pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18186 · v1 · pith:GVV4UIBTnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph· hep-th

The Case for Astrons

Claudio Corian\`o , Paul H. Frampton , Leonardo Torcellini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 09:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-phhep-th
keywords astronscharged compact objectsprimordial objectscosmic accelerationinhomogeneous averagingEinstein-Maxwellplasma screeningFLRW cosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

A population of primordial charged compact objects cannot produce late-time cosmic acceleration in the simplest cosmological models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores whether astrons, primordial electrically charged objects with huge masses and charges, could explain the accelerating expansion of the universe. The analysis reveals that when assuming a uniform distribution in the standard expanding universe model, the energy from their mutual charges decreases rapidly enough that it fails to cause the needed acceleration at late times. The authors conclude that the simple fluid approximation is insufficient. Any real effect would require carefully averaging the gravitational and electromagnetic fields over the actual clumpy distribution of these objects. This matters because it shows the limits of homogeneous assumptions when charged matter is involved and directs attention to more realistic but harder calculations.

Core claim

The homogeneous FLRW perfect-fluid reduction does not generate asymptotic late-time acceleration because the homogeneous interaction energy of a charged population scales as a^{-4}. Thus any viable cosmological role for astrons must come from a controlled inhomogeneous Einstein-Maxwell averaging problem beyond the homogeneous approximation.

What carries the argument

The inhomogeneous Einstein-Maxwell averaging, which treats the spatial variations in the charged population instead of assuming perfect uniformity.

If this is right

  • Charge generation and persistence must be primordial since ordinary accretion does not produce the large charge.
  • Plasma screening and neutralization have to be avoided for the objects to remain charged.
  • The exterior solution is super-extremal Reissner-Nordstrom without a photon sphere.
  • Lyman-alpha absorption offers a possible way to detect the electric fields.
  • Connection to early galaxy formation is indirect through later structure growth.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Effective dark energy might arise from electromagnetic interactions in non-uniform distributions of charged matter.
  • Numerical relativity simulations including Maxwell fields could test whether averaging produces acceleration-like behavior.
  • Surveys for megaparsec-scale charged objects could provide indirect evidence or constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The fiducial large charge on astrons persists without being neutralized or screened by plasma in the early ionized universe.

What would settle it

An observation or calculation demonstrating that plasma screening neutralizes the charge of such objects within a short time after formation would disprove the persistence required for their proposed role.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18186 by Claudio Corian\`o, Leonardo Torcellini, Paul H. Frampton.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Numerical scan of the charge scales relevant to the astron scenario. The red curve shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Extremality structure in the (M, Q) plane. The black line marks the Reissner–Nordstr¨om extremality bound Ξ = 1, the gray dashed line marks the photon-sphere threshold Ξ = 9/8, and the colored curves show the same charge prescriptions as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Numerical scan of the Debye–H¨uckel linearization parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the number of electrons contained in a sphere of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Single four-panel summary of an illustrative dimensionless charged-TOV integration for a regular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The dimensionless geometric charge parameter Ξ = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Classification of charged compact objects in the (Ξ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Kerr–Newman extremality diagram in terms of the dimensionless charge and spin parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Normalized Reissner–Nordstr¨om characteristic radii as functions of Ξ, defined in Eq. (103). The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Normalized coefficient of the b −2 correction in the weak-field Reissner–Nordstr¨om bending angle, relative to its Schwarzschild value. The coefficient decreases linearly with Ξ, showing that electric charge weakens the next-to-leading focusing term. The vertical markers indicate the extremality threshold, the photon-sphere threshold, and the fiducial astron value. where the photon sphere disappears and t… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Shell-truncated cubic-lattice sum for a Yukawa-screened inter-astron interaction, shown as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We examine a proposed population of primordial, electrically charged compact objects, which we call astrons, with fiducial parameters \(M_A\sim10^{12}M_\odot\), \(Q_A\sim4\times10^{32}\,\mathrm{C}\), and megaparsec-scale separations. We analyze charge generation, ordinary accretion saturation, charge persistence in an ionized medium, plasma screening, the Reissner--Nordstr\"om and Kerr--Newman geometric regimes, lensing, and the possible use of Lyman-\(\alpha\) absorption as a probe of astron electric fields, and the cosmological interpretation of a sparse charged population. The large-charge branch is not obtained from ordinary accretion saturation; it should be treated as a primordial or early-universe charge-concentration hypothesis. A horizon-mass estimate places a \(10^{12}M_\odot\) primordial object at times of order months after the Big Bang, so any relation to the early structures observed by the James Webb Space Telescope would be indirect, through later baryonic assembly around dark seeds. The main constraints are severe: plasma screening and neutralization must be avoided, the fiducial charge drives the exterior into a super-extremal regime without a Reissner--Nordstr\"om photon sphere, and the homogeneous interaction energy of a charged population scales as \(a^{-4}\). Thus the simplest FLRW perfect-fluid reduction does not generate asymptotic late-time acceleration. Any viable cosmological role for astrons must instead come from a controlled inhomogeneous Einstein--Maxwell averaging problem beyond the homogeneous approximation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a population of primordial electrically charged compact objects ('astrons') with fiducial parameters M_A ~ 10^{12} M_⊙, Q_A ~ 4×10^{32} C and megaparsec-scale separations. It analyzes charge generation, ordinary accretion saturation, charge persistence in ionized media, plasma screening, Reissner-Nordström and Kerr-Newman regimes, lensing, Lyman-α absorption as a probe, and the cosmological interpretation of such a sparse charged population. The central claim is that the homogeneous FLRW perfect-fluid reduction of the interaction energy density scales as a^{-4} and therefore cannot produce asymptotic late-time acceleration, so any viable cosmological role requires a controlled inhomogeneous Einstein-Maxwell averaging procedure.

Significance. If the charge-persistence assumption holds, the work correctly identifies that the homogeneous limit precludes late-time acceleration and usefully maps the severe constraints (plasma screening, super-extremal regime) that any such population must satisfy. It thereby directs attention to the technically nontrivial problem of controlled inhomogeneous averaging in Einstein-Maxwell theory. The large-charge branch is explicitly treated as a hypothesis rather than a derived result, and the horizon-mass timing argument is standard.

major comments (2)
  1. [charge persistence and plasma screening analysis] The analysis of charge generation, persistence, and plasma screening (abstract and associated section): the manuscript lists these topics and states that neutralization must be avoided, yet supplies no explicit neutralization timescale, optical depth, survival probability, or comparison to the Hubble time at the horizon-mass epoch (t ~ months after the Big Bang). This quantitative gap is load-bearing for the continued existence of a distinct charged population with the fiducial Q_A.
  2. [cosmological interpretation] The cosmological-interpretation section: while the a^{-4} scaling of homogeneous electromagnetic energy density is standard and correctly implies no asymptotic acceleration, the conclusion that any viable role requires inhomogeneous averaging rests on the unquantified persistence of the large-charge branch; if neutralization occurs on timescales ≪ Hubble time, both the homogeneous scaling argument and the proposed inhomogeneous problem become inapplicable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [fiducial parameters] The fiducial parameters M_A, Q_A and separation are stated to be chosen by hand; a brief table or paragraph summarizing how each value was selected would improve traceability.
  2. [homogeneous FLRW reduction] Notation for the interaction energy density could be introduced with an explicit equation rather than only a verbal description of the a^{-4} scaling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments correctly identify a quantitative gap in the neutralization analysis and the conditional nature of the cosmological conclusions. We address both points below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [charge persistence and plasma screening analysis] The analysis of charge generation, persistence, and plasma screening (abstract and associated section): the manuscript lists these topics and states that neutralization must be avoided, yet supplies no explicit neutralization timescale, optical depth, survival probability, or comparison to the Hubble time at the horizon-mass epoch (t ~ months after the Big Bang). This quantitative gap is load-bearing for the continued existence of a distinct charged population with the fiducial Q_A.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit neutralization timescale is a load-bearing quantity that the current draft does not supply. A full first-principles calculation would require detailed early-universe plasma simulations that lie outside the scope of the present work. In the revision we will add an order-of-magnitude estimate based on standard recombination rates and the fiducial charge density, together with a comparison to the Hubble time at the horizon-mass epoch (t ~ months). This will include a qualitative discussion of optical depth and survival probability under the assumption that the objects remain isolated from dense baryonic environments. The estimate will be presented as an indicative constraint rather than a definitive proof of persistence. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [cosmological interpretation] The cosmological-interpretation section: while the a^{-4} scaling of homogeneous electromagnetic energy density is standard and correctly implies no asymptotic acceleration, the conclusion that any viable role requires inhomogeneous averaging rests on the unquantified persistence of the large-charge branch; if neutralization occurs on timescales ≪ Hubble time, both the homogeneous scaling argument and the proposed inhomogeneous problem become inapplicable.

    Authors: We accept the referee’s observation. The manuscript already frames the large-charge branch as a hypothesis rather than a derived result and repeatedly states that neutralization and screening “must be avoided.” The a^{-4} scaling argument and the call for inhomogeneous averaging are therefore conditional on the population retaining a substantial net charge over cosmological timescales. In the revision we will make this conditional structure explicit in both the abstract and the cosmological-interpretation section, clarifying that rapid neutralization would render the scenario inapplicable and that the work is intended to map the constraints any such population must satisfy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard FLRW scaling independently

full rationale

The paper's key step—that homogeneous FLRW perfect-fluid reduction of a charged population yields interaction energy density scaling as a^{-4} and therefore cannot produce asymptotic late-time acceleration—follows directly from the standard radiation-like scaling of electromagnetic energy density in cosmology (rho_EM ~ a^{-4}), which is an external benchmark independent of the astron fiducial parameters. No derivation reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or self-definitional loop; the fiducial M_A, Q_A and separations are explicitly introduced as a proposed population under study rather than derived or renamed as a prediction. Charge persistence is listed as a necessary condition to be analyzed rather than smuggled in as a load-bearing theorem. The overall argument remains self-contained against external FLRW cosmology and does not require the target conclusion to hold by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on three hand-chosen fiducial parameters that define the population, plus the domain assumption that charge can survive plasma screening. No machine-checked proofs or external data are referenced.

free parameters (3)
  • M_A = 10^12 M_sun
    Fiducial mass of each astron set to 10^12 solar masses to place formation in the early universe.
  • Q_A = 4 x 10^32 C
    Fiducial electric charge chosen to place the exterior in the super-extremal regime.
  • separation = megaparsec
    Megaparsec-scale mean separation chosen to make the population sparse.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Large electric charge can persist without neutralization or plasma screening in the ionized early-universe medium.
    Invoked to allow analysis of the charged population; stated as a necessary condition in the abstract.
  • standard math The homogeneous FLRW perfect-fluid description is an appropriate starting point for assessing late-time acceleration.
    Used to derive the a^{-4} scaling and the negative conclusion about acceleration.
invented entities (1)
  • Astrons no independent evidence
    purpose: Primordial electrically charged compact objects proposed as a new population with the listed fiducial parameters.
    Newly introduced objects whose existence is hypothesized rather than derived from prior equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5808 in / 1792 out tokens · 52354 ms · 2026-05-20T09:42:27.183357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Electromagnetic accelerating universe,

    P. H. Frampton, “Electromagnetic accelerating universe,” Phys. Lett. B835(2022) 137480, arXiv:2210.10632

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    A model of dark matter and energy,

    P. H. Frampton, “A model of dark matter and energy,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A38(2023) 2350032, arXiv:2301.10719

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Astrophysical Black Holes: A Review,

    C. Bambi, “Astrophysical Black Holes: A Review,” arXiv:1906.03871 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 1906

  4. [4]

    Electric charge of black holes: Is it really always negligible?,

    M. Zajacek and A. Tursunov, “Electric charge of black holes: Is it really always negligible?,” arXiv:1904.04654 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 1904

  5. [5]

    On the charge of the Galactic centre black hole,

    M. Zajacek, A. Tursunov, A. Eckart and S. Britzen, “On the charge of the Galactic centre black hole,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.480(2018) 4408–4423

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Hydrostatic equilibrium and gravitational collapse of relativistic charged fluid balls,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Hydrostatic equilibrium and gravitational collapse of relativistic charged fluid balls,” Phys. Rev. D4(1971) 2185–2190, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.4.2185

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.4.2185 1971

  7. [7]

    Electrically charged compact stars and formation of charged black holes,

    S. Ray, A. L. Espindola, M. Malheiro, J. P. S. Lemos and V. T. Zanchin, “Electrically charged compact stars and formation of charged black holes,” Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 084004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.084004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.084004 2003

  8. [8]

    G. Darmois,Les ´ equations de la gravitation einsteinienne, M´ emorial des Sciences Math´ ematiques, Fascicule25, Gauthier–Villars, Paris, 1927,https://www.numdam.org/item/MSM_1927__25__1_0/

    work page 1927

  9. [9]

    Geometry of general hypersurfaces in spacetime: Junction condi- tions,

    M. Mars and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Geometry of general hypersurfaces in spacetime: Junction condi- tions,” Class. Quantum Grav.10(1993) 1865–1897, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/10/9/026

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/10/9/026 1993

  10. [10]

    A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics,

    E. Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606601

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606601 2004

  11. [11]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,

    W. Israel, “Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,” Nuovo Cim. B44(1966) 1–14, doi:10.1007/BF02710419; erratum Nuovo Cim. B48(1967) 463, doi:10.1007/BF02712210

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02710419 1966

  12. [12]

    Constraints on Long-Ranged Interactions Between Dark Matter and the Standard Model,

    Z. Bogorad, P. W. Graham and H. Ramani, “Constraints on Long-Ranged Interactions Between Dark Matter and the Standard Model,” arXiv:2410.07324 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Plasma Constraints on the Cosmological Abundance of Magnetic Monopoles and the Origin of Cosmic Magnetic Fields

    M. V. Medvedev and A. Loeb, “Plasma Constraints on the Cosmological Abundance of Magnetic Monopoles and the Origin of Cosmic Magnetic Fields,” arXiv:1704.05094 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Debye screening of non-Abelian plasmas in curved spacetimes,

    E. Alonso-Monsalve and D. I. Kaiser, “Debye screening of non-Abelian plasmas in curved spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 125010

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Cosmological solutions with charged black holes,

    R. Bibi, T. Clifton and J. Durk, “Cosmological solutions with charged black holes,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.49(2017) 98

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity I: dust cosmologies

    T. Buchert, “On Average Properties of Inhomogeneous Fluids in General Relativity: Dust Cosmolo- gies,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.32(2000) 105–125, arXiv:gr-qc/9906015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  17. [17]

    Does the Growth of Structure Affect Our Dy- namical Models of the Universe? The Averaging, Backreaction and Fitting Problems in Cosmology,

    C. Clarkson, G. F. R. Ellis, J. Larena and O. Umeh, “Does the Growth of Structure Affect Our Dy- namical Models of the Universe? The Averaging, Backreaction and Fitting Problems in Cosmology,” Rep. Prog. Phys.74(2011) 112901

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    A new framework for analyzing the effects of small scale inhomogeneities in cosmology

    S. R. Green and R. M. Wald, “A new framework for analyzing the effects of small scale inhomogeneities in cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 084020, arXiv:1011.4920 [gr-qc]. 74

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2024 (2024) 083C01

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Cosmology,

    S. Weinberg, “Cosmology,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Modern Cosmology,

    S. Dodelson and F. Schmidt, “Modern Cosmology,” 2nd ed., Academic Press, London, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    The formation of super- massive black holes in rapidly rotating discs,

    F. Becerra, T. H. Greif, V. Bromm, M. A. Klessen and R. S. Somerville, “The formation of super- massive black holes in rapidly rotating discs,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.476(2018) 3523–3544

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    The formation of supermassive stars by rapid mass accretion in the early Universe,

    S. Chon, K. Omukai and V. Bromm, “The formation of supermassive stars by rapid mass accretion in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.475(2018) 4104–4121

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Astrophysical Constants and Parameters,

    Particle Data Group, “Astrophysical Constants and Parameters,” 2025 online update,https://pdg. lbl.gov/2025/reviews/rpp2025-rev-astrophysical-constants.pdf

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Astrophysical Constants and Parameters,

    Particle Data Group, “Astrophysical Constants and Parameters,” 2024 review update,https://pdg. lbl.gov/2024/download/db2024.pdf

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    The Lyman Alpha Forest in the Spectra of QSOs

    M. Rauch, “The Lyman Alpha Forest in the Spectra of QSOs,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.36 (1998) 267–316, doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.267, arXiv:astro-ph/9806286

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.267 1998

  28. [28]

    B. T. Draine,Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    The Physics of the Intergalactic Medium,

    A. A. Meiksin, “The Physics of the Intergalactic Medium,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 1405–1469, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1405

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1405 2009

  30. [30]

    The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium,

    M. McQuinn, “The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54(2016) 313–362, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122355

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122355 2016

  31. [31]

    Baryons in the Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium,

    R. Dav´ e, R. Cen, J. P. Ostriker, G. L. Bryan, L. Hernquist, N. Katz, D. H. Weinberg, M. L. Norman and B. O’Shea, “Baryons in the Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium,” Astrophys. J.552(2001) 473–483, doi:10.1086/320548

    work page doi:10.1086/320548 2001

  32. [32]

    S., & Werk, J

    J. Tumlinson, M. S. Peeples and J. K. Werk, “The Circumgalactic Medium,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.55(2017) 389–432, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240 2017

  33. [33]

    Intergalactic Medium,

    Center for Astrophysics — Harvard & Smithsonian, “Intergalactic Medium,”https://pweb.cfa. harvard.edu/research/topic/intergalactic-medium

    work page

  34. [34]

    Intergalactic Medium,

    COSMOS Encyclopedia, “Intergalactic Medium,”https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/I/ Intergalactic+Medium

    work page

  35. [35]

    Dark matter from primordial black holes would hold charge,

    I. J. Araya, N. D. Padilla, M. E. Rubio, J. Sureda, J. Maga˜ na and L. Osorio, “Dark matter from primordial black holes would hold charge,” JCAP02(2023) 030, arXiv:2207.05829 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Direct collapse black hole formation via high-velocity collisions of protogalaxies,

    K. Inayoshi, E. Visbal and K. Kashiyama, “Direct collapse black hole formation via high-velocity collisions of protogalaxies,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453(2015) 1692–1700

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Radiation hydrodynamics simulations of the formation of direct-collapse supermassive stellar systems,

    S. Chon, T. Hosokawa and N. Yoshida, “Radiation hydrodynamics simulations of the formation of direct-collapse supermassive stellar systems,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.475(2018) 4104–4121

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Direct Collapse to Supermassive Black Hole Seeds with Radiative Transfer: Isolated Halos,

    Y. Luo, K. Ardaneh, I. Shlosman, K. Nagamine, J. H. Wise and M. C. Begelman, “Direct Collapse to Supermassive Black Hole Seeds with Radiative Transfer: Isolated Halos,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.476(2018) 3523–3539. 75

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    A population of red candidate massive galaxies∼600 Myr after the Big Bang,

    I. Labb´ e, P. van Dokkum, E. Nelsonet al., “A population of red candidate massive galaxies∼600 Myr after the Big Bang,” Nature616(2023) 266–269

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168 (1974) 399–415

    work page 1974

  41. [41]

    Insights from HST into Ultramassive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology,

    N. Sabti, J. B. Mu˜ noz and M. Kamionkowski, “Insights from HST into Ultramassive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 061002, arXiv:2305.07049 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    The first billion years according to JWST,

    A. Adamo, H. Atek, M. B. Bagleyet al., “The first billion years according to JWST,” Nat. Astron. 9(2025) 1134–1147, doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02624-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02624-5 2025

  43. [43]

    2024, Nature, 633, 318, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    S. Carniani, K. Hainline, F. D’Eugenioet al., “Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14,” Nature633(2024) 318–322, doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9 2024

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    M. Xiao, P. A. Oesch, D. Elbazet al., “Accelerated formation of ultra-massive galaxies in the first billion years,” Nature635(2024) 311–315, doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08094-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08094-5 2024

  45. [45]

    Looking beyond lambda,

    A. Leauthaud and A. G. Riess, “Looking beyond lambda,” Nat. Astron.9(2025) 1123–1128

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Kappa distributions: theory and applications in space plasmas

    V. Pierrard and M. Lazar, “Kappa distributions: theory and applications in space plasmas,” Sol. Phys.267(2010) 153–174, arXiv:1003.3532 [physics.space-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Understanding Kappa Distributions: A Toolbox for Space Science and Astrophysics,

    G. Livadiotis and D. J. McComas, “Understanding Kappa Distributions: A Toolbox for Space Science and Astrophysics,” Space Sci. Rev.175(2013) 183–214

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Debye screening under non-equilibrium plasma conditions,

    H. J. Fahr and M. Heyl, “Debye screening under non-equilibrium plasma conditions,” Astron. Astro- phys.589(2016) A85

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Gravitational Vacuum Condensate Stars

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, “Gravitational vacuum condensate stars,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(2004) 9545–9550, doi:10.1073/pnas.0402717101, arXiv:gr-qc/0407075

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1073/pnas.0402717101 2004

  50. [50]

    Reality of the Schwarzschild Singularity,

    A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman and J. Winicour, “Reality of the Schwarzschild Singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.20(1968) 878–880

    work page 1968

  51. [51]

    Static Spherically Symmetric Scalar Fields in General Relativity,

    M. Wyman, “Static Spherically Symmetric Scalar Fields in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 839–841

    work page 1981

  52. [52]

    Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics,

    R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.11(1963) 237–238

    work page 1963

  53. [53]

    Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass,

    E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash and R. Torrence, “Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass,” J. Math. Phys.6(1965) 918–919

    work page 1965

  54. [54]

    Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,

    B. Carter, “Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,” Phys. Rev.174(1968) 1559– 1571, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.174.1559

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.174.1559 1968

  55. [55]

    Neutrino and Photon Lensing by Black Holes: Radiative Lens Equations and Post-Newtonian Contributions

    C. Corian` o, A. Costantini, M. Dell’Atti and L. Delle Rose, “Neutrino and Photon Lensing by Black Holes: Radiative Lens Equations and Post-Newtonian Contributions,” JHEP07(2015) 160, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)160, arXiv:1504.01322 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2015)160 2015

  56. [56]

    Electroweak Corrections to Photon Scat- tering, Polarization and Lensing in a Gravitational Background and the Near Horizon Limit,

    C. Corian` o, L. Delle Rose, M. M. Maglio and M. Serino, “Electroweak Corrections to Photon Scat- tering, Polarization and Lensing in a Gravitational Background and the Near Horizon Limit,” JHEP 01(2015) 091, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)091, arXiv:1411.2804 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2015)091 2015

  57. [57]

    Topology of Some Spheroidal Metrics,

    D. M. Zipoy, “Topology of Some Spheroidal Metrics,” J. Math. Phys.7(1966) 1137–1143

    work page 1966

  58. [58]

    Static Axially Symmetric Gravitational Fields,

    B. H. Voorhees, “Static Axially Symmetric Gravitational Fields,” Phys. Rev. D2(1970) 2119–2122. 76

    work page 1970

  59. [59]

    New Exact Solution for the Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass,

    A. Tomimatsu and H. Sato, “New Exact Solution for the Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass,” Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1344–1345

    work page 1972

  60. [60]

    New Series of Exact Solutions for Gravitational Fields of Spinning Masses,

    A. Tomimatsu and H. Sato, “New Series of Exact Solutions for Gravitational Fields of Spinning Masses,” Prog. Theor. Phys.50(1973) 95–110. 77

    work page 1973