Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

M-theory at fixed chemical potential yields Airy functions

2026-07-08 03:49 UTC pith:HBOR4EG3

load-bearing objection Solid paper with a real new result (zero-mode analysis via relative cohomology); the TTI subleading discrepancy is a genuine open problem but does not undermine the main contributions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06493 v1 pith:HBOR4EG3 submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th

Holographic Tests of the μ Ensemble

Nikolay Bobev , Fridrik Freyr Gautason , Jesse van Muiden This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.Tq11.25.Yb04.65.+e
keywords M-theoryAdS/CFTABJMAiry functionensemble transformzero-mode countingsupersymmetric localizationlogarithmic corrections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that M-theory on asymptotically AdS4 backgrounds is most naturally computed at fixed three-form gauge potential (the M2-ensemble, or fixed chemical potential mu), rather than at fixed flux integer N. In this ensemble, the perturbative partition function truncates to a cubic polynomial in mu: Z = C/3 mu^3 + B mu + A, with no logarithmic term. The authors show that this vanishing of the log term follows from a zero-mode counting argument: Dirichlet boundary conditions on A3 impose relative boundary conditions on the BRST ghost two-form, and the relevant relative cohomology group H^2(B4, S3) is trivial, eliminating the single ghost zero-mode that would otherwise contribute. Combining the cubic truncation with a measure factor determined by this same zero-mode counting, the Laplace transform to the fixed-N ensemble produces Airy function expressions for the squashed S3 partition function, the superconformal index, and the topologically twisted index of the dual ABJM theory, matching known and conjectured field theory results.

Core claim

The central mechanism is the ensemble-dependent zero-mode counting for the BRST ghost two-form associated with the 11d three-form potential A3. In the fixed-mu (M2) ensemble, Dirichlet boundary conditions on A3 force the ghost to satisfy relative boundary conditions, reducing the zero-mode problem to relative cohomology H^2(B4, S3), which is trivial. This eliminates the logarithmic correction entirely (D=0), which in turn fixes the measure of the Laplace transform to the fixed-N ensemble and, combined with the cubic truncation of the perturbative series in mu, yields Airy function expressions for multiple SCFT partition functions.

What carries the argument

M2-ensemble (fixed chemical potential mu), M5-ensemble (fixed flux N), Laplace transform between ensembles, relative cohomology for BRST ghost zero-mode counting, four-derivative 4d N=2 gauged supergravity consistent truncation, Airy function integral identities

Load-bearing premise

The entire Airy function derivation rests on the assumption that the M2-ensemble partition function truncates exactly to a cubic polynomial in mu with no 1/mu corrections. The authors state they have no bulk explanation for this truncation; it is imported from the QFT supersymmetric localization side.

What would settle it

If higher-derivative corrections beyond eight derivatives in 11d supergravity produce non-vanishing 1/mu terms in the M2-ensemble partition function, the cubic truncation breaks down and the Airy function form of the Laplace transform no longer holds.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The fixed-mu ensemble provides a bulk derivation of the Airy function form of ABJM partition functions (squashed S3, SCI, TTI) to all perturbative orders in 1/N, matching results previously established or conjectured only from the field theory side.
  • The zero-mode counting method extends to black hole backgrounds (AdS-Schwarzschild, supersymmetric Kerr-Newman, Reissner-Nordstrom on higher-genus Riemann surfaces), producing concrete log-correction predictions that differ between ensembles.
  • For the topologically twisted index on higher-genus surfaces, the bulk Laplace transform produces subleading terms that disagree with existing field theory results beyond the first three leading orders, pointing to either unaccounted Bethe roots or contour subtleties.
  • The framework extends to backgrounds with wrapped M5-brane sources, where a quadratic term in mu appears and the fixed-N partition function acquires an exponential prefactor multiplying an Airy function.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the cubic truncation in mu is indeed exact (as predicted by QFT but unexplained from the bulk), then there must exist a non-renormalization theorem in M-theory that prevents 1/mu corrections from higher-derivative terms beyond eight derivatives. The paper notes this possibility but does not establish it; identifying such a mechanism would explain why the M2-ensemble is dramatically simpler.
  • The disagreement between the bulk-derived TTI subleading terms and the field theory factorization log Z(g) = (1-g) log Z(g=0) could serve as a diagnostic: if additional Bethe roots contribute subleadingly, the bulk result predicts their exact form.
  • The extension to AdS7 x S4 backgrounds (Appendix B) suggests that the (2,0) theory partition function on S5 x S1, which has no log N term, is consistent with the absence of middle-degree ghost zero-modes in odd-dimensional AdS, potentially offering a parallel ensemble-based derivation for 6d theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper studies the fixed-$A_3$ (M2) ensemble in M-theory on asymptotically AdS$_4$ backgrounds, extending the framework introduced in [1]. The authors compute the two leading terms ($C/3$ $mu^3$ and $Bmu$) in the grand-canonical partition function $Z_{M2}(mu)$ using 11d supergravity and its 4d gauged supergravity consistent truncation, and determine the logarithmic correction $Dlogmu$ via a careful zero-mode counting analysis using relative cohomology. Combining these ingredients, they perform the Laplace transform to the fixed-$N$ (M5) ensemble and obtain Airy-function expressions for the squashed $S^3$, SCI, and TTI partition functions of ABJM theory. The zero-mode counting (§3.1.2) showing that $D=0$ in the M2-ensemble for AdS$_4 times S^7/Z_k$ is mathematically clean, and the agreement of the leading $N^{3/2}$, $N^{1/2}$, and $log N$ terms with field theory is a solid result. The derivation of the $Ai^2$ formula for the SCI (§5, Eq. 5.11) is a new and interesting prediction. However, the TTI result (§5, Eq. 5.19) disagrees with field theory at subleading order in $1/N$, which the authors acknowledge but do not resolve.

Significance. The paper provides several genuine advances. First, the relative cohomology computation of zero-modes (§3.1.2) is a clean mathematical result that explains the absence of $logmu$ in the M2-ensemble from first principles. Second, the derivation of the $Ai^2$ formula for the SCI (Eq. 5.11) from the bulk Laplace transform is a falsifiable prediction that agrees with recent field theory conjectures. Third, the unified treatment of the squashed $S^3$, SCI, and TTI within a single framework is valuable. The coefficients $a_0$ and $b_{0,1,2}$ in §4.2 are fixed by matching to the ABJM Airy conjecture for the squashed $S^3$ (Eqs. 4.20-4.22), which constitutes a form of fitting to the target; however, the paper then uses these to predict the SCI and TTI coefficients (Eqs. 4.25, 4.28), which were not used in the fit, and the zero-mode analysis provides an independent determination of the measure. The cubic truncation of $Z_{M2}(mu)$ is assumed from QFT rather than derived from the bulk, which is a limitation the authors are transparent about.

major comments (2)
  1. §5, Eq. (5.19): The TTI partition function obtained from the Laplace transform disagrees with the field theory results of [17,18] at subleading order in $1/N$. Specifically, the QFT result predicts $log Z_{TTI}(N) = (1-g) log Z_{S^1 times S^2}(N)$, i.e. the higher-genus TTI is simply $(1-g)$ times the genus-0 TTI, while Eq. (5.19) produces different subleading terms. The authors suggest possible resolutions (contour subtleties for $n neq 1/2$, additional Bethe roots in the QFT saddle) but do not resolve the discrepancy. This is a load-bearing issue because the TTI is one of the three central observables for which the paper claims 'remarkable agreement' with the dual SCFT. The authors should either (i) sharpen the diagnosis by ruling out some of the proposed explanations (e.g., by checking whether a different contour choice can reproduce the $(1-g)$ scaling), or (ii) temper the claim of '
  2. §2.1 and §5, Eq. (5.2): The entire Airy function derivation in §5 depends on the perturbative M2-brane partition function truncating exactly to $C/3 mu^3 + Bmu + A$ with no $1/mu$ corrections. This truncation is rigorously established from the QFT side only for the squashed $S^3$ with $b^2=1$ and $b^2=3$ (via the Fermi gas analysis of [12,30,52]). For the SCI and TTI, the truncation is conjectural. The paper acknowledges this in §2.1 ('we do not have a bulk explanation for why the M2-ensemble answer seems much simpler and truncates after finitely many terms, but this is predicted by the QFT supersymmetric localization analysis'), but the abstract and introduction present the Airy function results as established achievements. The authors should clarify in the abstract/introduction that the cubic truncation is assumed (from QFT) rather than derived from the bulk, and that the SCI and TTI $
minor comments (7)
  1. §3.1.2, Eq. (3.18): The notation $Omega^2_{text{rel}}(bar{Y}, S^3 times S^7)$ is introduced without explicitly defining the relative boundary conditions on $d^dagger c_2$ in relation to the standard APS or absolute/relative boundary conditions for the Hodge Laplacian. A brief reference to the specific boundary value problem being solved would clarify this for the reader's benefit.
  2. §4.2, Eqs. (4.20)–(4.22): The coefficients $a_0$ and $b_{0,1,2}$ are fixed by matching to the ABJM Airy conjecture. While the paper is transparent about this, it would strengthen the presentation to explicitly state which values of $b$ are used in the fit (e.g., $b^2=1$ and $b^2=3$) and which are predictions, since the claim that $a_0$ can be independently computed from 11d reduction is important and should be distinguished from the $b_{0,1,2}$ which cannot currently be determined from the bulk.
  3. §5, Eq. (5.4): The measure $mu^{n-1/2}$ is parametrized and $n$ is fixed by matching to the $logmu$ coefficient $D$. The logic is: $D=0 rightarrow n=1/2$ (squashed $S^3$), $D=-1/2 rightarrow n=0$ (SCI), $D=(g-1)/2 rightarrow n=g$ (TTI). This inference is supported by the squashed $S^3$ and SCI cases, but for the TTI (where edge modes contribute and $n neq 1/2$), the subleading discrepancy in Eq. (5.19) suggests the measure determination may be incomplete. A brief discussion of why the measure is expected to be fully determined by the zero-mode counting alone, even when $n neq 1/2$, would strengthen the presentation.
  4. §5.1, Eq. (5.20): The $mu^2$ contribution from wrapped M5-brane sources is discussed but the constant $E$ is left undetermined. While the authors note that checking this against dual 3d $mathcal{N}=2$ CS-matter theories would be interesting, it would help to state whether $E$ is expected to be computable from the bulk (e.g., from the M5-brane tension) or whether it is another parameter to be fixed by matching.
  5. Appendix A, Eq. (A.6): The saddle-point formula for the logarithmic term $gamma + h - 1/2(p-2)/(p-1) log N$ is used in the main text but the derivation in Appendix A is somewhat terse. A few more steps showing how the Gaussian integration around the saddle produces this coefficient would help readers verify the claim.
  6. The reference to 'severeal non-trivial examples' (§5, between Eqs. 5.4 and 5.5) contains a typo.
  7. §3.7, Eq. (3.48)–(3.50): The edge-mode contribution $Z_{text{edge}}(mu) propto mu^g$ is derived for the $S^1 times Sigma_g$ boundary. This result is used to fix the measure for the TTI Laplace transform. It would be useful to cross-check this against the independent M5-ensemble zero-mode counting (Eq. 3.44), which the authors state is consistent. The consistency check is mentioned but the explicit verification is left to the reader; a one-line confirmation would strengthen the presentation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The referee correctly identifies the main advances of the paper: the relative cohomology zero-mode computation, the Ai^2 SCI prediction, and the unified treatment of three observables. The two major comments concern (1) the TTI subleading discrepancy at order 1/N, and (2) the status of the cubic truncation assumption for the SCI and TTI. We address both below. On the TTI discrepancy, we agree the claim of 'remarkable agreement' should be tempered for the TTI case specifically, and we will revise the manuscript accordingly. We also provide a sharpened discussion of the possible resolutions. On the cubic truncation, we agree the abstract and introduction should be more transparent about what is derived from the bulk versus assumed from QFT, and we will revise. We emphasize that the squashed S^3 results (for b^2=1 and b^2=3) are fully rigorous on both sides, and that the zero-mode analysis and the leading C and B coefficients are independently derived from the bulk.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: TTI discrepancy at subleading order in 1/N: Eq. (5.19) disagrees with field theory results of [17,18] which predict log Z_TTI(N) = (1-g) log Z_{S^1 x S^2}(N). The authors suggest possible resolutions but do not resolve the discrepancy. The referee asks the authors to either (i) sharpen the diagnosis by ruling out some proposed explanations, or (ii) temper the claim of 'remarkable agreement'.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the TTI subleading discrepancy is a genuine open issue that we do not resolve, and that the language of 'remarkable agreement' should be qualified for the TTI case. We will revise the manuscript to make clear that: (a) the N^{3/2}, N^{1/2}, and log N terms agree precisely with field theory for all three observables including the TTI; (b) for the squashed S^3 and SCI, the full Airy-function structure agrees with field theory conjectures/results; (c) for the TTI specifically, subleading terms beyond log N in Eq. (5.19) disagree with the (1-g) scaling prediction of [17,18], and this remains an open problem. Regarding option (i), we can partially sharpen the diagnosis as follows. The contour issue is specific to the TTI because the measure exponent n = g is a positive integer (not 1/2), which means the integrand involves integer powers rather than a square-root branch cut. For integer n, the contour choice is in principle less ambiguous than for half-integer n, since there is no branch cut to navigate. This makes it less likely (though not impossible) that a different contour choice alone resolves the discrepancy. We will add this observation to the manuscript. However, we cannot at present rule out the Bethe root explanation, as checking whether additional Bethe roots contribute at subleading order requires a detailed reanalysis of the Bethe Ansatz equations of [17,18] that is beyond the scope of this paper. We therefore adopt option (ii) as well: we will temper the claims in the abstract, introduction, and Section 5 to distinguish clearly between the fully successful tests (squashed S^3, SCI) and the partially successful test (TTI: leading orders agree, subleading terms do not). revision: yes

  2. Referee: The cubic truncation of Z_{M2}(mu) to C/3 mu^3 + B mu + A with no 1/mu corrections is rigorously established from QFT only for the squashed S^3 with b^2=1 and b^2=3. For the SCI and TTI, the truncation is conjectural. The paper acknowledges this in Section 2.1 but the abstract and introduction present the Airy function results as established achievements. The referee asks the authors to clarify in the abstract/introduction that the cubic truncation is assumed from QFT rather than derived from the bulk, and that the SCI and TTI results rest on this assumption.

    Authors: This is a fair point and we will revise the abstract and introduction accordingly. Specifically, we will: (1) add language in the abstract clarifying that the cubic truncation of the perturbative M2-ensemble partition function is established from QFT for the squashed S^3 (at b^2=1,3) and conjectured for the SCI and TTI; (2) add a corresponding qualification in the introduction where the Airy function results are first discussed; (3) make explicit in Section 5 that the SCI and TTI Airy function derivations assume the cubic truncation as input. We emphasize that several ingredients are independently derived from the bulk and do not rely on the truncation assumption: the coefficient C (from the 2-derivative on-shell action), the coefficient B (from the 4-derivative supergravity consistent truncation), the coefficient D (from the relative cohomology zero-mode analysis), and hence the measure of the Laplace transform. The truncation assumption enters only in asserting that there are no further 1/mu perturbative corrections beyond the cubic polynomial. We will make this distinction clear. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; coefficients fitted to squashed S³ QFT data are applied to genuinely different solutions for SCI/TTI predictions, and the zero-mode analysis is independent

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained. The zero-mode counting in §3 (determining the D coefficients and hence the Laplace transform measure) is an independent bulk topological computation with no QFT input. The coefficient C is independently computed from 2-derivative 11d supergravity and verified against direct dimensional reduction (eq. 4.21). The coefficients a₀, b₀,₁,₂ are fitted to the squashed S³ ABJM Airy data for b²=1 and b²=3 (eq. 4.20-4.22), but this fitting is then used to predict the SCI (eq. 4.28) and TTI (eq. 4.25) coefficients by applying the same universal parameters to different 4d supergravity solutions (KN and RN) with different topological data (F, χ). These are genuine predictions, not renamings of the fitted inputs. The cubic truncation Z_M2(μ) = C/3 μ³ + Bμ + A is explicitly acknowledged as an assumption from QFT (§2.1: 'we do not have a bulk explanation... but this is predicted by the QFT'), not disguised as a derivation. The self-citation to [1] (Gautason, van Muiden) provides the ensemble framework being tested, not a theorem invoked to force the conclusion. Critically, the TTI subleading discrepancy (eq. 5.19) demonstrates the framework has genuine predictive content — a circular construction would agree by construction. The minor fitting of a₀, b₀,₁,₂ to QFT data is standard holographic matching and does not reduce the central claims to their inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. The M2- and M5-ensembles are proposed in prior work [1]. The free parameters are matching coefficients fixed by holographic comparison, and the constant map A is explicitly acknowledged as not derived from the bulk.

free parameters (3)
  • a0 = 4/(3π³k)
    Fixed by matching to the ABJM C coefficient (eq. 4.21), though independently verifiable by 11d reduction.
  • b0, b1, b2 = b1=1/k, 2b2+πb0=k/12+2/(3k)
    Fixed by matching to the ABJM B coefficient (eq. 4.22). Only a linear combination is determined.
  • A (constant map) = not derived from bulk
    The constant term in the μ-ensemble partition function is not computed from 11d supergravity; it is taken as input from the QFT (§2.2).
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The M2-brane path integral is well-defined and admits a semiclassical expansion in powers of ℓp (eq. 1.3).
    Invoked in §1 and §2. This is standard in the M-theory literature but not rigorously proven.
  • ad hoc to paper The perturbative M2-ensemble partition function truncates exactly to a cubic polynomial in μ with no 1/μ corrections.
    Stated in §2.1: 'we do not have a bulk explanation for why the M2-ensemble answer seems much simpler.' The Airy function derivation in §5 depends on this.
  • domain assumption The 8-derivative correction to 11d supergravity is fully captured by the 4d N=2 gauged supergravity truncation.
    Invoked in §4.2, following [13,14]. This is a standard assumption in this program but not proven from first principles.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 36412 in / 2578 out tokens · 678183 ms · 2026-07-08T03:49:41.417561+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study in detail a recent proposal stating that M-theory observables arising from the quantisation of M2-branes are naturally computed in a fixed $A_3$ ensemble. In a holographic setting this implies that in a semiclassical approximation 11d bulk observables in an asymptotically AdS$_4$ background are computed in a grand canonical ensemble of fixed chemical potential $\mu$ conjugate to the integer $N$ determining the rank of the gauge group in the dual CFT. We provide detailed precision tests of holography in the fixed $\mu$ ensemble by focusing on the two leading terms in the derivative expansion of the 11d theory. In addition, we study one-loop logarithmic corrections which we compute in detail. For asymptotically AdS$_4\times S^7/\mathbf{Z}_k$ 11d backgrounds our results are in agreement with supersymmetric localisation calculations in the dual ABJM SCFT. Moreover, we employ the logarithmic corrections in the $\mu$ ensemble to determine the measure of the integral Laplace transform and use this to compute dual SCFT supersymmetric partition functions, like the superconformal index and the squashed $S^3$ partition function, to all orders in the perturbative $1/N$ expansion in terms of Airy functions in harmony with results and conjectures in the dual SCFT.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Airy functions from quantum M-theory

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0

    Airy function partition functions for M2-brane theories are derived from relative equivariant localization of quantum M-theory, with the 11D Chern-Simons term giving the cubic term and X₈ giving the charge shift.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 52 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden,Ensembles in M-theory and holography,JHEP11 (2025) 078, [arXiv:2505.21633]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden,Localization of the M2-Brane,Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025), no. 10 101601, [arXiv:2503.16597]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    van Muiden,Quantum M2-branes and Holography,arXiv:2603.14544

    J. van Muiden,Quantum M2-branes and Holography,arXiv:2603.14544

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    M. J. Duff, P. S. Howe, T. Inami, and K. S. Stelle,Superstrings in D=10 from Supermembranes in D=11,Phys. Lett. B191(1987) 70

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    Bergshoeff, E

    E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin, and P. K. Townsend,Supermembranes and Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B189(1987) 75–78

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    String Theory Dynamics In Various Dimensions

    E. Witten,String theory dynamics in various dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B443(1995) 85–126, [hep-th/9503124]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    P. K. Townsend,The eleven-dimensional supermembrane revisited,Phys. Lett. B350(1995) 184–187, [hep-th/9501068]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    F. F. Gautason, V. G. M. Puletti, and J. van Muiden,Quantized strings and instantons in holography,JHEP08(2023) 218, [arXiv:2304.12340]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Comments on ABJM free energy on $S^{3}$ at large $N$ and perturbative expansions in M-theory and string theory

    M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Comments on ABJM free energy on S3 at large N and perturbative expansions in M-theory and string theory,Nucl. Phys. B994(2023) 116286, [arXiv:2306.02862]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    (2,0) theory on $S^5 \times S^1$ and quantum M2 branes

    M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin,(2,0) theory onS5×S1 and quantum M2 branes,Nucl. Phys. B998(2024) 116400, [arXiv:2309.10786]. 35

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Localization techniques in quantum field theories

    V. Pestunet al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories,J. Phys. A50(2017), no. 44 440301, [arXiv:1608.02952]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    ABJM theory as a Fermi gas

    M. Marino and P. Putrov,ABJM theory as a Fermi gas,J. Stat. Mech.1203(2012) P03001, [arXiv:1110.4066]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Higher-Derivative Supergravity in AdS$_4$ Holography

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov, and V. Reys,The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Higher-Derivative Supergravity in AdS4 Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020), no. 13 131601, [arXiv:2006.09390]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Higher-Derivative Supergravity, AdS$_4$ Holography, and Black Holes

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov, and V. Reys,Higher-derivative supergravity, AdS4 holography, and black holes,JHEP08(2021) 173, [arXiv:2106.04581]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    A One-Loop Test of Quantum Supergravity

    S. Bhattacharyya, A. Grassi, M. Marino, and A. Sen,A One-Loop Test of Quantum Supergravity,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 015012, [arXiv:1210.6057]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    J. T. Liu, L. A. Pando Zayas, V. Rathee, and W. Zhao,One-Loop Test of Quantum Black Holes in anti–de Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 22 221602, [arXiv:1711.01076]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Large $N$ Topologically Twisted Indices, Holography, and Black Holes

    N. Bobev, J. Hong, and V. Reys,Large N Partition Functions, Holography, and Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 4 041602, [arXiv:2203.14981]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Large $N$ Partition Functions of the ABJM Theory

    N. Bobev, J. Hong, and V. Reys,Large N partition functions of the ABJM theory,JHEP 02(2023) 020, [arXiv:2210.09318]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Large $N$ Superconformal Indices for 3d Holographic SCFTs

    N. Bobev, S. Choi, J. Hong, and V. Reys,Large N superconformal indices for 3d holographic SCFTs,JHEP02(2023) 027, [arXiv:2210.15326]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    An Airy Tale at Large $N$

    N. Bobev, P.-J. De Smet, J. Hong, V. Reys, and X. Zhang,An Airy Tale at LargeN, arXiv:2502.04606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Towards OSV in AdS

    N. Bobev, S. Choi, J. Hong, and V. Reys,Towards OSV in AdS,arXiv:2606.23893

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    ABJM at finite $N$ via 4d supergravity

    K. Hristov,ABJM at finite N via 4d supergravity,JHEP10(2022) 190, [arXiv:2204.02992]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Maximally symmetric nuts in 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ higher derivative supergravity

    K. Hristov,Maximally symmetric nuts in 4dN= 2higher derivative supergravity,JHEP 02(2023) 110, [arXiv:2212.10590]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    D. Marolf,Chern-Simons terms and the three notions of charge, inInternational Conference on Quantization, Gauge Theory, and Strings: Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Professor Efim Fradkin, pp. 312–320, 6, 2000.hep-th/0006117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  25. [25]

    Fractional M2-branes

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, and D. L. Jafferis,Fractional M2-branes,JHEP11(2008) 043, [arXiv:0807.4924]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    Localization in Supergravity and Quantum $AdS_4/CFT_3$ Holography

    A. Dabholkar, N. Drukker, and J. Gomes,Localization in supergravity and quantum AdS4/CFT 3 holography,JHEP10(2014) 090, [arXiv:1406.0505]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Exact Results in ABJM Theory from Topological Strings

    M. Marino and P. Putrov,Exact Results in ABJM Theory from Topological Strings,JHEP 06(2010) 011, [arXiv:0912.3074]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory

    N. Drukker, M. Marino, and P. Putrov,From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory, Commun. Math. Phys.306(2011) 511–563, [arXiv:1007.3837]. 36

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    Nonperturbative aspects of ABJM theory

    N. Drukker, M. Marino, and P. Putrov,Nonperturbative aspects of ABJM theory,JHEP11 (2011) 141, [arXiv:1103.4844]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    H. Fuji, S. Hirano, and S. Moriyama,Summing Up All Genus Free Energy of ABJM Matrix Model,JHEP08(2011) 001, [arXiv:1106.4631]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Higher Derivative Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions

    M. Ozkan, Y. Pang, and E. Sezgin,Higher derivative supergravities in diverse dimensions, Phys. Rept.1086(2024) 1–95, [arXiv:2401.08945]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    J. T. Liu and W. Zhao,One-loop supergravity onAdS4×S7/Zk and comparison with ABJM theory,JHEP11(2016) 099, [arXiv:1609.02558]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes

    M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin,Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes,JHEP10(2023) 029, [arXiv:2307.14112]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Camporesi and A

    R. Camporesi and A. Higuchi,The plancherel measure for p-forms in real hyperbolic spaces, Journal of Geometry and Physics15(1994), no. 1 57–94

    work page 1994

  35. [35]

    A Note On Boundary Conditions In Euclidean Gravity

    E. Witten,A note on boundary conditions in Euclidean gravity,Rev. Math. Phys.33 (2021), no. 10 2140004, [arXiv:1805.11559]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Schwarz,Hodge Decomposition: A Method for Solving Boundary Value Problems, vol

    G. Schwarz,Hodge Decomposition: A Method for Solving Boundary Value Problems, vol. 1607 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995

    work page 1995

  37. [37]

    Q. S. A. Al-Zamil and J. Montaldi,Witten-Hodge theory on manifolds with boundary and equivariant cohomology,arXiv e-prints(Apr., 2010) arXiv:1004.2687, [arXiv:1004.2687]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,JHEP10(2008) 091, [arXiv:0806.1218]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  39. [39]

    Moduli spaces of Chern-Simons quiver gauge theories and AdS_4/CFT_3

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks,Moduli spaces of Chern-Simons quiver gauge theories and AdS4/CFT3,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 126005, [arXiv:0808.0912]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Toric Calabi-Yau four-folds dual to Chern-Simons-matter theories

    K. Ueda and M. Yamazaki,Toric Calabi-Yau four-folds dual to Chern-Simons-matter theories,JHEP12(2008) 045, [arXiv:0808.3768]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Interacting fermions and N=2 Chern-Simons-matter theories

    M. Mariño and P. Putrov,Interacting fermions and N=2 Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP11(2013) 199, [arXiv:1206.6346]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Large $N$ Partition Functions of 3d Holographic SCFTs

    N. Bobev, J. Hong, and V. Reys,Large N partition functions of 3d holographic SCFTs, JHEP08(2023) 119, [arXiv:2304.01734]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Cassia and K

    L. Cassia and K. Hristov,M2-brane partition functions and HD supergravity from equivariant topological strings,arXiv:2508.21619

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed three-sphere

    D. Martelli, A. Passias, and J. Sparks,The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed three-sphere,Nucl. Phys. B864(2012) 840–868, [arXiv:1110.6400]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    Anti-de Sitter Space, Thermal Phase Transition, And Confinement In Gauge Theories

    E. Witten,Anti-de sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505–532, [hep-th/9803131]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  46. [46]

    J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela,Consistent Kaluza-Klein reductions for general supersymmetric AdS solutions,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 126007, [arXiv:0707.2315]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    The BPS limit of rotating AdS black hole thermodynamics

    D. Cassani and L. Papini,The BPS limit of rotating AdS black hole thermodynamics,JHEP 09(2019) 079, [arXiv:1906.10148]. 37

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Universal Spinning Black Holes and Theories of Class $\mathcal R$

    N. Bobev and P. M. Crichigno,Universal spinning black holes and theories of classR, JHEP12(2019) 054, [arXiv:1909.05873]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    L. J. Romans,Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory,Nucl. Phys. B383(1992) 395–415, [hep-th/9203018]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  50. [50]

    Euclidean Black Saddles and AdS$_4$ Black Holes

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, and V. S. Min,Euclidean black saddles and AdS4 black holes, JHEP10(2020) 073, [arXiv:2006.01148]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    M. C. Diamantini, P. Sodano, and C. A. Trugenberger,Topological Quantum Phase Transitions in Topological Superconductors,EPL92(2010), no. 5 57003, [arXiv:1006.0412]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    ABJM on ellipsoid and topological strings

    Y. Hatsuda,ABJM on ellipsoid and topological strings,JHEP07(2016) 026, [arXiv:1601.02728]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    A Universal Counting of Black Hole Microstates in AdS$_4$

    F. Azzurli, N. Bobev, P. M. Crichigno, V. S. Min, and A. Zaffaroni,A universal counting of black hole microstates in AdS4,JHEP02(2018) 054, [arXiv:1707.04257]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Universal RG Flows Across Dimensions and Holography

    N. Bobev and P. M. Crichigno,Universal RG Flows Across Dimensions and Holography, JHEP12(2017) 065, [arXiv:1708.05052]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    A compendium of logarithmic corrections in AdS/CFT

    N. Bobev, M. David, J. Hong, V. Reys, and X. Zhang,A compendium of logarithmic corrections in AdS/CFT,JHEP04(2024) 020, [arXiv:2312.08909]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    One-loop divergences for KK theories on $\mathrm{AdS}\times S$ spaces; a reanalysis of $\mathrm{AdS}_4 \times S^7\,\big/$ ABJM precision holography

    F. Arrighi and L. Casarin,One-loop divergences for KK theories onAdS×Sspaces; a reanalysis ofAdS4×S7 / ABJM precision holography,arXiv:2606.01167

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    W. H. Reid,Integral representations for products of airy functions,Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik ZAMP46(1995), no. 2 159–170

    work page 1995

  58. [58]

    M5-branes from gauge theories on the 5-sphere

    H.-C. Kim and S. Kim,M5-branes from gauge theories on the 5-sphere,JHEP05(2013) 144, [arXiv:1206.6339]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Wrapped M5-branes, consistent truncations and AdS/CMT

    A. Donos, J. P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, and O. Varela,Wrapped M5-branes, consistent truncations and AdS/CMT,JHEP12(2010) 003, [arXiv:1009.3805]. 38

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010