Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.10726 v1 pith:IBROWF3S submitted 2024-12-14 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO
keywords noiseagentquestionsagentsansweringbenchmarkcontainembodied
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has significantly advanced the development of Embodied Question Answering (EQA), enhancing agents' abilities in language understanding and reasoning within complex and realistic scenarios. However, EQA in real-world scenarios remains challenging, as human-posed questions often contain noise that can interfere with an agent's exploration and response, bringing challenges especially for language beginners and non-expert users. To address this, we introduce a NoisyEQA benchmark designed to evaluate an agent's ability to recognize and correct noisy questions. This benchmark introduces four common types of noise found in real-world applications: Latent Hallucination Noise, Memory Noise, Perception Noise, and Semantic Noise generated through an automated dataset creation framework. Additionally, we also propose a 'Self-Correction' prompting mechanism and a new evaluation metric to enhance and measure both noise detection capability and answer quality. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that current EQA agents often struggle to detect noise in questions, leading to responses that frequently contain erroneous information. Through our Self-Correct Prompting mechanism, we can effectively improve the accuracy of agent answers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ActiveFly-Bench: Aligning Embodied Question Answering with Vision-Language-Action for Aerial Embodied Perception

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ActiveFly-Bench defines Air-EQA, Observation Behavior Planning, and 7-DoF FLUC tasks on 10k real/sim trajectories so UAV agents must plan, fly, and answer questions they cannot solve from the start view.

Pith tools