Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Using GPT-4 to Augment Unbalanced Data for Automatic Scoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18365 v3 pith:HA5EARAV submitted 2023-10-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
keywords datascoringautomaticgpt-4augmentedresponsesunbalanceddatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning-based automatic scoring faces challenges with unbalanced student responses across scoring categories. To address this, we introduce a novel text data augmentation framework leveraging GPT-4, a generative large language model, specifically tailored for unbalanced datasets in automatic scoring. Our experimental dataset comprised student written responses to four science items. We crafted prompts for GPT-4 to generate responses, especially for minority scoring classes, enhancing the data set. We then finetuned DistillBERT for automatic scoring based on the augmented and original datasets. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 metrics. Our findings revealed that incorporating GPT-4-augmented data remarkedly improved model performance, particularly for precision and F1 scores. Interestingly, the extent of improvement varied depending on the specific dataset and the proportion of augmented data used. Notably, we found that a varying amount of augmented data (20%-40%) was needed to obtain stable improvement for automatic scoring. Comparisons with models trained on additional student-written responses suggest that GPT-4 augmented models match those trained with student data. This research underscores the potential and effectiveness of data augmentation techniques utilizing generative large language models like GPT-4 in addressing unbalanced datasets within automated assessment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Using Large Language Models to Assess Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In video-based teacher knowledge assessments, GPT-4 scoring was more lenient than both human raters and a supervised ML model, while rater-related factors dominated construct-irrelevant variance.

Pith tools