REVIEW 1 cited by
Defend Deep Neural Networks Against Adversarial Examples via Fixed and Dynamic Quantized Activation Functions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent studies have shown that deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. To this end, many defense approaches that attempt to improve the robustness of DNNs have been proposed. In a separate and yet related area, recent works have explored to quantize neural network weights and activation functions into low bit-width to compress model size and reduce computational complexity. In this work, we find that these two different tracks, namely the pursuit of network compactness and robustness, can be merged into one and give rise to networks of both advantages. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that uses quantization of activation functions to defend against adversarial examples. We also propose to train robust neural networks by using adaptive quantization techniques for the activation functions. Our proposed Dynamic Quantized Activation (DQA) is verified through a wide range of experiments with the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets under different white-box attack methods, including FGSM, PGD, and C & W attacks. Furthermore, Zeroth Order Optimization and substitute model-based black-box attacks are also considered in this work. The experimental results clearly show that the robustness of DNNs could be greatly improved using the proposed DQA.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Metric Learning for Adversarial Robustness
Adding a triplet loss with semi-hard negative sampling to adversarial training improves robustness and adversarial-example detection on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny ImageNet.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.