Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 104 references

This paper argues that a strongly lensed gravitational-wave memory signal carries a universal fingerprint of its image type: type I and III images produce nearly odd waveforms around the arrival-time axis, type II produces a nearly even one

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 10:40 UTC pith:HJ4GWKRY

load-bearing objection A genuinely new and clever idea about lensed memory waveform morphology, but the universal claim is broader than the paper's own mismatch statistics support; worth refereeing with revisions. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.09132 v2 pith:HJ4GWKRY submitted 2025-10-10 gr-qc

Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: universal characteristics of strongly lensed memory waveforms

Ruanjing Zhang , Zhi-Chao Zhao , Shaoqi Hou , Xi-Long Fan , Kai Liao , Zong-Hong Zhu This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C35 PACS 04.30.-w95.30.Sf
keywords gravitational-wave memorystrong gravitational lensinggeometric optics limitimage typeswaveform morphologystep-function approximationhigh-pass filterspace-borne interferometers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish a universal morphological rule for strongly lensed gravitational-wave memory signals. Because the unlensed memory waveform is close to a step function, strong lensing acts as a high-pass filter, producing oscillatory signals whose reflection symmetry about the arrival time reveals which type of lensed image produced them. Type I and III images yield nearly odd waveforms, type II yields a nearly even waveform, and the slope sign at the symmetry axis separates type I from type III. If true, this gives a fast two-parameter template—a step function of amplitude and arrival time—to classify lensed images before running full parameter estimation.

Core claim

The central claim is that the time-domain morphology of a strongly lensed memory waveform is universal. After shifting the signal so the peak is at T=0, type I and type III lensed memory waveforms are nearly odd functions, type II is nearly even, and the slope at T=0 is positive for type I and negative for type III. The paper derives explicit analytic kernels by replacing the unlensed memory waveform with h_max Θ(T) and applying the geometric-optics lensing factor with a frequency cutoff ωc; the remaining part of the memory waveform is asserted to be at least an order of magnitude smaller, so these symmetry features persist for any lens model and any binary system.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the decomposition of the unlensed memory waveform into a Heaviside step function of amplitude h_max plus a remainder: h_D(T)=h_max Θ(T)+h'_D(T). Lensing in the geometric-optics limit multiplies the Fourier transform by k_a μ_a e^{-iωT_d} with a frequency cutoff ωc, and the step-function part yields closed-form universal kernels—an odd kernel for type I/III images and an even kernel (involving the cosine integral) for type II. These kernels explain both the reflection symmetries and the slope sign, and they are independent of the lens model and binary parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The universality rests on the assumption that the unlensed memory waveform is dominated by a step function—that its remaining part h'_D is at least an order of magnitude smaller than h_max—which holds for near-edge-on binaries but fails for strongly inclined systems where the memory signal becomes oscillatory.

What would settle it

Simulate a strongly lensed memory signal from a face-on binary (inclination near zero) with a point-mass lens of mass 10^5 solar masses at redshift 0.5 and frequency cutoff ωc/2π=1 Hz; if the resulting waveform's odd/even symmetry around the arrival-time axis deviates by more than the 10% level allowed by h'_D, the claimed universality is contradicted.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Strong lensing turns the monotonic memory signal into an oscillatory one, acting as a high-pass filter with frequency set by the lens's curvature radius.
  • Image type can be identified directly from the symmetry and slope of the lensed memory waveform, without needing a full waveform model.
  • The step-function approximation of the memory signal uses only two parameters, making it a fast and cheap search template for classifying lensed events.
  • Once an image is classified, the appropriate oscillatory waveform template can be used for parameter estimation, avoiding expensive joint searches.
  • When multiple lensed images are detected (time delays of weeks to months), the direction of the type II peak provides a reference for distinguishing type I from type III.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The universality is likely to degrade for binaries viewed near face-on, where the intrinsic memory signal is oscillatory and the step-function remainder is no longer smaller than the step; tests should report how the odd/even symmetry breaks down with inclination.
  • The same morphological test could be extended to spin-memory or higher-memory modes, where the odd/even signature might invert or mix, providing a further handle on source and lens properties.
  • The step-function template could be used as a pre-classifier in wide-field searches for strongly lensed gravitational-wave events, potentially reducing false alarms before full Bayesian parameter estimation.
  • Because the type II peak defines an absolute sign convention, the odd/even distinction may help break degeneracies between lens type and unknown polarization angle in real detector responses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies strong gravitational lensing of the gravitational-wave memory signal in the geometric-optics limit. The authors argue that, because the unlensed memory waveform is approximately a step function, the strongly lensed memory waveform acquires a universal morphology: type I and type III images are nearly odd about a symmetry axis, the type II image is roughly even, and the slope at the symmetry axis distinguishes type I from type III. They derive time-domain expressions for the lensed step-function component, illustrate them with a point-mass lens example, and propose using the step-function approximation as a fast template for identifying lensed-image types. They validate the step approximation by computing noise-weighted mismatches against a population of simulated LISA binary systems.

Significance. If the universality claim is correct for a substantial population, the paper gives a new, computationally cheap diagnostic for identifying strongly lensed gravitational-wave memory events and distinguishing image types. The exact lensed step-function results in Eqs. (76) and (77) are clean and useful, and the paper contains a practical population simulation with PyCBC. The central weakness is that the universality is established only for the step-dominated subpopulation; the paper's own mismatch histogram shows that a large fraction of LISA events are not step-dominated, and the validation metric is not directly targeted at the high-frequency content that produces the lensed waveform. With a properly qualified claim and additional checks, this would be a worthwhile contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [§V, Eq. (74); abstract] The decomposition h_D(T)=h_max Θ(T)+h'_D(T) is the load-bearing assumption, but the stated bound on h'_D ('smaller than h_max by at least one order of magnitude') is asserted, not proved. The paper's own population check (Fig. 6) shows that only 49% of simulated LISA events have mismatch <0.05 and 17% <0.01, so a large fraction are not step-dominated. Section II also notes that for inclinations away from π/2 the memory becomes 'largely oscillating.' Therefore the abstract's claim that the morphology is independent of 'the binary system' is an overstatement; the universality should be restricted to the step-dominated subpopulation, or a bound on the lensed contribution of h'_D must be supplied.
  2. [§V A, Fig. 6 and Eq. (79)] The validation compares h_D and h_H with the full LISA inner product, whereas the lensed waveforms (69) and (71) contain only modes |ω|>ω_c. The statement that the mismatch is unchanged because both share the lensing factor ignores the high-pass filter applied to the signal. The noise-weighted low-frequency dominance of (79) therefore does not control the size of h'_D after high-passing, where h'_D can be comparable to the high-passed step for oscillatory/inclined signals. Please quote a mismatch evaluated only over |f|>ω_c/2π, or directly compare the lensed signals, and show that the odd/even morphology is preserved.
  3. [§V B and Eqs. (76)–(77)] The identification strategy in V B assumes that the time-domain waveforms in (76) and (77) dominate the lensed memory signal. For non-step events the remaining part of h_D can contribute at high frequencies and break the odd/even symmetry or flip the apparent slope sign at the axis. Since the population fraction of such events is large (Fig. 6), the proposed template-based identification should be either limited to the step-dominated sample or accompanied by a quantitative test of failure rate as a function of inclination and lens parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos: 'approxmiate', 'pheonmena', 'unontrivially', 'follwoing', 'calcualte', 'tempulate', 'Of curse'. A careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Eq. (77) and Eq. (56)] In Eq. (77), k_s appears as a constant multiplying a real, even function, but Eq. (56) defines k_s=iω/|ω|. Please clarify the convention used in the time-domain expression, or define a separate time-domain sign factor.
  3. [§V, discussion of Eq. (76)] The phrase 'slope at T=0' is imprecise: the leading term |T|/(4πT) in Eq. (76) is a step, so the ordinary derivative at T=0 is not finite. What is meant is the jump direction across the axis; please state this explicitly.
  4. [§V A, Eq. (78)–(81)] The approximate waveform ilde h_H is constructed without an adjustable time offset. The fitting factor in Eq. (78) normally maximizes over the arrival time. Please state whether the coalescence time was aligned, and whether maximizing over the step time would improve the quoted mismatch percentages.
  5. [Fig. 6 caption and text] The text says 'most of the events have a small mismatch,' but the histogram shows 49% below 0.05 and 17% below 0.01. This is not 'most'; please reword to avoid overstating the population coverage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the universal lensed-memory morphology is derived from an explicit step-function model and checked against independent simulations, not from fitted lensed waveforms or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The central morphological claims (type I/III nearly odd, type II even, slope sign difference) are derived by applying the lensing formulas (69) and (71) to the step component h_H = h_max Θ(T) of Eq. (74), yielding the explicit analytic expressions (76) and (77). These features are exact consequences of the sign function and the sine/cosine integral kernels; they are not obtained by tuning parameters to the lensed waveform. h_max is fixed from the low-frequency limit of the simulated unlensed memory waveform via Eq. (81), not by optimizing mismatch or by imposing parity, so the step-waveform prediction is not equivalent to its input by construction. The validation in Sec. V A against independently simulated PyCBC memory waveforms with LISA noise is an external check, not a circular one. The paper's self-citations ([10], [11], [25]) support standard lensing results, interference, and inclination dependence; none is load-bearing for the universality claim. The main weakness is the unproved assertion in Eq. (74) that h'_D is 'smaller than h_max by at least one order of magnitude', and the paper's own Fig. 6 shows only ~49% of the simulated LISA events have mismatch below 0.05. This is a correctness/scope limitation on the claimed universality, especially for inclined binaries, but it is not a circular reduction: the derivation does not presuppose the lensed morphology it sets out to predict.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theoretical argument uses only standard gravitational lensing and Bondi-Sachs memory formalism plus the step approximation. No new physical entities are introduced; the main uncharged inputs are the step-dominance assumption, the sharp frequency cutoff, and the correctness of the Fourier convention. The 2π normalization issue means one quantitative input is currently unreliable.

free parameters (2)
  • frequency cutoff ω_c = chosen by hand; e.g., ω_c/2π = 1 Hz for M_L = 10^5 M_sun and z_l = 0.5
    Defines which Fourier modes are treated as strongly lensed. It controls the oscillation frequency and ringing of the lensed memory waveform and is not derived from first principles.
  • step amplitude h_max = derived from lim_{f→0} f h_D(f) = h_max/(i4π^2)
    One of the two step-template parameters. In the validation it is fixed from the DC limit of the simulated waveform, not fitted to minimize mismatch.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Saddle-point evaluation of the diffraction integral in the geometric-optics limit yields image phase factors k_a = 1, iω/|ω|, -1 for type I, II, III.
    Invoked in Eq. (56); standard result from Nakamura & Deguchi (1999) and Takahashi & Nakamura (2003).
  • domain assumption The memory waveform is a Heaviside step plus a subdominant remainder: h_D = h_max Θ(T) + h'_D, with h'_D at least an order of magnitude smaller.
    Eq. (74) is the load-bearing basis for universality. It is checked statistically for a LISA population but is not universally true; the paper's own mismatch histogram shows many events where the approximation is poor.
  • domain assumption The strong lensing transition can be represented by a sharp Heaviside high-pass cutoff at ω_c, with all modes above ω_c multiplying by the same geometric factor.
    Used in Eqs. (69) and (71). In a real wave-optics-to-geometric-optics transition the cutoff is smooth and the magnification/phase vary near threshold; the sharp cutoff introduces Gibbs-like ringing.
  • standard math The Fourier-transform and inverse-transform conventions in Eqs. (15), (69), and (75) are mutually consistent.
    This consistency is needed for the quantitative amplitudes of Eqs. (76)-(77); the paper mixes f-domain and ω-domain forms, introducing apparent 2π errors.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 26029 in / 24908 out tokens · 637750 ms · 2026-08-04T10:40:01.647834+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, the strong lensing effect of the memory signal was considered. In the geometric optics limit, the lensed memory signal becomes oscillatory, while the unlensed is basically monotonic. This is because only the high frequency Fourier modes contribute strongly to the lensed signal. Due to the step function like behavior of the unlensed memory waveform, the lensed waveform possesses characteristic morphology that is dependent on the type of the image, but independent of the lens model and the binary system. That is, for each type of the lensed image, the lensed memory waveform has an approximate reflection symmetry about a symmetrical axis in the time domain. More specifically, for the type I and type III images, the lensed memory signals are nearly odd under the reflection, while the type II signal is roughly even. In addition, at the symmetrical axis, the sign of the slope for type I image is different from that for the type III image. These universal characteristic features would help determine the type of the lensed image. This is particularly because the memory waveform can be well approximated by a suitable step function, which involves just two parameters, the overall amplitude and the time of arrival. It is fast and cheap to simulate this approximated waveform. Once the type of the lensed image is determined with the approximated memory waveform, one can use the appropriate waveform template for the oscillatory component of the gravitational wave to perform the parameter estimation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.09132 by Kai Liao, Ruanjing Zhang, Shaoqi Hou, Xi-Long Fan, Zhi-Chao Zhao, Zong-Hong Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Memory waveforms. Upper panel: the time-domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The typical geometry of a gravitational lensing sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The lensed memory waveforms in the time domain. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The expressions in the squared brackets of Eqs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: , we plotted |fh˜D(f)| generated by a binary sys￾tem with m1 = 3600M⊙ and m2 = 3000M⊙, sharing all other paramters with the one in the previous section. The approximate waveform |fh˜H(f)| is a horizontal line. We also plotted LISA’s sensitivity curve p fSn(f). One 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 f (Hz) 10 24 10 22 10 20 10 18 Characteristic strain h~D h~H LISA FIG. 5. The actual memory waveform h˜D and the approx… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The histogram of the mismatches between the un [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 77 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(Virgo, LIGO Scientific), Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Einstein, Approximative Integration of the Field Equations of Gravitation, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Approximative Integration of the Field Equations of Gravitation, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)1916, 688 (1916)

    1916

  3. [3]

    Einstein, ¨Uber Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, ¨Uber Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)1918, 154 (1918)

    1918

  4. [4]

    a positive direction

    Clearly, in Eqs. (76) and (77), the squared brackets are universal, irrelevant to the details of the lens model and the binary system. They can be used to explain the morphology of the lensed memory waveform observed in the previous section based on a specific example. Since the expression in the squared brackets of Eq. (76) is odd, the lensed memory wave...

    2000

  5. [5]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1984)

    1984

  6. [6]

    Schneider, J

    P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco,Gravitational Lenses(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992) p. 560

    1992

  7. [7]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev, Radiation of grav- itational waves by a cluster of superdense stars, Sov. Astron.18, 17 (1974)

    1974

  8. [8]

    Braginsky and L

    V. Braginsky and L. Grishchuk, Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Anten- nas, Sov. Phys. JETP62, 427 (1985)

    1985

  9. [9]

    Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments, Phys

    D. Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 1486 (1991)

    1991

  10. [10]

    K. S. Thorne, Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect, Phys. Rev. D45, 520 (1992)

    1992

  11. [11]

    Hou, X.-L

    S. Hou, X.-L. Fan, and Z.-H. Zhu, Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves: Rotation of Polarization Plane, Phys. Rev. D100, 064028 (2019), arXiv:1907.07486 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Hou, X.-L

    S. Hou, X.-L. Fan, K. Liao, and Z.-H. Zhu, Gravitational Wave Interference via Gravitational Lensing: Measure- ments of Luminosity Distance, Lens Mass, and Cosmo- logical Parameters, Phys. Rev. D101, 064011 (2020), arXiv:1911.02798 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Favata, Gravitational-wave memory revisited: mem- ory from the merger and recoil of binary black holes, J

    M. Favata, Gravitational-wave memory revisited: mem- ory from the merger and recoil of binary black holes, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.154, 012043 (2009), arXiv:0811.3451 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Favata, Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, in- spiralling compact binaries, Phys

    M. Favata, Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, in- spiralling compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D80, 024002 (2009), arXiv:0812.0069 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  15. [15]

    Favata, Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers, Astrophys

    M. Favata, Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers, Astrophys. J. Lett.696, L159 (2009), arXiv:0902.3660 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    Favata, The Gravitational-wave memory from ec- centric binaries, Phys

    M. Favata, The Gravitational-wave memory from ec- centric binaries, Phys. Rev. D84, 124013 (2011), arXiv:1108.3121 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269, 21 (1962)

    1962

  18. [18]

    R. K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity

  19. [19]

    Waves in asymptotically flat space-times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270, 103 (1962)

    1962

  20. [20]

    M¨ adler and J

    T. M¨ adler and J. Winicour, Bondi-Sachs Formalism, Scholarpedia11, 33528 (2016), arXiv:1609.01731 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational the- ory, Phys

    R. Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational the- ory, Phys. Rev.128, 2851 (1962)

    1962

  22. [22]

    Strominger, On BMS invariance of gravitational scat- tering, JHEP07, 152, arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]

    A. Strominger, On BMS invariance of gravitational scat- tering, JHEP07, 152, arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Strominger and A

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, Gravitational Mem- ory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems, JHEP 01, 086, arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    E. E. Flanagan and D. A. Nichols, Conserved charges of the extended Bondi-Metzner-Sachs algebra, Phys. Rev. D95, 044002 (2017), arXiv:1510.03386 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Favata, The gravitational-wave memory effect, Class

    M. Favata, The gravitational-wave memory effect, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 084036 (2010), arXiv:1003.3486 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    P. D. Lasky, E. Thrane, Y. Levin, J. Blackman, and Y. Chen, Detecting gravitational-wave memory with LIGO: implications of GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1605.01415 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Hou, Z.-C

    S. Hou, Z.-C. Zhao, Z. Cao, and Z.-H. Zhu, Space-borne Interferometers to Detect Thousands of Memory Sig- nals Emitted by Stellar-mass Binary Black Holes, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2411.18053 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Grav- itation(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)

    1973

  29. [29]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity: Newtonian, Post- Newtonian, Relativistic(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  30. [30]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(Virgo and LIGO Scientific Collab- orations), GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient 16 Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observations from the First Half of LIGO–Virgo’s Third Observing Run, Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observations from the First Half of LIGO–Virgo’s Third Observing Run, Astrophys. J.923, 14 (2021), arXiv:2105.06384 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), Search for Gravitational-lensing Signatures in the Full Third Observing Run of the LIGO–Virgo Network, As- trophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), Search for Gravitational-lensing Signatures in the Full Third Observing Run of the LIGO–Virgo Network, As- trophys. J.970, 191 (2024), arXiv:2304.08393 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Sereno, A

    M. Sereno, A. Sesana, A. Bleuler, P. Jetzer, M. Volon- teri, and M. C. Begelman, Strong lensing of gravita- tional waves as seen by LISA, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 251101 (2010), arXiv:1011.5238 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Pi´ orkowska, M

    A. Pi´ orkowska, M. Biesiada, and Z.-H. Zhu, Strong grav- itational lensing of gravitational waves in Einstein Tele- scope, JCAP1310, 022, arXiv:1309.5731 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    X. Ding, M. Biesiada, and Z.-H. Zhu, Strongly lensed gravitational waves from intrinsically faint double com- pact binaries—prediction for the Einstein Telescope, JCAP1512(12), 006, arXiv:1508.05000 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Pi´ orkowska-Kurpas, S

    A. Pi´ orkowska-Kurpas, S. Hou, M. Biesiada, X. Ding, S. Cao, X. Fan, S. Kawamura, and Z.-H. Zhu, Inspiral- ing double compact object detection and lensing rate – forecast for DECIGO and B-DECIGO, Astrophys. J. 908, 196 (2021), arXiv:2005.08727 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    S. Hou, P. Li, H. Yu, M. Biesiada, X.-L. Fan, S. Kawa- mura, and Z.-H. Zhu, Lensing rates of gravitational wave signals displaying beat patterns detectable by DECIGO and B-DECIGO, Phys. Rev. D103, 044005 (2021), arXiv:2009.08116 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Z. Gao, X. Chen, Y.-M. Hu, J.-D. Zhang, and S.-J. Huang, A higher probability of detecting lensed super- massive black hole binaries by LISA, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.512, 1 (2022), arXiv:2102.10295 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    L. Yang, S. Wu, K. Liao, X. Ding, Z. You, Z. Cao, M. Biesiada, and Z.-H. Zhu, Event rate predictions of strongly lensed gravitational waves with detector net- works and more realistic templates, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.509, 3772 (2021), arXiv:2105.07011 [astro- ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Lin, J.-d

    X.-y. Lin, J.-d. Zhang, L. Dai, S.-J. Huang, and J. Mei, Detecting strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves with TianQin, Phys. Rev. D108, 064020 (2023), arXiv:2304.04800 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    H¨ ubner, C

    M. H¨ ubner, C. Talbot, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Measuring gravitational-wave memory in the first LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D101, 023011 (2020), arXiv:1911.12496 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    A. M. Grant and D. A. Nichols, Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave de- tectors, Phys. Rev. D107, 064056 (2023), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 029901 (2023)], arXiv:2210.16266 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Zhao and Z

    Z.-C. Zhao and Z. Cao, Stochastic gravitational wave background due to gravitational wave memory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65, 119511 (2022), arXiv:2111.13883 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    S. Sun, C. Shi, J.-d. Zhang, and J. Mei, Detecting the gravitational wave memory effect with TianQin, Phys. Rev. D107, 044023 (2023), arXiv:2207.13009 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Gasparotto, R

    S. Gasparotto, R. Vicente, D. Blas, A. C. Jenk- ins, and E. Barausse, Can gravitational-wave mem- ory help constrain binary black-hole parameters? A LISA case study, Phys. Rev. D107, 124033 (2023), arXiv:2301.13228 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Inchausp´ e, S

    H. Inchausp´ e, S. Gasparotto, D. Blas, L. Heisenberg, J. Zosso, and S. Tiwari, Measuring gravitational wave memory with LISA, Phys. Rev. D111, 044044 (2025), arXiv:2406.09228 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    T. T. Nakamura and S. Deguchi, Wave Optics in Grav- itational Lensing, Progress of Theoretical Physics Sup- plement133, 137 (1999)

    1999

  51. [51]

    Takahashi and T

    R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, Wave effects in grav- itational lensing of gravitational waves from chirping binaries, Astrophys. J.595, 1039 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0305055 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, D. E. Holz, W. Hu, M. Lagos, and R. M. Wald, Phase effects from strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D103, 064047 (2021), arXiv:2008.12814 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Y. Wang, R. K. L. Lo, A. K. Y. Li, and Y. Chen, Identifying Type II Strongly Lensed Gravitational- Wave Images in Third-Generation Gravitational- Wave Detectors, Phys. Rev. D103, 104055 (2021), arXiv:2101.08264 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Janquart, E

    J. Janquart, E. Seo, O. A. Hannuksela, T. G. F. Li, and C. V. D. Broeck, On the Identification of Individ- ual Gravitational-wave Image Types of a Lensed System Using Higher-order Modes, Astrophys. J. Lett.923, L1 (2021), arXiv:2110.06873 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Vijaykumar, A

    A. Vijaykumar, A. K. Mehta, and A. Ganguly, De- tection and parameter estimation challenges of type- II lensed binary black hole signals, Phys. Rev. D108, 043036 (2023), arXiv:2202.06334 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Taylor, D

    K. Taylor, D. Davis, and R. K. L. Lo, Phase consistency test to identify type II strongly lensed gravitational- wave signals using a single event, Phys. Rev. D112, 024035 (2025), arXiv:2412.15148 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, ArXiv (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, ArXiv (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP05, 062, arXiv:1001.1541 [hep- th]. 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    S. Hou, T. Zhu, and Z.-H. Zhu, Asymptotic analysis of Chern-Simons modified gravity and its memory effects, Phys. Rev. D105, 024025 (2022), arXiv:2109.04238 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Bieri and D

    L. Bieri and D. Garfinkle, Perturbative and gauge in- variant treatment of gravitational wave memory, Phys. Rev. D89, 084039 (2014), arXiv:1312.6871 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    D. A. Nichols, Spin memory effect for compact binaries in the post-Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D95, 084048 (2017), arXiv:1702.03300 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Mitman, J

    K. Mitman, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, M. Boyle, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, and W. Throwe, Computation of displacement and spin gravitational memory in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D102, 104007 (2020), arXiv:2007.11562 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    A. Nitz, I. Harry, D. Brown, C. M. Biwer, J. Willis, T. D. Canton, C. Capano, T. Dent, L. Pekowsky, G. S. C. Davies, S. De, M. Cabero, S. Wu, A. R. Williamson, B. Machenschalk, D. Macleod, F. Pan- narale, P. Kumar, S. Reyes, dfinstad, S. Kumar, M. T´ apai, L. Singer, P. Kumar, veronica villa, max- trevor, B. U. V. Gadre, S. Khan, S. Fairhurst, and A. Toll...

    2024

  65. [65]

    Boyleet al., The SXS Collaboration catalog of binary black hole simulations, Class

    M. Boyleet al., The SXS Collaboration catalog of binary black hole simulations, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 195006 (2019), arXiv:1904.04831 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Possibil- ity of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravi- tational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 221103 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108011 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  67. [67]

    Kawamuraet al., Space gravitational-wave antennas DECIGO and B-DECIGO, Int

    S. Kawamuraet al., Space gravitational-wave antennas DECIGO and B-DECIGO, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. D28, 1845001 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    Kawamuraet al., Current status of space gravita- tional wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

    S. Kawamuraet al., Current status of space gravita- tional wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific), Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Punturoet al., The third generation of gravitational wave observatories and their science reach,Gravitational waves

    M. Punturoet al., The third generation of gravitational wave observatories and their science reach,Gravitational waves. Proceedings, 8th Edoardo Amaldi Conference, Amaldi 8, New York, USA, June 22-26, 2009, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 084007 (2010)

    2009

  71. [71]

    Babak, A

    S. Babak, A. Petiteau, and M. Hewitson, LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations, arXiv (2021), arXiv:2108.01167 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Prattenet al., Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of pre- cessing binary black holes, Phys

    G. Prattenet al., Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of pre- cessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    (11), (12) and (13), for a chosen pair ofh ˆℓˆmandh ˜ℓ˜m,C ℓm(−2, ˆℓ,ˆm; 2,˜ℓ,˜m) might be vanish- ing for a lot of (ℓ, m) pairs

    According to Eqs. (11), (12) and (13), for a chosen pair ofh ˆℓˆmandh ˜ℓ˜m,C ℓm(−2, ˆℓ,ˆm; 2,˜ℓ,˜m) might be vanish- ing for a lot of (ℓ, m) pairs

  74. [74]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, Gravitational wave lensing beyond general relativity: birefringence, echoes and shadows, Phys. Rev. D102, 124048 (2020), arXiv:2009.12187 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    F. Xu, J. M. Ezquiaga, and D. E. Holz, Please Repeat: Strong Lensing of Gravitational Waves as a Probe of Compact Binary and Galaxy Populations, Astrophys. J.929, 9 (2022), arXiv:2105.14390 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Weinberg,Cosmology(Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ

    S. Weinberg,Cosmology(Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Pr. (2008) 593 p, 2008)

    2008

  77. [77]

    K. Liao, M. Biesiada, and X.-L. Fan, The wave nature of continuous gravitational waves from microlensing, As- trophys. J.875, 139 (2019), arXiv:1903.06612 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Allen, J

    B. Allen, J. D. E. Creighton, E. E. Flanagan, and J. D. Romano, Robust statistics for deterministic and stochastic gravitational waves in nonGaussian noise. 2. Bayesian analyses, Phys. Rev. D67, 122002 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0205015

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  79. [79]

    Allen, W

    B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, FINDCHIRP: An Algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling com- pact binaries, Phys. Rev. D85, 122006 (2012), arXiv:gr- qc/0509116

    arXiv 2012

  80. [80]

    Tinto and S

    M. Tinto and S. V. Dhurandhar, Time-Delay Interfer- ometry, Living Rev. Rel.17, 6 (2014)

    2014

Showing first 80 references.