pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23162 · v1 · pith:HKYAH6RInew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.CR· cs.DC· cs.ET· econ.GN· q-fin.EC

SolarChain: Bridging Physical Law, Verifiable Trust, and Sustainable Markets for Urban Energy Resilience

Shilin Ou , Yifan Xu , Zhenshan Zhang , Luyao Zhang , Ming-Chun Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.CRcs.DCcs.ETecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords solar energyblockchainphysical verificationurban decarbonizationpeer-to-peer energy marketdata integritycarbon accounting
0
0 comments X

The pith

SolarChain uses real-time weather data and physics calculations to reject any solar generation report exceeding a panel's physical maximum before ledger entry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents SolarChain as a system that calculates each solar panel's maximum possible output from meteorological data, location, and first-principles yield models, then automatically discards any higher reported value on the shared ledger. This physical anchoring creates verifiable trust for peer-to-peer energy trading without relying on participant honesty. Programmatic rewards direct value toward equipment upkeep and market liquidity rather than speculation, while consumption retires credits in proportion to actual energy use to produce direct carbon accounting. A prototype across city nodes shows resistance to data injection attacks and reduced entry barriers for community solar projects.

Core claim

Using real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and first-principles calculations of solar yield, the system establishes a hard physical boundary for every panel's maximum possible output; any reported generation exceeding this limit is automatically rejected before entering the shared ledger, enabling trustless verification for a peer-to-peer marketplace that reinvests value into maintenance and retires credits on physical consumption.

What carries the argument

The physical boundary enforcement mechanism that computes maximum solar output from weather and location data then rejects ledger entries above that limit.

If this is right

  • Enables a peer-to-peer marketplace with rewards that continuously fund maintenance and liquidity instead of hoarding.
  • Creates an auditable one-to-one link between urban electricity consumption and carbon credits by retiring digital units on physical dissipation.
  • Provides resilience to data injection attacks in heterogeneous city deployments.
  • Lowers capital requirements for expanding community rooftop solar.
  • Extends the same physical-law anchoring approach to other distributed infrastructure domains.
  • pith_inferences=[

Load-bearing premise

Real-time meteorological data and geospatial coordinates remain accurate and unmanipulable enough for the yield calculations to correctly identify and block excess reports.

What would settle it

An input of altered weather or location data that permits a panel to record output above its calculated physical maximum without automatic rejection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23162 by Luyao Zhang, Ming-Chun Huang, Shilin Ou, Yifan Xu, Zhenshan Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System architecture of SolarChain. The platform consists of three interconnected layers: (1) an off-chain physics engine that calculates the deterministic power boundary using real-time meteorological data; (2) on-chain smart contracts that execute data verification, the 1:3 liquidity distribution, and the thermodynamic token burn; and (3) a decentralized frontend that provides spatial-temporal visualizati… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Demonstration screenshots from the SolarChain prototype. residual difference against the thermodynamic limit. A record is cryptographically rejected before entering the shared ledger if it violates the constraint: 𝑃reported > 𝜏 · 𝑃max (3) where 𝜏 represents the tolerance margin accounting for accept￾able measurement noise and inherent hardware variances. Fur￾thermore, assertions of generation during mathem… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Data processing workflow. The five cities are used for demonstration & evaluation purposes only; the workflow is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Geospatial distribution of the SolarChain evaluation benchmark across representative Chinese cities. Panel (a) encodes installed PV capacity by marker size and FDIA rate by color intensity; panel (b) shows the verified-versus-FDIA record composition at each city. 4 System Evaluation We evaluate SolarChain across three interconnected layers: physical sensing, data verification, and digital settlement. Speci… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spatio-temporal generation heatmap across five [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Physics-bounded anomaly scatter plot. The de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hourly liquidity and slippage comparison. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Energy exchange interface. The user selects a fac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Solar panel confirmation. User verifies the selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Urban decarbonization requires scaling rooftop solar across millions of fragmented producers, yet cities face a fundamental tension: energy data is easily manipulated, and economic incentives often reward speculation rather than actual infrastructure deployment. We present SolarChain, a platform that resolves both problems by anchoring digital accountability to the thermodynamic limits of solar energy conversion. Using real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and first-principles calculations of solar yield, the system establishes a hard physical boundary for every panel's maximum possible output; any reported generation exceeding this limit is automatically rejected before entering the shared ledger. This trustless verification enables a peer-to-peer marketplace with programmatic reward structures that continuously reinvest value into equipment maintenance and market liquidity, preventing the speculative hoarding that typically destabilizes blockchain-based marketplaces. When electricity is consumed, the corresponding digital credits are permanently retired in direct proportion to physical energy dissipation, creating an auditable one-to-one mapping between urban consumption and carbon accounting. Deployed across heterogeneous city nodes, the prototype demonstrates resilience against data injection attacks while lowering capital barriers for community-level solar expansion. Beyond energy, the framework offers a general model for coordinating economic activity with physical law in any domain where distributed infrastructure demands both data integrity and sustainable investment. We release the data and code as open-access on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents SolarChain, a platform for urban rooftop solar that anchors blockchain-based accountability to thermodynamic limits of solar conversion. Using real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and first-principles yield calculations, it enforces a hard physical upper bound on reported generation, automatically rejecting any excess before ledger entry. This enables a P2P marketplace with programmatic rewards that reinvest in maintenance and liquidity, plus permanent credit retirement upon consumption to create a one-to-one mapping with physical energy use. The abstract claims a deployed prototype across heterogeneous nodes demonstrates resilience to data injection attacks, lowers capital barriers, and offers a general model for coordinating economic activity with physical law; open-access data and code are released on GitHub.

Significance. If the physical-bound enforcement and marketplace mechanisms function as described, the work could provide a meaningful advance in verifiable distributed energy systems by grounding digital claims in observable physical constraints rather than purely cryptographic or economic rules. The open release of code and data would support reproducibility and extension to other domains where infrastructure must align with physical limits.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the prototype demonstrates resilience against data injection attacks' is unsupported by any description of the prototype architecture, attack models considered, test methodology, quantitative metrics, or results, leaving the central claim of verifiable trust without empirical grounding.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the physical boundary is stated to rely on 'real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and first-principles calculations,' yet no oracle mechanism, authentication protocol, redundancy scheme, or error analysis for these external feeds is provided; this leaves open the possibility that manipulated inputs could raise the computed ceiling or trigger false rejections, shifting rather than eliminating the trust boundary.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the reward structures, credit retirement rules, and marketplace liquidity mechanisms are defined internally by the platform, so the claimed independence from speculation rests on platform-specific rules rather than external physical constraints; no analysis shows how these rules remain stable under adversarial participation or liquidity shocks.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'heterogeneous city nodes' and 'community-level solar expansion' without defining the scale, number of nodes, or deployment context used in the prototype.
  2. [Abstract] No repository URL or commit hash is supplied for the claimed open-access GitHub release of data and code.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments. The feedback correctly identifies areas where the abstract makes claims that exceed the level of detail and analysis provided in the manuscript. We respond point by point and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the prototype demonstrates resilience against data injection attacks' is unsupported by any description of the prototype architecture, attack models considered, test methodology, quantitative metrics, or results, leaving the central claim of verifiable trust without empirical grounding.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's claim is not supported by the level of empirical detail described. The manuscript contains a high-level description of the prototype deployment but does not include a formal attack model, test methodology, or quantitative results on data injection resilience. We will revise the abstract to remove or substantially qualify this claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the physical boundary is stated to rely on 'real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and first-principles calculations,' yet no oracle mechanism, authentication protocol, redundancy scheme, or error analysis for these external feeds is provided; this leaves open the possibility that manipulated inputs could raise the computed ceiling or trigger false rejections, shifting rather than eliminating the trust boundary.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the absence of any description of how external data feeds are secured or validated. The manuscript treats meteorological and geospatial inputs as given without discussing oracles, authentication, or error bounds. We will revise the abstract to state that the physical upper bound depends on the integrity of these external sources and therefore does not fully eliminate trust assumptions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reward structures, credit retirement rules, and marketplace liquidity mechanisms are defined internally by the platform, so the claimed independence from speculation rests on platform-specific rules rather than external physical constraints; no analysis shows how these rules remain stable under adversarial participation or liquidity shocks.

    Authors: We agree that the economic mechanisms are platform-defined and that no adversarial or stability analysis is provided. The physical generation cap does impose an external limit on claimable supply, but this does not extend to proving robustness of the reward and liquidity rules. We will revise the abstract to distinguish the physical constraint on generation from the unanalyzed economic rules and to remove the stronger claim of independence from speculation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central mechanism establishes a physical output boundary via external real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and standard first-principles solar yield calculations; reported generation exceeding this limit is rejected by direct comparison. This step is not reduced to the platform's internal rules, fitted parameters, or self-citations. No equations, self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, smuggled ansatzes, or renamings of known results appear in the provided text. The marketplace and credit-retirement features are described as consequences of the external physical bound rather than inputs that define it. The derivation remains independent of the paper's own constructs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Populated from abstract description only; no full text available for exhaustive extraction.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and first-principles calculations can accurately determine the maximum possible solar yield for any given panel.
    Invoked to establish the hard physical boundary used for automatic rejection of excess reports.
invented entities (1)
  • SolarChain platform no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide trustless verification of solar generation and a sustainable P2P marketplace tied to physical energy flows.
    The integrated system is the primary proposed contribution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5773 in / 1467 out tokens · 76897 ms · 2026-05-25T03:28:48.774717+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    Using real-time meteorological data, geospatial coordinates, and first-principles calculations of solar yield, the system establishes a hard physical boundary for every panel's maximum possible output; any reported generation exceeding this limit is automatically rejected before entering the shared ledger.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean entropy_from_berry echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    When electricity is consumed, the corresponding digital credits are permanently retired in direct proportion to physical energy dissipation, creating an auditable one-to-one mapping between urban consumption and carbon accounting.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    P_max = A·η·G_max·[1−β(T_min−T_ref)] ... Smart contracts enforce P_max as a strict threshold; any reported data exceeding this limit is physically impossible and automatically rejected.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Juhar Abdella and Khaled Shuaib. 2018. Peer to peer distributed energy trading in smart grids: A survey.Energies11, 6 (2018), 1560

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Seerin Ahmad, Kalyan Nakka, Taesic Kim, Dongjun Han, Dongjun Won, and Bohyun Ahn. 2024. Blockchain-assisted resilient control for distributed energy resource management systems.IEEE Access12 (2024), 191748–191762

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Mohamed G Moh Almihat and Josiah L Munda. 2025. The role of smart grid technologies in urban and sustainable energy planning.Energies18, 7 (2025), 1618

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Muneer Maher Alshater. 2026. Decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN) tokenomics.Frontiers in Blockchain8 (2026), 1644115. doi:10.3389/fbloc. 2025.1644115

    work page doi:10.3389/fbloc 2026

  5. [5]

    Kevin S Anderson, Clifford W Hansen, William F Holmgren, Adam R Jensen, Mark A Mikofski, and Anton Driesse. 2023. pvlib python: 2023 project update. Journal of Open Source Software8, 92 (2023), 5994

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Guillermo Angeris and Tarun Chitra. 2020. Improved price oracles: Constant function market makers.Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies(2020), 80–91

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Alain Aoun, Mehdi Adda, Adrian Ilinca, Mazen Ghandour, and Hussein Ibrahim

    work page

  8. [8]

    decentralized electric grid resilience analysis using Leon- tief’s input–output model.Energies17, 6 (2024), 1321

    Centralized vs. decentralized electric grid resilience analysis using Leon- tief’s input–output model.Energies17, 6 (2024), 1321

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Saad AL Azzam, Raenu AL Kolandaisamy, and Ghassan AL Dharhani. 2025. AI- Driven Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: A Systematic Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Mesopotamian Journal of Big Data2025 (2025), 178–194

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    G Caldarelli. 2020. Understanding the blockchain oracle problem: a call for action. Information 11 (11): 509

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Giulio Caldarelli. 2025. Can artificial intelligence solve the blockchain oracle problem? unpacking the challenges and possibilities.Frontiers in Blockchain8 (2025), 1682623

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Tarun Chitra. 2020. Competitive equilibria between staking and on-chain lending. In2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). IEEE, 1–8

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Lin William Cong, Ye Li, and Neng Wang. 2021. Tokenomics: Dynamic adoption and valuation.The Review of Financial Studies34, 3 (2021), 1105–1155

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Jiahong Dai, Jiawei Yang, Yu Wang, and Yan Xu. 2023. Blockchain-enabled cyber-resilience enhancement framework of microgrid distributed secondary control against false data injection attacks.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid15, 2 (2023), 2226–2236

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Mohammad Darabseh and João Poças Martins. 2023. Blockchain orchestration and transformation for construction.Smart Cities6, 1 (2023), 652–675

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    2012.Exergy: energy, environment and sus- tainable development

    Ibrahim Dincer and Marc A Rosen. 2012.Exergy: energy, environment and sus- tainable development. Newnes

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Md Sadek Ferdous, Umit Cali, Ugur Halden, and Wolfgang Prinz. 2023. Leveraging self-sovereign identity and distributed ledger technology in renewable energy certificate ecosystems.Journal of Cleaner Production422 (2023), 138355. doi:10. 1016/j.jclepro.2023.138355

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Shengcheng Fu, Yaxin Tan, and Zhiyu Xu. 2023. Blockchain-based renewable energy certificate trade for low-carbon community of active energy agents. Sustainability15, 23 (2023), 16300

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Lazar Gitelman and Mikhail Kozhevnikov. 2023. New business models in the energy sector in the context of revolutionary transformations.Sustainability15, 4 (2023), 3604

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Shaowei He. 2025. Blockchain-Powered Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading: A Com- prehensive Framework for Secure, Transparent, and Direct Transactions in the Energy Sector.Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc–Maintenance and Reliability27, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Chung-Ting Huang and Ian J Scott. 2024. Peer-to-peer multi-period energy market with flexible scheduling on a scalable and cost-effective blockchain. Applied Energy367 (2024), 123331

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Stefanos Leonardos, Barnabé Monnot, Daniël Reijsbergen, Efstratios Skoulakis, and Georgios Piliouras. 2021. Dynamical analysis of the eip-1559 ethereum fee market. InProceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies. 114–126

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Tian Li, Zhuosen Wang, Christopher Kyba, Miguel O Román, Karen C Seto, Yun Yang, Shi Qiu, Theres Kuester, Michail Fragkias, Xiang Chen, et al. 2026. Satellite imagery reveals increasing volatility in human night-time activity.Nature652, 8109 (2026), 379–386

    work page 2026

  24. [24]

    Zipeng Liang, Xin Yin, Chi Yung Chung, Safwat Khair Rayeem, Xinquan Chen, and Haosen Yang. 2025. Managing massive RES integration in hybrid micro- grids: A data-driven quad-level approach with adjustable conservativeness.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics(2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Zhibin Lin, Taotao Wang, Long Shi, Shengli Zhang, and Bin Cao. 2024. Decen- tralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN): Challenges and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02239(2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.02239

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02239 2024

  26. [26]

    Zhibin Lin, Taotao Wang, Long Shi, Shengli Zhang, and Bin Cao. 2024. Decen- tralized physical infrastructure networks (depin): Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Network39, 2 (2024), 91–99

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Yao Liu, Peng Ning, and Michael K Reiter. 2011. False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids.ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC)14, 1 (2011), 1–33

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Yuan Lu and Jingyuan Ding. [n. d.]. A Hybrid IoT-Hadoop-Blockchain Architec- ture for Decentralized MRV and Carbon Data Governance.Frontiers in Climate 8 ([n. d.]), 1776972

    work page

  29. [29]

    Sara Mohammadi, Frank Eliassen, Yan Zhang, and Hans-Arno Jacobsen. 2021. Detecting false data injection attacks in peer to peer energy trading using ma- chine learning.IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing19, 5 (2021), 3417–3431

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Muhammad Baqer Mollah, Jun Zhao, Dusit Niyato, Kwok-Yan Lam, Xin Zhang, Amer MYM Ghias, Leong Hai Koh, and Lei Yang. 2020. Blockchain for future smart grid: A comprehensive survey.IEEE Internet of Things journal8, 1 (2020), 18–43

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Pedamallu Sai Mrudula, Rayappa David Amar Raj, Archana Pallakonda, Yana- mala Rama Muni Reddy, K Krishna Prakasha, and V Anandkumar. 2025. Smart grid intrusion detection for IEC 60870-5-104 with feature optimization, privacy protection, and honeypot-firewall integration.IEEE Access(2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Ahmed S Musleh, Guo Chen, Zhao Yang Dong, Chen Wang, and Shiping Chen

    work page

  33. [33]

    Spatio-temporal data-driven detection of false data injection attacks in power distribution systems.International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems145 (2023), 108612

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Svein Ølnes, Synnøve Rubach, Hans Petter Kildal, and Marius Røthe Bøen. 2022. Exploring the Use of Blockchain Technology in the Guarantees of Origin Value Chain. InBærekraft: Fjordantologien 2022. Universitetsforlaget, 198–217

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Imtiaz Parvez and Aditya Sundararajan. 2025. A Graph-Net with Node Embed- dings to Detect False Data Injection Attacks in Photovoltaic Systems. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (eIT). IEEE, 085–090

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis. 2019. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations.Journal of Computa- tional physics378 (2019), 686–707

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Jorge Soria Ruiz-Ogarrio, Jorge Moya Velasco, and Carlos Estévez-Mendoza

    work page

  38. [38]

    The road to decentralization: Optimal coverage on Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN).Finance Research Letters(2025), 109115

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Amin Zakhirehkar Sahih, Alireza Abbasi, and Milad Ghasri. 2024. Blockchain- enabled solutions for fair and efficient peer-to-peer renewable energy trading: An experimental comparison.Journal of Cleaner Production455 (2024), 142301

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Fabian Schär. 2021. Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract- based financial markets.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review103, 2 (2021), 153–174

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Alexandra Schneiders, Michael J Fell, and Colin Nolden. 2022. Peer-to-peer electricity trading and the sharing economy: Social, markets and regulatory perspectives.Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy17, 1 (2022), 2050849

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Ala’a Shamaseen, Mohammad Qatawneh, and Basima Elshqeirat. 2025. Blockchain for future smart grid: a comprehensive survey.Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics14, 4 (2025), 2497–2513

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Elisa Skoplaki and John A Palyvos. 2009. On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: A review of efficiency/power correlations.Solar energy83, 5 (2009), 614–624

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    Roman Vakulchuk, Indra Overland, and Daniel Scholten. 2020. Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review.Renewable and sustainable energy reviews122 (2020), 109547

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Johann Westphall and Jean Everson Martina. 2022. Blockchain privacy and scalability in a decentralized validated energy trading context with hyperledger fabric.Sensors22, 12 (2022), 4585

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Youquan Xian, Lianghaojie Zhou, Jianyong Jiang, Boyi Wang, Hao Huo, and Peng Liu. 2024. A distributed efficient blockchain oracle scheme for internet of things.IEICE Transactions on Communications107, 9 (2024), 573–582

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    et al. Zhao. 2025. A comprehensive academic and industrial survey of blockchain technology for the energy sector using fuzzy Einstein decision-making.Renew- able and Sustainable Energy Reviews222 (2025), 136403

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Yu Zheng, Licia Capra, Ouri Wolfson, and Hai Yang. 2014. Urban computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications.ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology5, 3 (2014), 1–55. doi:10.1145/2629592 Ou et al. A User Experience Workflow SolarChainis designed as a human-in-the-loop energy planning workflow. The user experience begins from a map-ce...

    work page doi:10.1145/2629592 2014