Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 124 references

Scalar-induced gravitational waves can carry a detectable circular-polarization signal from primordial parity violation, and next-generation ground-based detectors can constrain its amplitude alongside the bispectrum and parity-even trispec

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:09 UTC pith:GSJXKQW7

load-bearing objection A capable, internally consistent SIGW forecasting paper whose headline claim about parity-odd trispectrum constraints is weaker than advertised: the chiral V-mode has sub-threshold SNR and a known astrophysical V-mode foreground is set aside. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16162 v1 pith:GSJXKQW7 submitted 2026-07-17 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity and parity-violation through Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with next-generation ground-based interferometers

Ilaria Caporali , H. V. Ragavendra , Angelo Ricciardone , Nicola Bartolo This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords scalar-induced gravitational wavesprimordial non-Gaussianityparity violationscalar trispectrumcircular polarizationstochastic gravitational-wave backgroundEinstein TelescopeCosmic Explorer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that scalar-induced gravitational waves—gravitational waves produced when enhanced scalar density perturbations feed tensor metric fluctuations at second order—can simultaneously probe primordial non-Gaussianity and primordial parity violation with next-generation ground-based interferometers. The key claim is that a parity-odd component of the primordial scalar trispectrum (the connected four-point correlation of curvature perturbations) produces a circularly polarized V-mode in the gravitational-wave background, while the intensity spectrum receives additional contributions from the scalar bispectrum and the parity-even trispectrum. Using simulated one-year data from Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer, the authors show that a Bayesian analysis recovers the injected peak amplitude, peak frequency, f_NL, tau_NL, and parity-odd amplitude tau_tilde_NL within about 1–2 sigma even when an astrophysical foreground from unresolved binaries is present. Because the probed comoving wavelengths are roughly 10^6–10^7 meters—scales where most other cosmological observables are erased by nonlinear structure formation—SIGWs offer a nearly unique window into the final e-folds of inflation.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a forecast with a specific mechanism: the chirality (V-mode) of the stochastic gravitational-wave background acts as a direct probe of parity-odd primordial scalar correlations. For a lognormal scalar power spectrum peaked near 50 Hz, the induced intensity spectrum decomposes into a Gaussian piece proportional to A_p^2, a hybrid bispectrum piece proportional to f_NL^2 A_p^3, and an exchange-trispectrum piece proportional to tau_NL A_p^3; the V-mode is proportional to tau_tilde_NL A_p^3 and vanishes unless the scalar trispectrum contains the parity-odd triple-product term. Implementing a Bayesian parameter estimation on simulated Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Expl

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the parity-odd exchange trispectrum template T_odd = i tau_tilde_NL w4(k1,k2,k3,k4) β(k1+k2, k1, k3) P_R(k1)P_R(k3)P_R(|k1+k2|) + 23 permutations, where β = k1·(k2×k3) is the scalar triple product. The trispectrum—the connected four-point correlation of curvature perturbations—is the lowest-order correlation whose inversion behavior cannot be mimicked by a rotation, so it is the first place parity can appear in a statistically isotropic scalar field. Substituted into the second-order tensor two-point function, this template generates the V-mode power spectrum P_V^h = P_L^h − P_R^h with a frequency shape fixed by the numerically evaluated kernel I_V(k,kp,σp); the sa

Load-bearing premise

The forecast rests on the assumption that the parity-odd trispectrum has exactly the exchange-template shape of Eq. (18b)—triple-product momentum dependence with the shape function w4 tied to the bispectrum template—and that no other source of circular polarization, such as the Poisson-fluctuation chirality of unresolved binaries, contaminates the V-mode.

What would settle it

Look for the V-mode in one year of Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer cross-correlation data: if the observed Ω_V(f) is not proportional to the kernel I_V(k,kp,σp) and peaked at the same frequency as Ω_I(f), or if the recovered tau_tilde_NL shifts systematically when the astrophysical foreground amplitude is varied over its allowed range, the central claim is falsified. Injecting a differently shaped parity-odd trispectrum into the simulated pipeline and checking whether the local/equilateral template recovers an unbiased tau_tilde_NL would likewise settle the scope of the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If a V-mode is detected in the ET+CE stochastic background, it would be direct evidence for a parity-odd scalar trispectrum—parity violation in the scalar sector near the end of inflation.
  • Small-scale bounds on f_NL and tau_NL, compared with CMB-scale constraints, can reveal whether non-Gaussianity runs with scale across many orders of magnitude.
  • With the adopted power-law foreground at currently allowed amplitude, the astrophysical unresolved-binary background does not prevent measurement: all cosmological parameters remain recovered within 2 sigma.
  • Reconstructing the polarization degree Π(f) yields a scale-dependent chirality template, extending the analysis beyond the constant- or power-law polarization templates usually used in stochastic-background searches.
  • The peak parameters (A_p ≈ 10^-2, f_NL and tau_NL of order 1–10 on ~10^7 m scales) have direct relevance for primordial black hole formation around 10^10 kg, though abundance calculations require care in the presence of substantial non-Gaussianities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the quoted tau_tilde_NL interval constrains the amplitude of the adopted parity-odd exchange template, not parity violation in general; a trispectrum with a different momentum configuration, contact piece, or scale dependence would predict a different Ω_V(f) and would likely yield weaker or shifted bounds.
  • Editorial inference: the same pipeline could be turned around to search for the parity-odd astrophysical foreground—the Poisson-fluctuation chirality of unresolved binaries that the paper deliberately sets aside—which would either corroborate or complicate the cosmological reading of any detected V-mode.
  • Editorial inference: because f_NL enters only quadratically and its sign is unobservable in intensity alone, joint measurement of the V-mode's relative amplitude may help break degeneracies between non-Gaussianity templates that intensity-only analyses cannot resolve.
  • Editorial inference: a null V-mode detection would still give an upper limit on tau_tilde_NL at ~10^7 m scales; combined with large-scale parity-odd trispectrum limits from galaxy surveys, that would constitute a two-point test of whether primordial parity violation runs with scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. arXiv:2607.16162 presents a Bayesian forecasting pipeline for constraining primordial non-Gaussianity and parity violation through scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) with next-generation ground-based interferometers. The paper constructs the SIGW intensity and circular-polarization spectra from Gaussian, hybrid f_NL^2, and exchange-trispectrum (τ_NL and τ̃_NL) contributions, for local and equilateral bispectrum/trispectrum templates, and for a lognormal scalar power spectrum peaked near 50 Hz. Using simulated ET 2L + CE data for one year, a cross-correlation likelihood, and Bilby/Dynesty, it performs injection-recovery of f_peak, A_p, f_NL, τ_NL, τ̃_NL, and astrophysical foreground parameters, with and without the astrophysical foreground. The paper reports recovery of injected values within 1σ (local) and 2σ (equilateral), reconstructs the polarization degree Π(f), and claims that future interferometers can place competitive constraints on the parity-odd scalar trispectrum.

Significance. The novelty is an end-to-end forecast for the V-mode of SIGWs from a parity-odd scalar trispectrum, extending earlier SIGW forecasts to a chiral observable and including an astrophysical foreground in the joint analysis. Strengths include the explicit likelihood and injection-recovery setup, use of public sampling/SNR tools, inclusion of the astrophysical intensity foreground, and honest reporting of sub-threshold V-mode SNRs (0.5 and 1.9). If the parity-violation claim were robust, the paper would offer a genuinely new small-scale probe of primordial parity violation. However, the central claim is not yet established at the stated level: a known chiral astrophysical foreground is omitted without a quantitative bound, the V-mode SNR is very low, and the recovered τ̃_NL is an amplitude of one specific template rather than a model-independent constraint.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (29) and Table II] The parity-violation claim rests on isolating Ω_V^GW. The paper explicitly disregards the chiral shot-noise foreground of unresolved astrophysical binaries [107] without estimating its amplitude or spectrum in the ET/CE band. Table II gives the injected primordial V-mode SNR as only 0.5 (local) and 1.9 (equilateral) for T_obs = 1 yr. An unmodeled chiral foreground with comparable or smaller SNR, or with spectral overlap near f_peak, will shift the τ̃_NL posterior even for zero primordial parity violation. The local posterior is already compatible with zero (τ̃_NL = 12.8^{+14.9}_{-14.8}, Sec. VII), so the reported 'competitive constraint' is not robust until this foreground is included or explicitly bounded.
  2. [Sec. IV C, Eqs. (45)-(48); Sec. V A, Figs. 2-3] The perturbative hierarchy f_NL^2 A_p < 1 and τ_NL A_p < 1 is imposed only on injected values, not on the priors in Table I. The equilateral posterior median f_NL = 12.8 with A_p = 9.71×10^{-3} gives f_NL^2 A_p ≈ 1.6, and the 1σ upper value gives ≈ 3.8, violating Eq. (45). Since the likelihood uses the truncated spectrum Eq. (26), posterior samples in this region lie outside the domain of validity of the model; the '2σ recovery' claim is therefore not fully meaningful. The analysis should restrict the prior to the perturbative region or verify that the final posterior, especially the f_NL–A_p degeneracy, lies within it.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (18b); App. B, Eq. (B8)] The entire V-mode signal is generated by a single parity-odd trispectrum ansatz: T_odd = i τ̃_NL w_4 β + 23 permutations, with w_4 tied to w_3 through Eq. (B8) and β a particular triple product. The forecasted τ̃_NL is therefore an amplitude of this template, not a model-independent bound on the parity-odd scalar trispectrum. A different momentum configuration, scale dependence, or contact contribution gives a different Ω_V(f) (Eqs. 22, 27) and likely weaker or different constraints. This limitation should be stated in the abstract and conclusions; ideally a second template or a scale-dependence check should be included.
  4. [Abstract and Sec. VII, Table II] The abstract's wording 'competitive constraints' and the conclusion that τ̃_NL is constrained are stronger than the numbers support. The V-mode SNR is 0.5–1.9, below the usual detection threshold; the local 1σ interval is consistent with zero, and the equilateral interval excludes zero at only about 2σ for one simulated noise realization. These results are better characterized as weak upper limits on one template amplitude. The paper should either soften the summary claims or report explicit detection thresholds and 95% credible upper limits, including their dependence on the noise realization.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (17)] The Dirac delta in the trispectrum definition should be δ^(3)(k1+k2), not δ^(2)(k1+k2).
  2. [Eqs. (27) and (46)] The V-mode numerical factor is written I_V^(3) in Eq. (27) but I_V^(2) in Eq. (46). The notation should be made consistent.
  3. [Sec. IV C b] Minor typos: 'intrisic' should be 'intrinsic', and 'The results we obtain has to be taken' should be 'have to be taken'.
  4. [Eq. (18b)] Please clarify the permutation count: if all 24 orientations are summed with equal weight, the triple-product sum would vanish for a scale-invariant P_R; the numerical results therefore rely on the P_R weighting. State explicitly whether all 24 terms are included with unit coefficient.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the spectral derivation is reproduced in the paper and the parameter constraints are standard injection-recovery forecasts; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central V-mode relation (Eqs. 22 and 27) is not simply imported from a self-citation: the same expression is re-derived in Appendix B from the standard SIGW kernel and the explicitly declared parity-odd exchange-trispectrum template, and the template itself is introduced openly as a parametric ansatz (Eq. 18b) motivated by Chern-Simons-like models, not as an externally forced uniqueness result. The Bayesian analysis is an injection-recovery forecast: simulated data are generated from the same model with fiducial parameters (Sec. IVA and IVC), and the reported posteriors (Sec. V) quantify how well the pipeline recovers those injected values. This is standard forecasting practice, not a hidden fit: the detectability claim is explicitly conditional on the assumed model and is not presented as an empirical measurement of nature. Self-citations to [43] and [70] are present but not load-bearing: the theoretical content is re-derived in this paper, and [70] is the sensitivity-curve code used only for PLS/SNR evaluation. The disregarded astrophysical V-mode foreground (Sec. III) is an assumption/omission that affects the robustness of the parity-violation claim and should be assessed as a model-risk/correctness concern, not as circularity; the paper itself notes that the local-template tau_tilde posterior is compatible with zero. Overall, no step in the claimed derivation chain reduces by construction to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or mediators are introduced. The parity-odd amplitude tau_tilde_NL is a template parameter inherited from ref [43] and existing inflationary literature [76-82], not a newly invented entity; its only quantitative anchor in this paper is the injection into the authors' own simulated data. The ledger's weight falls on the template ansatz and the factorization assumption (Eqs. 18b, 26-27), both of which determine the quoted constraints.

free parameters (5)
  • sigma_p^2 (lognormal peak width) = 0.1 (fixed)
    Width of the lognormal peak in P_R(k), Eq. (25), fixed by hand rather than varied or inferred; the shapes of Omega_I,V and hence the projected constraints depend on it.
  • fiducial A_p = 10^-2
    Injected peak amplitude, chosen under the perturbativity conditions f_NL^2 A_p < 1 and tau_NL A_p < 1 (Sec. IV C).
  • fiducial fpeak = 50 Hz
    Injected peak frequency of the SIGW spectrum, recovered by the pipeline.
  • fiducial f_NL, tau_NL, tau_tilde_NL = 5, 10, 10
    Injected non-Gaussianity and parity-odd parameters; the quoted 'constraints' are the posteriors around these injected values.
  • astrophysical foreground parameters = log10 A = -9, n = 2/3
    Fiducial values motivated by the LVK O4a upper bound [108], not fitted from data.
axioms (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Parity-odd trispectrum template T_odd = i tau_tilde_NL w_4 beta P_R P_R P_R + 23 permutations (Eq. 18b), with w_4 tied to w_3 via Eq. (B8)
    The entire Omega_V and its forecast assume this specific triple-product shape for parity-odd scalar correlations, motivated by Chern-Simons-like exchange models in refs [76-82, 94].
  • domain assumption Scaling-factorization of Omega_I,V into parameter-independent shapes (Eqs. 26-27)
    The numerical kernels I^(1,2,3)_I,V are asserted to absorb all scale dependence, leaving exact powers A_p^2, A_p^3 f_NL^2, A_p^3 tau_NL, A_p^3 tau_tilde_NL; no error control is given for this factorization.
  • domain assumption Primary (linearly-evolving) tensor chirality is subdominant to SIGW chirality in the scalar-amplification scenario
    Section III states this to justify attributing Omega_V solely to the parity-odd scalar trispectrum; it fails for models with maximally chiral primary GWs, as the paper itself notes.
  • domain assumption Detector model: fixed ET/CE PSDs, no correlated noise, T_obs = 1 yr, auto-correlations used only for PSD reconstruction
    Sec. IV A/B; standard forecast idealization that sets the noise floor of every quoted constraint.
  • domain assumption Lognormal peaked scalar power spectrum (Eq. 25)
    The peaked-P_R(k) enhancement is the assumed source mechanism; a different peak shape changes Omega_I,V and the recoverability of parameters.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28800 in / 19001 out tokens · 163778 ms · 2026-08-01T21:09:44.527555+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate the prospects for probing primordial non-Gaussianity and associated symmetry of parity through scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs), with third-generation gravitational-wave detectors. We develop a framework that accounts for contributions to the energy density spectrum of GWs arising from the scalar non-Gaussianity quantified by bispectrum and trispectrum, and perform parameter inference using simulated data from Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer. The parity-odd component of the scalar trispectrum induces circular polarization in the stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB), providing a direct probe of parity-violation in the primordial Universe. We show that future interferometers can place competitive constraints on the parity-odd scalar trispectrum, along with the bispectrum and parity-even trispectrum. Moreover, we include the astrophysical contribution, which could act as a foreground for the SIGWs. We show that, despite the addition of such a foreground, we are still able to effectively constrain the cosmological parameters related to SIGWs and the astrophysical parameters as well.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16162 by Angelo Ricciardone, H. V. Ragavendra, Ilaria Caporali, Nicola Bartolo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Plot of the SIGW spectral densities for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Parameter estimation for the case of local template with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Parameter estimation for the the case of equilateral template with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Reconstructed degree of polarization for the local [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Reconstructed degree of polarization for the equilat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 112 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    We substituteR3nG as given in Eq

    Contributions to SIGW Having the non-Gaussian component of scalar perturbationR3nG informing the generic shape of bispectrum and associated exchange trispectrum, we turn to the contributions to SIGW which are uniquely arising from the loop-level contribution to the scalar power due to the cubic order interaction. We substituteR3nG as given in Eq. (B1) in ...

  2. [2]

    S.Matarrese, O.Pantano,andD.Saez,Phys.Rev.D47, 1311 (1993)

    1993

  3. [3]

    Tomita, Prog

    K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys.37, 831 (1967)

    1967

  4. [4]

    Matarrese and S

    S. Matarrese and S. Mollerach, inERE - Spanish Rela- tivity Conference(1996) arXiv:astro-ph/9705168

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    Matarrese, O

    S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and D. Saez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 320 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9310036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D75, 123518 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612013 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Matarrese, S

    S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, and M. Bruni, Phys. Rev. D58, 043504 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9707278 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, A. Riotto, and A. Vaihkonen, Phys. Rev. D76, 061302 (2007), arXiv:0705.4240 [astro- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    Baumann, P

    D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki, Phys. Rev.D76, 084019 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0703290 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2007

  10. [10]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Phys. Rev. D97, 123532 (2018), arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matar- rese, Riv. Nuovo Cim.39, 399 (2016), arXiv:1605.01615 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D81, 104019 (2010), arXiv:0912.5297 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Domènech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    G. Domènech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Bartoloet al., JCAP12, 026, arXiv:1610.06481 [astro-ph.CO]

    N. Bartoloet al., JCAP12, 026, arXiv:1610.06481 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev. D94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Bartolo, V

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Lewis, M. Peloso, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 211301 (2019), arXiv:1810.12218 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    B. Carr, M. Raidal, T. Tenkanen, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe, Phys. Rev.D96, 023514 (2017), arXiv:1705.05567 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 116902 (2021), arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Bartolo, V

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, M. Peloso, D. Racco, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D99, 103521 (2019), arXiv:1810.12224 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Baguiet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), Liv- ing Rev

    E. Baguiet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), Liv- ing Rev. Rel.28, 1 (2025), arXiv:2310.19857 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    H. V. Ragavendra and L. Sriramkumar, Galaxies11, 34 (2023), arXiv:2301.08887 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Özsoy and G

    O. Özsoy and G. Tasinato, Universe9, 203 (2023), arXiv:2301.03600 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Cai, X.-C

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-C. He, X.-H. Ma, S.-F. Yan, and G.-W. Yuan, Sci. Bull.68, 2929 (2023), arXiv:2306.17822 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Chang, Y.-T

    Z. Chang, Y.-T. Kuang, D. Wu, and J.-Z. Zhou, JCAP 2024, 044, arXiv:2312.14409 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermae, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 201401 (2023), arXiv:2306.17149 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri, JCAP06, 039, arXiv:2309.07792 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Chang, Y.-T

    Z. Chang, Y.-T. Kuang, D. Wu, J.-Z. Zhou, and Q.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D109, L041303 (2024), arXiv:2311.05102 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Yi, Z.-Q

    Z. Yi, Z.-Q. You, and Y. Wu, JCAP01, 066, arXiv:2308.05632 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Firouzjahi and A

    H. Firouzjahi and A. Talebian, JCAP10, 032, arXiv:2307.03164 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Domènech, S

    G. Domènech, S. Pi, A. Wang, and J. Wang, JCAP08, 054, arXiv:2402.18965 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Liu, Z.-C

    L. Liu, Z.-C. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 109, L061301 (2024), arXiv:2307.01102 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Gouttenoire, S

    Y. Gouttenoire, S. Trifinopoulos, and M. Vanvlasselaer, JCAP02, 072, arXiv:2508.19328 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Wang and N

    S.-j. Wang and N. Li, JCAP08, 001, arXiv:2503.01243 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    S. J. Kapadia, K. Lal Pandey, T. Suyama, S. Kand- hasamy, and P. Ajith, Astrophys. J. Lett.910, L4 (2021), arXiv:2009.05514 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    J. E. Gammalet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), JCAP05, 062, arXiv:2501.11320 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Martinovic, C

    K. Martinovic, C. Badger, M. Sakellariadou, and V. Mandic, Phys. Rev. D104, L081101 (2021), arXiv:2103.06718 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    R. Inui, S. Jaraba, S. Kuroyanagi, and S. Yokoyama, JCAP05, 082, arXiv:2311.05423 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Punturoet al., Class

    M. Punturoet al., Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2025), arXiv:2510.26848 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Reitzeet al., Bull

    D. Reitzeet al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Maggioreet al.(ET), JCAP03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Maggioreet al.(ET), JCAP03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  44. [44]

    R.-g. Cai, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201101 (2019), arXiv:1810.11000 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    H. V. Ragavendra and N. Bartolo, (2025), arXiv:2507.02733 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Adshead, K

    P. Adshead, K. D. Lozanov, and Z. J. Weiner, JCAP 10, 080, arXiv:2105.01659 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Unal, Phys

    C. Unal, Phys. Rev. D99, 041301 (2019), arXiv:1811.09151 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Yuan, D.-S

    C. Yuan, D.-S. Meng, and Q.-G. Huang, JCAP12, 036, arXiv:2308.07155 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Garcia-Saenz, L

    S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel, and 20 D. Werth, JCAP03, 057, arXiv:2207.14267 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, and K. Kohri, JCAP05, 064, arXiv:2505.16820 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Perna, C

    G. Perna, C. Testini, A. Ricciardone, and S. Matarrese, JCAP05, 086, arXiv:2403.06962 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Abacet al.(ET), JCAP03, 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    A. Abacet al.(ET), JCAP03, 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Branchesiet al., JCAP07, 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    M. Branchesiet al., JCAP07, 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Minami and E

    Y. Minami and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 221301 (2020), arXiv:2011.11254 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    M.Evanset al., (2023),arXiv:2306.13745[astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Komatsu, Nature Rev

    E. Komatsu, Nature Rev. Phys.4, 452 (2022), arXiv:2202.13919 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Diego-Palazueloset al., Phys

    P. Diego-Palazueloset al., Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 091302 (2022), arXiv:2201.07682 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Arcari, N

    S. Arcari, N. Bartolo, A. Greco, A. Gruppuso, M. Lat- tanzi, and P. Natoli, JCAP10, 101, arXiv:2407.02144 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Greco, N

    A. Greco, N. Bartolo, and A. Gruppuso, JCAP05, 026, arXiv:2211.06380 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  60. [60]

    Diego-Palazuelos and E

    P. Diego-Palazuelos and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D113, L101302 (2026), arXiv:2509.13654 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Gruppuso and S

    A. Gruppuso and S. di Serego Alighieri, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34, 2540008 (2025), arXiv:2502.07743 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    O. H. E. Philcox, Phys. Rev. D106, 063501 (2022), arXiv:2206.04227 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    J. Hou, Z. Slepian, and R. N. Cahn, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.522, 5701 (2023), arXiv:2206.03625 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Hewson, W

    S. Hewson, W. J. Handley, and C. G. Lester, Phys. Rev. D111, 123528 (2025), arXiv:2410.16030 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Krolewski, S

    A. Krolewski, S. May, K. Smith, and H. Hopkins, JCAP 08, 044, arXiv:2407.03397 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Kurita, D

    T. Kurita, D. Jamieson, E. Komatsu, and F. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D113, 063557 (2026), arXiv:2509.08787 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, Living Rev. Rel.20, 2 (2017), arXiv:1608.06889 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Allen and J

    B. Allen and J. D. Romano, Phys. Rev. D59, 102001 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9710117

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  70. [70]

    Caporali and A

    I. Caporali and A. Ricciardone, (2025), arXiv:2507.15791 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    hybrid” contribution to the SIGWs [45, 46, 49, 73]. The other contributions to SIGW thatareatthesameorderoff 2 NLP 3 R, namelythe“C-type

    for an analysis of the SGWB detection prospects in presence of correlated noise. III. SCALAR-INDUCED GRA VIT A TIONAL W A VES TO PROBE PRIMORDIAL P ARITY-VIOLA TION Having quantified the two-point correlation of the GW signal as seen by the detectors, we shall turn to model the signal of SIGWs. A remarkable property of SIGWs is its sensitivity to scalar n...

    2017

  72. [72]

    Thrane and J

    E. Thrane and J. D. Romano, Phys. Rev. D88, 124032 (2013), arXiv:1310.5300 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [73]

    Caporali, G

    I. Caporali, G. Capurri, W. Del Pozzo, A. Ricciardone, and L. Valbusa Dall’Armi, Phys. Rev. D112, 022005 (2025), arXiv:2501.09057 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    H. V. Ragavendra, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Silk, JCAP 05, 010, arXiv:2011.09938 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    H. V. Ragavendra, Phys. Rev. D105, 063533 (2022), arXiv:2108.04193 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Garcia-Saenz, Y

    S. Garcia-Saenz, Y. Lu, and Z. Shuai, Phys. Rev. D108, 123507 (2023), arXiv:2306.09052 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Cabass, S

    G. Cabass, S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer, and D. Stefanyszyn, JHEP02, 021, arXiv:2210.02907 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    X. Niu, M. H. Rahat, K. Srinivasan, and W. Xue, JCAP 05, 018, arXiv:2211.14324 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Fujita, T

    T. Fujita, T. Murata, I. Obata, and M. Shiraishi, JCAP 05, 127, arXiv:2310.03551 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Reinhard, Z

    M. Reinhard, Z. Slepian, J. Hou, and A. Greco, (2024), arXiv:2412.16037 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.