Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

EFT-Ramses: a code to simulate the effective field theory of dark energy

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Pith's one-line read One master Vainshtein equation lets a single N-body code simulate many dark-energy and modified-gravity models.

desk verdict Solid infrastructure paper: one master Vainshtein solver plus public code and multi-model P(k) checks; the large-scale linear mismatch is real but not cleanly proven physical, and novelty is moderate given the ECOSMOG lineage and a parallel release. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24940 v1 pith:I373WXWP submitted 2026-07-27 astro-ph.CO gr-qcphysics.comp-ph

classification astro-ph.COgr-qcphysics.comp-ph
keywords effectivefieldtheoryofdarkenergyN-bodysimulationsVainshteinscreeningmodifiedgravityHorndeskimatterpowerspectrumcubicGalileonDGP
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Stage-IV surveys will map cosmic structure so precisely that background expansion alone cannot tell dynamical dark energy from modified gravity. The authors therefore built EFT-RAMSES, an extension of an existing adaptive-mesh N-body code that embeds the effective field theory of dark energy. Diverse scalar- and vector-tensor theories are reduced to one master Vainshtein equation controlled by three time-dependent coefficients. High-resolution runs of normal-branch DGP, cubic Galileon, generalised cubic covariant Galileon and generic EFT models recover the expected screening turnover and match legacy and independent codes to roughly one-to-two percent on nonlinear scales. The result is a single, publicly available engine that can specialise to many models without rewriting the solver, ready for precision tests with forthcoming survey data.

What carries the argument

The master Vainshtein equation: a single nonlinear elliptic equation for the scalar-field perturbation, written in code units, whose model-specific content is entirely encoded in three time-dependent coefficients α, β and R_c².

What would settle it

Run the same initial conditions with a solver that retains the dropped time derivatives or the M_4^{2} operator; if the nonlinear matter power spectrum then differs from EFT-RAMSES by more than the claimed one-to-two percent on the scales validated here, the master-equation reduction is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By consolidating the normal and self-accelerating DGP branches, cubic scalar and vector Galileons, the generalised cubic covariant Galileon and generic EFT parameterisations into a single master Vainshtein equation whose physics is carried by three time-dependent background functions, EFT-RAMSES produces nonlinear matter power spectra that agree with both its parent code and an independent approximate code while correctly recovering Vainshtein screening.

Load-bearing premise

The quasi-static and weak-field approximations drop all time derivatives of the scalar and metric perturbations, so the equations never see dark-energy sound-speed operators and cannot describe models in which dark energy itself clusters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single public code base can generate nonlinear predictions for nDGP, cubic Galileons, GCCG and generic α-basis EFT models without model-specific solvers.
  • Background expansion and fifth-force effects can be cleanly separated by comparing full runs against QCDM counterparts that share the same expansion history.
  • The same pipeline can produce halo mass functions and weak-lensing maps deep into the nonlinear regime for Stage-IV survey forecasts.
  • Parameter-space scans over α_M and α_B become feasible because only the three background coefficients need updating.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once the quasi-static restriction is lifted, the same master-equation architecture could be reused for clustering dark-energy models that current Stage-IV analyses may need.
  • The observed large-scale power suppression relative to linear theory, shown to be driven by nonlinear mode coupling, may itself become a diagnostic of Vainshtein-type screening in survey data.
  • Vector-tensor models already covered by the master equation open a route to testing whether longitudinal vector modes leave distinct nonlinear signatures compared with pure scalar Galileons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The authors present EFT-RAMSES, an extension of the ECOSMOG/RAMSES N-body code that embeds the EFTofDE framework (in both the original EFT-function and α-basis parameterisations) into a single "master" Vainshtein equation (Eq. 27) with three time-dependent coefficients (α, β, R_c²). Under the quasi-static and weak-field approximations, this one equation covers nDGP/sDGP, cubic scalar and vector Galileons, GCCG, and generic EFT models, so a single multigrid Newton–Gauss–Seidel solver serves all of them. The code is validated with 1024³-particle, 1 Gpc/h simulations of nDGP, csG, GCCG, and two EFT models, compared against legacy ECOSMOG-V, an independent GCCG ECOSMOG variant, and the independent HiCOLA code, finding ~1–2% agreement on nonlinear scales and the expected Vainshtein screening turnover. A persistent ~1% scale-independent suppression relative to linear theory at k≲0.05 h/Mpc is interpreted in Appendix A as physical mode-coupling driven by the nonlinear Vainshtein term, based on diagnostics that rescale R_c² and vary relaxation parameters.

Significance. If the validation holds, this is a useful and timely tool: a publicly released, model-agnostic nonlinear solver for the full class of Vainshtein-screening Horndeski theories, which removes the need to hard-code model-specific scalar-field equations and is directly relevant to Stage-IV survey modelling. Strengths worth naming: the master-equation reduction (Eqs. 27–28) is a genuine reparameterisation validated against independent solvers rather than against quantities derived from itself; the validation is multi-code (legacy ECOSMOG-V, an independent GCCG ECOSMOG implementation, HiCOLA) and multi-redshift; QCDM counterpart runs cleanly separate background-expansion from fifth-force effects; the csG comparison uses paired inverted-phase ICs to control sample variance; and the code is publicly available. The explicit treatment of the cvG→csG limit (§3.2.4) and the EFT-basis mappings (Eqs. 62–64) add to the paper's usefulness as a reference.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.3.1 and Appendix A (Figs. A1–A2)] The ~1% scale-independent suppression at k≲0.05 h/Mpc relative to linear theory is asserted to be 'inherent mode-coupling' and the text states the authors 'can confidently rule out it as a code error'. The evidence shown does not support that confidence. The Appendix A diagnostic rescales R_c² and shows the mismatch tracks the strength of the nonlinear term; but a discretization error in the operator-split finite-difference representation of (∇²φ)²−(∂i∂jφ)² (the Chan & Scoccimarro splitting inherited from ECOSMOG-V) would also scale with R_c² at leading order, so this test cannot distinguish continuum mode-coupling from a term-proportional mesh error. The codes exhibiting the effect (legacy ECOSMOG-V, EFT-RAMSES, ecosmog-eft, mg-glam) all share the grid-relaxation/operator-splitting algorithm class, while the one fully independent code, HiCOLA, does not show the anomaly — a fact the pape
  2. [§4.3.1, Fig. 1 discussion] The mismatch of the longest-wavelength (lowest-k) mode is attributed to 'some version difference that affects the new and old ΛCDM runs, where EFT-RAMSES shows a better behaviour.' This is too vague for a validation paper: the ΛCDM runs should be the most trivially reproducible part of the comparison, and an unexplained discrepancy in the baseline undermines confidence in the ratios built on it. Please identify the cause (IC generator difference — MPGRAFIC vs 2LPTic is a candidate given Table 1 —, background integration, or binning) and state it explicitly.
minor comments (8)
  1. [§3.2.3] Equations (36)–(38) for the cvG model duplicate the equation numbers already used for the nDGP parameters in §3.2.2 (Eqs. 36–38). This is a numbering error that will confuse readers; please renumber.
  2. [§1, final paragraph] The description of Section 4 is duplicated verbatim ('Section 4 details our computational methodology, outlining the architecture...'). One of the two sentences should be removed or rewritten.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] Typo: 'the csG (red)z and QCDM (orange) models' — stray 'z'.
  4. [§4.1] Typo: 'the first efficientlympi parallelised N-body simulation code' — 'efficientlympi' should be 'efficiently MPI-parallelised'.
  5. [§1] 'the Large Survey of Space Telescope (Collaboration 2012)' should read 'the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)'.
  6. [§2.3] The statement that the validity of the combined QSA+WFA 'has been firmly established by previous counterpart works that successfully benchmarked these approximations against full, un-approximated dynamical simulations' is given without citations at that point; please cite the specific benchmarking studies (e.g., Winther & Ferreira 2015; Barreira et al. 2013b are cited only later, in §5).
  7. [§5 / Data Availability] The conclusions quote a 1–2% bound on nonlinear-scale deviations, but the figures show only qualitative agreement; a short quantitative statement (e.g., maximum fractional residual between EFT-RAMSES and each comparator over a stated k-range) would make the headline number verifiable. Also, given that the code is public, consider depositing the power-spectrum data in a public repository rather than 'upon request'.
  8. [Table 1] All models except csG use a single realisation. Since code-to-code comparisons use identical ICs this is acceptable, but the linear-theory comparisons at low k (the basis for the Appendix A anomaly claim) are subject to sample variance for the single-realisation models; a caveat to this effect would be appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: master equation is a genuine reparameterisation; validations include independent HiCOLA and linear theory, not quantities forced by construction.

full rationale

EFT-RAMSES is a numerical-methods paper. The load-bearing derivation (Horndeski/EFT under QSA → N-body equation Eqs. 19–21 → master Vainshtein equation Eqs. 27–28 with coefficients α, β, R_c²) is an algebraic reparameterisation of known field equations into a single solver form; the coefficients are fixed by each model’s background functions, not fitted to the comparison spectra. Validation P(k) ratios are compared to legacy ECOSMOG, an independent approximate code (HiCOLA), and linear growth factors—none of which are defined from the same fit as the outputs. Self-citations are to the parent ECOSMOG multigrid/AMR infrastructure being extended, which is normal for a code paper and is cross-checked externally. The Appendix A large-scale mismatch vs linear theory is a correctness/interpretation issue (shared-lineage artifact vs physical mode-coupling), not a circular reduction of a claimed prediction to its inputs. Score 1 only for mild intra-family validation weight; central claim remains independently contentful.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The result is a numerical methods paper. Load-bearing content is standard GR+Horndeski/EFT machinery, the quasi-static reduction, GW170817-motivated α_T=0, neglect of M₄², tracker backgrounds for Galileons, and the code-unit master-equation rewrite. No new physical entity is postulated; free parameters are user-chosen model inputs for the validation runs, not fitted to manufacture agreement.

free parameters (5)
  • Ω_rc (nDGP crossover) = 0.25
    Chosen validation value Ω_rc=0.25 in Table 1; sets fifth-force strength and R_c² for nDGP runs.
  • c_B (EFT braiding amplitude) = ±1.0
    User coefficient in α_B=c_B Ω_DE(a); set to ±1 for EFTP/EFTN demonstration runs.
  • w0, wa (CPL dark-energy EoS) = w0=-1.0, wa=-0.2
    Background EFT expansion parameters in Table 1; fixed to (-1.0, -0.2) for the EFT examples.
  • s, q (GCCG parameters) = s=0.649, q=1.061
    Background and braiding parameters for GCCG validation (s=0.649, q=1.061).
  • f_φ, β̃_3 (cvG/csG) = f_φ=1 (csG); β̃_3 tiny for csG limit
    Scalar fraction and cubic vector coupling; csG recovered as β̃_3→0 (e.g. 1e-6) with f_φ=1 in the csG runs.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Quasi-static and weak-field approximations: |∂_i δQ| ≫ |δQ̇| ~ |H δQ| and neglect of first-derivative and time-derivative perturbation terms in the scalar EoM.
    Section 2.3; required to close the N-body equation without M₄² and without full time-dependent scalar dynamics.
  • domain assumption α_T = 0 from GW170817, so G_{4X}=G_5=0 and only generalised cubic Galileon operators remain.
    Sections 2.1–2.2; truncates Horndeski to the class the master equation covers.
  • domain assumption Dark-energy clustering operator M₄² is negligible (c_s ~ c); N-body equations fully fixed by α_M, α_B and background.
    Explicitly stated after Eqs. 20–21 and in conclusions; defines the scope of EFT-RAMSES.
  • domain assumption Background functions K, G3, G4 are not strongly nonlinear, so coefficients may be evaluated on the homogeneous background (δφ ≪ φ̄).
    Paragraph after Eq. 24; fails for clustering DE with highly nonlinear G3.
  • domain assumption Galileon models follow tracker solutions that fix c2, c3 (or equivalent) from cosmological parameters.
    Section 3.2.4 (csG) and 3.2.6 (GCCG); removes extra free functions for the validation models.
  • domain assumption Longitudinal vector mode dominates cvG clustering; transverse modes negligible, allowing map onto scalar master equation.
    Section 3.2.3, citing Becker et al. 2020a.
  • standard math Standard FLRW Newtonian-gauge perturbation theory and Horndeski/EFT operator dictionary (Bellini & Sawicki; Gleyzes et al.).
    Sections 2.1–2.2; background literature assumed throughout.
invented entities (1)
  • Master Vainshtein equation (Eq. 27) with coefficients α, β, R_c² independent evidence
    purpose: Single discrete nonlinear PDE that specialises to nDGP, sDGP, csG, cvG, GCCG and generic EFT by changing only background functions.
    Not a new physical field; it is a code-oriented rewrite of the already-derived N-body equation (19–21). Independent evidence is the cross-code power-spectrum agreement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EFT-Ramses: a code to simulate the effective field theory of dark energy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I373WXWP

@misc{pith2026260724940,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EFT-Ramses: a code to simulate the effective field theory of dark energy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I373WXWP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24940}
}
abstract

While the standard $\Lambda$CDM paradigm is in excellent agreement with most current cosmological observations, theoretical challenges surrounding the cosmological constant ($\Lambda$) have strongly motivated the exploration of dynamical dark energy (DE) and modified gravity (MG) models. Investigating the physical nature of the cosmic acceleration requires N-body simulations to probe the non-linear growth of cosmic structure and prepare for the high-precision data from Stage-IV surveys. In this paper, we present EFT-RAMSES, a comprehensive extension of the ECOSMOG cosmological simulation code designed to explore non-linear structure formation in DE and MG scenarios. We embed the effective field theory of dark energy (EFTofDE) framework into this new numerical pipeline, utilising the $\alpha$-basis parameterisation to provide a versatile, model-agnostic, computational engine. By consolidating diverse scalar and vector-tensor theories---including the normal and self-accelerating Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) models, cubic Galileons (cubic scalar Galileon (csG), cubic vector Galileon (cvG) and generalised cubic covariant Galileon (GCCG)), and generic effective field theory (EFT) parameterisation---into a single "master" Vainshtein equation, this pipeline bypasses the need for model-specific solvers and easily specialises to any particular model. As validations, we perform high-resolution N-body simulations for the normal-branch DGP (nDGP), csG, GCCG, and EFT models, comparing the resulting matter power spectra against dependent and independent codes such as legacy ECOSMOG and HiCOLA, as well as linear theory, and find excellent agreement. EFT-RAMSES provides a robust and versatile computational tool for precision cosmological tests of DE and MG using upcoming cosmological surveys. The code is available for download from the GitHub EFT-RAMSES repository.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24940 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. presents the non-linear matter power spectrum (top panel) and its enhancement relative to the ΛCDM baseline (bottom panel), for the nDGP model, at three distinct redshifts: 𝑧 = 1.0, 0.5, and 0). We compare eft-ramses (dashed lines) against an older, established version of the ecosmog-V (solid lines) code. The latter differs from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The fractional enhancement of the non-linear matter power spec￾trum at 𝑧 = 0 for the csG (red)z and QCDM (orange) models. The solid lines denote the eft-ramses simulations, which have been averaged over two inverted-phase realisations to suppress sample variance at low 𝑘. The dashed lines show the predictions from the HiCOLA code for comparison. The dotted horizontal lines indicate the linear-theory expectations bas… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the non-linear matter power spectra at 𝑧 = 0 for the QCDM and GCCG cosmologies. The ecosmog-QCDM and ecosmog￾GCCG data are preliminary results from work in preparation by Atayde et al. (2026). Top panel: The absolute matter power spectra, 𝑃(𝑘). To improve visual clarity and prevent overlapping, the QCDM curves have been artificially shifted downward by a decade (×10−1 ). The outputs from ecosmog (thin … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The fractional enhancement of the non-linear matter power spectrum for the EFT and QCDM models relative to the ΛCDM counterpart. Results are shown across three redshifts: 𝑧 = 1.0 (blue), 𝑧 = 0.5 (green), and 𝑧 = 0.0 (red). The left panel displays the EFTP model (𝑐B = 1…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The fractional enhancement of the non-linear matter power spectrum for the EFT model relative to the QCDM counterpart. Results are shown across three redshifts: 𝑧 = 1.0 (blue), 𝑧 = 0.5 (green), and 𝑧 = 0.0 (red). The left panel displays the EFTP model (𝑐B = 1.0), which…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. N-body Simulations of Large-Scale Structure in the Generalized Cubic Covariant Galileon Model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the GCCG modified-gravity model, late-time structure formation is enhanced by up to about 7 percent at z=0, and the fast halo-model reaction method matches simulations to percent level on mildly nonlinear scales.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

260 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alestas, George and Antoniou, Savvas and Perivolaropoulos, Leandros , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , doi =. 2309.15781 , archivePrefix =

  2. [3]

    Mlapm - a c code for cosmological simulations

    Knebe, Alexander and Green, Andrew and Binney, James. Mlapm - a c code for cosmological simulations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04532.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0103503

  3. [4]

    Structure Formation by Fifth Force I: N-Body vs

    Li, Baojiu and Zhao, Hongsheng. Structure Formation by Fifth Force I: N-Body vs. Linear Simulations. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.044027. arXiv:0906.3880

  4. [5]

    Astrophys

    Structure Formation by Fifth Force: Power Spectrum from N-Body Simulations. Astrophys. J. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/712/2/L179 , archivePrefix =. 0910.3207 , primaryClass =

  5. [6]

    , keywords =

    Structure formation by the fifth force: Segregation of baryons and dark matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.104047 , archivePrefix =. 1001.3152 , primaryClass =

  6. [7]

    N-body Simulations for f(R) Gravity using a Self-adaptive Particle-Mesh Code

    Zhao, Gong-Bo and Li, Baojiu and Koyama, Kazuya. N-body Simulations for f(R) Gravity using a Self-adaptive Particle-Mesh Code. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044007. arXiv:1011.1257

  7. [8]

    N-Body Simulations for Coupled Scalar Field Cosmology

    Li, Baojiu and Barrow, John D. N-Body Simulations for Coupled Scalar Field Cosmology. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024007. arXiv:1005.4231

  8. [9]

    Astrophys

    N-body Simulations for Extended Quintessence Models. Astrophys. J. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/109 , archivePrefix =. 1009.1400 , primaryClass =

Show all 260 references
  1. [10]

    Nonlinear Structure Formation with the Environmentally Dependent Dilaton

    Brax, Philippe and van de Bruck, Carsten and Davis, Anne-Christine and Li, Baojiu and Shaw, Douglas J. Nonlinear Structure Formation with the Environmentally Dependent Dilaton. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.104026. arXiv:1102.3692

  2. [11]

    and Winther, Hans A

    Davis, Anne-Christine and Li, Baojiu and Mota, David F. and Winther, Hans A. Structure Formation in the Symmetron Model. Astrophys. J. 2012. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/61. arXiv:1108.3081

  3. [12]

    and Li, Baojiu

    Becker, Christoph and Eggemeier, Alexander and Davies, Christopher T. and Li, Baojiu. Proca-stinated cosmology. Part II. Matter, halo, and lensing statistics in the vector Galileon. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/014. arXiv:2011.01719

  4. [13]

    Vainshtein

    A.I. Vainshtein. To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass. Physics Letters B. 1972. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(72)90147-5

  5. [14]

    A new multiprobe analysis of modified gravity and evolving dark energy , year =

    Lu, Zhiyu and Simon, Th. A new multiprobe analysis of modified gravity and evolving dark energy , year =. 2511.10616 , archivePrefix =

  6. [15]

    and others , collaboration =

    Riess, Adam G. and others , collaboration =. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant , journal =. 1998 , doi =. astro-ph/9805201 , archivePrefix =

  7. [18]

    2025 , month =

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations , journal =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 , eprint =

  8. [19]

    Bertschinger, Edmund and Zukin, Phillip , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2008 , doi =. 0801.2431 , archivePrefix =

  9. [20]

    Gubitosi, Giulia and Piazza, Federico and Vernizzi, Filippo , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , doi =. 1210.0201 , archivePrefix =

  10. [22]

    Pogosian, Levon and others , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2010 , doi =. 1002.2382 , archivePrefix =

  11. [23]

    Frusciante, Noemi and Perenon, Louis , title =. Phys. Rept. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 1907.03150 , archivePrefix =

  12. [24]

    Horndeski, Gregory Walter , title =. Int. J. Theor. Phys. , volume =. 1974 , doi =

  13. [25]

    Astrophys

    Ma, Chung-Pei and Bertschinger, Edmund , title =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. 1995 , doi =. astro-ph/9506072 , archivePrefix =

  14. [27]

    Andrade, Uendert and Capistrano, Abra. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae402 , eprint =

  15. [28]

    and Langlois, D

    Gleyzes, J. and Langlois, D. and Piazza, F. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2015 , doi =. 1408.1952 , archivePrefix =

  16. [29]

    and Papadomanolakis, G

    Frusciante, N. and Papadomanolakis, G. and Silvestri, A. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2016 , doi =. 1601.04064 , archivePrefix =

  17. [30]

    and Langlois, D

    Gleyzes, J. and Langlois, D. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =. 2015 , doi =. 1411.3712 , archivePrefix =

  18. [31]

    and others , title =

    Amendola, L. and others , title =. Living Rev. Rel. , volume =. 2018 , doi =. 1606.00180 , archivePrefix =

  19. [33]

    Kodama, Hideo and Sasaki, Misao , title =. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. , volume =. 1984 , doi =

  20. [34]

    Essential building blocks of dark energy , journal =

    Gleyzes, J. Essential building blocks of dark energy , journal =. 2013 , doi =. 1304.4840 , archivePrefix =

  21. [35]

    Lombriser, Lucas and Dalang, Charles and Kennedy, Joseph and Taylor, Andrew , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2019 , doi =. 1811.08460 , archivePrefix =

  22. [36]

    and Mirmelstein, M

    Carron, J. and Mirmelstein, M. M. and Lewis, A. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2022 , doi =. 2206.07783 , archivePrefix =

  23. [37]

    and others , title =

    Popovic, B. and others , title =. 2025 , eprint =

  24. [38]

    and Eifler, T

    Krause, E. and Eifler, T. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2017 , doi =. 1601.05779 , archivePrefix =

  25. [39]

    and Rogozenski, P

    Miranda, V. and Rogozenski, P. and Krause, E. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2021 , doi =. 2009.14241 , archivePrefix =

  26. [40]

    Sharma, R. K. and Lesgourgues, Julien , title =. 2025 , eprint =

  27. [41]

    and Poulin, V

    Simon, Th\'eo and Zhang, P. and Poulin, V. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2208.05929 , archivePrefix =

  28. [42]

    and Poulin, V

    Simon, Th\'eo and Zhang, P. and Poulin, V. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2210.14931 , archivePrefix =

  29. [43]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/057 , url =

    Yunhao Gao and Baojiu Li and Jie Wang , title =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/057 , url =

  30. [44]

    and Baugh, Carlton M

    Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Hellwing, Wojciech A. and Baugh, Carlton M. and Pascoli, Silvia , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , doi =. 1306.3219 , archivePrefix =

  31. [45]

    hi\_class: Horndeski in the Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System , journal =

    Zumalac. hi\_class: Horndeski in the Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System , journal =. 2017 , doi =. 1605.06102 , archivePrefix =

  32. [46]

    and Kopp, Michael and Padilla, Antonio and Saffin, Paul M

    Copeland, Edmund J. and Kopp, Michael and Padilla, Antonio and Saffin, Paul M. and Skordis, Constantinos , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2019 , doi =. 1810.08239 , archivePrefix =

  33. [47]

    and Jimenez, Raul and Verde, Licia , title =

    Bellini, Emilio and Cuesta, Antonio J. and Jimenez, Raul and Verde, Licia , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2016 , doi =. 1509.07816 , archivePrefix =

  34. [48]

    and Zumalac

    Alonso, David and Bellini, Emilio and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Zumalac. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2017 , doi =. 1610.09290 , archivePrefix =

  35. [49]

    Gleyzes, J. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2016 , doi =. 1509.02191 , archivePrefix =

  36. [50]

    Chudaykin, Anton and Kunz, Martin , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , doi =. 2407.02558 , archivePrefix =

  37. [51]

    Abbott, B. P. and others , collaboration =. Astrophys. J. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , doi =. 1710.05834 , archivePrefix =

  38. [53]

    and Komatsu, Eiichiro , title =

    Kreisch, Christina D. and Komatsu, Eiichiro , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2018 , doi =. 1712.02710 , archivePrefix =

  39. [55]

    Chevallier, Michel and Polarski, David , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =. 2001 , doi =. gr-qc/0009008 , archivePrefix =

  40. [56]

    , title =

    Linder, Eric V. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2003 , doi =. astro-ph/0208512 , archivePrefix =

  41. [58]

    and others , collaboration =

    Aghanim, N. and others , collaboration =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 1907.12875 , archivePrefix =

  42. [60]

    and others , collaboration =

    Abdul Karim, M. and others , collaboration =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2025 , doi =. 2503.14739 , archivePrefix =

  43. [61]

    and others , title =

    Bennett, Charles L. and others , title =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , volume =. 2013 , doi =. 1212.5225 , archivePrefix =

  44. [62]

    Aiola, Simone and others , collaboration =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 2007.07288 , archivePrefix =

  45. [63]

    Choi, Soonyeong and others , collaboration =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 2007.07289 , archivePrefix =

  46. [64]

    Astrophys

    Qu, Feng and others , collaboration =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2301.06219 , archivePrefix =

  47. [65]

    and others , collaboration =

    Madhavacheril, Mathew S. and others , collaboration =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2301.06254 , archivePrefix =

  48. [66]

    Balkenhol, Leonhard and others , collaboration =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2212.05642 , archivePrefix =

  49. [67]

    and others , title =

    Ross, Ashley J. and others , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2015 , doi =. 1409.3242 , archivePrefix =

  50. [68]

    Alam, Shadab and others , collaboration =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2021 , doi =. 2007.08991 , archivePrefix =

  51. [71]

    Amendola, Luca and Kunz, Martin and Sapone, Domenico , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2008 , doi =. 0704.2421 , archivePrefix =

  52. [72]

    and Linder, Eric V

    Daniel, Samuel F. and Linder, Eric V. and Smith, Tristan L. and Caldwell, Robert R. and Cooray, Asantha and Leauthaud, Alexie , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2010 , doi =. 1002.1962 , archivePrefix =

  53. [73]

    Scolnic, D. M. and others , title =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. 2018 , doi =. 1710.00845 , archivePrefix =

  54. [74]

    and others , collaboration =

    Akrami, Y. and others , collaboration =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 2007.04997 , archivePrefix =

  55. [75]

    and Mirmelstein, M

    Carron, J. and Mirmelstein, M. and Lewis, A. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2022 , doi =. 2206.07773 , archivePrefix =

  56. [76]

    and Lewis, A

    Carron, J. and Lewis, A. and Fabbian, G. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2022 , doi =. 2209.07395 , archivePrefix =

  57. [77]

    and others , title =

    Pellejero-Ibanez, M. and others , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2017 , doi =. 1607.03155 , archivePrefix =

  58. [78]

    Sabogal, M. A. and Nunes, R. C. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2025 , doi =. 2505.24465 , archivePrefix =

  59. [79]

    and others , title =

    Zhou, R. and others , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2309.06443 , archivePrefix =

  60. [80]

    and others , collaboration =

    Zhou, R. and others , collaboration =. Astron. J. , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2208.08515 , archivePrefix =

  61. [81]

    and Lesgourgues, J

    Audren, B. and Lesgourgues, J. and Benabed, K. and Prunet, S. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , doi =. 1210.7183 , archivePrefix =

  62. [82]

    and Lesgourgues, J

    Brinckmann, T. and Lesgourgues, J. , title =. Phys. Dark Univ. , volume =. 2019 , doi =. 1804.07261 , archivePrefix =

  63. [83]

    and others , collaboration =

    Abdul-Karim, M. and others , collaboration =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2025 , doi =. 2503.14738 , archivePrefix =

  64. [84]

    Astrophys

    Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

  65. [85]

    2012 , eprint=

    Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: Dark Energy Science Collaboration , author=. 2012 , eprint=

  66. [86]

    Abbott, B. P. and others , collaboration =. Astrophys. J. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , doi =. 1710.05833 , archivePrefix =

  67. [87]

    Abbott, T. M. C. and others , collaboration =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2026 , doi =. 2503.06712 , archivePrefix =

  68. [88]

    and others , collaboration =

    Aghanim, N. and others , collaboration =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 1807.06209 , archivePrefix =

  69. [89]

    Alimi, J. -M. and Fuzfa, A. and Rasera, Y. and Courtin, J. and Corasaniti, P. -S. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2010 , doi =. 0903.5490 , archivePrefix =

  70. [90]

    and Bellini, E

    Baker, T. and Bellini, E. and Ferreira, P. G. and Lagos, M. and Noller, J. and Sawicki, I. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , doi =. 1710.06394 , archivePrefix =

  71. [91]

    and Arnold, C

    Becker, C. and Arnold, C. and Li, B. and Heisenberg, L. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 2006.02422 , archivePrefix =

  72. [92]

    and Jimenez, R

    Bellini, E. and Jimenez, R. and Verde, L. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2015 , doi =. 1504.04341 , archivePrefix =

  73. [93]

    and Sawicki, I

    Bellini, E. and Sawicki, I. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2014 , doi =. 1404.3713 , archivePrefix =

  74. [94]

    and Sawicki, I

    Bellini, E. and Sawicki, I. and Zumalac\'arregui, M. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 1909.01828 , archivePrefix =

  75. [95]

    and others , title =

    Bellini, E. and others , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2018 , doi =. 1709.09135 , archivePrefix =

  76. [96]

    Bloomfield, J. K. and Flanagan, \'E. \'E. and Park, M. and Watson, S. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , doi =. 1211.7054 , archivePrefix =

  77. [97]

    and Tsedrik, M

    Bose, B. and Tsedrik, M. and Kennedy, J. and Lombriser, L. and Pourtsidou, A. and Taylor, A. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2210.01094 , archivePrefix =

  78. [98]

    and Koyama, K

    Brando, G. and Koyama, K. and Winther, H. A. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2303.09549 , archivePrefix =

  79. [99]

    Breton, M. -A. , title =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 2025 , doi =. 2407.13636 , archivePrefix =

  80. [100]

    Breton, M. -A. and Rasera, Y. and Taruya, A. and Lacombe, O. and Saga, S. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2019 , doi =. 1803.04294 , archivePrefix =

  81. [101]

    and Jaffe, A

    Colombi, S. and Jaffe, A. and Novikov, D. and Pichon, C. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2009 , doi =. 0811.0313 , archivePrefix =

  82. [102]

    and Vernizzi, F

    Creminelli, P. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , doi =. 1710.05877 , archivePrefix =

  83. [103]

    and Lewandowski, M

    Cusin, G. and Lewandowski, M. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  84. [104]

    and Pantiri, M

    de Boe, D. and Pantiri, M. and Ye, G. and Silvestri, A. , title =. 2026 , eprint =

  85. [105]

    and Gao, X

    Deffayet, C. and Gao, X. and Steer, D. A. and Zahariade, G. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =

  86. [106]

    and Papadomanolakis, G

    Frusciante, N. and Papadomanolakis, G. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  87. [107]

    and Perenon, L

    Frusciante, N. and Perenon, L. , title =. Phys. Rep. , volume =

  88. [108]

    and Langlois, D

    Gleyzes, J. and Langlois, D. and Piazza, F. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  89. [109]

    and Langlois, D

    Gleyzes, J. and Langlois, D. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =

  90. [110]

    and Piazza, F

    Gubitosi, G. and Piazza, F. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  91. [111]

    and Teyssier, R

    Guillet, T. and Teyssier, R. , title =. J. Comput. Phys. , volume =

  92. [112]

    Gupta, A. S. and Fiorini, B. and Baker, T. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  93. [113]

    and Adamek, J

    Hassani, F. and Adamek, J. and Kunz, M. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  94. [114]

    and Lombriser, L

    Hassani, F. and Lombriser, L. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =

  95. [115]

    Horndeski, G. W. , title =. Int. J. Theor. Phys. , volume =

  96. [116]

    Effective field theory of cosmic acceleration: An implementation in CAMB , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103530 , url =

  97. [117]

    , title =

    Langlois, D. , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =

  98. [118]

    and Mancarella, M

    Langlois, D. and Mancarella, M. and Noui, K. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  99. [119]

    and Noui, K

    Langlois, D. and Noui, K. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  100. [120]

    and Allen, L

    Levi, M. and Allen, L. E. and Raichoor, A. and others , title =. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. , volume =

  101. [121]

    and Challinor, A

    Lewis, A. and Challinor, A. and Lasenby, A. , title =. Astrophys. J. , volume =

  102. [122]

    and Zhao, G.-B

    Li, B. and Zhao, G.-B. and Koyama, K. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  103. [123]

    , title =

    Llinares, C. , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =

  104. [124]

    and Simon, T

    Lu, Z. and Simon, T. and Zhang, P. , title =. 2025 , eprint =

  105. [125]

    and Shapiro, P

    Martel, H. and Shapiro, P. R. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =

  106. [126]

    and Frusciante, N

    Moretti, T. and Frusciante, N. and Verza, G. and Pace, F. , title =. 2026 , eprint =

  107. [127]

    and Hassani, F

    Nouri-Zonoz, A. and Hassani, F. and Bellini, E. and Kunz, M. , title =. 2025 , eprint =

  108. [128]

    and Pichon, C

    Prunet, S. and Pichon, C. and Aubert, D. and others , title =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. , volume =

  109. [129]

    and Breton, M.-A

    Rasera, Y. and Breton, M.-A. and Corasaniti, P.-S. and others , title =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =

  110. [130]

    and Corasaniti, P.-S

    Rasera, Y. and Corasaniti, P.-S. and Alimi, J.-M. and others , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =

  111. [131]

    and Klypin, Anatoly and Prada, Francisco

    Ruan, Cheng-Zong and Hern \'a ndez-Aguayo, C \'e sar and Li, Baojiu and Arnold, Christian and Baugh, Carlton M. and Klypin, Anatoly and Prada, Francisco. Fast full N-body simulations of generic modified gravity: conformal coupling models. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2022. doi:...

  112. [132]

    and Klypin, Anatoly and Prada, Francisco

    Hern \'a ndez-Aguayo, C \'e sar and Ruan, Cheng-Zong and Li, Baojiu and Arnold, Christian and Baugh, Carlton M. and Klypin, Anatoly and Prada, Francisco. Fast full N-body simulations of generic modified gravity: derivative coupling models. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2022. doi...

  113. [133]

    Realistic simulations of galaxy formation in f(R) modified gravity

    Arnold, Christian and Leo, Matteo and Li, Baojiu. Realistic simulations of galaxy formation in f(R) modified gravity. Nature Astron. 2019. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0823-y. arXiv:1907.02977

  114. [134]

    Galaxy formation in the brane world I: overview and first results

    Hern \'a ndez-Aguayo, C \'e sar and Arnold, Christian and Li, Baojiu and Baugh, Carlton M. Galaxy formation in the brane world I: overview and first results. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab694. arXiv:2006.15467

  115. [135]

    Modified Gravity-GADGET: A new code for cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of modified gravity models

    Puchwein, Ewald and Baldi, Marco and Springel, Volker. Modified Gravity-GADGET: A new code for cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of modified gravity models. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2013. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1575. arXiv:1305.2418

  116. [136]

    and Winther, Hans A

    Llinares, Claudio and Mota, David F. and Winther, Hans A. ISIS: a new N-body cosmological code with scalar fields based on RAMSES. Code presentation and application to the shapes of clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 2014. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322412. arXiv:1307.6748

  117. [137]

    Systematic simulations of modified gravity: symmetron and dilaton models. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/10/002 , archivePrefix =. 1206.3568 , primaryClass =

  118. [138]

    and Li, Baojiu and Winther, Hans A

    Brax, Philippe and Davis, Anne-C. and Li, Baojiu and Winther, Hans A. and Zhao, Gong-Bo. Systematic simulations of modified gravity: chameleon models. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/04/029. arXiv:1303.0007

  119. [141]

    PySCo-EFT and ECOSMOG-EFT: a tandem of N-body simulation codes for the Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy , journal =

    Ganjoo, Himanish and Rasera, Yann and Bellini, Emilio and Breton, Michel-Andr. PySCo-EFT and ECOSMOG-EFT: a tandem of N-body simulation codes for the Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy , journal =. 2026 , eprint =

  120. [142]

    Matter power spectra in modified gravity: a comparative study of approximations and N-body simulations

    Bose, Benjamin and others. Matter power spectra in modified gravity: a comparative study of approximations and N-body simulations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2024. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2562. arXiv:2406.13667

  121. [143]

    and Pontzen, Andrew

    Angulo, Raul E. and Pontzen, Andrew. Cosmological N -body simulations with suppressed variance. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2016. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw098. arXiv:1603.05253

  122. [144]

    and Sen Gupta, Ashim and Baker, Tessa and Valogiannis, Georgios and Fiorini, Bartolomeo , year=

    Wright, Bill S. and Sen Gupta, Ashim and Baker, Tessa and Valogiannis, Georgios and Fiorini, Bartolomeo , year=. Hi-COLA: fast, approximate simulations of structure formation in Horndeski gravity , volume=. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/0...

  123. [145]

    S. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =

  124. [146]

    and Jain, B

    Sakstein, J. and Jain, B. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =

  125. [147]

    and Crocce, M

    Sefusatti, E. and Crocce, M. and Scoccimarro, R. and Couchman, H. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =

  126. [148]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement - A new high resolution code called RAMSES , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361:20011817", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011817", journal =

  127. [149]

    , title =

    Villaescusa-Navarro, F. , title =

  128. [150]

    Will, Clifford M. , year=. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment , volume=. Living Reviews in Relativity , publisher=. doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 , number=

  129. [151]

    Winther, H. A. and Ferreira, P. G. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =

  130. [152]

    Winther, H. A. and others , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =

  131. [153]

    Wright, B. S. and Sen Gupta, A. and Baker, T. and Valogiannis, G. and Fiorini, B. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  132. [154]

    and Yokoyama, S

    Yamauchi, D. and Yokoyama, S. and Tashiro, H. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =

  133. [155]

    Zumalac. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =

  134. [156]

    Zumalac. Phys. Rev. D , volume =

  135. [157]

    Riess, A. G. and others , title =. Astron. J. , volume =. 1998 , eprint =

  136. [158]

    , keywords =

    Measurements of and from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/307221 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9812133 , primaryClass =

  137. [159]

    and Peebles, P

    Ratra, B. and Peebles, P. J. E. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =

  138. [160]

    Ferreira, P. G. and Joyce, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1997 , eprint =

  139. [161]

    Copeland, E. J. and Liddle, A. R. and Wands, D. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1998 , eprint =

  140. [162]

    Caldwell, R. R. and Dave, R. and Steinhardt, P. J. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1998 , eprint =

  141. [163]

    and Wang, L

    Zlatev, I. and Wang, L. and Steinhardt, P. J. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1999 , eprint =

  142. [164]

    and Odintsov, S

    Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. , title =. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2007 , eprint =

  143. [165]

    Sotiriou, T. P. and Faraoni, V. , title =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2010 , eprint =

  144. [166]

    Armend. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 1999 , eprint =

  145. [167]

    and Okabe, T

    Chiba, T. and Okabe, T. and Yamaguchi, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2000 , eprint =

  146. [168]

    Generalized Galileons: All scalar models whose curved background extensions maintain second-order field equations and stress tensors , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.064015 , url =

  147. [169]

    Physics Letters B , keywords =

    4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00669-9 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0005016 , primaryClass =

  148. [170]

    and Shafer, D

    Huterer, D. and Shafer, D. L. , title =. Rep. Prog. Phys. , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

  149. [171]

    and others , title =

    Moresco, M. and others , title =. Living Rev. Rel. , volume =. 2022 , eprint =

  150. [172]

    ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER , volume=

    Chevallier, Michel and Polarski, David , year=. ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER , volume=. International Journal of Modern Physics D , publisher=. doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 , number=

  151. [173]

    Linder, E. V. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2003 , eprint =

  152. [174]

    Constraints on a new post-general relativity cosmological parameter , volume=

    Caldwell, Robert and Cooray, Asantha and Melchiorri, Alessandro , year=. Constraints on a new post-general relativity cosmological parameter , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.023507 , number=

  153. [175]

    and Kunz, M

    Amendola, L. and Kunz, M. and Sapone, D. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2008 , eprint =

  154. [176]

    and Piazza, F

    Gubitosi, G. and Piazza, F. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , eprint =

  155. [177]

    and Flanagan,

    Bloomfield, J. and Flanagan,. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , eprint =

  156. [178]

    and Langlois, D

    Gleyzes, J. and Langlois, D. and Piazza, F. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , eprint =

  157. [179]

    and Papadomanolakis, G

    Frusciante, N. and Papadomanolakis, G. and Silvestri, A. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2016 , eprint =

  158. [180]

    and Papadomanolakis, G

    Frusciante, N. and Papadomanolakis, G. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2017 , eprint =

  159. [181]

    and Lewandowski, M

    Cusin, G. and Lewandowski, M. and Vernizzi, F. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

  160. [182]

    and Nakamura, T

    Chiba, T. and Nakamura, T. , title =. 20th Texas Symposium on relativistic astrophysics , volume =. 2001 , publisher =

  161. [183]

    and Barrow, J

    Rubano, C. and Barrow, J. D. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2001 , eprint =

  162. [184]

    Gerke, B. F. and Efstathiou, G. , title =. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2002 , eprint =

  163. [185]

    , title =

    Zhang, X. , title =. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 2007 , eprint =

  164. [186]

    and Ma, D.-Z

    Wu, J.-P. and Ma, D.-Z. and Ling, Y. , title =. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 2008 , eprint =

  165. [187]

    and Mukherjee, A

    Sangwan, A. and Mukherjee, A. and Jassal, H. K. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

  166. [188]

    and Raveri, M

    Park, M. and Raveri, M. and Jain, B. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2021 , eprint =

  167. [189]

    and Odintsov, S

    Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. , title =. Gen. Rel. Grav. , volume =. 2006 , eprint =

  168. [190]

    and Nojiri, S

    Capozziello, S. and Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. , title =. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 2006 , eprint =

  169. [191]

    and Esposito-Far

    Boisseau, B. and Esposito-Far. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2000 , eprint =

  170. [192]

    and Odintsov, S

    Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. and Sami, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2006 , eprint =

  171. [193]

    and Elizalde, E

    Cognola, G. and Elizalde, E. and Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. and Zerbini, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2007 , eprint =

  172. [194]

    and Odintsov, S

    Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. , title =. Journal of Physics Conference Series , volume =. 2007 , publisher =. hep-th/0611071 , archivePrefix =

  173. [195]

    and Nesseris, S

    Capozziello, S. and Nesseris, S. and Perivolaropoulos, L. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2007 , eprint =

  174. [196]

    and Davis, A.-C

    Brax, P. and Davis, A.-C. and Li, B. , title =. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  175. [197]

    and Odintsov, S

    Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2006 , eprint =

  176. [198]

    Elizalde, E. and S. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , eprint =

  177. [199]

    and Khaledian, M

    Karami, K. and Khaledian, M. S. , title =. J. High Energy Phys. , volume =. 2011 , eprint =

  178. [200]

    and Goswami, R

    Carloni, S. and Goswami, R. and Dunsby, P. K. S. , title =. Class. Quant. Grav. , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  179. [201]

    Houndjo, M. J. S. , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  180. [202]

    and Momeni, D

    Jamil, M. and Momeni, D. and Raza, M. and Myrzakulov, R. , title =. Eur. Phys. J. C , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  181. [203]

    Singh, C. P. and Singh, V. , title =. Gen. Rel. Grav. , volume =

  182. [204]

    and Myrzakulov, R

    Elizalde, E. and Myrzakulov, R. and Obukhov, V. V. and S. Class. Quant. Grav. , volume =. 2010 , eprint =

  183. [205]

    and Rodrigues, M

    Hamani Daouda, M. and Rodrigues, M. E. and Houndjo, M. J. S. , title =. Eur. Phys. J. C , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  184. [206]

    Elkhateeb, E. A. , title =. Found. Phys. , volume =. 2024 , eprint =

  185. [207]

    , title =

    Tsujikawa, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2005 , eprint =

  186. [208]

    Sen, A. A. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2006 , eprint =

  187. [209]

    and Nojiri, S

    Matsumoto, J. and Nojiri, S. , title =. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 2010 , eprint =

  188. [210]

    Perkovi. Class. Quant. Grav. , volume =

  189. [211]

    , title =

    Zhang, X. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2006 , eprint =

  190. [212]

    and Zhang, X

    Zhang, J. and Zhang, X. and Liu, H. , title =. Mod. Phys. Lett. A , volume =. 2008 , eprint =

  191. [213]

    and Steinhardt, P

    Ijjas, A. and Steinhardt, P. J. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2016 , eprint =

  192. [214]

    Dobre, D. A. and Frolov, A. V. and G. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

  193. [215]

    and Cardona, W

    Arjona, R. and Cardona, W. and Nesseris, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2019 , eprint =

  194. [216]

    , title =

    Arjona, R. , title =. 2020 , eprint =

  195. [217]

    Bernardo, R. C. and Levi Said, J. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2021 , eprint =

  196. [218]

    , title =

    Nesseris, S. , title =. Universe , volume =. 2022 , eprint =

  197. [219]

    Bernardo, R. C. and Vega, I. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2019 , eprint =

  198. [220]

    , title =

    Herrera, R. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2020 , eprint =

  199. [221]

    and Myrzakul, S

    Sebastiani, L. and Myrzakul, S. and Myrzakulov, R. , title =. Eur. Phys. J. Plus , volume =. 2017 , eprint =

  200. [222]

    and Housset, M

    Herrera, R. and Housset, M. and Osses, C. and Videla, N. , title =. Phys. Dark Univ. , volume =. 2024 , eprint =

  201. [223]

    , title =

    Herrera, R. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

  202. [224]

    and Lombriser, L

    Kennedy, J. and Lombriser, L. and Taylor, A. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =

  203. [225]

    and Lombriser, L

    Kennedy, J. and Lombriser, L. and Taylor, A. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

  204. [226]

    and Lombriser, L

    Kennedy, J. and Lombriser, L. and Taylor, A. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2019 , eprint =

  205. [227]

    and Kennedy, J

    Renevey, C. and Kennedy, J. and Lombriser, L. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , eprint =

  206. [228]

    , title =

    Kobayashi, T. , title =. Rep. Prog. Phys. , volume =. 2019 , eprint =

  207. [229]

    Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , eprint =

  208. [230]

    and Jain, B

    Sakstein, J. and Jain, B. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , eprint =

  209. [231]

    Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251304 , url =

  210. [232]

    and Bellini, E

    Baker, T. and Bellini, E. and Ferreira, P. G. and Lagos, M. and Noller, J. and Sawicki, I. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , eprint =

  211. [233]

    and Sawicki, I

    Bellini, E. and Sawicki, I. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2014 , eprint =

  212. [234]

    and Raveri, M

    Hu, B. and Raveri, M. and Frusciante, N. and Silvestri, A. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2014 , eprint =

  213. [235]

    Zumalac. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2017 , eprint =

  214. [236]

    and Sawicki, I

    Bellini, E. and Sawicki, I. and Zumalac. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , eprint =

  215. [237]

    and Odintsov, S

    Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S. D. and Tsujikawa, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2005 , eprint =

  216. [238]

    and Koyama, K

    Clemson, T. and Koyama, K. and Zhao, G.-B. and Maartens, R. and V. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  217. [239]

    , title =

    Vikman, A. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2005 , eprint =

  218. [240]

    Caldwell, R. R. and Doran, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2005 , eprint =

  219. [241]

    and Cai, Y.-F

    Xia, J.-Q. and Cai, Y.-F. and Qiu, T.-T. and Zhao, G.-B. and Zhang, X. , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =. 2008 , eprint =

  220. [242]

    and Saridakis, E

    Cai, Y.-F. and Saridakis, E. N. and Setare, M. R. and Xia, J.-Q. , title =. Phys. Rep. , volume =. 2010 , eprint =

  221. [243]

    Abramo, L. R. and Pinto-Neto, N. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2006 , eprint =

  222. [244]

    and Rattazzi, R

    Nicolis, A. and Rattazzi, R. and Trincherini, E. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , eprint =

  223. [245]

    and Tsujikawa, S

    de Felice, A. and Tsujikawa, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2010 , eprint =

  224. [246]

    and Tsujikawa, S

    De Felice, A. and Tsujikawa, S. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  225. [247]

    and De Felice, A

    Giacomello, F. and De Felice, A. and Ansoldi, S. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2019 , eprint =

  226. [248]

    Phenomenology of the generalized cubic covariant Galileon model and cosmological bounds , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.064001 , url =

  227. [249]

    and Tsujikawa, S

    Kase, R. and Tsujikawa, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

  228. [250]

    and Benevento, G

    Peirone, S. and Benevento, G. and Frusciante, N. and Tsujikawa, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2019 , eprint =

  229. [251]

    and Pujol

    Deffayet, C. and Pujol. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2010 , eprint =

  230. [252]

    and Pascoli, Silvia , title =

    Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Baugh, Carlton M. and Pascoli, Silvia , title =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , abstract =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/059 , url =

  231. [253]

    and Davis, A.-C

    Brax, P. and Davis, A.-C. and Li, B. and Winther, H. A. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  232. [254]

    and Davis, A.-C

    Brax, P. and Davis, A.-C. and Li, B. and Winther, H. A. and Zhao, G.-B. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2012 , eprint =

  233. [255]

    and Davis, A.-C

    Brax, P. and Davis, A.-C. and Li, B. and Winther, H. A. and Zhao, G.-B. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , eprint =

  234. [256]

    and Raveri, M

    Hu, B. and Raveri, M. and Frusciante, N. and Silvestri, A. , title =. 2014 , journal =. 1405.3590 , archivePrefix =

  235. [257]

    Covariant Galileon , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084003 , url =

  236. [258]

    Atayde, Lu. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , eprint =

  237. [259]

    N-body simulations of large-scale structure in the generalized cubic covariant Galileon model , journal =

    Atayde, Lu. N-body simulations of large-scale structure in the generalized cubic covariant Galileon model , journal =. 2026 , eprint =

  238. [260]

    and Pascoli, Silvia

    Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Baugh, Carlton M. and Pascoli, Silvia. Spherical collapse in Galileon gravity: fifth force solutions, halo mass function and halo bias. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/056. arXiv:1308.3699

  239. [261]

    and Ferreira, Pedro G

    Winther, Hans A. and Ferreira, Pedro G. Vainshtein mechanism beyond the quasistatic approximation. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.064005. arXiv:1505.03539

  240. [262]

    How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity

    Moretti, Tommaso and Frusciante, Noemi and Verza, Giovanni and Pace, Francesco. How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity. Phys. Rev. D. 2026. doi:10.1103/nk9f-dw1z. arXiv:2601.05145

  241. [263]

    and Pichon, C

    Prunet, S. and Pichon, C. and Aubert, D. and Pogosyan, D. and Teyssier, R. and Gottloeber, S. Initial Conditions for Large Cosmological Simulations. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2008. doi:10.1086/590370. arXiv:0804.3536

  242. [264]

    and Pueblas, S

    Crocce, M. and Pueblas, S. and Scoccimarro, R. Transients from Initial Conditions in Cosmological Simulations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11040.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0606505

  243. [265]

    and Arnold, C

    Becker, C. and Arnold, C. and Li, B. and Heisenberg, L. , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =. 2007.03042 , archivePrefix =

  244. [266]

    Barreira, Alexandre and Bose, Sownak and Li, Baojiu , title =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. 2015 , doi =. 1511.08200 , archivePrefix =

  245. [267]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , issn =

    Li, Baojiu and Zhao, Gong-Bo and Koyama, Kazuya and Teyssier, Romain , title =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , issn =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/01/051 , url =

  246. [268]

    Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Baugh, Carlton and Pascoli, Silvia , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2012 , doi =. 1208.0600 , archivePrefix =

  247. [269]

    De Felice, Antonio and Tsujikawa, Shinji , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2011 , doi =. 1011.6132 , archivePrefix =

  248. [270]

    Oyaizu, Hiroaki and Lima, Marcos and Hu, Wayne , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , doi =. 0906.4548 , archivePrefix =

  249. [271]

    Zhao, Gong-Bo and Li, Baojiu and Koyama, Kazuya , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2013 , doi =. 1303.0008 , archivePrefix =

  250. [272]

    and Baugh, Carlton M

    Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Hellwing, Wojciech A. and Baugh, Carlton M. and Pascoli, Silvia , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2013 , doi =. 1308.3491 , archivePrefix =

  251. [273]

    Khoury, Justin and Wyman, Mark , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2009 , doi =. 0903.1292 , archivePrefix =

  252. [274]

    Generalization of the Proca Action. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , year = 2014, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/015 , archivePrefix =. 1402.7026 , primaryClass =

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.