Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Neural Pruning via Growing Regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.09243 v2 pith:HC3UDUXE submitted 2020-12-16 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.NE
keywords pruningregularizationneuralpenaltyalgorithmscompareddatasetsdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Regularization has long been utilized to learn sparsity in deep neural network pruning. However, its role is mainly explored in the small penalty strength regime. In this work, we extend its application to a new scenario where the regularization grows large gradually to tackle two central problems of pruning: pruning schedule and weight importance scoring. (1) The former topic is newly brought up in this work, which we find critical to the pruning performance while receives little research attention. Specifically, we propose an L2 regularization variant with rising penalty factors and show it can bring significant accuracy gains compared with its one-shot counterpart, even when the same weights are removed. (2) The growing penalty scheme also brings us an approach to exploit the Hessian information for more accurate pruning without knowing their specific values, thus not bothered by the common Hessian approximation problems. Empirically, the proposed algorithms are easy to implement and scalable to large datasets and networks in both structured and unstructured pruning. Their effectiveness is demonstrated with modern deep neural networks on the CIFAR and ImageNet datasets, achieving competitive results compared to many state-of-the-art algorithms. Our code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/mingsuntse/regularization-pruning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Catalyst: a Novel Regularizer for Structured Pruning with Auxiliary Extension of Parameter Space

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Catalyst regularizes structured pruning by minimizing ||DW|| over auxiliary diagonal variables D, aiming for lossless, unbiased pruning, but the fairness proof is missing.

  2. Towards Universal & Efficient Model Compression via Exponential Torque Pruning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Exponential Torque Pruning applies an exponential penalty on network modules based on their distance from a pivot, improving compression accuracy trade-offs over linear Torque pruning.

Pith tools