Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Zero-shot visual reasoning through probabilistic analogical mapping

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.15087 v1 pith:HPCTW7GZ submitted 2022-09-29 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords reasoningvisualmappinganalogicalhumanvisipamapproachescognitive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human reasoning is grounded in an ability to identify highly abstract commonalities governing superficially dissimilar visual inputs. Recent efforts to develop algorithms with this capacity have largely focused on approaches that require extensive direct training on visual reasoning tasks, and yield limited generalization to problems with novel content. In contrast, a long tradition of research in cognitive science has focused on elucidating the computational principles underlying human analogical reasoning; however, this work has generally relied on manually constructed representations. Here we present visiPAM (visual Probabilistic Analogical Mapping), a model of visual reasoning that synthesizes these two approaches. VisiPAM employs learned representations derived directly from naturalistic visual inputs, coupled with a similarity-based mapping operation derived from cognitive theories of human reasoning. We show that without any direct training, visiPAM outperforms a state-of-the-art deep learning model on an analogical mapping task. In addition, visiPAM closely matches the pattern of human performance on a novel task involving mapping of 3D objects across disparate categories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unfolding Spatial Cognition: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Visual Simulations

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    STARE is a 4K-task benchmark showing multimodal LLMs perform near random chance on multi-step spatial simulation tasks such as cube net folding and tangrams, despite strong 2D transformation results.

Pith tools