, N. Patient and Provider Experience with Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology for Dia- betic Retinopathy in a Rural Primary Care Setting. Journal of Maine Medical Center 5, (2023)

    2023

  89. [98]

    B., Paglinawan, A

    Panganiban, E. B., Paglinawan, A. C., Chung, W. Y. & Paa, G. L. S. ECG diagnostic support system (EDSS): A deep learning neural network based clas- sification system for detecting ECG abnormal rhythms from a low-powered wearable biosensors. Sens Biosensing Res 31, (2021)

    2021

  90. [99]

    Pangti, R. et al. A machine learning-based, decision support, mobile phone application for diagnosis of common dermatological diseases. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 35, 536-545 (2021)

    2021

  91. [100]

    K., Durga, P

    Pathinarupothi, R. K., Durga, P. & Rangan, E. S. IoT-based smart edge for global health: Remote monitoring with severity detection and alerts transmis- sion. IEEE Internet Things J 6, 2449-2462 (2019)

    2019

  92. [101]

    N., Joseph, M., Jegannathan, S

    Pawar, B., Lobo, S. N., Joseph, M., Jegannathan, S. & Jayraj, H. Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in the Detection and Staging of Diabetic Retinopathy through Fundus Photography: An Automated Tool for Detection and Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy. (2021) doi:10....

    2021 doi

  93. [102]

    Price, B. S. et al. Predicting increases in COVID-19 incidence to identify locations for targeted testing in West Virginia: A machine learning enhanced approach. PLoS One 16, (2021)

    2021

  94. [103]

    Qian, X. et al. Study on the prediction model of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the rural Xinjiang population based on survival analysis. BMC Public Health 23, (2023)

    2023

  95. [104]

    have enhanced resource allocation, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. These applications highlight AI’s role in improving patient outcomes and supporting system-level decision-making, underscoring its transformative capacity to address rural healthcare disp...

  96. [105]

    Qian, X. et al. A Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Model Based on Routine Physical Examination Indicators Using Machine Learning Methods: A Cohort Study. Front Cardiovasc Med 9, (2022)

    2022

  97. [106]

    & Jinny, S

    Raghavan Nair Lalitha, P. & Jinny, S. V. Internet of medical things-based mul- titiered and hybrid architectural framework for effective heart disease prediction model. Concurr Comput 34, (2022)

    2022

  98. [107]

    & Sarkar, B

    Raja, R., Mukherjee, I. & Sarkar, B. K. A Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Preterm Birth in Rural India. J Healthc Eng 2021, (2021)

    2021

  99. [108]

    Rajput, D. S. et al. Providing diagnosis on diabetes using cloud computing envi- ronment to the people living in rural areas of India. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 13, 2829-2840 (2022). 38

    2022

  100. [109]

    Robinson, E. et al. Spatial patterns of rural opioid-related hospital emergency department visits: A machine learning analysis. Health Place 90, (2024)

    2024

  101. [110]

    Sachdeva, M. et al. Acceptability of artificial intelligence for cervical cancer screening in Dschang, Cameroon: a qualitative study on patient perspectives. Reproductive Health 21, (2024)

    2024

  102. [111]

    H., Ratul, I

    Sarker, F., Chowdhury, M. H., Ratul, I. J., Islam, S. & Mamun, K. A. An interactive national digital surveillance system to fight against COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Front Digit Health 5, (2023)

    2023

  103. [112]

    Sawant, P. A. et al. Predicting over-the-counter antibiotic use in rural Pune, India, using machine learning methods. Epidemiol Health 46, e2024044 (2024)

    2024

  104. [113]

    Shah, D. et al. Prevalence of non-communicable chronic diseases in rural India amongst peri- and post-menopausal women: Can artificial intelligence help in early identification? Maturitas 186, (2024)

    2024

  105. [114]

    Frontiers in Bioscience - Landmark 27, (2022)

    Shao,J.etal.DeepLearningEmpowersLungCancerScreeningBasedonMobile Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Resource-Constrained Sites. Frontiers in Bioscience - Landmark 27, (2022)

    2022

  106. [115]

    Shen, J. et al. An innovative artificial intelligence-based app for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM-AI): Development study. J Med Internet Res 22, (2020)

    2020

  107. [116]

    Smith, A. J. et al. Multisite evaluation of prediction models for emergency department crowding before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 30, 292-300 (2023)

    2023

  108. [117]

    Song, W. et al. Machine learning-based warning model for chronic kidney disease in individuals over 40 years old in underprivileged areas, Shanxi Province. Front Med (Lausanne) 9, (2023)

    2023

  109. [118]

    Stranieri, A. et al. Emerging point of care devices and artificial intelligence: Prospects and challenges for public health. Smart Health 24, (2022)

    2022

  110. [119]

    Stuckey, T. D. et al. Clinical Validation of a Machine-Learned, Point-of- Care System to IDENTIFY Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease. Diagnostics 14, (2024). 39

    2024

  111. [120]

    Tang, C. Y. et al. Prediction models for COVID-19 disease outcomes. Emerg Microbes Infect 13, (2024)

    2024

  112. [121]

    K., Butsorn, A., Khotprom, A

    Turnbull, N., Nghiep, L. K., Butsorn, A., Khotprom, A. & Tudpor, K. Machine learning models identify micronutrient intake as predictors of undiagnosed hypertension among rural community-dwelling older adults in Thailand: a cross-sectional study. Front Nutr 11, (2024)

    2024

  113. [122]

    K., Mohapatra, S

    Upadhyay, D. K., Mohapatra, S. & Singh, N. K. An early assessment of Per- sistent Depression Disorder using machine learning algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 49149-49171 (2024)

    2024

  114. [123]

    Upadhyaya, S. et al. Diagnostic Performance of the Offline Medios Artificial Intelligence for Glaucoma Detection in a Rural Tele-Ophthalmology Setting. Ophthalmol Glaucoma (2024) doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.09.002

    2024 doi

  115. [124]

    Vaghefi, E. et al. A multi-centre prospective evaluation of THEIATM to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in the New Zealand screening program. Eye (Basingstoke) 37, 1683-1689 (2023)

    2023

  116. [125]

    & Aravindhar, D

    Veena, S. & Aravindhar, D. J. Remote Monitoring System for the Detection of Prenatal Risk in a Pregnant Woman. Wirel Pers Commun 119, 1051-1064 (2021)

    2021

  117. [126]

    Wang, Z. et al. Detection and subtyping of hepatic echinococcosis from plain CT images with deep learning: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health 5, e754-e762 (2023)

    2023

  118. [127]

    & Chitraranjan, C

    Wijesinghe, I., Gamage, C., Perera, I. & Chitraranjan, C. A Smart Telemedicine System with Deep Learning to Manage Diabetic Retinopa- thy and Foot Ulcers. MERCon 2019 - Proceedings, 5th International Mul- tidisciplinary Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference 686-691 (2019) d...

    2019

  119. [128]

    Wroblewski, J. J. et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Smartphone- Based Fundus Photography and Deep-Learning Artificial Intelligence in the Yucatan Peninsula: A Field Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol (2023) doi:10.1177/19322968231194644

    2023 doi

  120. [129]

    Wu, P. et al. An effective machine learning approach for identifying non-severe and severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients in a rural Chinese population: The wenzhou retrospective study. IEEE Access 9, 45486-45503 (2021)

    2019

  121. [130]

    Wu, X. et al. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a digital technology-driven hierarchical healthcare screening pattern in China. Nat Commun 15, (2024). 40

    2024

  122. [131]

    & Ren, X

    Xin, Y. & Ren, X. Predicting depression among rural and urban disabled elderly in China using a random forest classifier. BMC Psychiatry 22, (2022)

    2022

  123. [132]

    Xu, F. et al. Development and validation of prediction models for hypertension risks in rural Chinese populations. J Glob Health 9, (2019)

    2019

  124. [133]

    Yang, C. et al. Usefulness of Machine Learning for Identification of Refer- able Diabetic Retinopathy in a Large-Scale Population-Based Study. Front Med (Lausanne) 8, (2021)

    2021

  125. [134]

    Yi, S. E. et al. Predicting hospitalisations related to ambulatory care sensitive conditions with machine learning for population health planning: derivation and validation cohort study. BMJ Open 12, (2022)

    2022

  126. [135]

    Zamin, S. A. et al. aBnormal motION capture In aCute Stroke (BIONICS): A Low-Cost Tele-Evaluation Tool for Automated Assessment of Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 37, 591-602 (2023)

    2023

  127. [136]

    Zhang, L. et al. Prediction of hypertension, hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning: A cross-sectional study of chronic diseases in central China. PLoS One 15, (2020)

    2020

  128. [137]

    Zhang, L. et al. Nonlaboratory-based risk assessment model for coronary heart disease screening: Model development and validation. Int J Med Inform 162, (2022)

    2022

  129. [138]

    & Wang, Z

    Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Niu, M., Wang, C. & Wang, Z. Nonlaboratory-Based Risk Assessment Model for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening in Chinese Rural Population: A Joint Bagging-Boosting Model. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 25, 4005-4016 (2021)

    2021

  130. [139]

    & Wang, Z

    Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Niu, M., Wang, C. & Wang, Z. Machine learning for characterizing risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a rural Chinese population: the Henan Rural Cohort Study. Sci Rep 10, (2020)

    2020

  131. [140]

    & Lin, C

    Zhang, Y., Tong, G. & Lin, C. Home Activity Recognition for Rural Elderly Based on Deep Learning and Smartphone Sensors. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 36, (2024)

    2024

  132. [141]

    Zhou, W. et al. Ensembled deep learning model outperforms human experts in diagnosing biliary atresia from sonographic gallbladder images. Nat Commun 12, (2021)

    2021

  133. [142]

    M., Sanzogni, L., Houghton, L

    Zobair, K. M., Sanzogni, L., Houghton, L. & Zahidul Islam, M. Forecasting care seekers satisfaction with telemedicine using machine learning and structural equation modeling. PLoS One 16, (2021). 41

    2021

  134. [143]

    & Turner, A

    Bekemeier, B., Park, S., Backonja, U., Ornelas, I. & Turner, A. M. Data, capacity-building, and training needs to address rural health inequities in the Northwest United States: A qualitative study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 26, 825-834 (2019)

    2019

  135. [144]

    Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/reports/broadband-progress- reports/2022-broadband-deployment-report

    2022

  136. [145]

    Perez, K. et al. Investigation into Application of AI and Telemedicine in Rural Communities: A Systematic Literature Review. Healthcare (Switzerland) vol. 13 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030324 (2025)

    2025 doi

  137. [146]

    Moore, Starlink outshines cable for reliable service, mostly rural footprint, Fierce Network, Jan

    M. Moore, Starlink outshines cable for reliable service, mostly rural footprint, Fierce Network, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.fierce-network.com/broadband/starlink-outshines-cable-reliable- service-mostly-rural-footprint 42

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.