Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

CapArena: Benchmarking and Analyzing Detailed Image Captioning in the LLM Era

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.12329 v1 pith:HGO6IF7R submitted 2025-03-16 cs.CV cs.CL

CapArena: Benchmarking and Analyzing Detailed Image Captioning in the LLM Era

classification cs.CV cs.CL
keywords captioningcaparenadetailedhumanimagecaptionmetricsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Image captioning has been a longstanding challenge in vision-language research. With the rise of LLMs, modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) generate detailed and comprehensive image descriptions. However, benchmarking the quality of such captions remains unresolved. This paper addresses two key questions: (1) How well do current VLMs actually perform on image captioning, particularly compared to humans? We built CapArena, a platform with over 6000 pairwise caption battles and high-quality human preference votes. Our arena-style evaluation marks a milestone, showing that leading models like GPT-4o achieve or even surpass human performance, while most open-source models lag behind. (2) Can automated metrics reliably assess detailed caption quality? Using human annotations from CapArena, we evaluate traditional and recent captioning metrics, as well as VLM-as-a-Judge. Our analysis reveals that while some metrics (e.g., METEOR) show decent caption-level agreement with humans, their systematic biases lead to inconsistencies in model ranking. In contrast, VLM-as-a-Judge demonstrates robust discernment at both the caption and model levels. Building on these insights, we release CapArena-Auto, an accurate and efficient automated benchmark for detailed captioning, achieving 94.3% correlation with human rankings at just $4 per test. Data and resources will be open-sourced at https://caparena.github.io.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CaptionQA: Is Your Caption as Useful as the Image Itself?

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    CaptionQA is a new benchmark with 33,027 questions across natural, document, e-commerce, and embodied AI domains that measures how much utility model-generated captions retain compared to original images when used by ...

  2. Seeing Time: Benchmarking Chronological Reasoning and Shortcut Biases in Vision-Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces ChronoVision benchmark with three datasets showing VLMs rely on superficial cues such as color filters rather than genuine chronological reasoning.

  3. Context-Aware Spear Phishing: Generative AI-Enabled Attacks Against Individuals via Public Social Media Data

    cs.CR 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Generative AI enables scalable, context-aware spear phishing by extracting profiles from public social media, producing emails that outperform real-world phishing samples in personalization and lower recipient suspicion.

  4. BalCapRL: A Balanced Framework for RL-Based MLLM Image Captioning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BalCapRL applies balanced multi-objective RL with GDPO-style normalization and length-conditional masking to improve MLLM image captioning, reporting gains of up to +13.6 DCScore, +9.0 CaptionQA, and +29.0 CapArena on...

  5. MSD-Score: Multi-Scale Distributional Scoring for Reference-Free Image Caption Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MSD-Score introduces multi-scale distributional scoring on von Mises-Fisher mixtures to evaluate image captions without references and reports state-of-the-art correlation with human judgments.

  6. Vision-aligned Latent Reasoning for Multi-modal Large Language Model

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VaLR generates vision-aligned latent tokens before each reasoning step to preserve perceptual cues, improving VSI-Bench accuracy from 33.0% to 52.9%.

  7. A Reconstruction-Based Framework for Caption Evaluation Beyond Reference Captions

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Reference-free caption quality is scored by the downstream vision-language accuracy of a caption-conditioned reconstructed image, via a new CTTD benchmark.

  8. Robust Onion: Peeling Open Vocab Object Detectors Under Noise

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Empirical study finds OV-OD robustness driven by vision backbone and image domain via layer-wise feature collapse analysis, validated with a low-parameter robustness improvement on real data.

  9. Robust Onion: Peeling Open Vocab Object Detectors Under Noise

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Empirical analysis shows open vocabulary object detector robustness is driven mainly by vision backbone and image domain via similar feature collapse patterns, with a lightweight NN & TK0 method improving real-world p...