REVIEW 4 cited by
MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Instruction tuning has become the de facto method to equip large language models (LLMs) with the ability of following user instructions. Usually, hundreds of thousands or millions of instruction-following pairs are employed to fine-tune the foundation LLMs. Recently, some studies show that a small number of high-quality instruction data is enough. However, how to select appropriate instruction data for a given LLM is still an open problem. To address this problem, in this paper we present a model-oriented data selection (MoDS) approach, which selects instruction data based on a new criteria considering three aspects: quality, coverage and necessity. First, our approach utilizes a quality evaluation model to filter out the high-quality subset from the original instruction dataset, and then designs an algorithm to further select from the high-quality subset a seed instruction dataset with good coverage. The seed dataset is applied to fine-tune the foundation LLM to obtain an initial instruction-following LLM. Finally, we develop a necessity evaluation model to find out the instruction data which are performed badly in the initial instruction-following LLM and consider them necessary instructions to further improve the LLMs. In this way, we can get a small high-quality, broad-coverage and high-necessity subset from the original instruction datasets. Experimental results show that, the model fine-tuned with 4,000 instruction pairs selected by our approach could perform better than the model fine-tuned with the full original dataset which includes 214k instruction data.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
DaMoC: Efficiently Selecting the Optimal Large Language Model for Fine-tuning Domain Tasks Based on Data and Model Compression
DaMoC combines data filtering, token compression, and layer pruning to select the best LLM for domain fine-tuning, claiming ~20x faster training while preserving model rankings.
-
From Macro to Micro: Probing Dataset Diversity in Language Model Fine-Tuning
Controlling the variety of mid-frequency response tokens during SFT dataset construction correlates more strongly with downstream model performance than instruction-level diversity strategies.
-
Middo: Model-Informed Dynamic Data Optimization for Enhanced LLM Fine-Tuning via Closed-Loop Learning
An iterative data-optimization pipeline that simplifies, extends, and rewrites SFT examples based on the model's own loss, embedding sparsity, and self-scores reports up to 7.15 absolute points of average benchmark im...
-
Improving Task Diversity in Label Efficient Supervised Finetuning of LLMs
Weighted Task Diversity allocates the annotation budget across tasks in inverse proportion to the base model's average confidence, improving MMLU and AlpacaEval scores with up to 80% fewer labels.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.