REVIEW 4 cited by
Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Cosmological Theories at Reheating and at the End of the Inflationary Era
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Cosmological Theories at Reheating and at the End of the Inflationary Era
read the original abstract
In this work we study the GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theories during the reheating and the end of inflationary era. Given the scalar field potential $V(\phi)$ which can have some intrinsic importance for the theory, determining the scalar coupling function $\xi(\phi)$ can be cumbersome due to lack of analyticity. The GW170817 observation constrains the scalar coupling function and the scalar field potential to have some interdependence, thus during the slow-roll era one can calculate the scalar coupling function. However, when the slow-roll era ends, it is expected that the scalar coupling function should have a different form and the same applies for the reheating era, assuming that the scalar potential of the theory does not change. In this work we exactly aim to highlight this feature of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theories, as the Universe evolves through distinct sequential evolution eras, and we focus on how to determine the scalar coupling function during the various evolutionary eras, from inflation to the reheating era. Regarding both the end of the inflationary era and the reheating era, it is found that the Hubble rate obeys a constant-roll-like condition of the form $\dot{H}=\delta H^2$, thus the determination of the scalar Gauss-Bonnet function $\xi(\phi)$ is reduced to solving a differential equation. A mentionable feature of the era exactly at the end of inflation is that the Klein-Gordon equation is decoupled from the field equations, because the Gauss-Bonnet invariant is zero. We provide several examples of interest to support our arguments.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Einstein--Gauss--Bonnet Inflationary Cosmology in Phase-$\theta$ Formalism
Phase-θ formalism maps EGB inflation backgrounds to closed-form observables beyond slow-roll; Starobinsky+linear-GB fits ACT DR6 ns and r while predicting a DECIGO-accessible GW plateau.
-
Preheating and oscillon formation in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Simulations in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity show oscillons form with similar properties to standard cases but trigger EFT breakdown for large couplings via high local curvatures.
-
Constraining Quintessential Inflation with ACT: A Gauss-Bonnet Gateway
Exponential and sech Gauss–Bonnet couplings restore ACT-compatible ns and r for quintessential inflation, while tanh fails for a structural sign reason; reheating remains BBN-safe.
-
Constraining Quintessential Inflation with ACT: A Gauss-Bonnet Gateway
Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet corrections with exponential or sech couplings shift quintessential inflation into the 1 sigma ACT region for r and ns, while tanh coupling remains disfavored.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.