REVIEW 2 cited by
In-Context Analogical Reasoning with Pre-Trained Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Analogical reasoning is a fundamental capacity of human cognition that allows us to reason abstractly about novel situations by relating them to past experiences. While it is thought to be essential for robust reasoning in AI systems, conventional approaches require significant training and/or hard-coding of domain knowledge to be applied to benchmark tasks. Inspired by cognitive science research that has found connections between human language and analogy-making, we explore the use of intuitive language-based abstractions to support analogy in AI systems. Specifically, we apply large pre-trained language models (PLMs) to visual Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM), a common relational reasoning test. By simply encoding the perceptual features of the problem into language form, we find that PLMs exhibit a striking capacity for zero-shot relational reasoning, exceeding human performance and nearing supervised vision-based methods. We explore different encodings that vary the level of abstraction over task features, finding that higher-level abstractions further strengthen PLMs' analogical reasoning. Our detailed analysis reveals insights on the role of model complexity, in-context learning, and prior knowledge in solving RPM tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The potential -- and the pitfalls -- of using pre-trained language models as cognitive science theories
Pretrained language models can serve as credible cognitive science theories only if researchers validate linking hypotheses and avoid pitfalls of commission and omission.
-
Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models
A literature review concludes that LLMs show partial humanlike cognitive patterns in bias, reasoning, and creativity, but the evidence is dominated by GPT models and the 'emergence' framing is not directly tested.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.