Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 117 references

Semiclassical Dispersion Corrections efficiently improve Multi-Configurational Theory with Short-Range Density-Functional Dynamic Correlation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding the D3 dispersion correction to a multiconfigurational wave function combined with short-range DFT reproduces the CCSD(T) benzene-dimer stacking curve to within 0.2 kcal/mol at negligible extra cost.

desk verdict A useful, honestly scoped proof-of-concept for adding D3 to MC-srDFT, but it does not test the method in the multireference regime it targets. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08604 v2 pith:HM2CTHEM submitted 2019-08-22 physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-ph

Christopher J. Stein , Markus Reiher This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-ph
keywords multiconfigurationalwavefunctionshort-rangeDFTD3dispersioncorrectionCASSCFbenzenedimerS66benchmarkrangeseparationdoublecounting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a composite electronic-structure method, CASSCF-srPBE-D3, in which a multiconfigurational wave function (CASSCF) provides static correlation, a short-range variant of the PBE density functional supplies short-range dynamical correlation, and the empirical D3 dispersion correction accounts for long-range dynamical correlation. The central claim is that this division of labour captures dispersion-controlled interaction energies with near-coupled-cluster accuracy at the cost of the CASSCF reference alone. The evidence is a set of benzene and pyridine dimers whose interaction is dominated by dispersion: the stacked benzene dimer curve matches CCSD(T)/CBS to within 0.2 kcal/mol, and five S66 dimers are reproduced with deviations from 0.08 to 0.90 kcal/mol at reference geometries. A sympathetic reader would care because standard second-order multireference perturbation theory tends to overestimate such dispersion interactions while costing far more, so this is a cheap route to quantitative binding energies in strongly correlated systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the composite energy expression $E_{\text{CASSCF}} + E_{\text{srPBE}} + E_{\text{D3(BJ)}}$, where $E_{\text{D3(BJ)}}$ is the semiclassical atom-pair dispersion sum with Becke-Johnson damping, Eq. (1): for atom pairs $I,J$ it adds terms $s_n C_{n,IJ}/(R_{IJ}^n + (a_1\sqrt{C_{8,IJ}/C_{6,IJ}} + a_2)^n)$ for $n=6,8$. Range-separated two-electron integrals (split at $\mu = 0.4\,a_0^{-1}$) feed the short-range PBE functional, the compact active space supplies only static correlation, and the D3 term supplies the long-range dynamical correlation that neither part contains. The paper adopts the PBE-D3 values for the functional-dependent parameters $s_8$, $a_1$, $a_2$ without refitting them to the new composite.

What would settle it

Replace the PBE-D3 damping parameters in Eq. (1) with the parameter set of another GGA functional and recompute the five Table 1 dimers, or refit the three parameters to the srPBE component; if the interaction energies shift by more than about 0.2 kcal/mol at the minima, the claimed accuracy is an error compensation of the transferred damping rather than a clean separation of correlation contributions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that semiclassical D3 dispersion corrections, borrowed unmodified from DFT, can be grafted onto an MC-srDFT composite without reparameterisation and without apparent double counting. For the stacked benzene dimer, CASSCF-srPBE-D3 gives a minimum 0.2 kcal/mol from the CCSD(T)/CBS value, whereas CASSCF alone is purely repulsive and CASSCF with short-range PBE still has no minimum; adding D3 to bare CASSCF gives a minimum only half as deep. Across five benzene/pyridine dimers in π-stacked and T-shaped geometries, deviations from CCSD(T)/CBS lie between 0.08 and 0.90 kcal/mol at reference geometries, and between 0.08 and 0.38 kcal/mol at the composite's own interpolated minima. The paper also finds that the short-range DFT part regularizes the active space so that a CAS(12,12) can be reduced to CAS(8,8), and it argues that the model contains no dispersion double counting because the compact active space and the short-range functional are both dispersion-free, leaving the long-range dispersion to D3 alone.

Load-bearing premise

The whole accuracy claim rests on the untested transfer of the PBE-D3 damping parameters to the CASSCF-srPBE composite, i.e. on the assumption that the damping smoothly switches off the empirical dispersion term exactly where the short-range functional and active-space correlation already cover it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For dispersion-bound systems with strong static correlation, the composite offers an accuracy comparable to second-order multireference perturbation theory at a small fraction of its cost, because the expensive higher-order reduced density matrices are never needed.
  • Because the short-range DFT regularizes the wave function, smaller active spaces than a CASSCF-only treatment requires may be sufficient, as illustrated by the reduction from CAS(12,12) to CAS(8,8) for the π dimers.
  • The method is compatible with large-active-space reference methods such as DMRG or FCIQMC, so it could extend quantitative dynamic correlation to active spaces beyond the roughly 30 orbitals that limit CASPT2/NEVPT2.
  • Reparameterizing the dispersion correction and designing short-range functionals specifically for this composite could push the deviations below the current 0.08–0.90 kcal/mol range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The PBE-D3 damping transfer is the part most likely to fail outside the tested dimers; a dedicated srPBE damping parameterisation would show whether the current agreement is robust or partly error compensation.
  • Since D3 is a pairwise, additive model that assumes well-separated fragments, the composite should be stress-tested on π-stacked systems with charge transfer or on strongly delocalized active spaces, where dispersion determinants are no longer cleanly assigned to one fragment.
  • Because the composite adds essentially no cost once the CAS-type reference exists, the same D3 correction could be applied post hoc to existing CASSCF-srDFT or DMRG-srDFT calculations, turning them into quantitative tools for dispersion-bound systems without re-running the expensive part.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a composite electronic-structure method, CASSCF-srPBE-D3, in which a multiconfigurational wave function treats static correlation, a short-range density functional (srPBE) supplies short-range dynamical correlation through range separation, and Grimme's D3(BJ) semiclassical correction adds long-range dispersion. The authors argue that a compact active space contains essentially no dispersion and that range separation avoids double counting, so adding D3 is both safe and inexpensive. They test the method on the stacked benzene dimer and on five benzene/pyridine dimers from the S22/S66 benchmark sets, comparing interaction energies with CCSD(T)/CBS. The uncorrected CASSCF-srPBE curves are repulsive, while adding D3 produces minima; reported errors range from 0.08 to 0.90 kcal/mol depending on system and geometry. The paper concludes that the approach has very good reliability at negligible cost and great potential for genuinely multiconfigurational systems.

Significance. If the central claim held, the method would be a valuable low-cost route to non-covalent interactions in multiconfigurational systems, avoiding both the dispersion overestimation of second-order multireference perturbation theory and the high cost of high-order reduced density matrices. The paper has clear strengths: a conceptually clean separation of static, short-range dynamic, and long-range dispersion correlation; a plausible double-counting argument based on compact active spaces and range separation; and direct numerical comparison with CCSD(T)/CBS benchmarks. However, all numerical evidence is obtained on closed-shell, essentially single-reference dimers with near-double occupation numbers, and the D3 parameters are inherited from PBE fits to benchmark sets that overlap the test set. The significance of the work therefore rests on an extrapolation to the multiconfigurational regime rather than on demonstrated performance there; the current results support the narrower statement that D3 can be grafted onto CASSCF-srPBE for dispersion-dominated closed-shell dimers.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. 4-5, Table 1] The test systems have essentially no multiconfigurational character, so the central claim is not tested in the regime the method is designed for. Section 1 explicitly states that the chosen systems "does not feature any MC character at all," and Sec. 4 reports natural occupation numbers of 1.998/0.002 at the benzene-dimer equilibrium, which is numerically a single-determinant wave function. The CASSCF part is therefore inert in these calculations, and the quantitative evidence in Fig. 2 and Table 1 cannot support the paper's conclusion that the approach is a reliable efficient multiconfigurational model. The authors should add at least one dispersion-bound system with genuine static correlation (for example, a diradicaloid, an open-shell transition-metal complex, or a stretched bond system) and compare it against a suitable multireference benchmark before drawing the conclusions in Sec. 6.
  2. [Eq. (1), Secs. 3-4] The D3(BJ) damping parameters s8, a1, and a2 in Eq. (1) are taken from a PBE fit, as stated in Sec. 3, and the benchmark dimers are drawn from S22/S66, which are standard D3 calibration sets; the paper itself notes that the benzene dimer was part of the set for which the D3 parameters were optimized. The reported agreement is therefore partly a consequence of fitted parameters rather than an independent test of the composite method. The claim of "very good reliability" requires an out-of-sample test or a leave-one-out analysis. In addition, the transferability of PBE-D3 damping to CASSCF-srPBE is assumed without numerical checks; because the damping function was optimized for PBE, the absence of double counting between the empirical dispersion term and the srPBE/CAS correlation at intermediate distances should be explicitly verified or the parameters should be reoptimized.
  3. [Table 1, Sec. 5] The minima labeled "CASSCF-srPBE-D3 structure" were located by fitting only three computed energies at d = 1.05, 1.10, and 1.25 deq to a Lennard-Jones function. This is too sparse to determine a minimum reliably: the fitted well position and depth depend on the assumed functional form, and the interpolated distance shifts are large (up to 0.28 Å for the π-stacked pyridine dimer). The reported errors at the interpolated minima (0.08-0.38 kcal/mol) are therefore not robust evidence of accuracy. The authors should provide the fitted curves, an estimate of the interpolation uncertainty, or additional sampled distances around the minimum.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 1] The sentence "we choose to study seystems which does not feature any MC character at all" contains a typo ("seystems") and a subject-verb disagreement; it should read "systems that do not feature."
  2. [Fig. 2] The legend entry "D3" is unclear: it should specify whether this is the bare D3 correction energy, a D3-only interaction curve, or something else. The horizontal axis label "d/dref" should also be explained in the caption.
  3. [Table 1] The column header "ECASSCF−D3 diss ∆" is misformatted; the label "diss" appears to be a subscript or abbreviation and should be defined in the caption or table footnote.
  4. [Sec. 3] The paper does not state whether a basis-set superposition error correction was applied to the interaction energies; if none was applied, this should be stated explicitly because ANO-RCC-VTZ is not a large basis.
  5. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is typeset with an awkward line break; the denominator of the Becke-Johnson damping term should be displayed clearly so that the algebraic form is unambiguous.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Reported accuracy is partly in-sample for the fitted D3 dispersion term, because the S22/S66 validation complexes overlap the benchmark sets used to optimize the PBE-D3 parameters; the CASSCF-srPBE core otherwise provides independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, discussion of Fig. 2 and Eq. (1); Table 1 validation dimers from S22/S66 described in Section 3]
    "Certainly, the agreement of D3 corrected PBE is even better (gray dashed line) but it must be emphasized that this molecule was part of the benchmark set for which the D3 parameters were optimized and there is also little MC character that could break the standard PBE model."

    The only functional-dependent parameters in Eq. (1), s8, a1, and a2, were optimized for PBE on benchmark sets, and the paper adopts them unchanged for CASSCF-srPBE-D3. The molecules used to demonstrate the composite's reliability are S22/S66 dimers, which are among the standard benchmark sets used for D3 calibration, and the paper explicitly admits that the benzene dimer is part of the D3 parameterization benchmark. Consequently, the agreement of CASSCF-srPBE-D3 with CCSD(T)/CBS in Fig. 2 and Table 1 partly reflects the in-sample fit of the D3 term rather than an independent prediction of the new composite.

full rationale

The paper's new combination CASSCF-srPBE-D3 is a genuine composition of a multiconfigurational wave function, a short-range DFT correlation functional, and an existing empirical D3 dispersion term. The arguments that CASSCF contains essentially no dispersion, that srPBE supplies short-range dynamic correlation, and that range separation avoids double counting are self-contained and not circular. The main circularity concern is empirical rather than logical: Eq. (1) is evaluated with PBE-fitted D3 parameters, and the validation complexes (S22/S66 dimers) overlap the benchmark sets on which those parameters were optimized. The paper openly states that the benzene dimer was part of the D3 parameterization benchmark, so the agreement in Fig. 2 and Table 1 is partly an in-sample check of the fitted D3 term rather than an independent test of the new composite. Because CASSCF-srPBE is not fitted and changes the curve qualitatively, the circularity is partial, leading to a moderate score of 4. The paper's additional admissions, such as the absence of multiconfigurational character in the test systems, are limitations on external validity rather than circularity, and the self-citations to autoCAS and related method papers are contextual and do not carry the derivation. The central derivation is otherwise self-contained, which is why the score is not higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method is a composition of existing components, so the ledger is modest. The main pulled-from-prior-fit quantity is the D3 dispersion term, which contains three benchmark-fitted parameters and supplies the entire long-range dynamic correlation contribution. The no-double-counting claim rests on the compact-active-space assumption and the transferability of PBE damping, both untested here.

free parameters (2)
  • D3(BJ) functional-dependent parameters s8, a1, a2 = PBE D3(BJ) values from Ref. [80], not listed numerically in the paper
    Eq. (1) uses s8, a1, a2 curve-fitted for PBE in prior work; the paper adopts them unchanged. These parameters set the magnitude and damping of the dispersion energy that drives the reported interaction energies.
  • Range-separation parameter mu = 0.4 a0^-1
    Chosen for all srDFT calculations in Section 3 from earlier srDFT practice; no sensitivity analysis is provided, although results may depend on this value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Range separation by an error function with srDFT eliminates double counting between short-range DFT and long-range wave function correlation.
    Invoked in Sections 2 and 3 to justify the composite energy expression; the paper relies on this formal property from prior work rather than proving it.
  • ad hoc to paper A compact CAS active space contains essentially zero intermolecular dispersion contribution.
    Stated in Sections 2 and 6; used to exclude double counting of dispersion between CASSCF and D3. The paper describes a possible dispersion-determinant removal scheme but does not apply it to the test systems.
  • ad hoc to paper PBE-D3 damping parameters are transferable from PBE-only calculations to the CASSCF-srPBE composite.
    Required so that Eq. (1) added to CASSCF-srPBE gives the correct long-range correlation without overcounting; acknowledged in Section 4 as an unoptimized choice.
  • domain assumption CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark values from S22 and S66 are accurate references for these dimers.
    Standard domain benchmark practice; used as ground truth in Figure 2 and Table 1.
  • ad hoc to paper Three computed points fit to a Lennard-Jones function reliably locate the composite minimum.
    Used for the CASSCF-srPBE-D3 minimum entries in Table 1; no uncertainty or validation is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Semiclassical Dispersion Corrections efficiently improve Multi-Configurational Theory with Short-Range Density-Functional Dynamic Correlation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HM2CTHEM

@misc{pith2026190808604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Semiclassical Dispersion Corrections efficiently improve Multi-Configurational Theory with Short-Range Density-Functional Dynamic Correlation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HM2CTHEM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08604}
}
read the original abstract

Multi-configurational wave functions are known to describe electronic structure across a Born-Oppenheimer surface qualitatively correct. However, for quantitative reaction energies, dynamical correlation originating from the many configurations involving excitations out of the restricted orbital space, the active space, must be considered. Standard procedures involve approximations that eventually limit the ultimate accuracy achievable (most prominently, multi-reference perturbation theory). At the same time, the computational cost increase dramatically due to the necessity to obtain higher-order reduced density matrices. It is this disproportion that leads us here to propose a MC-srDFT-D hybrid approach of semiclassical dispersion (D) corrections to cover long-range dynamical correlation in a multi-configurational (MC) wave function theory which includes short-range (sr) dynamical correlation by density functional theory (DFT) without double counting. We demonstrate that the reliability of this approach is very good (at negligible cost), especially when considering that standard second-order multi-reference perturbation theory usually overestimates dispersion interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two classes of doubly excited determinants that define the dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Although the repulsive part is shifted to shorter distances, no proper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P.; Rancurel, P

    Huron, B.; Malrieu, J. P.; Rancurel, P. Iterative perturbation calculations of ground and excited state energies from multiconfigurational zeroth-order wavefunctions. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 58, 5745–5759

    1973

  2. [2]

    Recent advances in multireference second order perturbation CI: The CIPSI method revisited

    Cimiraglia, R.; Persico, M. Recent advances in multireference second order perturbation CI: The CIPSI method revisited. J. Comput. Chem. 1987, 8, 39–47

    1987

  3. [3]

    Specific CI calculation of energy differences: Transition energies and bond energies

    Miralles, J.; Castell, O.; Caballol, R.; Malrieu, J.-P. Specific CI calculation of energy differences: Transition energies and bond energies. Chem. Phys. 1993, 172, 33 – 43

    1993

  4. [4]

    A spectroscopy oriented configuration interaction procedure

    Neese, F. A spectroscopy oriented configuration interaction procedure. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 9428–9443. 10

    2003

  5. [5]

    M.; Lee, J.; Takeshita, T

    Tubman, N. M.; Lee, J.; Takeshita, T. Y.; Head-Gordon, M.; Whaley, K. B. A deterministic alternative to the full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo method. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 044112

    2016

  6. [6]

    A.; Tubman, N

    Holmes, A. A.; Tubman, N. M.; Umrigar, C. J. Heat-Bath Configuration Interaction: An Efficient Selected Configuration Interaction Algorithm In- spired by Heat-Bath Sampling. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2016, 12, 3674– 3680

    2016

  7. [7]

    A.; Jeanmairet, G.; Alavi, A.; Umrigar, C

    Sharma, S.; Holmes, A. A.; Jeanmairet, G.; Alavi, A.; Umrigar, C. J. Semis- tochastic Heat-Bath Configuration Interaction Method: Selected Configura- tion Interaction with Semistochastic Perturbation Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 1595–1604

    2017

  8. [8]

    H.; Thom, A

    Booth, G. H.; Thom, A. J. W.; Alavi, A. Fermion Monte Carlo Without Fixed Nodes: A Game of Life, Death, and Annihilation in Slater Determi- nant Space. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 054106

    2009

Show all 117 references
  1. [9]

    H.; Alavi, A

    Booth, G. H.; Alavi, A. Approaching Chemical Accuracy Using Full Configuration-Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo: A Study of Ionization Potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 174104

    2010

  2. [10]

    J.; Booth, G

    Shepherd, J. J.; Booth, G. H.; Alavi, A. Investigation of the Full Configura- tion Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo Method Using Homogeneous Elec- tron Gas Models. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 244101

    2012

  3. [11]

    White, S. R. Density Matrix Formulation for Quantum Renormalization Groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 2863–2866

    1992

  4. [12]

    White, S. R. Density-Matrix Algorithms for Quantum Renormalization Groups. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 48, 10345–10356

    1993

  5. [13]

    Applications of Quantum In- formation in the Density-Matrix Renormalization Group

    Legeza, ¨O.; Noack, R.; S´ olyom, J.; Tincani, L. Applications of Quantum In- formation in the Density-Matrix Renormalization Group. Lect. Notes Phys. 2008, 739, 653–664

    2008

  6. [14]

    K.-L.; Dorando, J

    Chan, G. K.-L.; Dorando, J. J.; Ghosh, D.; Hachmann, J.; Neuscamman, E.; Wang, H.; Yanai, T. An Introduction to the Density Matrix Renormalization Group Ansatz in Quantum Chemistry. Prog. Theor. Chem. Phys. 2008, 18, 49–65

    2008

  7. [15]

    K.-L.; Zgid, D

    Chan, G. K.-L.; Zgid, D. The Density Matrix Renormalization Group in Quantum Chemistry. 2009, 5, 149–162

    2009

  8. [16]

    H.; Reiher, M

    Marti, K. H.; Reiher, M. The Density Matrix Renormalization Group Algo- rithm in Quantum Chemistry. Z. Phys. Chem. 2010, 224, 583–599

    2010

  9. [17]

    H.; Reiher, M

    Marti, K. H.; Reiher, M. New Electron Correlation Theories for Transition Metal Chemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 6750–6759

    2011

  10. [18]

    K.-L.; Sharma, S

    Chan, G. K.-L.; Sharma, S. The Density Matrix Renormalization Group in Chemistry. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2011, 62, 465. 11

    2011

  11. [19]

    The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group in the Age of Matrix Product States

    Schollw¨ ock, U. The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group in the Age of Matrix Product States. Annals of Physics 2011, 326, 96–192

    2011

  12. [20]

    Multireference Electron Correlation Methods With Density Matrix Renormalisation Group Reference Functions

    Kurashige, Y. Multireference Electron Correlation Methods With Density Matrix Renormalisation Group Reference Functions. Mol. Phys. 2014, 112, 1485–1494

    2014

  13. [21]

    The Density Matrix Renormalization Group for ab initio Quantum Chemistry

    Wouters, S.; Van Neck, D. The Density Matrix Renormalization Group for ab initio Quantum Chemistry. Eur. Phys. J. D 2014, 68, 272

    2014

  14. [22]

    N.; Saitow, M

    Yanai, T.; Kurashige, Y.; Mizukami, W.; Chalupsk´ y, J.; Lan, T. N.; Saitow, M. Density Matrix Renormalization Group for ab initio Calcula- tions and Associated Dynamic Correlation Methods: A Review of Theory and Applications. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2015, 115, 283–299

    2015

  15. [23]

    Tensor Product Methods and Entanglement Optimization for ab initio Quantum Chemistry

    Szalay, S.; Pfeffer, M.; Murg, V.; Barcza, G.; Verstraete, F.; Schneider, R.; Legeza, ¨O. Tensor Product Methods and Entanglement Optimization for ab initio Quantum Chemistry. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2015, 115, 1342–1391

    2015

  16. [24]

    D.; Keller, S.; Kovyrshin, A.; Ma, Y.; Muolo, A.; Stein, C

    Knecht, S.; Hedeg˚ ard, E. D.; Keller, S.; Kovyrshin, A.; Ma, Y.; Muolo, A.; Stein, C. J.; Reiher, M. New Approaches for ab initio Calculations of Molecules with Strong Electron Correlation. Chimia 2016, 70, 244–251

    2016

  17. [25]

    K.-L.; Keselman, A.; Nakatani, N.; Li, Z.; White, S

    Chan, G. K.-L.; Keselman, A.; Nakatani, N.; Li, Z.; White, S. R. Matrix Product Operators, Matrix Product States, and ab initio Density Matrix Renormalization Group Algorithms. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 014102

    2016

  18. [26]

    O.; Taylor, P

    Roos, B. O.; Taylor, P. R.; Siegbahn, P. E. A Complete Active Space SCF Method (CASSCF) Using a Density Matrix Formulated Super-CI Approach. Chem. Phys. 1980, 48, 157–173

    1980

  19. [27]

    W.; Gilbert, M

    Ruedenberg, K.; Schmidt, M. W.; Gilbert, M. M.; Elbert, S. Are Atoms In- trinsic to Molecular Electronic Wavefunctions? I. The FORS Model. Chem. Phys. 1982, 71, 41–49

    1982

  20. [28]

    W.; Gilbert, M

    Ruedenberg, K.; Schmidt, M. W.; Gilbert, M. M. Are Atoms Intrinsic to Molecular Electronic Wavefunctions? II. Analysis of FORS Orbitals. Chem. Phys. 1982, 71, 51 – 64

    1982

  21. [29]

    W.; Gilbert, M

    Ruedenberg, K.; Schmidt, M. W.; Gilbert, M. M.; Elbert, S. Are Atoms Intrinsic to Molecular Electronic Wavefunctions? III. Analysis of FORS Configurations. Chem. Phys. 1982, 71, 65 – 78

    1982

  22. [30]

    Werner, H.-J.; Knowles, P. J. A Second Order Multiconfiguration SCF Pro- cedure With Optimum Convergence. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 5053–5063

    1985

  23. [31]

    Roos, B. O. The Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field Method and its Applications in Electronic Structure Calculations. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1987, 69, 399–445

    1987

  24. [32]

    The Multiconfiguration Self-Consistent Field Method

    Shepard, R. The Multiconfiguration Self-Consistent Field Method. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1987, 69, 63–200. 12

    1987

  25. [33]

    ˚A.; Roos, B

    Andersson, K.; Malmqvist, P. ˚A.; Roos, B. O.; Sadlej, A. J.; Wolinski, K. Second-order Perturbation Theory With a CASSCF Reference Function. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5483–5488

    1990

  26. [34]

    ˚A.; Roos, B

    Andersson, K.; Malmqvist, P. ˚A.; Roos, B. O. Second-order Perturbation Theory With a Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field Reference Func- tion. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 1218–1226

    1992

  27. [35]

    Intro- duction ofn-Electron Valence States for Multireference Perturbation Theory

    Angeli, C.; Cimiraglia, R.; Evangelisti, S.; Leininger, T.; Malrieu, J.-P. Intro- duction ofn-Electron Valence States for Multireference Perturbation Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 10252–10264

    2001

  28. [36]

    n-electron Valence State Pertur- bation Theory: a Fast Implementation of the Strongly Contracted Variant

    Angeli, C.; Cimiraglia, R.; Malrieu, J.-P. n-electron Valence State Pertur- bation Theory: a Fast Implementation of the Strongly Contracted Variant. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 350, 297–305

    2001

  29. [37]

    n-Electron Valence State Pertur- bation Theory: A Spinless Formulation and an Efficient Implementation of the Strongly Contracted and of the Partially Contracted Variants

    Angeli, C.; Cimiraglia, R.; Malrieu, J.-P. n-Electron Valence State Pertur- bation Theory: A Spinless Formulation and an Efficient Implementation of the Strongly Contracted and of the Partially Contracted Variants. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 9138–9153

    2002

  30. [38]

    Jeziorski, B.; Monkhorst, H. J. Coupled-cluster method for multidetermi- nantal reference states. Phys. Rev. A 1981, 24, 1668–1681

    1981

  31. [39]

    S.; Datta, B.; Mukherjee, D

    Mahapatra, U. S.; Datta, B.; Mukherjee, D. A state-specific multi-reference coupled cluster formalism with molecular applications. Mol. Phys. 1998, 94, 157–171

    1998

  32. [40]

    Single-root multireference Brillouin-Wigner coupled-cluster theory: Applicability to the F2 molecule

    M´ aˇ sik, J.; Hubaˇ c, I.; Mach, P. Single-root multireference Brillouin-Wigner coupled-cluster theory: Applicability to the F2 molecule. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 6571–6579

    1998

  33. [41]

    A.; Gauss, J

    Evangelista, F. A.; Gauss, J. An orbital-invariant internally contracted mul- tireference coupled cluster approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 114102

    2011

  34. [42]

    Pilot applications of internally contracted multirefer- ence coupled cluster theory, and how to choose the cluster operator properly

    Hanauer, M.; K¨ ohn, A. Pilot applications of internally contracted multirefer- ence coupled cluster theory, and how to choose the cluster operator properly. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 204111

    2011

  35. [43]

    Evangelista, F. A. A driven similarity renormalization group approach to quantum many-body problems. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 054109

    2014

  36. [44]

    Evangelista, F. A. Perspective: Multireference coupled cluster theories of dynamical electron correlation. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 149, 030901

    2018

  37. [45]

    Cou- pled Cluster Method with Single and Double Excitations Tailored by Matrix Product State Wave Functions

    Veis, L.; Antal´ ık, A.; Brabec, J.; Neese, F.; Legeza, ¨O.; Pittner, J. Cou- pled Cluster Method with Single and Double Excitations Tailored by Matrix Product State Wave Functions. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 7, 4072–4078

    2016

  38. [46]

    The Intricate Case of Tetramethyleneethane: A Full Configuration Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo Benchmark and Multireference Coupled Cluster Studies

    Veis, L.; Antal´ ık, A.; Legeza,¨O.; Alavi, A.; Pittner, J. The Intricate Case of Tetramethyleneethane: A Full Configuration Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo Benchmark and Multireference Coupled Cluster Studies. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 2439–2445. 13

    2018

  39. [47]

    M.; M´ at´ e, M.; Laestadius, A.; Csirik, M

    Faulstich, F. M.; M´ at´ e, M.; Laestadius, A.; Csirik, M. A.; Veis, L.; Anta- lik, A.; Brabec, J.; Schneider, R.; Pittner, J.; Kvaal, S.; Legeza, ¨O. Numeri- cal and Theoretical Aspects of the DMRG-TCC Method Exemplified by the Nitrogen Dimer. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15,...

    2019

  40. [48]

    Low-Order Scaling Local Electron Correlation Methods

    Sch¨ utz, M.; Werner, H.-J. Low-Order Scaling Local Electron Correlation Methods. IV. Linear Scaling Local Coupled-Cluster (LCCSD). J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 661–681

    2001

  41. [49]

    Explicitly correlated second order perturbation theory: Intro- duction of a rational generator and numerical quadratures

    Ten-no, S. Explicitly correlated second order perturbation theory: Intro- duction of a rational generator and numerical quadratures. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 117–129

    2004

  42. [50]

    E.; Sodt, A.; Head-Gordon, M

    Subotnik, J. E.; Sodt, A.; Head-Gordon, M. A Near Linear-Scaling Smooth Local Coupled Cluster Algorithm for Electronic Structure. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 074116

    2006

  43. [51]

    Linear scaling cou- pled cluster method with correlation energy based error control

    Zi´ o lkowski, M.; Jans´ ık, B.; Kjærgaard, T.; Jørgensen, P. Linear scaling cou- pled cluster method with correlation energy based error control. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 014107

    2010

  44. [52]

    An efficient linear-scaling CCSD(T) method based on local natural orbitals

    Rolik, Z.; Szegedy, L.; Ladj´ anszki, I.; Ladczki, B.; K´ allay, M. An efficient linear-scaling CCSD(T) method based on local natural orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 094105

    2013

  45. [53]

    An Efficient and Near Linear Scaling Pair Natural Orbital Based Local Coupled Cluster Method

    Riplinger, C.; Neese, F. An Efficient and Near Linear Scaling Pair Natural Orbital Based Local Coupled Cluster Method. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 034106

    2013

  46. [54]

    J.; Baudin, P.; Ettenhuber, P.; Kristensen, K.; Kjærgaard, T.; Jørgensen, P

    Eriksen, J. J.; Baudin, P.; Ettenhuber, P.; Kristensen, K.; Kjærgaard, T.; Jørgensen, P. Linear-Scaling Coupled Cluster with Perturbative Triple Exci- tations: The Divide-Expand-Consolidate CCSD(T) Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 2984–2993

    2015

  47. [55]

    Explicitly correlated local coupled-cluster methods using pair natural orbitals

    Ma, Q.; Werner, H.-J. Explicitly correlated local coupled-cluster methods using pair natural orbitals. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1371

    2018

  48. [56]

    O.; Valeev, E

    Sinnokrot, M. O.; Valeev, E. F.; Sherrill, C. D. Estimates of the Ab Initio Limit forπ−π Interactions: The Benzene Dimer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10887–10893

    2002

  49. [57]

    M.; Lytle, M

    Cybulski, S. M.; Lytle, M. L. The Origin of Deficiency of the Supermolecule Second-Order Møller-Plesset Approach for Evaluating Interaction Energies. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 141102

    2007

  50. [58]

    E.; Platts, J

    Riley, K. E.; Platts, J. A.; ˇRez´ aˇ c, J.; Hobza, P.; Hill, J. G. Assessment of the Performance of MP2 and MP2 Variants for the Treatment of Noncovalent Interactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 4159–4169

    2012

  51. [59]

    Accu- racy of Quantum Chemical Methods for Large Noncovalent Complexes

    Sedlak, R.; Janowski, T.; Pitoˇ n´ ak, M.;ˇRez´ aˇ c, J.; Pulay, P.; Hobza, P. Accu- racy of Quantum Chemical Methods for Large Noncovalent Complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3364–3374. 14

    2013

  52. [60]

    Density Functional Methods in Physics ; Plenum: New York, 1985; p 177

    Stoll, H.; Savin, A. Density Functional Methods in Physics ; Plenum: New York, 1985; p 177

    1985

  53. [61]

    Density functionals for the Yukawa electron-electron interaction

    Savin, A.; Flad, H.-J. Density functionals for the Yukawa electron-electron interaction. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1995, 56, 327–332

    1995

  54. [62]

    Combining Long-Range Configuration Interaction With Short-Range Density Functionals

    Leininger, T.; Stoll, H.; Werner, H.-J.; Savin, A. Combining Long-Range Configuration Interaction With Short-Range Density Functionals. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 275, 151–160

    1997

  55. [63]

    Combining Multideterminantal Wave Functions With Density Functionals to Handle Near-Degeneracy in Atoms and Molecules

    Pollet, R.; Savin, A.; Leininger, T.; Stoll, H. Combining Multideterminantal Wave Functions With Density Functionals to Handle Near-Degeneracy in Atoms and Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 1250–1258

    2002

  56. [64]

    Long-range–short-range separation of the electron-electron interaction in density-functional theory

    Toulouse, J.; Colonna, F.; Savin, A. Long-range–short-range separation of the electron-electron interaction in density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. A 2004, 70, 062505

    2004

  57. [65]

    G.; Gerber, I

    ´Angy´ an, J. G.; Gerber, I. C.; Savin, A.; Toulouse, J. Van-der-Waals Forces in Density Functional Theory: Perturbational Long-Range Electron- Interaction Corrections. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72, 012510

    2005

  58. [66]

    A Short-Range Gradient-Corrected Den- sity Functional in Long-Range Coupled-Cluster Calculations for Rare Gas Dimers

    Goll, E.; Werner, H.-J.; Stoll, H. A Short-Range Gradient-Corrected Den- sity Functional in Long-Range Coupled-Cluster Calculations for Rare Gas Dimers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3917–3923

    2005

  59. [67]

    A short-range gradient-corrected spin density functional in combination with long-range coupled-cluster methods: Application to alkali-metal rare-gas dimers

    Goll, E.; Werner, H.-J.; Stoll, H.; Leininger, T.; Gori-Giorgi, P.; Savin, A. A short-range gradient-corrected spin density functional in combination with long-range coupled-cluster methods: Application to alkali-metal rare-gas dimers. Chem. Phys. 2006, 329, 276–282

    2006

  60. [68]

    Fromager, E.; Toulouse, J.; Jensen, H. J. A. On the Universality of the Long-/Short-Range Separation in Multiconfigurational Density-Functional Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 074111

    2007

  61. [69]

    D.; Knecht, S.; Kielberg, J

    Hedeg˚ ard, E. D.; Knecht, S.; Kielberg, J. S.; Jensen, H. J. A.; Reiher, M. Density Matrix Renormalization Group With Efficient Dynamical Electron Correlation Through Range Separation. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 224108

    2015

  62. [70]

    D.; Jensen, H

    Hubert, M.; Hedeg˚ ard, E. D.; Jensen, H. J. A. Investigation of Multiconfigu- rational Short-Range Density Functional Theory for Electronic Excitations in Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 2203–2213

    2016

  63. [71]

    D.; Toulouse, J.; Jensen, H

    Hedeg˚ ard, E. D.; Toulouse, J.; Jensen, H. J. A. Multiconfigurational short- range density-functional theory for open-shell systems.J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 214103

    2018

  64. [72]

    Range-separated multideterminant density- functional theory with a short-range correlation functional of the on-top pair density

    Fert´ e, A.; Giner, E.; Toulouse, J. Range-separated multideterminant density- functional theory with a short-range correlation functional of the on-top pair density. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 084103. 15

    2019

  65. [73]

    K.; Luo, S.; Ma, D.; Olsen, J.; Truhlar, D

    Li Manni, G.; Carlson, R. K.; Luo, S.; Ma, D.; Olsen, J.; Truhlar, D. G.; Gagliardi, L. Multiconfiguration Pair-Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 3669–3680

    2014

  66. [74]

    G.; Li Manni, G.; Carlson, R

    Gagliardi, L.; Truhlar, D. G.; Li Manni, G.; Carlson, R. K.; Hoyer, C. E.; Bao, J. L. Multiconfiguration Pair-Density Functional Theory: A New Way To Treat Strongly Correlated Systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 66–73

    2017

  67. [75]

    J.; Gagliardi, L.; Truhlar, D

    Bao, J. J.; Gagliardi, L.; Truhlar, D. G. Weak Interactions in Alkaline Earth Metal Dimers by Pair-Density Functional Theory. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 799–805

    2019

  68. [76]

    R.; Becke, A

    Johnson, E. R.; Becke, A. D. A post-Hartree–Fock model of intermolecular interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 024101

    2005

  69. [77]

    Accurate description of van der Waals complexes by density functional theory including empirical corrections

    Grimme, S. Accurate description of van der Waals complexes by density functional theory including empirical corrections. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1463–1473

    2004

  70. [78]

    Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction

    Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799

    2006

  71. [79]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu

    Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104

    2010

  72. [80]

    Effect of the damping function in dis- persion corrected density functional theory

    Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dis- persion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456–1465

    2011

  73. [81]

    Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model

    Caldeweyher, E.; Bannwarth, C.; Grimme, S. Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 034112

    2017

  74. [82]

    A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction

    Caldeweyher, E.; Ehlert, S.; Hansen, A.; Neugebauer, H.; Spicher, S.; Ban- nwarth, C.; Grimme, S. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 154122

    2019

  75. [83]

    Density functional method including weak interactions: Dispersion coefficients based on the local response approximation

    Sato, T.; Nakai, H. Density functional method including weak interactions: Dispersion coefficients based on the local response approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 224104

    2009

  76. [84]

    Local response dispersion method

    Sato, T.; Nakai, H. Local response dispersion method. II. Generalized mul- ticenter interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 194101

    2010

  77. [85]

    Accurate Molecular Van Der Waals Interac- tions from Ground-State Electron Density and Free-Atom Reference Data

    Tkatchenko, A.; Scheffler, M. Accurate Molecular Van Der Waals Interac- tions from Ground-State Electron Density and Free-Atom Reference Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 073005

    2009

  78. [86]

    A.; Car, R.; Scheffler, M

    Tkatchenko, A.; DiStasio, R. A.; Car, R.; Scheffler, M. Accurate and Efficient Method for Many-Body van der Waals Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 236402. 16

    2012

  79. [87]

    N.; Corminboeuf, C

    Steinmann, S. N.; Corminboeuf, C. A System-Dependent Density-Based Dis- persion Correction. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 1990–2001

    2010

  80. [88]

    N.; Corminboeuf, C

    Steinmann, S. N.; Corminboeuf, C. A generalized-gradient approximation exchange hole model for dispersion coefficients. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 044117

    2011

  81. [89]

    Andersson, K.; Roos, B. O. Excitation Energies in the Nickel Atom Studied With the Complete Active Space SCF Method and Second-Order Perturba- tion Theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 191, 507–514

    1992

  82. [90]

    In Computational Organometallic Chemistry ; Cundari, T

    Pierloot, K. In Computational Organometallic Chemistry ; Cundari, T. R., Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2001; Chapter Nondynamic Correlation Effects in Transition Metal Coordination Compounds, pp 123–158

    2001

  83. [91]

    J.; Reiher, M

    Stein, C. J.; Reiher, M. autoCAS: A Program for Fully Automated Multi- configurational Calculations. J. Comput. Chem 2019, 40, 2216–2226

    2019

  84. [92]

    F.; Head-Gordon, M

    Gonthier, J. F.; Head-Gordon, M. Compressed representation of dispersion interactions and long-range electronic correlations. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 144110

    2017

  85. [93]

    Pipek, J.; Mezey, P. G. A Fast Intrinsic Localization Procedure Applicable for ab initio and Semiempirical Linear Combination of Atomic Orbital Wave Functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 4916–4926

    1989

  86. [94]

    An Energy Decomposition Analysis for Second-Order Møller–Plesset Perturbation Theory Based on Absolutely Lo- calized Molecular Orbitals

    Thirman, J.; Head-Gordon, M. An Energy Decomposition Analysis for Second-Order Møller–Plesset Perturbation Theory Based on Absolutely Lo- calized Molecular Orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 084124

    2015

  87. [95]

    B.; Bistoni, G.; Sparta, M.; Saitow, M.; Riplinger, C.; Auer, A

    Schneider, W. B.; Bistoni, G.; Sparta, M.; Saitow, M.; Riplinger, C.; Auer, A. A.; Neese, F. Decomposition of Intermolecular Interaction Ener- gies within the Local Pair Natural Orbital Coupled Cluster Framework. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 4778–4792

    2016

  88. [96]

    Decomposition of Density Matrix Renormalization Group States Into a Slater Determinant Basis

    Moritz, G.; Reiher, M. Decomposition of Density Matrix Renormalization Group States Into a Slater Determinant Basis. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 244109

    2007

  89. [97]

    H.; Reiher, M

    Boguslawski, K.; Marti, K. H.; Reiher, M. Construction of CASCI-Type Wave Functions for Very Large Active Spaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 224101

    2011

  90. [98]

    G.; Bannwarth, C

    Grimme, S.; Hansen, A.; Brandenburg, J. G.; Bannwarth, C. Dispersion- Corrected Mean-Field Electronic Structure Methods. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5105–5154

    2016

  91. [99]

    Aidas, K. et al. The Dalton quantum chemistry program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 269–284

    2014

  92. [100]

    O.; Lindh, R.; Malmqvist, P.- ˚A.; Veryazov, V.; Widmark, P.-O

    Roos, B. O.; Lindh, R.; Malmqvist, P.- ˚A.; Veryazov, V.; Widmark, P.-O. Main Group Atoms and Dimers Studied with a New Relativistic ANO Basis Set. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 2851–2858. 17

    2004

  93. [101]

    Widmark, P.-O.; Malmqvist, P.- ˚A.; Roos, B. O. Density Matrix Averaged Atomic Natural Orbital (ANO) Basis Sets for Correlated Molecular Wave Functions. Theor. Chim. Acta 1990, 77, 291–306

    1990

  94. [102]

    P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M

    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approxima- tion Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868

    1996

  95. [103]

    https://www.chemie.uni-bonn.de/pctc/ mulliken-center/software/dft-d3/dft-d3 , Accessed: 2020-01-15

    DFT-D3 program. https://www.chemie.uni-bonn.de/pctc/ mulliken-center/software/dft-d3/dft-d3 , Accessed: 2020-01-15

    2020

  96. [104]

    Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs.Phys

    Jureˇ cka, P.;ˇSponer, J.; ˇCern´ y, J.; Hobza, P. Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 1985–1993

    2006

  97. [105]

    E.; Hobza, P

    ˇRez´ aˇ c, J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. S66: A Well-balanced Database of Bench- mark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 2427–2438

    2011

  98. [106]

    Møller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many- Electron Systems. Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618–622

    1934

  99. [107]

    A.; Binkley, J

    Pople, J. A.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R. Theoretical models incorporating electron correlation. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1976, 10, 1–19

    1976

  100. [108]

    Dunning, T. H. Gaussian Basis Sets for Use in Correlated Molecular Calcu- lations. I. The Atoms Boron Through Neon and Hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007–1023

    1989

  101. [109]

    A.; Dunning, T

    Kendall, R. A.; Dunning, T. H.; Harrison, R. J. Electron Affinities of the First-Row Atoms Revisited. Systematic Basis Sets and Wave Functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 6796–6806

    1992

  102. [110]

    Optimizing the Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Method Using Quantum Information Entropy

    Legeza, ¨O.; S´ olyom, J. Optimizing the Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Method Using Quantum Information Entropy. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 195116

    2003

  103. [111]

    Measuring orbital interaction using quantum information theory. Chem. Phys. 2006, 323, 519 – 531

    2006

  104. [112]

    Entanglement Measures for Single- and Multireference Correlation Effects

    Boguslawski, K.; Tecmer, P.; Legeza, .; Reiher, M. Entanglement Measures for Single- and Multireference Correlation Effects. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2012, 3, 3129–3135

    2012

  105. [113]

    J.; Reiher, M

    Stein, C. J.; Reiher, M. Automated Selection of Active Orbital Spaces. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 1760–1771

    2016

  106. [114]

    Statistical Analysis of Semiclassical Dispersion Corrections

    Weymuth, T.; Proppe, J.; Reiher, M. Statistical Analysis of Semiclassical Dispersion Corrections. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 2480–2494

    2018

  107. [115]

    Gaussian Process-Based Refinement of Dispersion Corrections

    Proppe, J.; Gugler, S.; Reiher, M. Gaussian Process-Based Refinement of Dispersion Corrections. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 6046–6060. 18

    2019

  108. [116]

    J.; von Burg, V.; Reiher, M

    Stein, C. J.; von Burg, V.; Reiher, M. The Delicate Balance of Static and Dynamic Electron Correlation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 3764– 3773

    2016

  109. [117]

    J.; Reiher, M

    Stein, C. J.; Reiher, M. Automated Identification of Relevant Frontier Or- bitals for Chemical Compounds and Processes. Chimia 2017, 71, 170–176. 19

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.