Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Semantic Approach to Quantifying the Consistency of Diffusion Model Image Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.08799 v1 pith:I5AXVHDI submitted 2024-04-12 cs.CV cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords consistencysemanticmodelscorediffusiongenerationimagemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, we identify the need for an interpretable, quantitative score of the repeatability, or consistency, of image generation in diffusion models. We propose a semantic approach, using a pairwise mean CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) score as our semantic consistency score. We applied this metric to compare two state-of-the-art open-source image generation diffusion models, Stable Diffusion XL and PixArt-{\alpha}, and we found statistically significant differences between the semantic consistency scores for the models. Agreement between the Semantic Consistency Score selected model and aggregated human annotations was 94%. We also explored the consistency of SDXL and a LoRA-fine-tuned version of SDXL and found that the fine-tuned model had significantly higher semantic consistency in generated images. The Semantic Consistency Score proposed here offers a measure of image generation alignment, facilitating the evaluation of model architectures for specific tasks and aiding in informed decision-making regarding model selection.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Any-to-Any Models More Consistent Across Modality Transfers Than Specialists?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On the ACON benchmark, any-to-any models do not consistently beat specialist model pairs on cyclic consistency, but show weak latent-space consistency in equivariance tests.

Pith tools