Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Distribution of the Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix for chaotic cavities with absorption and coupled Coulomb gases

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the exact distribution of the Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix for chaotic cavities with uniform absorption, covering all symmetry classes and any absorption rate.

desk verdict Solid exact RMT result for the Wigner-Smith matrix with absorption, but the beta=1 coverage is proven only for even N and the abstract should say so. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01002 v2 pith:I7W24XQO submitted 2019-09-03 math-ph cond-mat.mes-hallmath.MPquant-ph

Aurélien Grabsch This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcond-mat.mes-hallmath.MPquant-ph MSC 15B5260B2081Q50
keywords Wigner-SmithmatrixtimedelaychaoticcavityrandomtheoryabsorptionCoulombgasWishart-Laguerredistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the full statistical distribution of the Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix, a Hermitian matrix that encodes how long waves spend inside a scattering cavity, when the cavity absorbs energy uniformly. The result covers the three symmetry classes (orthogonal, unitary, symplectic) and any absorption rate, and reduces to the known Wishart-Laguerre distribution in the zero-absorption limit. For broken time-reversal symmetry the distribution takes the compact form of a matrix integral; in the other classes the eigenvalues are governed by a joint distribution with an auxiliary integral. The paper also shows that, for many channels, the statistics are described by two coupled Coulomb gases, and uses this to compute the first cumulants of the Wigner time delay in the weak- and strong-absorption regimes.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two ingredients. First, absorption is modelled by $N_\phi$ fictitious channels with tunnel probability $T$, in the limit $N_\phi \to \infty$ with $N_\phi T = \gamma N$; this converts the absorbing cavity into a larger unitary scattering problem governed by the Poisson kernel. Second, for $\beta = 2$ the distribution of the reflection matrix is obtained by explicit integration over the unitary group, while for general $\beta$ the eigenvalue distribution follows from the known finite-$N$ reflection eigenvalue distribution of Jarosz, Vidal and Kanzieper. A change of variables $\Gamma = \gamma (1 - r^\dagger r)^{-1}$ then yields the time-delay distribution. For large $N$, the joint distribution is reinterpreted as two logarithmically repelling Coulomb gases on $[0,\gamma]$ and $[\gamma,\infty)$, with the inter-gas repulsion half as strong as the intra-gas repulsion, whose saddle-point equations are solved with Tricomi's theorem in the weak- and strong-absorption limits.

What would settle it

Simulate the scattering matrix of an absorbing chaotic cavity directly, for instance by drawing the unitary matrix from the Poisson kernel while including fictitious channels (or by an imaginary energy shift), and compare the empirical distribution of $\Gamma = (NQ)^{-1}$ for small $N$ (say $N=2$, $\beta=2$) with the integrated form of Eq. (56); a mismatch in the eigenvalue density would falsify the claimed exact distribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, for a chaotic cavity with uniform absorption rate $\gamma$ and $N$ perfectly coupled channels, the inverse time-delay matrix $\Gamma = (NQ)^{-1}$ has the distribution, for $\beta = 2$, $P(\Gamma) \propto e^{-N \operatorname{tr}\Gamma} \int_0^{\gamma 1_N} dT \det(1_N \otimes \Gamma - T \otimes 1_N) e^{-N \operatorname{tr}T}$, with $\Gamma > \gamma 1_N$. For the other symmetry classes, the joint distribution of the eigenvalues is given by an integral over $\beta N/2$ auxiliary variables $t_n \in [0,\gamma]$. These expressions extend the zero-absorption Wishart-Laguerre law of Brouwer, Frahm and Beenakker to arbitrary absorption, and imply that the eigenvalues of $\Gamma$ are bounded below by $\gamma$, so the proper time delays are bounded above by $1/(N\gamma)$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that a cavity with $N_\phi$ fictitious absorbing channels of tunnel probability $T$ reproduces a uniform absorption rate $\gamma$ in the limit $N_\phi \to \infty$ with $N_\phi T = \gamma N$; if that equivalence fails, the exact distributions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full distribution of the time-delay matrix (or its eigenvalues) is now known for any absorption rate, so all linear statistics of the proper time delays become computable at finite $N$.
  • The hard bound $\Gamma > \gamma 1_N$ means proper time delays cannot exceed $1/(N\gamma)$, quantifying how absorption eliminates long-lived resonances.
  • The Coulomb-gas description yields a large-deviation function for the Wigner time delay, producing the mean and variance in the weak- and strong-absorption limits and matching the known mean $\langle \tau_W \rangle = 1/(N(\gamma+1))$.
  • In the weak-absorption regime, all cumulants of the Wigner time delay can be expressed in terms of the cumulants at zero absorption via Eq. (85), extending earlier zero-absorption results.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The edge constraint $\Gamma > \gamma$ suggests that the density of eigenvalues of $\Gamma$ develops a universal edge behaviour at $\gamma$; checking this in a microwave-cavity experiment would be a direct test of the distribution.
  • For the orthogonal class with odd $N$, the paper leaves the distribution open; an inference is that a Pfaffian or a modified auxiliary ensemble may be needed, and the even-$N$ duality hints at a closed form waiting to be found.
  • The two-gas representation with unequal inter-gas repulsion may transfer to other random-matrix settings where two coupled spectral sets interact, such as eigenvalues above a threshold in Wishart matrices, with modified exponents; this could be tested numerically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper addresses the joint distribution of the Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix Q for a chaotic cavity with uniform absorption rate γ, perfectly coupled to N channels, within random matrix theory. Working with Γ = (NQ)^{-1}, the author derives for β = 2 an exact matrix-integral representation (Eq. (47)) and for β = 1, 2, 4 a joint eigenvalue distribution (Eq. (56)) by taking a fictitious-channel limit of the known reflection-eigenvalue distribution (Eq. (53)). The large-N analysis is recast as two interacting Coulomb gases, and saddle-point methods give the cumulants of the Wigner time delay in the weak- and strong-absorption limits (Eqs. (5), (6), (85)). The paper checks the γ → 0 Wishart-Laguerre limit, the strong-absorption limit, and the known N = 1 result.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, this is a significant contribution: it provides the first exact distribution of the full Wigner-Smith matrix for an absorbing chaotic cavity at arbitrary absorption, generalizing the zero-absorption result of Brouwer, Frahm and Beenakker. The β = 2 formula (47) is compact, and the Coulomb-gas treatment yields concrete predictions for cumulants of the Wigner time delay. The derivation is transparent and the consistency checks are convincing. The main caveat is the scope for β = 1: Eq. (56) is established only for even N because the input Eq. (53) has half-integer dimension for odd N; the abstract and Section 1.1 currently overstate the coverage.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract; §1.1; §2.2] The abstract and Section 1.1 claim, without qualification, that the joint eigenvalue distribution is derived for β = 1, 2, and 4. However, Eq. (56) is obtained from Eq. (53), whose integral dimension N_t = βN/2 is half-integer for β = 1 and odd N; the author acknowledges in Section 2.2 that the dimension N_t = N/2 restricts the number of channels to even numbers, and the Conclusion states that the odd-N β = 1 case remains open. Since β = 1 odd N includes the physically relevant single-channel case N = 1, the advertised claim is narrower than what is proven. Please qualify the abstract and Section 1.1 (for example, by stating that for β = 1 the result holds for even N) and explicitly note that odd-N β = 1 remains open.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (50)] The product over i < j in Eq. (50) appears to be a typographical error: it should read ∏_{i<j}(t_i - t_j)^2 ∏_{i,j=1}^N (Γ_i - t_j), rather than ∏_{i<j}((t_i - t_j)^2(Γ_i - t_j)), which omits most of the Γ-t cross terms and is inconsistent with the Andréief form in Eq. (51).
  2. [§1.1, Eq. (4)] Eq. (4) should carry the same even-N restriction for β = 1 as Eq. (56), or a footnote should point to Section 2.2 explaining that the integral dimension N_t = N/2 restricts the formula to even N in the orthogonal class.
  3. [§1.1, below Eq. (3)] There is a typo in the phrase introducing Eq. (3): 'Kroenecker' should be 'Kronecker'.
  4. [Eqs. (49)-(50)] The index convention is inconsistent in Eqs. (49)-(50): the eigenvalues of Γ are denoted Γ_n in the text but Γ_i appears in the integral over t; please make the notation uniform.
  5. [Conclusion] The sentence in the Conclusion that the derivation covers 'most situations' is vague; please specify there that the β = 1 odd-channel case is excluded, matching the caveat in Section 2.2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central distributions are derived from the Poisson kernel and from independent published reflection-eigenvalue results, not from the target claim.

full rationale

The beta=2 result, Eq. (47), follows from the reflection-matrix distribution Eq. (45), which is obtained by integrating the Poisson kernel Eq. (9) over the fictitious channels and taking N_phi -> infinity with N_phi T = gamma N, followed by the change of variables Gamma = (N Q)^{-1} (Eq. (46)). The inputs are the standard Poisson kernel, Jacobian factors, and the fictitious-channel absorption model; none of these contains the final Gamma distribution. The general-class eigenvalue distribution, Eq. (56), is produced by substituting the same absorption limit into the published finite-N reflection-eigenvalue distribution Eq. (53) from Refs. [39,67] (Vidal and Kanzieper; Jarosz, Vidal, and Kanzieper), then changing variables to Gamma_n = gamma/(1 - R_n). That input is an externally published result whose assumptions do not include the target Wigner-Smith distribution, so the derivation is not a renaming or refitting of the conclusion. The author's own cited work (Refs. [34,35]) enters only through the thermodynamic identity Eq. (74) used in the large-N cumulant computation; this is a calculational tool, not the source of Eqs. (47) or (56), and the first cumulants are checked against the known result of Ref. [60]. The even-N limitation inherited from Eq. (53) for beta=1 and 4 is an acknowledged scoping caveat (Section 2.2, Conclusion), not a circular step. No fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction, and no load-bearing inference rests on an unverified self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; gamma is a physical model input. The main postulates are the Poisson kernel description of chaotic scattering and the fictitious-channel model of absorption, both standard but load-bearing. The beta=1,4 branch also depends on the published reflection-eigenvalue distribution Eq. (53).

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The scattering matrix S of the chaotic cavity is distributed according to the Poisson kernel, Eq. (9), with mean scattering matrix (10).
    Assumed at the start of Section 2.1; this is the standard stochastic random matrix theory approach to chaotic scattering, with equivalence to the Hamiltonian approach cited as [7].
  • domain assumption Uniform absorption is modeled by N_phi fictitious channels with tunnel probability T in the double scaling limit N_phi to infinity with N_phi T = gamma N, Eq. (8).
    This is the load-bearing model of absorption used to pass from finite N_phi to the absorbing cavity; equivalence to an imaginary energy shift is cited to [8].
  • domain assumption The finite-(N, N_phi) joint distribution of reflection eigenvalues with nonideal leads, Eq. (53), taken from Refs. [39,67], is valid.
    Used as the starting point in Section 2.2 for beta=1 and beta=4; it is not rederived in this paper. For beta=1 it is only established for even N, as the paper states.
  • domain assumption Because the N real channels are equivalent, the eigenvectors of Gamma and Q are statistically independent from the eigenvalues and uniformly distributed.
    Used in Section 2.1 after Eq. (48) to reduce the full matrix distribution to a joint eigenvalue distribution.
  • domain assumption In the large-N limit, the two empirical densities concentrate on the minimizer of the Coulomb gas energy functional E[rho_Gamma, rho_t], Eq. (64), with 1/N corrections neglected.
    Standard Coulomb gas saddle-point approximation, introduced in Section 2.3 and used for all cumulant calculations in Section 3.
  • standard math Tricomi's inversion formula for singular integral equations, stated in Appendix A, is applicable to Eqs. (80) and (89).
    The theorem gives the explicit density solutions used in the weak- and strong-absorption expansions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Distribution of the Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix for chaotic cavities with absorption and coupled Coulomb gases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I7W24XQO

@misc{pith2026190901002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Distribution of the Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix for chaotic cavities with absorption and coupled Coulomb gases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I7W24XQO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01002}
}
abstract

Within the random matrix theory approach to quantum scattering, we derive the distribution of the Wigner-Smith time delay matrix $\mathcal{Q}$ for a chaotic cavity with uniform absorption, coupled via $N$ perfect channels. In the unitary class $\beta=2$ we obtain a compact expression for the distribution of the full matrix in terms of a matrix integral. In the other symmetry classes we derive the joint distribution of the eigenvalues. We show how the large $N$ properties of this distribution can be analysed in terms of two interacting Coulomb gases living on two different supports. As an application of our results, we study the statistical properties of the Wigner time delay $\tau_{\mathrm{W}} = \mathrm{tr}[\mathcal{Q}]/N$ in the presence of absorption.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01002 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The model for chaotic cavities with absorption. The cavity is connected to N real channels via a perfect contact, and to Nφ fictitious channels with tunnel probability T . In the limit Nφ → ∞ and T → 0 with NφT = γN, this model describes a cavity with uniform absorption, with rate γ. 2. Distribution of the Wigner-Smith matrix Let us consider a chaotic cavity perfectly coupled to N scattering channels. In the presenc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Coulomb gases associated to the energy (61), or equivalently to the continuous version (64). Two log-gases are placed in a linear confining potential. The first gas is confined on [0, γ], while the other one is restricted to [γ, +∞). The particles of different gases repel logarithmically, with an interaction weaker (dashed arrow) by a factor 2 compared to the repulsion within each gas (solid arrows). For large N… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sketch of the densities of the two Coulomb gases, solutions of (70,71) in the two limiting cases. Left: regime of weak absorption (γ 1). Right: regime of strong absorption (γ 1). which is the analogous for the generating function of another thermodynamic identity introduced in the computation of the distribution of linear statistics [14, 34]. This identity allows us to easily study the cumulants of s. Indeed, the cu… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alhassid, The statistical theory of quantum dots, Rev

    Y. Alhassid, The statistical theory of quantum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys.72, 895–968 (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Andréief, Note sur une relation entre les intégrales définies des produits des fonctions, Mém

    C. Andréief, Note sur une relation entre les intégrales définies des produits des fonctions, Mém. de la Soc. Sci. (Bordeaux)2, 1–14 (1886)

    work page

  3. [3]

    H. U. Baranger and P. A. Mello, Mesoscopic transport through chaotic cavities: A random S- matrix theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 142–145 (1994)

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    H. U. Baranger and P. A. Mello, Effect of phase breaking on quantum transport through chaotic cavities, Phys. Rev. B 51, 4703–4706 (1995)

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 731–808 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Beenakker and P

    C. Beenakker and P. Brouwer, Distribution of the reflection eigenvalues of a weakly absorbing chaotic cavity, Physica E9(3), 463 – 466 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    P. W. Brouwer, Generalized circular ensemble of scattering matrices for a chaotic cavity with nonideal leads, Phys. Rev. B51, 16878–16884 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    P. W. Brouwer and C. W. J. Beenakker, Voltage-probe and imaginary-potential models for dephasing in a chaotic quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B55, 4695–4702 (1997)

    work page 1997

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    P. W. Brouwer and M. Büttiker, Charge-relaxation and dwell time in the fluctuating admittance of a chaotic cavity, Europhys. Lett.37(7), 441 (1997)

    1997

  2. [10]

    P. W. Brouwer, K. M. Frahm, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Quantum Mechanical Time-Delay Matrix in Chaotic Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4737–4740 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    P. W. Brouwer, K. M. Frahm, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Distribution of the quantum mechanical time-delay matrix for a chaotic cavity, Waves in Random Media9, 91–104 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Brouwer, On the random matrix theory of quantum transport, PhD thesis, Leiden University, 1997

    P. Brouwer, On the random matrix theory of quantum transport, PhD thesis, Leiden University, 1997

    1997

  5. [13]

    Büttiker, Role of quantum coherence in series resistors, Phys

    M. Büttiker, Role of quantum coherence in series resistors, Phys. Rev. B33, 3020–3026 (1986). Distribution of the Wigner-Smith matrix for chaotic cavities with absorption 25

    1986

  6. [14]

    F. D. Cunden, P. Facchi, and P. Vivo, A shortcut through the Coulomb gas method for spectral linear statistics on random matrices, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49(13), 135202 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    F. D. Cunden, F. Mezzadri, N. Simm, and P. Vivo, Correlators for the Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix of chaotic cavities, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49(18), 18LT01 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    D. S. Dean and S. N. Majumdar, Large Deviations of Extreme Eigenvalues of Random Matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 160201 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    D. S. Dean and S. N. Majumdar, Extreme value statistics of eigenvalues of Gaussian random matrices, Phys. Rev. E 77, 041108 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    Doron, U

    E. Doron, U. Smilansky, and A. Frenkel, Experimental demonstration of chaotic scattering of microwaves, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3072–3075 (1990)

    1990

  11. [19]

    F. J. Dyson, Statistical Theory of the Energy Levels of Complex Systems. I, J. Math. Phys.3(1), 140–156 (1962), F. J. Dyson, Statistical Theory of the Energy Levels of Complex Systems. II, J. Math. Phys. 3(1), 157–165 (1962), F. J. Dyson,Statistical Theory of the Energy Levels...

    1962

  12. [20]

    S. B. Fedeli and Y. V. Fyodorov, Statistics of off-diagonal entries of Wigner K-matrix for chaotic wave systems with absorption, arXiv:1905.04157 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    P. J. Forrester,Log-gases and random matrices, Princeton University Press, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    P. J. Forrester, Meet AndrÃľief, Bordeaux 1886, and Andreev, Kharkov 1882âĂŞ1883, Random Matrices Theory Appl.08(02), 1930001 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    P. J. Forrester and E. M. Rains, Matrix averages relating to Ginibre ensembles, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42(38), 385205 (2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, Induced vs. Spontaneous breakdown of S-matrix unitarity: Probability of no return in quantum chaotic and disordered systems, JETP Letters78(4), 250–254 (2003)

    2003

  17. [25]

    Y. V. Fyodorov and D. V. Savin, Resonance scattering of waves in chaotic systems, inThe Oxford handbook of random matrix theory, edited by G. Akemann, J. Baik, and P. Di Francesco, pages 703–722, Oxford University Press, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, D. V. Savin, and H.-J. Sommers, Scattering, reflection and impedance of waves in chaotic and disordered systems with absorption, J. Phys. A38(49), 10731 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, Complexity of Random Energy Landscapes, Glass Transition, and Absolute Value of the Spectral Determinant of Random Matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 240601 (2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    Y. V. Fyodorov and B. A. Khoruzhenko, A few remarks on colour–flavour transformations, truncations of random unitary matrices, Berezin reproducing kernels and Selberg-type integrals, J. Phys. A40(4), 669–699 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, D. V. Savin, and H.-J. Sommers, Parametric correlations of phase shifts and statistics of time delays in quantum chaotic scattering: Crossover between unitary and orthogonal symmetries, Phys. Rev. E55, R4857–R4860 (1997)

    1997

  22. [30]

    Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J. Sommers, Statistics of resonance poles, phase shifts and time delays in quantum chaotic scattering: Random matrix approach for systems with broken time-reversal invariance, J. Math. Phys. 38(4), 1918–1981 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    V. A. Gopar, P. A. Mello, and M. Büttiker, Mesoscopic Capacitors: A Statistical Analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3005–3008 (1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    A. Grabsch, Random matrix theory in statistical physics: quantum scattering and disordered systems, PhD thesis, Université Paris Saclay, 2018, https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel- 01849097

    2018

  25. [33]

    Grabsch, S

    A. Grabsch, S. N. Majumdar, and C. Texier, Truncated Linear Statistics Associated with the Top Eigenvalues of Random Matrices, J. Stat. Phys.167(2), 234–259 (2017), updated version arXiv:1609.08296

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Grabsch and C

    A. Grabsch and C. Texier, Capacitance and charge relaxation resistance of chaotic cavities—Joint distribution of two linear statistics in the Laguerre ensemble of random matrices, Europhys. Distribution of the Wigner-Smith matrix for chaotic cavities with absorption 26 Lett. 1...

    2015

  27. [35]

    Grabsch and C

    A. Grabsch and C. Texier, Distribution of spectral linear statistics on random matrices beyond the large deviation function – Wigner time delay in multichannel disordered wires, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 465002 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Grabsch, D

    A. Grabsch, D. V. Savin, and C. Texier, WignerâĂŞSmith time-delay matrix in chaotic cavities with non-ideal contacts, J. Phys. A51(40), 404001 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    T. Guhr, A. Müller-Groeling, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: common concepts, Phys. Rep. 299(4/6), 189–425 (1998)

    1998

  30. [38]

    R. A. Jalabert, J.-L. Pichard, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Universal Quantum Signatures of Chaos in Ballistic Transport, Europhys. Lett.27(4), 255 (1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    Jarosz, P

    A. Jarosz, P. Vidal, and E. Kanzieper, Random matrix theory of quantum transport in chaotic cavities with nonideal leads, Phys. Rev. B91, 180203 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Kogan, P

    E. Kogan, P. A. Mello, and H. Liqun, Wave scattering through classically chaotic cavities in the presence of absorption: An information-theoretic model, Phys. Rev. E61, R17–R20 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    U. Kuhl, M. Martínez-Mares, R. A. Méndez-Sánchez, and H.-J. Stöckmann, Direct Processes in Chaotic Microwave Cavities in the Presence of Absorption, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 144101 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    Lehmann, D

    N. Lehmann, D. V. Savin, V. V. Sokolov, and H.-J. Sommers, Time delay correlations in chaotic scattering: random matrix approach, Physica D86, 572–585 (1995)

    1995

  35. [43]

    I. G. Macdonald, Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials, New York: Clarendon, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, 1995

    1995

  36. [44]

    Mahaux and H

    C. Mahaux and H. A. Weidenmüller,Shell-Model Approach to Nuclear Reactions., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969

    1969

  37. [45]

    S. N. Majumdar, C. Nadal, A. Scardicchio, and P. Vivo, Index distribution of Gaussian random matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 220603 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    S. N. Majumdar, C. Nadal, A. Scardicchio, and P. Vivo, How many eigenvalues of a Gaussian random matrix are positive?, Phys. Rev. E83, 041105 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    S. N. Majumdar and P. Vivo, Number of Relevant Directions in Principal Component Analysis and Wishart Random Matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 200601 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Marino, Number statistics in random matrices and applications to quantum systems, PhD thesis, Université Paris Saclay, 2015

    R. Marino, Number statistics in random matrices and applications to quantum systems, PhD thesis, Université Paris Saclay, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    A. M. Martínez-Argüello, R. A. Méndez-Sánchez, and M. Martínez-Mares, Wave systems with direct processes and localized losses or gains: The nonunitary Poisson kernel, Phys. Rev. E86, 016207 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    A. M. Mathai, Jacobians of Matrix Transformations and Functions of Matrix Arguments, World Scientific, 1997

    1997

  43. [51]

    M. L. Mehta, Random matrices, Elsevier, Academic, New York, third edition, 2004

    2004

  44. [52]

    P. A. Mello and N. Kumar,Quantum transport in mesoscopic systems – Complexity and statistical fluctuations, Oxford University Press, 2004

    2004

  45. [53]

    P. A. Mello, P. Pereyra, and T. H. Seligman, Information theory and statistical nuclear reactions. I. General theory and applications to few-channel problemsSS, Ann. Phys.161(2), 254 – 275 (1985)

    1985

  46. [54]

    Mezzadri and N

    F. Mezzadri and N. J. Simm, Tau-Function Theory of Quantum Chaotic Transport with beta=1,2,4, Commun. Math. Phys. 324, 465–513 (2013)

    2013

  47. [55]

    G. E. Mitchell, A. Richter, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Random matrices and chaos in nuclear physics: Nuclear reactions, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2845–2901 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    Nadal, Matrices aléatoires et leurs applications à la physique statistique et physique quantique, PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud, 2011

    C. Nadal, Matrices aléatoires et leurs applications à la physique statistique et physique quantique, PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud, 2011

    2011

  49. [57]

    D. V. Savin, H. J. Sommers, and Y. V. Fyodorov, Universal statistics of the local Green’s function in wave chaotic systems with absorption, JETP Letters82(8), 544–548 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    D. V. Savin, Y. V. Fyodorov, and H.-J. Sommers, Reducing nonideal to ideal coupling in random matrix description of chaotic scattering: Application to the time-delay problem, Phys. Rev. E Distribution of the Wigner-Smith matrix for chaotic cavities with absorption 27 63, 035202 (2001)

    2001

  51. [59]

    D. V. Savin and H.-J. Sommers, Delay times and reflection in chaotic cavities with absorption, Phys. Rev. E68, 036211 (2003)

    2003

  52. [60]

    D. V. Savin and H.-J. Sommers, Distribution of reflection eigenvalues in many-channel chaotic cavities with absorption, Phys. Rev. E69, 035201 (2004)

    2004

  53. [61]

    F. T. Smith, Lifetime Matrix in Collision Theory, Phys. Rev.118, 349–356 (1960)

    1960

  54. [62]

    Stöckmann, Quantum Chaos: An Introduction, Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, UK, 1999

    H.-J. Stöckmann, Quantum Chaos: An Introduction, Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, UK, 1999

    1999

  55. [63]

    C. Texier, Wigner time delay and related concepts – Application to transport in coherent conductors, Physica E82, 16–33 (2016), Frontiers in quantum electronic transport - In memory of Markus BÃijttiker. See arXiv:1507.00075 for an updated version

    2016 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Texier and S

    C. Texier and S. N. Majumdar, Wigner Time-Delay Distribution in Chaotic Cavities and Freezing Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 250602 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    F. G. Tricomi, Integral equations, Interscience, London, 1957

    1957

  58. [66]

    Verbaarschot, H

    J. Verbaarschot, H. WeidenmÃijller, and M. Zirnbauer, Grassmann integration in stochastic quantum physics: The case of compound-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rep. 129(6), 367 – 438 (1985)

    1985

  59. [67]

    Vidal and E

    P. Vidal and E. Kanzieper, Statistics of Reflection Eigenvalues in Chaotic Cavities with Nonideal Leads, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 206806 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    H. A. Weidenmüller and G. E. Mitchell, Random matrices and chaos in nuclear physics: Nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 539–589 (2009)

    2009

  61. [69]

    E. P. Wigner, Lower Limit for the Energy Derivative of the Scattering Phase Shift, Phys. Rev. 98, 145–147 (1955)

    1955

  62. [70]

    Zheng, T

    X. Zheng, T. M. Antonsen, and E. Ott, Statistics of Impedance and Scattering Matrices in Chaotic Microwave Cavities: Single Channel Case, Electromagnetics26(1), 3–35 (2006)

    2006

  63. [71]

    Zheng, T

    X. Zheng, T. M. Antonsen, and E. Ott, Statistics of Impedance and Scattering Matrices of Chaotic Microwave Cavities with Multiple Ports, Electromagnetics26(1), 37–55 (2006)

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.