Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

In-Context Analogical Reasoning with Pre-Trained Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.17626 v2 pith:ICFPD3B6 submitted 2023-05-28 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords reasoninglanguageanalogicalhumanplmsabstractionscapacityexplore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Analogical reasoning is a fundamental capacity of human cognition that allows us to reason abstractly about novel situations by relating them to past experiences. While it is thought to be essential for robust reasoning in AI systems, conventional approaches require significant training and/or hard-coding of domain knowledge to be applied to benchmark tasks. Inspired by cognitive science research that has found connections between human language and analogy-making, we explore the use of intuitive language-based abstractions to support analogy in AI systems. Specifically, we apply large pre-trained language models (PLMs) to visual Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM), a common relational reasoning test. By simply encoding the perceptual features of the problem into language form, we find that PLMs exhibit a striking capacity for zero-shot relational reasoning, exceeding human performance and nearing supervised vision-based methods. We explore different encodings that vary the level of abstraction over task features, finding that higher-level abstractions further strengthen PLMs' analogical reasoning. Our detailed analysis reveals insights on the role of model complexity, in-context learning, and prior knowledge in solving RPM tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The potential -- and the pitfalls -- of using pre-trained language models as cognitive science theories

    cs.CL 2025-01 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    Pretrained language models can serve as credible cognitive science theories only if researchers validate linking hypotheses and avoid pitfalls of commission and omission.

  2. Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A literature review concludes that LLMs show partial humanlike cognitive patterns in bias, reasoning, and creativity, but the evidence is dominated by GPT models and the 'emergence' framing is not directly tested.

Pith tools