Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SteerConf: Steering LLMs for Confidence Elicitation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.02863 v2 pith:HQKZBTWW submitted 2025-03-04 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords confidencellmssteerconfsteeringcalibrationreliabilityscoressteered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across diverse domains but often suffer from overconfidence, limiting their reliability in critical applications. We propose SteerConf, a novel framework that systematically steers LLMs' confidence scores to improve their calibration and reliability. SteerConf introduces three key components: (1) a steering prompt strategy that guides LLMs to produce confidence scores in specified directions (e.g., conservative or optimistic) by leveraging prompts with varying steering levels; (2) a steered confidence consistency measure that quantifies alignment across multiple steered confidences to enhance calibration; and (3) a steered confidence calibration method that aggregates confidence scores using consistency measures and applies linear quantization for answer selection. SteerConf operates without additional training or fine-tuning, making it broadly applicable to existing LLMs. Experiments on seven benchmarks spanning professional knowledge, common sense, ethics, and reasoning tasks, using advanced LLM models (GPT-3.5, LLaMA 3, GPT-4), demonstrate that SteerConf significantly outperforms existing methods, often by a significant margin. Our findings highlight the potential of steering the confidence of LLMs to enhance their reliability for safer deployment in real-world applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AGENT-X: Adaptive Guideline-based Expert Network for Threshold-free AI-generated teXt detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AGENT-X is a zero-shot multi-LLM framework for AI-generated text detection that routes texts to guideline-specific agents and aggregates their calibrated confidences without threshold tuning.

  2. LLM Assertiveness can be Mechanistically Decomposed into Emotional and Logical Components

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Mechanistic evidence that LLM assertiveness decomposes into orthogonal emotional and logical components that steer predictions differently.

  3. Agents Require Metacognitive and Strategic Reasoning to Succeed in the Coming Labor Markets

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AI agents in future labor markets will need metacognitive and strategic reasoning because incomplete information creates adverse selection, moral hazard, and reputation effects.

Pith tools