Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Timing Process Interventions with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.04299 v1 pith:HU4PHV6F submitted 2023-06-07 cs.LG cs.AI

Timing Process Interventions with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords processonlineexperimentsinterventionslearningoptimizationpoliciesprespm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The shift from the understanding and prediction of processes to their optimization offers great benefits to businesses and other organizations. Precisely timed process interventions are the cornerstones of effective optimization. Prescriptive process monitoring (PresPM) is the sub-field of process mining that concentrates on process optimization. The emerging PresPM literature identifies state-of-the-art methods, causal inference (CI) and reinforcement learning (RL), without presenting a quantitative comparison. Most experiments are carried out using historical data, causing problems with the accuracy of the methods' evaluations and preempting online RL. Our contribution consists of experiments on timed process interventions with synthetic data that renders genuine online RL and the comparison to CI possible, and allows for an accurate evaluation of the results. Our experiments reveal that RL's policies outperform those from CI and are more robust at the same time. Indeed, the RL policies approach perfect policies. Unlike CI, the unaltered online RL approach can be applied to other, more generic PresPM problems such as next best activity recommendations. Nonetheless, CI has its merits in settings where online learning is not an option.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.