Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Structured Review of Literature on Uncertainty in Machine Learning & Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00332 v1 pith:H3HMGN5N submitted 2024-06-01 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

A Structured Review of Literature on Uncertainty in Machine Learning & Deep Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords uncertaintyreviewlearningquantificationunderstandingadaptationdeepdiscussion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The adaptation and use of Machine Learning (ML) in our daily lives has led to concerns in lack of transparency, privacy, reliability, among others. As a result, we are seeing research in niche areas such as interpretability, causality, bias and fairness, and reliability. In this survey paper, we focus on a critical concern for adaptation of ML in risk-sensitive applications, namely understanding and quantifying uncertainty. Our paper approaches this topic in a structured way, providing a review of the literature in the various facets that uncertainty is enveloped in the ML process. We begin by defining uncertainty and its categories (e.g., aleatoric and epistemic), understanding sources of uncertainty (e.g., data and model), and how uncertainty can be assessed in terms of uncertainty quantification techniques (Ensembles, Bayesian Neural Networks, etc.). As part of our assessment and understanding of uncertainty in the ML realm, we cover metrics for uncertainty quantification for a single sample, dataset, and metrics for accuracy of the uncertainty estimation itself. This is followed by discussions on calibration (model and uncertainty), and decision making under uncertainty. Thus, we provide a more complete treatment of uncertainty: from the sources of uncertainty to the decision-making process. We have focused the review of uncertainty quantification methods on Deep Learning (DL), while providing the necessary background for uncertainty discussion within ML in general. Key contributions in this review are broadening the scope of uncertainty discussion, as well as an updated review of uncertainty quantification methods in DL.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RadProPoser: Probabilistic Radar Tensor Human Pose Estimation That Knows Its Limits

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    RadProPoser uses a variational encoder-decoder with spectral attention to predict 3D poses and aleatoric uncertainties from radar tensors, achieving 6.425 cm MPJPE on a new benchmark and 5.042 cm on HuPR with calibrat...

  2. VOLTA: The Surprising Ineffectiveness of Auxiliary Losses for Calibrated Deep Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    VOLTA, consisting of a deep encoder with learnable prototypes plus cross-entropy and post-hoc temperature scaling, matches or exceeds ten UQ baselines in accuracy, achieves lower expected calibration error, and perfor...

  3. AEGIS: A Semantic GAN and Evidential Learning Frameworkfor Robust Adversarial Detection in Vision Sensors

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AEGIS combines SemantiGAN filtering with evidential learning on five handcrafted instability metrics to detect adversarial attacks, reporting 92.1% AUROC on Tiny ImageNet across six attack types.