Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Classifying Exoplanet Candidates with Convolutional Neural Networks: Application to the Next Generation Transit Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.11109 v1 pith:I2VTNZT6 submitted 2019-07-25 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Classifying Exoplanet Candidates with Convolutional Neural Networks: Application to the Next Generation Transit Survey

classification astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM
keywords candidatesdatanetworkneuraltransitconvolutionalexoplanetflagged
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vetting of exoplanet candidates in transit surveys is a manual process, which suffers from a large number of false positives and a lack of consistency. Previous work has shown that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) provide an efficient solution to these problems. Here, we apply a CNN to classify planet candidates from the Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS). For training datasets we compare both real data with injected planetary transits and fully-simulated data, as well as how their different compositions affect network performance. We show that fewer hand labelled lightcurves can be utilised, while still achieving competitive results. With our best model, we achieve an AUC (area under the curve) score of $(95.6\pm{0.2})\%$ and an accuracy of $(88.5\pm{0.3})\%$ on our unseen test data, as well as $(76.5\pm{0.4})\%$ and $(74.6\pm{1.1})\%$ in comparison to our existing manual classifications. The neural network recovers 13 out of 14 confirmed planets observed by NGTS, with high probability. We use simulated data to show that the overall network performance is resilient to mislabelling of the training dataset, a problem that might arise due to unidentified, low signal-to-noise transits. Using a CNN, the time required for vetting can be reduced by half, while still recovering the vast majority of manually flagged candidates. In addition, we identify many new candidates with high probabilities which were not flagged by human vetters.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.