Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Non-perturbative quark production and transport in the evolving glasma: the WAGASHI event generator

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The glasma alone creates hundreds of quarks before thermalization begins.

desk verdict A genuinely new integrated generator with a plausible qualitative message, but the headline yield rests on an unquantified Abelian projection and an overstated comparison to final hadron multiplicities. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13393 v1 pith:HYTIZIIR submitted 2026-08-13 hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th

Nicholas J. Benoit , Chiho Nonaka , Hidetoshi Taya This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords glasmaSchwingerpairproductionheavy-ioncollisionsquark-gluonplasmainitialconditionsspinpolarizationevent-by-eventfluctuationsoxygen-oxygencoloredparticle-in-cell
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds an event generator that follows quark-antiquark pairs from the instant they are produced non-perturbatively out of the glasma, the coherent color-field state formed right after a heavy-ion collision. Its central claim is that this pair production already yields a quark population comparable to the final hadron yields: roughly 400 quarks and antiquarks per unit rapidity in central Pb-Pb collisions by $\tau \approx 0.5$ fm/c, and about 15 in O-O, before perturbative quark-production processes become efficient. The same transport step then reshapes those quarks, broadening their transverse momenta into a low-$p_T$ spectrum close to a Boltzmann form with $T \approx 150$ MeV and almost fully randomizing their production-time spin alignment along the beam. If correct, the earliest quark degrees of freedom are a dynamical initial condition that subsequent hydrodynamic and spin physics must inherit, not a perturbative afterthought.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is WAGASHI, an event-by-event generator that couples three layers. The glasma background is evolved on a real-time, boost-invariant $(2+1)$-dimensional lattice via classical Yang-Mills equations, seeded by a small-$x$ color-glass initial-current model. Quark-antiquark pairs are sampled in each spacetime cell from a Poisson distribution whose mean is the locally constant-field non-perturbative rate of Eq. (1), evaluated after projecting the glasma fields onto their diagonal color components with a gauge choice that suppresses off-diagonal components; the rate includes quantized transverse-momentum levels, spin sums, the flavor mass suppression, and color weights $\omega_i$. Produced quarks are then pushed through the evolving fields using the classical equations of motion for phase space, color charge, and spin, in a colored particle-in-cell scheme.

What would settle it

Compute quark production from the same classical glasma configurations by directly solving the Dirac equation for quark mode functions in the full non-Abelian background, and compare the per-event yield $dN/d\eta_s$, $p_T$ spectra, and spin observables at $\tau = 0.5$ fm/c with WAGASHI; a systematic difference would show the Abelian locally constant rate is missing non-Abelian contributions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the glasma alone produces a substantial quark-antiquark population through the non-perturbative pair-production mechanism, and that this population is actively reshaped while the glasma evolves. The yield reaches $dN/d\eta_s \approx 400$ quarks and antiquarks in central Pb-Pb and about 15 in O-O at $\tau \sim 0.5$ fm/c, with the strange-to-up ratio remaining near 90%. Colored transport in the evolving color fields broadens the quark transverse-momentum spectrum, which at $p_T \lesssim 1$ GeV is close to a Boltzmann distribution with $T \approx 150$ MeV, while spin precession erases the initial beam-direction spin polarization by the end of the glasma stage. The paper also reports event-by-event fluctuations of baryon number, electric charge, strangeness, and spin, with normalized charge fluctuations growing toward higher $p_T$ and more strongly in the smaller O-O system.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that, after a gauge choice that suppresses off-diagonal color components, the glasma's color fields can be treated as locally constant, effectively Abelian fields for the purpose of quark-pair production; the paper notes this is exact only for special field backgrounds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Roughly 400 quarks and antiquarks per unit rapidity are already present at $\tau \approx 0.5$ fm/c in central Pb-Pb, a yield comparable to final hadron multiplicities, so the early quark sector cannot be ignored in initial-condition modeling.
  • The low-$p_T$ spectrum emerging from glasma transport is approximately thermal with $T \approx 150$ MeV, so the glasma preconditions the quark sector for later kinetic equilibration even though it remains a coherent field-dominated system.
  • Beam-direction spin alignment generated at production is almost completely washed out by $\tau \approx 0.5$ fm/c, so late-time spin observables inherit little direct memory of the earliest spin polarization.
  • Event-by-event charge fluctuations are larger in O-O than in Pb-Pb and grow with $p_T$, giving small systems a sharper experimental handle on early non-perturbative production and transport.
  • The local-rate implementation scales as $O(N_{\rm site}^3)$, making event-by-event production and transport calculations feasible for both large and small systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gauge projection undercounts the contribution of off-diagonal color components, WAGASHI's yields would be a lower bound; the size of the correction could be estimated by comparing with a direct Dirac-mode-function calculation on the same glasma configurations.
  • The combination of soft-to-hard momentum broadening, spin erasure, and near-thermal low-$p_T$ spectra suggests the glasma acts as a partial pre-thermalizer for the quark sector, a role that could connect to bottom-up thermalization pictures without the usual perturbative ordering.
  • The large O-O fluctuations imply that oxygen-oxygen collisions may be the most direct place to look for experimental imprints of early non-perturbative quark production, since the shorter medium lifetime limits later washout.
  • The produced quark and spin distributions are ready-made initial data for spin-hydrodynamic simulations; whether the reported suppression by ideal hydrodynamics preserves the line-like charge structures is a testable next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces WAGASHI, an event-by-event generator that combines classical Yang-Mills evolution of the glasma with Wong-equation transport (including colored BMT spin precession) and Schwinger pair production in the locally constant field approximation. The production rate in Eq. (1) is evaluated after fixing the maximally Abelian gauge and retaining only the Cartan components of the color field. The authors report about 400 quarks and antiquarks per unit spatial rapidity in central Pb-Pb at tau ~ 0.5 fm/c, a much smaller yield in O-O, substantial early momentum broadening, near-complete spin randomization by the end of the glasma stage, and large event-by-event fluctuations of baryon number, electric charge, strangeness, and spin polarization. They propose these distributions as dynamical initial conditions for the subsequent hydrodynamic evolution of the quark-gluon plasma.

Significance. If robust, the framework provides a concrete, computationally efficient link between classical glasma fields and early quark production, with testable event-by-event predictions for conserved-charge and spin fluctuations, especially in small systems. The manuscript's strengths include a clearly specified physics chain from classical fields to Wong/BMT transport, use of a standard Schwinger-rate formula with LCFA, an explicit acknowledgment of the Abelian-projection limitation, and a favorable O(N_site^3) scaling of the production-rate evaluation that makes event-by-event studies feasible. The claimed early-time spin randomization and the O-O/Pb-Pb difference in spin fluctuations are falsifiable predictions, and the proposed initial conditions are directly useful for subsequent hydrodynamic and spin-hydrodynamic modeling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (1) and the maximally Abelian gauge paragraph] The entire quantitative output rests on the Abelian projection in Eq. (1), whose validity the paper itself limits by stating that the Abelianization 'is not generally justified for an arbitrary non-Abelian configuration.' No quantitative estimate of the omitted off-diagonal contribution is provided, and the projected rate may depend on the chosen MAG implementation and Gribov copy. Because the reported dN/deta_s ~ 400, the pT spectrum, and the charge and spin fluctuations all inherit this uncertainty, the central quantitative claim is not yet fully supported. Please add a sensitivity check (e.g., alternative gauge-fixing prescriptions, different Cartan decompositions, or a full non-Abelian constant-field rate evaluated on representative glasma cells) and state how the yields, pT spectra, and polarization distributions shift.
  2. [Figure 1 and the abstract] The abstract's claim that the produced quark yield is 'comparable to the final hadron yields' is not quantitatively supported as written. Figure 1 gives dN/deta_s ~ 400 quark-antiquark pairs at tau ~ 0.5 fm/c in 0-5% Pb-Pb, but the paper never quotes the final hadron multiplicity used for comparison, nor the assumed conversion from q-qbar pairs to hadrons. Please state the reference multiplicity explicitly (with collision energy, centrality, and particle species) and, if appropriate, revise the claim to indicate what fraction of the final yield this represents.
  3. [Production-transport consistency (Eqs. (1) and (3))] There is a mismatch between the fields used for production and those used for transport: Eq. (1) uses only Cartan components after maximally Abelian gauge fixing, while the Wong/BMT evolution in Eq. (3) uses the full non-Abelian field. The manuscript does not specify how the color charge Q of a produced quark is initialized, so it is unclear whether the phase-space coordinates and color charges assigned at production are consistent with the fields that subsequently act on the quarks. Please specify the initialization of Q for produced pairs and test the sensitivity of the momentum-broadening and spin-randomization results to the initial color-charge orientation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Time evolution of quark production] The text says 'approximately linearly with time' but then notes a slight slowdown for strange quarks; please soften or quantify what is meant by 'approximately' over the quoted time range.
  2. [Figure 2] The initial pT spectrum is described as concentrated at pT ~ 0, but the figure appears to show only the spectrum at tau = 0.5 fm/c; showing the initial spectrum explicitly would make the momentum-broadening effect easier to verify.
  3. [Eq. (4)] The symbol std[nq(pT)] denotes a normalized standard deviation, not a standard deviation of nq; consider using a distinct symbol such as sigma_rel[nq(pT)] to avoid confusion.
  4. [Conclusions / code availability] The code is currently 'available for review' with a plan to make it fully open-source; for an event-generator paper, public archival availability would substantially improve reproducibility.
  5. [Figure 5] The binned spin distributions would benefit from error bars or a statement of the number of events used per bin; with only 200 events, the tails of the sz distribution may be noisy.
  6. [Figure 2 fits] The Boltzmann and Tsallis fit parameters (T, q, normalization, and fit range) are not tabulated; including them would allow readers to reproduce the comparison quantitatively.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the quark yields, momentum broadening, and spin randomization are genuine outputs of the specified production and transport equations, not re-statements of the model inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The pair-production rate in Eq. (1) is a standard constant-field Schwinger/Landau-level formula, cited to independent literature (Nikishov, Tanji) as well as to reviews that include an author; the glasma fields entering it come from solving Eq. (2) with the McLerran-Venugopalan model, whose parameter μ is calibrated to external ALICE/CMS charged-particle multiplicities. That is a calibration to experiment, not a fit to the quark observables being reported, so the subsequent claim of roughly 400 quarks per unit rapidity is not statistically forced by the input. Quark transport is then evolved with the independent Wong and colored-BMT equations in Eq. (3), and the reported momentum broadening, spin randomization, and event-by-event charge fluctuations are time-integrated results of those equations over the simulated glasma configurations. The Boltzmann and Tsallis fits shown in Fig. 2 are descriptive fits to the model output and are not used to set any parameter. The only author self-citations (Refs. [13,23,39]) provide background, a review, or an earlier flux-tube estimate; none is load-bearing for the present calculation, and none is invoked to forbid alternative choices or to supply a uniqueness theorem. The admitted Abelian-projection and locally-constant-field limitations are modeling assumptions, not circular steps: the observables are consequences of those assumptions, not inputs to them. Overall, the central findings do not reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard glasma initial conditions (MC replication with the MV model) plus three physical approximations: LCFA, Abelian projection, and no back-reaction. The MV parameter mu is fit to external charged-particle multiplicity data, which is not circular but is a free parameter.

free parameters (3)
  • MV model parameter mu = not stated in text
    Model parameter of the McLerran-Venugopalan initial conditions, fit to ALICE and CMS 0-5% charged-particle multiplicities (Refs [54-57]). It controls the field strength scale and therefore the quark production rate.
  • Effective temperature T = approximately 150 MeV
    Boltzmann fit to the low-pT part of the model's own pT spectrum; used to support the claim of a thermal-like shape, not an input.
  • Smearing width = 0.4 fm
    Chosen for demonstration in the single-event density plots of Fig. 3; affects the visual line-like structures but not the event-averaged yields.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The glasma color fields vary slowly enough for the locally constant field approximation to apply (Omega^{-1} >> m/gE, m/gB).
    Stated after Eq. (1) with Omega ~ Q_s. Entering the central rate calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper After maximally Abelian gauge fixing, the off-diagonal color components of the glasma fields are negligible for Schwinger pair production.
    The paper acknowledges this is 'not generally justified for an arbitrary non-Abelian configuration' (section 'Schwinger pair production in the glasma'). Central to Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption Produced quarks and antiquarks do not back-react on the glasma fields; the fields evolve as if the quarks were absent.
    The source J^mu in Eq. (2) is the current of the colliding nuclei, not the produced quarks. Implicit throughout the cPIC transport.
  • domain assumption Classical Wong and colored-BMT equations describe the quark motion and spin after production.
    The transport step uses Eq. (3), citing Refs [31,32,59-61], ignoring quantum diffusion and collisions.
  • domain assumption Landau-level and spin structure of the constant-field rate Eq. (1) survives the local-field averaging in each cell.
    The rate is sampled Poisson-wise per cell from the LCFA formula; nonlocal interference between cells is neglected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-perturbative quark production and transport in the evolving glasma: the WAGASHI event generator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HYTIZIIR

@misc{pith2026260813393,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-perturbative quark production and transport in the evolving glasma: the WAGASHI event generator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HYTIZIIR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13393}
}
read the original abstract

We study non-perturbative quark-antiquark pair production and the subsequent quark dynamics in the earliest glasma stage of relativistic heavy-ion collisions. For that, we develop a new model, WAGASHI (Wong-precessing Anisotropic Glasma And ScHwinger-produced Initial-conditions), which combines classical Yang-Mills glasma evolution, Wong-equation transport, and Schwinger pair production on an event-by-event basis. We find that a sizeable number of quarks, comparable to the final hadron yields, are produced already during the glasma stage and subsequently undergo substantial momentum broadening and spin randomization, suggesting a significant contribution toward the early equilibration of the quark-gluon plasma. We also determine the event-by-event distributions of baryon number, electric charge, strangeness, and spin polarization in Pb-Pb and O-O collisions at LHC energies, finding particularly large fluctuations in the smaller O-O system. These results provide dynamical initial conditions for the subsequent hydrodynamic evolution of the quark-gluon plasma.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13393 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The total number of quarks and antiquarks produced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Transverse momentum spectrum of the produced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The conserved charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Binned rest frame spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. Yagi, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Miake,Quark-gluon plasma: From big bang to little bang, Vol. 23 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 339 (2018), arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Lappi and L

    T. Lappi and L. McLerran, Some features of the glasma, Nucl. Phys. A772, 200 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602189

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Schlichting and D

    S. Schlichting and D. Teaney, The First fm/c of Heavy- Ion Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69, 447 (2019), arXiv:1908.02113 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021), arXiv:2005.12299 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Gelfand, A

    D. Gelfand, A. Ipp, and D. M¨ uller, Simulating collisions of thick nuclei in the color glass condensate framework, Phys. Rev. D94, 014020 (2016), arXiv:1605.07184 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Schlichting and P

    S. Schlichting and P. Singh, 3-D structure of the Glasma initial state – Breaking boost-invariance by collisions of extended shock waves in classical Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D103, 014003 (2021), arXiv:2010.11172 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    McDonald, S

    S. McDonald, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, 3+1D initialization and evolution of the glasma, Phys. Rev. C108, 064910 (2023), arXiv:2306.04896 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Matsuda and X.-G

    H. Matsuda and X.-G. Huang, Simulation of a (3+1)D glasma in Milne coordinates: Topological charge, eccen- tricity, and angular momentum, Phys. Rev. D110, 114032 (2024), arXiv:2409.08742 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polar- ization, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  3. [11]

    Gelis and N

    F. Gelis and N. Tanji, Schwinger mechanism revisited, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.87, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.05451 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Advances in QED with intense background fields, Phys. Rept.1010, 1 (2023), arXiv:2203.00019 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Taya, Schwinger effect in QCD and nuclear physics (2026) arXiv:2603.07847 [hep-ph]

    H. Taya, Schwinger effect in QCD and nuclear physics (2026) arXiv:2603.07847 [hep-ph]

    2026

  6. [14]

    Kajantie and T

    K. Kajantie and T. Matsui, Decay of Strong Color Electric Field and Thermalization in Ultrarelativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions, Phys. Lett. B164, 373 (1985)

    1985

  7. [15]

    Gatoff, A

    G. Gatoff, A. K. Kerman, and T. Matsui, The Flux Tube Model for Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions: Electro- hydrodynamics of a Quark Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. D 36, 114 (1987)

    1987

  8. [16]

    Bialas and W

    A. Bialas and W. Czyz, Production and Collective Motion of q¯qPlasma in Heavy Ion Collisions, Acta Phys. Polon. B17, 635 (1986)

    1986

  9. [17]

    Bialas, W

    A. Bialas, W. Czyz, A. Dyrek, and W. Florkowski, Os- cillations of Quark - Gluon Plasma Generated in Strong Color Fields, Nucl. Phys. B296, 611 (1988). 6

    1988

  10. [18]

    Banerjee, R

    B. Banerjee, R. S. Bhalerao, and V. Ravishankar, Equi- libration of the Quark - Gluon Plasma Produced in Rel- ativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Lett. B224, 16 (1989)

    1989

  11. [19]

    Tanji, Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform electric and magnetic fields, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    N. Tanji, Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform electric and magnetic fields, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    2009

  12. [21]

    Tanji, Electromagnetic currents induced by color fields, Physical Review D92, 125012 (2015), arXiv:1506.08442 [hep-ph]

    N. Tanji, Electromagnetic currents induced by color fields, Physical Review D92, 125012 (2015), arXiv:1506.08442 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Ruggieri, A

    M. Ruggieri, A. Puglisi, L. Oliva, S. Plumari, F. Scardina, and V. Greco, Modelling Early Stages of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions: Coupling Relativistic Transport Theory to Decaying Color-electric Flux Tubes, Phys. Rev. C92, 064904 (2015), arXiv:1505.08081 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Taya, Quark and Gluon Production from a Boost- invariantly Expanding Color Electric Field, Physical Re- view D96, 014033 (2017), arXiv:1609.06189 [hep-ph]

    H. Taya, Quark and Gluon Production from a Boost- invariantly Expanding Color Electric Field, Physical Re- view D96, 014033 (2017), arXiv:1609.06189 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Gelis, K

    F. Gelis, K. Kajantie, and T. Lappi, Quark-antiquark production from classical fields in heavy-ion collisions: 1 + 1 dimensions, Physical Review C71, 024904 (2005)

    2005

  16. [25]

    Gelis, K

    F. Gelis, K. Kajantie, and T. Lappi, Chemical Ther- malization in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Physical Review Letters96, 032304 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0508229 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical equilibration in weakly coupled QCD, Phys. Rev. D99, 054018 (2019), arXiv:1811.03068 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Du and S

    X. Du and S. Schlichting, Equilibration of the Quark- Gluon Plasma at Finite Net-Baryon Density in QCD Kinetic Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 122301 (2021), arXiv:2012.09068 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Baier, A

    R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schiff, and D. T. Son, ’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 502, 51 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0009237

    2001 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Carzon, M

    P. Carzon, M. Martinez, M. D. Sievert, D. E. Wertepny, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Toward Initial Conditions of Conserved Charges Part II: The ICCING Monte Carlo Algorithm (2021), arXiv:1911.12454 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Giacalone and E

    G. Giacalone and E. Speranza, Initial-state-driven spin correlations in high-energy nuclear collisions (2025), arXiv:2502.13102 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [31]

    S. K. Wong, Field and particle equations for the classical Yang-Mills field and particles with isotopic spin, Nuovo Cim. A65, 689 (1970)

    1970

  23. [32]

    Bargmann, L

    V. Bargmann, L. Michel, and V. L. Telegdi, Precession of the polarization of particles moving in a homogeneous electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.2, 435 (1959)

    1959

  24. [33]

    Brewer, A

    J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, Op- portunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC, inOp- portunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC(2021) arXiv:2103.01939 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of long-range collective flow in OO and NeNe collisions and implications for nuclear structure studies (2025), arXiv:2510.02580 [nucl-ex]

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of long-range collective flow in OO and NeNe collisions and implications for nuclear structure studies (2025), arXiv:2510.02580 [nucl-ex]

    2025

  26. [35]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of Suppressed Charged-Particle Production in Ultrarelativistic Oxygen- Oxygen Collisions, Phys

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of Suppressed Charged-Particle Production in Ultrarelativistic Oxygen- Oxygen Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 162301 (2026), arXiv:2510.09864 [nucl-ex]

    2026 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Ali Hassan Abdallahet al.(ALICE), Evidence for parton energy loss in oxygen −oxygen collisions at√sNN =5.36TeV (2026), arXiv:2606.19967 [nucl-ex]

    D. Ali Hassan Abdallahet al.(ALICE), Evidence for parton energy loss in oxygen −oxygen collisions at√sNN =5.36TeV (2026), arXiv:2606.19967 [nucl-ex]

    2026 arXiv

  28. [37]

    S. S. Bulanov, N. B. Narozhny, V. D. Mur, and V. S. Popov, On e+ e- pair production by a focused laser pulse in vacuum, Phys. Lett. A330, 1 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0403163

    2004

  29. [38]

    I. A. Aleksandrov, G. Plunien, and V. M. Shabaev, Locally-constant field approximation in studies of electron- positron pair production in strong external fields, Phys. Rev. D99, 016020 (2019), arXiv:1811.01419 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [39]

    H. Taya, T. Fujimori, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Exact WKB analysis of the vacuum pair pro- duction by time-dependent electric fields, JHEP03, 082, arXiv:2010.16080 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [40]

    A. I. Nikishov, Pair production by a constant external field, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.57, 1210 (1969)

    1969

  32. [41]

    Tanji, Quark pair creation in color electric fields and effects of magnetic fields, Annals Phys.325, 2018 (2010), arXiv:1002.3143 [hep-ph]

    N. Tanji, Quark pair creation in color electric fields and effects of magnetic fields, Annals Phys.325, 2018 (2010), arXiv:1002.3143 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  33. [42]

    G. C. Nayak, Non-perturbative quark-antiquark pro- duction from a constant chromo-electric field via the Schwinger mechanism, Phys. Rev. D72, 125010 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0510052

    2005 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Gyulassy and A

    M. Gyulassy and A. Iwazaki, QUARK AND GLUON PAIR PRODUCTION IN SU(N) COV ARIANT CON- STANT FIELDS, Phys. Lett. B165, 157 (1985)

    1985

  35. [44]

    I. A. Batalin, S. G. Matinyan, and G. K. Savvidy, Vacuum Polarization by a Source-Free Gauge Field, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.26, 214 (1977)

    1977

  36. [45]

    L. S. Brown and W. L. Weisberger, Vacuum polarization in uniform non-Abelian gauge fields, Nuclear Physics B 157, 285 (1979)

    1979

  37. [46]

    Schr¨ ock and H

    M. Schr¨ ock and H. Vogt, Coulomb, Landau and maximally Abelian gauge fixing in lattice QCD with multi-GPUs, Computer Physics Communications184, 1907 (2013), arXiv:1212.5221 [hep-lat]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Avramescu, V

    D. Avramescu, V. B˘ aran, V. Greco, A. Ipp, D. I. M¨ uller, and M. Ruggieri, Simulating jets and heavy quarks in the Glasma using the colored particle-in-cell method, Physical Review D107, 114021 (2023), arXiv:2303.05599 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Schenke, P

    B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Event-by- event gluon multiplicity, energy density and eccentricities at RHIC and LHC, Physical Review C86, 034908 (2012), arXiv:1206.6805 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [49]

    M¨ uller,Simulations of the Glasma in 3+1D, Ph.D

    D. M¨ uller,Simulations of the Glasma in 3+1D, Ph.D. thesis, Technischen Universitat Wien (2020), arXiv:1904.04267 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [50]

    C. Loizides, Glauber predictions for oxygen and neon collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Physical Review C113, 014914 (2026), arXiv:2507.05853 [nucl-th]

    2026

  42. [51]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei, Phys. Rev. D49, 2233 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9309289

    1994 arXiv

  43. [52]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Gluon distribu- tion functions for very large nuclei at small transverse momentum, Phys. Rev. D49, 3352 (1994), arXiv:hep- ph/9311205

    1994

  44. [53]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Green’s functions in the color field of a large nucleus, Phys. Rev. D50, 2225 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9402335

    1994 arXiv

  45. [54]

    ALICE Collaboration, Centrality dependence of charged- particle pseudorapidity density at midrapidity in Pb-Pb 7 collisions at s NN = 5.36 TeV (2025), arXiv:2504.02505 [nucl-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  46. [55]

    C. M. S. Collaboration, Centrality dependence of charged- hadron pseudorapidity distributions in oxygen-oxygen collisions at$ \sqrt{s \mathrm{NN}}$= 5.36 TeV (2026), arXiv:2606.02285 [nucl-ex]

    2026 arXiv

  47. [56]

    ALICE Collaboration, Centrality Dependence of the Charged-Particle Multiplicity Density at Midrapidity in Pb-Pb Collisions at s NN = 5.02 TeV, Physical Review Letters116, 222302 (2016), arXiv:1512.06104 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [57]

    ALICE Collaboration, Centrality Dependence of the Charged-Particle Multiplicity Density at Midrapidity in Pb-Pb Collisions at s NN = 2.76 TeV, Physical Review Letters106, 032301 (2011), arXiv:1012.1657 [nucl-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Dumitru and Y

    A. Dumitru and Y. Nara, Numerical simulation of non- Abelian particle-field dynamics, The European Physical Journal A29, 65 (2006)

    2006

  50. [59]

    Elze and U

    H.-T. Elze and U. Heinz, Quark-Gluon Transport Theory, Physics Reports183, 81 (1989)

    1989

  51. [60]

    Yang, Quantum kinetic theory for spin transport of quarks with background chromo-electromagnetic fields, JHEP06, 140, arXiv:2112.14392 [hep-ph]

    D.-L. Yang, Quantum kinetic theory for spin transport of quarks with background chromo-electromagnetic fields, JHEP06, 140, arXiv:2112.14392 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  52. [61]

    Hidaka, S

    Y. Hidaka, S. Pu, Q. Wang, and D.-L. Yang, Foundations and applications of quantum kinetic theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127, 103989 (2022), arXiv:2201.07644 [hep- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [62]

    S. B. Cabodevila, C. A. Salgado, and B. Wu, Quark production and thermalization of the quark-gluon plasma, JHEP06, 145, arXiv:2311.07450 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  54. [63]

    Barrera Cabodevila, X

    S. Barrera Cabodevila, X. Du, C. A. Salgado, and B. Wu, Quark production in the bottom-up thermaliza- tion, Physics Letters B871, 139987 (2025)

    2025

  55. [64]

    Tsallis, Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics, J

    C. Tsallis, Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics, J. Statist. Phys.52, 479 (1988)

    1988

  56. [65]

    Plumberg, D

    C. Plumberg, D. Almaalol, T. Dore, D. Mroczek, J. S. S. Mart ´ ın, W. M. Serenone, L. Spychalla, P. Carzon, M. D. Sievert, F. G. Gardim, and J. Noronha-Hostler, BSQ Conserved Charges in Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics solved with Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (2024), arXi...

    2024 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Kumar, B

    A. Kumar, B. M¨ uller, and D.-L. Yang, Spin polarization and correlation of quarks from the glasma, Phys. Rev. D 107, 076025 (2023), arXiv:2212.13354 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Kumar, B

    A. Kumar, B. M¨ uller, and D.-L. Yang, Spin alignment of vector mesons by glasma fields, Phys. Rev. D108, 016020 (2023), arXiv:2304.04181 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Yang, Transverse and longitudinal spin alignment from color fields in heavy ion collisions, Phys

    D.-L. Yang, Transverse and longitudinal spin alignment from color fields in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D111, 056005 (2025), arXiv:2411.14822 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  60. [69]

    H. Sung, B. M¨ uller, and D.-L. Yang, Local spin po- larization by color-field correlators and momentum anisotropy, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol.5, 100311 (2026), arXiv:2507.23210 [hep-ph]

    2026

  61. [70]

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Global polarization of Λ and Λ¯hyperons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=19.6 and 27 GeV, Phys. Rev. C108, 014910 (2023), arXiv:2305.08705 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Hattori and X.-G

    K. Hattori and X.-G. Huang, Novel quantum phenomena induced by strong magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Sci. Tech.28, 26 (2017), arXiv:1609.00747 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Matsuda, K

    H. Matsuda, K. Hattori, and K. Murase, Achieving angular-momentum conservation with physics-informed neural networks in computational relativistic spin hydro- dynamics (2025)

    2025

  64. [73]

    S. K. Singh, R. Ryblewski, and W. Florkowski, Spin dynamics with realistic hydrodynamic background for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Physical Review C111, 024907 (2025), arXiv:2411.08223 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Crameri, G

    F. Crameri, G. E. Shephard, and P. J. Heron, The misuse of colour in science communication, Nature Communica- tions11, 5444 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.