Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Adversarial Unlearning of Backdoors via Implicit Hypergradient

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.03735 v4 pith:HHYEISVB submitted 2021-10-07 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.CV
keywords cleandatai-bauminimaxattackbackdoorimplicitsetting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We propose a minimax formulation for removing backdoors from a given poisoned model based on a small set of clean data. This formulation encompasses much of prior work on backdoor removal. We propose the Implicit Bacdoor Adversarial Unlearning (I-BAU) algorithm to solve the minimax. Unlike previous work, which breaks down the minimax into separate inner and outer problems, our algorithm utilizes the implicit hypergradient to account for the interdependence between inner and outer optimization. We theoretically analyze its convergence and the generalizability of the robustness gained by solving minimax on clean data to unseen test data. In our evaluation, we compare I-BAU with six state-of-art backdoor defenses on seven backdoor attacks over two datasets and various attack settings, including the common setting where the attacker targets one class as well as important but underexplored settings where multiple classes are targeted. I-BAU's performance is comparable to and most often significantly better than the best baseline. Particularly, its performance is more robust to the variation on triggers, attack settings, poison ratio, and clean data size. Moreover, I-BAU requires less computation to take effect; particularly, it is more than $13\times$ faster than the most efficient baseline in the single-target attack setting. Furthermore, it can remain effective in the extreme case where the defender can only access 100 clean samples -- a setting where all the baselines fail to produce acceptable results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BURN: Backdoor Unlearning via Adversarial Boundary Analysis

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BURN removes backdoors from trained models by detecting poison samples through adversarial boundary distance and re-labeling them with labels recovered by adversarial perturbations.

  2. BadSR: Stealthy Label Backdoor Attacks on Image Super-Resolution

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BadSR creates stealthy poisoned high-resolution labels for super-resolution backdoors, achieving above 80% attack success across five SR models while keeping labels visually close to clean images.

Pith tools