Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Multiscale machine-learning interatomic potentials for ferromagnetic and liquid iron

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.10237 v1 pith:H5M5G5LQ submitted 2022-01-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph

Multiscale machine-learning interatomic potentials for ferromagnetic and liquid iron

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph
keywords potentialspotentialmachine-learnedtermscomparecomputationalcostcubic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop and compare four interatomic potentials for iron: a simple machine-learned embedded atom method (EAM) potential, a potential with machine-learned two- and three-body-dependent terms, a potential with machine-learned EAM and three-body terms, and a Gaussian approximation potential with the SOAP descriptor. All potentials are trained to the same diverse database of body-centered cubic and liquid structures computed with density functional theory. The four presented potentials represent different levels of complexity and span three orders of magnitude in computational cost. The first three potentials are tabulated and evaluated efficiently using cubic spline interpolations, while the fourth one is implemented without additional optimization. We compare and discuss the advantages of each implementation, transferability and applicability in terms of the balance between required accuracy versus computational cost.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.